THE POLITICS OF CITIZENSHIP AND THE TRUE NATURE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

THE POLITICS OF CITIZENSHIP AND THE TRUE NATURE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Saturday, Feb. 27, 2016

Preface:

    Everything possible must be done to persuade Catholic Charities and Greg Walgenbach, the Orange County Diocese's Director of "Life, Justice and Peace" that the fairest and most honest outcome of new citizens registering to vote  is that they register as Independents and not as Democrats or Republicans.

    The focus of this letter is the article in The Orange County Register on Wed. Feb. 24, 2016 titled, "Catholic Church starting effort to naturalize 2 Million Immigrants." Here are several excerpts:

    "About 160,000 of these residents are in Orange County, said Ryan Lilyengren, spokesman for the Diocese of Orange.... The goal is to train parishioners in the coming weeks on how to hold forums and workshops on naturalization, said Greg Walgenbach."

    " Last year, the U.S. government granted $10 million to groups that assist residents in preparing and applying for citizenship.... Catholic Charities a nonprofit arm of the church, will offer loans to cover the $680 naturalization fee to those who don't qualify for waivers.... "This is left-wing politics wrapped up in the Catholic Church," said John Berry, spokesman for the Redlands Tea Party Patriots." ... "Louis DeSipio, a UC Irvine political science professor said it's not a partisan effort ... even in the early 1900s, churches were involved in assisting immigrants to become citizens."

    As an American by choice from Canada, I obtained U.S. citizenship via joining the U.S. army for 3 years plus. (1958-1961). It was not my intention to become an Obama American. Because this is what has happened to the Democratic party. It is like darkness is to light when compared to the John F. Kennedy Democratic Party. Sadly, the U.S. Catholic Church still has an attachment to the Democratic Party. It was Catholic voters who elect this president in 2008 and 2012. A majority of other Christian did not vote for this president. Catholics were duped and uninformed.*

++++++++++++

    This leader of today's Democratic Party believes in partial-birth abortions. He believes that the DNA of an American includes racism. President Barack Obama has a love attachment to Planned Parenthood which any authentic Black American can never have. This President sincerely believes in taking away our Religious Rights as best for his new America. The above is what the President means by social justice.  It's time that common sense and the pursuit of the truth enter the solution and discussion and not political correctness or catholic religious correctness.  

This is what Ben Carson is trying to bring about in the coming crucial presidential election.

GEORGE H. KUBECK,

    *THIS MAY BE THE FIRST IN A SERIES OF LETTERS. CHECK OUT MY BLOG.

    

LIFE AT CONCEPTION/ STOCKMAN/ RATZINGER

 LIFE AT CONCEPTION/ STOCKMAN/ RATZINGER

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Saturday, Feb. 20, 2016 

From Congressman Steve Stockman - Feb. 7, 2016

Subject: Support for the Life At Conception Act - Excerpts -

But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a constitutional right. INSTEAD  THE SUPREME COURT SAID: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins ... the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

THEN THE HIGHT COURT MADE A KEY ADMISSION: "If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case ("Roe" who sought an abortion,) of course collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the 14th Amendment."

THE FACT IS, THE 14TH AMENDMENT COULDN'T BE CLEARER: "... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law."

FURTHERMORE, THE 14TH AMENDMENT SAYS: "Congress shall have the power to enforce by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT A LIFE AT CONCEPTION ACT WOULD DO.

The Supreme Court itself admitted, "If Congress declares unborn children "persons" under the law, the constitutional case for abortion-on-demand collapses.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR SENATORS AND CONGRESSMAN: PHONE:

Senator Dianne Feinstein                 Senator Barbara Boxer        Representative Ed Royce (39 Distr)

202-224-3841                                      202-224-0454                          714-255-0101 or fax 714-744-4056

+++++++++++

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, "Co-Workers of the Truth" Meditation, Feb. 15. (excerpts)

    When the murder of innocent life is called a right, then injustice has become justice. When the law can no longer protect human life, it is suspect as law. Saying this does not mean wanting to impose specifically Christian morality on all members of a pluralistic society.

    What is in question now here is human nature, the humanity of a person who cannot make the trampling on a created being a means of self-liberation without profoundly deceiving himself. The vehemence of the dispute over this question is due to the profundity of the question that is being discussed.

    Do we become free only when we cut ourselves loose from creation and have cast it off as an enslavement... In the anxious attempt to obstruct the path of new human life as silently and as surely as possible, can we not detect a deep anxiety about the future? Two answers seem to suggest themselves here.

    On one hand, this anxiety emanates, no doubt, from the fact that the free gift of life does not seem meaningful to us because we have lost the free gift of its meaning; there is evident a despair of one's own life that makes us unwilling to impose on others the dark way of humanity.

    On the other hand, we see exemplified here clearly and simply a fear of competition, a fear of curtailment the other may invariably be for me. The other, he who is to come, becomes a threat. True love is death, an obliteration of oneself before for the other. But we have no desire for death.

    We want only to be ourselves and to lead lives as free as possible from sharing and disturbance. We do not realize and we do not want to realize that, by our avidity for life, we are actually our own future, that we risk having our own lives fall into the hands of death.  (1977)

George H. Kubeck

MEMBERS AND FAMILIES OF U.S.A. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS

MEMBERS AND FAMILIES OF U.S.A. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Mon. Feb. 8, 2016

FROM THE PRO-LIFE CHAIRMAN IN THE FEB BULLETIN OF THE  KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS- DISTRICT 108 - DIVISION 5 - CYPRESS COUNCIL #8599 - COUNCIL'S 31st  YEAR - http://www.kofc8599.org

ADDRESS: COUNCIL NO. 8599 - P.O. BOX NO. 387 - CYPRESS, CA. 90630

DEAR BROTHER KNIGHTS:

   
A COUPLE OF DAYS AGO I WAS ASKED IF I WAS A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN. DOES IT MATTER WHAT I AM? I REALLY DON'T CARE IF YOU ARE DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN, I AM PRO-LIFE FIRST.

  
 THE QUESTION IS, "ARE YOU PRO-LIFE FIRST"? IF NOT WHY NOT?

  
 SINCE 1973 I HAVE HEARD BOTH DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES CLAIM TO BE PRO-LIFE BUT VOTE PRO-CHOICE. WHEN IT COUNTED THEY WERE NOT PRO-LIFE (THEIR VOTE).

   
THEY TALK THE TALK BUT DO NOT WALK THE WALK. IT COMES DOWN TO HOW DID THEY VOTE?

  
  SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR AND DAVID SOUTER WERE BOTH ELECTED TO THE SUPREME COURT PARTLY BECAUSE THEY WERE ALSO SUPPOSED TO BE PRO-LIFE AND CHRISTIAN.

  
 SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR IS A CATHOLIC, DAVID SOUTER WAS AN ELDER IN HIS CHURCH. THEY SAT IN A CASE THAT WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED ROE VS. WADE, IT WAS A 5 TO 4 DECISION. THEY BOTH VOTED PRO-CHOICE.

  
 THEY BOTH GO TO CHURCH ON SUNDAY AND WOULD SAY, "I'M PRO-LIE", THEIR VOTES SAY OTHERWISE. MILLION OF BABIES HAVE DIED AND WILL DIE BECAUSE OF THE WAY THEY VOTED?

  
 A MONTH AGO, BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS VOTED TO FUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD. THEY DID NOT WANT TO SHUT DOWN THE GOVERNMENT. SO OUR GOVERNMENT IS FUNDING AN ORGANIZATION THAT SELLS BABY PARTS. EVEN  NAZI GERMANY DIDN'T SELL BABY PARTS.

 
  WHEN YOU STAND BEFORE GOD I DON'T THINK HE'LL ASK, ARE YOU A DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN? HE MAY ASK WHY YOU DIDN'T VOTE PRO-LIFE. IF YOUR CANDIDATE ISN'T PRO-LIFE, WHY ARE YOU VOTING FOR HIM OR HER AND NOT FOR THE PRO-LIFE CANDIDATE?

  
 HERE IS A QUESTION FOR REFLECTION: DO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE GOD'S WILL TO VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO WOULD PROMOTE AND FUND ABORTION?

SINCERELY YOURS,

THOMAS NAGLE PGK

PRO-LIFE CHAIRMAN 

 GEORGE H. KUBECK

THE ELEPHANT: THE CINOP: PLANNED PARENTHOOD:

 THE ELEPHANT: THE CINOP: PLANNED PARENTHOOD

In pursuit of the truth: http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Friday, Feb. 5, 2016

 

Preface:

    More than eight years, I began a blog titled: Cinops Be Gone - Dedicated to the exposure and removal of Catholic-in-name politicians. St. Thomas More is our model and patron. Here are the first three paragraphs of my first letter: "The American Catholic Voter" # 1 - Monday, May 14, 2007 -

 

    "The American Catholic voter like all voters can be manipulated. In a culture of death environment that is easily done. More often, he is a swing voter, particularly if his registration through family history is democratic.

   

     In the U.S. 2006 election, the politically correct news media and others were able to influence the Catholic vote with 55% for the democratic candidates. My concern basically is with the elected candidate who is a Catholic-in-name-only politician. (CINOP)

   

     He (CINOP) is a dangerous religious and political enemy of our Catholic faith and traditional America. The CINOP is a lethal Trojan horse within any religious community. I have more respect for the ACLU and Planned Parenthood."

 

    When if comes to the CINOP, prevention and information is worth a pound of cure. The U.S. Catholic Church and its members have suffered enough.  The time has come the walrus said to flush out the elephant in the room of every U.S. American Catholic Diocese. Whom am I talking about? The Catholic-in-name-only-politician is the CINOP.

 

    We agree with one-half the things the CINOP does!  But on matters relating to abortion on demand, assisted suicide, euthanasia, same-sex marriage, religious rights, embryonic-stem-cell research, Planned Parenthood, etc., we as Catholics strongly disagree. So why are we not allowed to talk about this person and inform our parishioners about the CINOP. Now, why this letter?

+++++++++++

 

"Breaking News": Congress fails to override Obama's veto of bill defunding Planned Parenthood

Washington, D.C. February 2, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - The House of Representatives has failed to override President Obama's veto of a bill to defund Planned Parenthood. The final vote 241-186.

   

     Although the bill received a majority of votes, overturning a veto requires the bill to pass by a two-thirds margin.

   

     The "Restoring Americans' Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act" (H.R. 3762) would have denied Planned Parenthood, the nation's leading abortion provider, funding from Medicaid. Planned Parenthood performed 323,999 abortions and received $553.7 million from taxpayers in 2014 alone, according to its most recent annual report. ...

    

    "Margaret Sanger is connected to some of the ugliest segments in our history," said Rep. Glenn Grothman, R-WI, on the House floor Tuesday afternoon. "If you really want to strike a blow for equality," he said, defund Planned Parenthood....

+++++++++++

 

PRO-LIFE LEADERS: FAILED VOTE TO OVERRIDE PLANNED PARENTHOOD  DEFUNDING VETO STILL A VICTORY: Washington, D.C. Feb. 4, 2016 (LifeSiteNews)

 

Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser pointed out what many pro-lifers are thinking this election year, "Only one man - Barack Obama - stands in the way. His veto was a call to action to the pro-life grassroots. This year we must elect a president who respects life and protect the conscience rights of taxpayers," .... Click here to see how your congressman voted.

 

I clicked. Does it matter to Catholic Californians that Congresswomen Pelosi, Napollitano, Roybal-Allard, Eshoo and LInda and Loretta Sanchez voted to uphold the Barack Obama veto?

 

GEORGE H. KUBECK