June 14, 2007 - A Day of Infamy and Betrayal

June 14, 2007- A Day of Infamy and Betrayal
Monday, Aug. 13, 2007

It is a nightmare that is equal to the Abortion Roe vs. Wade decision of Jan. 22, 1973.
It is a truth that will raise your temperature to a fever pitch.
It is a truth that needs to be proclaimed and cries out to high heaven.
It is the historical betrayal by the Catholic-in-name-only politicians in Massachusetts.

With the bribery of desirable executive positions and campaign contributions, the CINOPS voted down the Marriage Amendment that would have put it on the Massachusetts ballot in 2008. “They failed the test of moral leadership because their vote put sodomy on the same legal level as sacramental marriage.” They betrayed the 170,000 qualified signatures that wanted it to be on next year’s ballot.

CINOP Speaker Nancy Pelosi perceived rightly that having the Marriage Amendment on the ballot in 2008 will hurt the Democratic Presidential Candidate. Marriage and family are the foundation of any civil society. It is now necessary in America to sacrifice these two on the altar of a secular progressive America. This will not stand.

Most of the U.S. CINOPS have a serious crisis of Faith, belief in the Eucharist & Catholic identity. Tragically in Massachusetts, their bishops are not chips of the old block, Pope John Paul II. Fortunately, all bishops in the U.S.A. can become chips of the old block.

Thankfully, a most powerful prayer is the Rosary. It can be prayed at the CINOP offices throughout the country. This is one mission for all Knights. Why? We were betrayed by 16 K. of C. legislators who blocked the Marriage Amendment of one man, one woman.
“We are warriors now, fighting on the battlefield of faith, and God sees all we do;”
Be not afraid of the truth, read about it and you decide. It is in the Catholic World Report – Aug. /Sep. 07. The article is by Philip Lawler, Not Even a Semblance of Clout.
“One aspect of that signature-gathering drive is noteworthy here: Although the political establishment in Massachusetts is thoroughly dominated by Irish and Italian Catholics, the process of collecting signatures was driven by evangelical Protestants. The Catholic bishops gave their full support to the effort, but individual Catholic pastors were much less supportive. Many priest discouraged or even forbade the collection of signatures outside their parish churches, and relatively few priest signed the documents themselves.” p. 25

“As late as mid-May, pro-family lobbyists were still confidently assuring their allies that they had more than 50 solid votes in favor of the initiative petition. But gay-rights activists were claiming new gains. The conservative lawmakers who had backed the marriage amendment in the 2006 session were facing new pressures and new promises. Governor Patrick was dropping, unsubtle hints that legislators who voted against the amendment might be in line for desirable executive positions in his administration.”…
“In the last few days before the June 14 vote, the lobbying became frenetic, and some legislators were demanding exorbitant rewards for their votes. Arline Isaacson, the leading representative for gay-rights activists on Beacon Hill, complained to the Boston Globe: ‘It’s very frustrating because legislators keep upping the ante on what they want to get for their vote.’” p. 25
Fraternally yours,
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate, and or translate into Spanish.