The First Simulcast and Life Chains
cinops be gone Monday, September 29, 2008
What did I learn from watching this first simulcast via satellite from San Diego on Yes on Proposition 8 – Protecting Marriage? (Feb. 25th, 1 ½ Hrs.)
*How blessed we are with Protestant ministers like Jim Garlow, Chuck Smith, Ken Ulmer and others who foresaw the California Supreme Court decision of 4-3 legalizing same-sex marriage? They gathered over a million signatures to put Proposition 8 the Marriage Amendment on the California ballot.
*(As a personal historically reminder, without these same type of Protestant preachers throughout the country we would have had Al Gore and or John Kerry in the White House.)
*We have some pastors who are afraid to speak up for marriage. I hope all pastors will preach about marriage at least twice before the Nov. 4th election. It is hard to believe but there are Christians who will vote against proposition 8.
*JIM GARLOW’S message is to take a stand for the truth, righteousness and the power of love and sound mind. It is the spirit of fear that hangs over many. Join us in prayer and fasting for marriage – 40 Days.
*There are about 1600 zip codes in California. Plans are for 40 callers in each zip code to telephone and ask for your support of Proposition 8. For more info. protectmarriagesimulcast.com, ProtectMarriageca.com
*I learned about the Parker family in Lexington, Massachusetts where there is legalized same-sex marriage. They registered their kindergarten child in a public school. They found out that they can’t take their child out from the homosexual-agenda education program. Parental and religious rights are the issues. Today, it is waiting for a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
*Also a majority of African American oppose homosexual marriage. They see the lies and false comparisons by the gay-agenda advocates as a civil rights issue by comparing it to the Black Civil Rights movement.
Finally, the next Simulcast via Satellite are Wed. Oct. 1, 7-8:30 P.M. and Sunday, Oct. 19th 5- 6:30 P.M. It will be in the following churches in Anaheim 714-527-5195, Buena Park 714-522-7201, Fullerton 714-871-6844, Garden Grove 562-431-8161, La Habra 562-691-3296, Orange 714-639-2070 and Yorba Linda 714-528-6496. FOR MORE INFO: CONTACT MIKE HAMMONTRE AT 714-527-5195, EXT.204 Look for excellent presentations.
++++++++++++++++++
LIFE CHAINS
THIS SUNDAY OCT. 5TH FROM 2:30 TO 3:30 P.M. AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: BEACH AND GARDEN GROVE BLVD.,STANTON,(ghk) ORANGETHORPE AND EUCLID, FULLERTON, HAZARD AND BEACH, Westmin.,19TH AND ANAHEIM,COSTA MESA, 17TH AND LINCOLN, SANTA ANA.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and e-mail to Churches, organization and leaders.
Monday, September 29, 2008
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Pfleger, Wright, Obama, Benedict XVI
Pfleger, Wright, Obama, Benedict XVI
cinops be gone Sunday, September 28, 2008
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand the religion of Michael Pfleger and Jeremiah Wright and their influence on Barack Obama. It is a tragedy for Obama to have come in contact with these two and their religion of radical Black Liberation Theology. This theology joins together Karl Marx and Jesus Christ with an advantage to Marx to bring about social justice. It’s all about envy, class struggle, take from the rich, and give to the poor. There is no foundation of this European hogwash in Christianity or in the writings of our Founding Fathers.
The editors and journalists of America have betrayed their profession by not reporting on this religion. One thing for sure, it is not traditional Christianity.
And now for a breadth of fresh air from the September 27th entry of Meditations of Every Day of the Year, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger’s book, “Co-Workers of the Truth” Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1992. p. 308-9
“Ninety years have elapsed since Pope Leo XIII issued the encyclical “Rerum Novarum”, which has since become the “Magna Carta of Christian Social Work”, as Pius XI called it. This encyclical provides a Christian answer to the social question of the Marxist interpretation of mankind and society.
The struggle of the oppressed against their oppressors is for Marxism the whole content of history and the way of liberation, to the paradise of classless world.
As a Christian, the Pope bases his argument on a radically different concept: “Precisely the opposite is true”, he replied to the idea of saving the world by means of a class struggle.
“On the contrary, the Creator ordered all things toward peace and mutual harmony…. Capital is oriented to work and work to capital.” To the atheistic concept of a struggle, the Pope proposed solidarity as the Christian standard.
Solidarity – that includes justice as its central demand. We are solidaristic only when we give to others what is rightfully theirs by reason of their creatureliness, their humanity. For us, therefore, the foundation of all economic and social relationships is not confrontation but charity and cooperation.
Confrontation is destruction. Violence solves no problems. Pope Leo says in this regard: “Constant struggle breeds barbarism and confusion. Today we can see the truth of this statement demonstrated all over the world.”
Constant conflict barbarizes humanity, barbarizes the world. It destroys men interiorly, and this interior destruction leads, with incontestable logic, to exterior destruction. It follows, then, that the great social achievements, the gradual construction of a system of social justice, do not owe their existence to the program of Karl Marx, whose disciples wanted, not reform, but a progressive deterioration that would pave the way for their paradise.
What are we to conclude from all this? To the concept of a class struggle and its inhumane utopias we are to propose the fundamental principles of solidarity and justice.
The decision of what is to be right and wrong is not be made lightly. Respect for what is right is the basis of every human activity. Without it, there is, in the long run, no respect for humanity itself and no preservation of human dignity.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate, and e-mail to Churches, organizations and persons.
cinops be gone Sunday, September 28, 2008
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand the religion of Michael Pfleger and Jeremiah Wright and their influence on Barack Obama. It is a tragedy for Obama to have come in contact with these two and their religion of radical Black Liberation Theology. This theology joins together Karl Marx and Jesus Christ with an advantage to Marx to bring about social justice. It’s all about envy, class struggle, take from the rich, and give to the poor. There is no foundation of this European hogwash in Christianity or in the writings of our Founding Fathers.
The editors and journalists of America have betrayed their profession by not reporting on this religion. One thing for sure, it is not traditional Christianity.
And now for a breadth of fresh air from the September 27th entry of Meditations of Every Day of the Year, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger’s book, “Co-Workers of the Truth” Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1992. p. 308-9
“Ninety years have elapsed since Pope Leo XIII issued the encyclical “Rerum Novarum”, which has since become the “Magna Carta of Christian Social Work”, as Pius XI called it. This encyclical provides a Christian answer to the social question of the Marxist interpretation of mankind and society.
The struggle of the oppressed against their oppressors is for Marxism the whole content of history and the way of liberation, to the paradise of classless world.
As a Christian, the Pope bases his argument on a radically different concept: “Precisely the opposite is true”, he replied to the idea of saving the world by means of a class struggle.
“On the contrary, the Creator ordered all things toward peace and mutual harmony…. Capital is oriented to work and work to capital.” To the atheistic concept of a struggle, the Pope proposed solidarity as the Christian standard.
Solidarity – that includes justice as its central demand. We are solidaristic only when we give to others what is rightfully theirs by reason of their creatureliness, their humanity. For us, therefore, the foundation of all economic and social relationships is not confrontation but charity and cooperation.
Confrontation is destruction. Violence solves no problems. Pope Leo says in this regard: “Constant struggle breeds barbarism and confusion. Today we can see the truth of this statement demonstrated all over the world.”
Constant conflict barbarizes humanity, barbarizes the world. It destroys men interiorly, and this interior destruction leads, with incontestable logic, to exterior destruction. It follows, then, that the great social achievements, the gradual construction of a system of social justice, do not owe their existence to the program of Karl Marx, whose disciples wanted, not reform, but a progressive deterioration that would pave the way for their paradise.
What are we to conclude from all this? To the concept of a class struggle and its inhumane utopias we are to propose the fundamental principles of solidarity and justice.
The decision of what is to be right and wrong is not be made lightly. Respect for what is right is the basis of every human activity. Without it, there is, in the long run, no respect for humanity itself and no preservation of human dignity.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate, and e-mail to Churches, organizations and persons.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
The Public Arena - Marriage
The Public Arena – Marriage
cinops be gone Saturday, September 27, 2008
The problems we have originated with the gay-homosexual agenda. It wants to redefine marriage. In preparation for this our nation has been soaked and awash with toleration, non-discrimination and diversity propaganda.
It has reached a point that if you have a PERVERT or TERRORIST living next door to you and you want to have something done; you may be accused of a hate- crime. There are no standards. Mind your own business, and put with it.
The 10 commandments are just a figure of speech and so are traditional values. You make your own rules and you are god. Since Alexander Hamilton is my favorite Founding Father let me make a clear Hamiltonian black and white distinction between the radical gay-homosexual agenda and the homosexually inclined person.
Firstly, there has never been a survey of homosexual persons on the subject of homosexual marriage and whether they are in favor. We need that survey. In Canada, I believe less than 5 % opted for marriage. Secondly, does the homosexual believe that he would be better off coming from a Mom and Dad home or from a homosexual home? Thirdly, as a homosexual do your believe that this is normal, or would you prefer that you were born heterosexual. Fourthly, what do you really believe of the gay activist who claims to speak for you? There could be other questions. Finally, I do not believe that the gay homosexual agenda speaks for homosexuals. And there is the black and white division between the two.
As an example, do you believe that the NOW organization & NARAL speak for women? These organizations speak only for its members and a minority of women. My opinion: the culture of death seeks to destroy marriage & the family.
And now we come to some stupid and asinine consequences of the defeat of proposition 8 on the California ballot. Why don’t you check your old marriage license? It seems that “brides” and “grooms” are no longer allowed to marry in the State of California. That privilege is only extended to individuals who allow themselves to be called “Party A” and “Party B”” on the marriage licenses.
How is this idiocy possible? It’s by one vote. One vote makes the difference. It was by one vote; by the California Supreme Court (4-3) that legally redefines marriage to also include same-sex marriage. One slogan should be:
I AM GOING TO BURY THIS HOGWASH DECISION WITH MY ONE VOTE!
IN THE 47TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT I WILL VOTE FOR ROSIE AVILA WHO IS FOR MARRIAGE AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ WHO IS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND HAS VOTED THREE TIMES FOR PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION!
PLEASE SEND YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO:
ROSIE AVILA FOR CONGRESS
1070 SOUTH VIA de ROSA
ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807
If possible help with precinct work: Deborah Courtney, (714) 508-5788 or 400.7170
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to Catholic Churches, organizations & persons.
cinops be gone Saturday, September 27, 2008
The problems we have originated with the gay-homosexual agenda. It wants to redefine marriage. In preparation for this our nation has been soaked and awash with toleration, non-discrimination and diversity propaganda.
It has reached a point that if you have a PERVERT or TERRORIST living next door to you and you want to have something done; you may be accused of a hate- crime. There are no standards. Mind your own business, and put with it.
The 10 commandments are just a figure of speech and so are traditional values. You make your own rules and you are god. Since Alexander Hamilton is my favorite Founding Father let me make a clear Hamiltonian black and white distinction between the radical gay-homosexual agenda and the homosexually inclined person.
Firstly, there has never been a survey of homosexual persons on the subject of homosexual marriage and whether they are in favor. We need that survey. In Canada, I believe less than 5 % opted for marriage. Secondly, does the homosexual believe that he would be better off coming from a Mom and Dad home or from a homosexual home? Thirdly, as a homosexual do your believe that this is normal, or would you prefer that you were born heterosexual. Fourthly, what do you really believe of the gay activist who claims to speak for you? There could be other questions. Finally, I do not believe that the gay homosexual agenda speaks for homosexuals. And there is the black and white division between the two.
As an example, do you believe that the NOW organization & NARAL speak for women? These organizations speak only for its members and a minority of women. My opinion: the culture of death seeks to destroy marriage & the family.
And now we come to some stupid and asinine consequences of the defeat of proposition 8 on the California ballot. Why don’t you check your old marriage license? It seems that “brides” and “grooms” are no longer allowed to marry in the State of California. That privilege is only extended to individuals who allow themselves to be called “Party A” and “Party B”” on the marriage licenses.
How is this idiocy possible? It’s by one vote. One vote makes the difference. It was by one vote; by the California Supreme Court (4-3) that legally redefines marriage to also include same-sex marriage. One slogan should be:
I AM GOING TO BURY THIS HOGWASH DECISION WITH MY ONE VOTE!
IN THE 47TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT I WILL VOTE FOR ROSIE AVILA WHO IS FOR MARRIAGE AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ WHO IS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND HAS VOTED THREE TIMES FOR PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION!
PLEASE SEND YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO:
ROSIE AVILA FOR CONGRESS
1070 SOUTH VIA de ROSA
ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807
If possible help with precinct work: Deborah Courtney, (714) 508-5788 or 400.7170
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to Catholic Churches, organizations & persons.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
The Public Arena - Prayers and Wisdom
The Public Arena – Prayers and Wisdom
cinops be gone Thursday, September 25, 2008
In this election year prayer is our most powerful weapon. Today is the second day of “40 Days for Life.” Cities in Orange County, California will be uniting with more than 170 cities across America and around the world. It is to pray and persuade the hearts and minds of women and men from abortion to life.
Prayer is for the unborn in the womb of their mothers. Those mothers will choose life, not abortion which is the secular sacrament of the Culture of Death a.k.a. the Culture of Hollywood. They seem to hate life. {Witness what they are doing to Sarah Palin and her family with their smears and character assassination. They fear a leader in life. And she is a badge of honor for the pro-life movement.}
Yesterday, I attended the funeral of my friend Leroy Anderson. He was a prayer associate at the abortion sites. Here is what I wrote.
“I’ll Remember Leroy
For over a two year period I picked up Leroy on Wednesdays at about nine in morning at St. Ireneaus, Cypress. He accompanied me to this place about 20 minutes away at the Northwest Corner of the 57 Freeway and Chapman Avenue in the city of Orange.
In about an hour we were able to pray two or three mysteries of the Rosary. This place is an abortion site, and it is also on Sunday mornings. We had Joan Hosek a sidewalk counselor. (One year she recorded 100 ladies who changed their minds.)
Do you know who else will remember Leroy? It will be the babies who with the grace of God and Leroy’s prayers were born and are rooting for Leroy on judgment day.
What a precious Honor Guard Leroy will have!
Finally, it is ironic that today Wednesday at the Southwest corner of the 22 Freeway and Tustin Street at this place, “A Planned Parenthood Site.” “40 Days of Prayers and Fasting” begins to end the acceptance of abortion by many Americans.
George H. Kubeck,
Pro-Life Chairman, Knights of Columbus, San Juan Capistrano Council and member of the Knights of Columbus Council 8599, St. Ireneaus.”
P.S.To participate Contact PatsyDubriel@hotmail.com or Tel. 949-632-6680
For South Orange County contact Alejandra: 949-69—7315, alejandra.baker@gmail.com
++++++++++++++++++++++
Now let me share some information and action items on the issues in this election for this blog’s 40 days. Thanks to Mecki:
As we have read in Faithful Citizenship we are called to vote on Catholic principles. The most important of all these principles is the Right to Life (the most basic issue) and related family issues.
Catholic voters should use Catholic teaching to examine candidates positions on ISSUES. A great website about these Catholic teachings is Priest for Life. It has a comparison of the candidates’ positions in English and Spanish. www.priestsforlife.org.org/elections/index.htm
Finally, we are blessed in the 47th Congressional District with “A Champion for the Unborn,” www.VoteRosie.com. Info: Deborah Courtney, (714)-508.5789 or400-7170
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Thursday, September 25, 2008
In this election year prayer is our most powerful weapon. Today is the second day of “40 Days for Life.” Cities in Orange County, California will be uniting with more than 170 cities across America and around the world. It is to pray and persuade the hearts and minds of women and men from abortion to life.
Prayer is for the unborn in the womb of their mothers. Those mothers will choose life, not abortion which is the secular sacrament of the Culture of Death a.k.a. the Culture of Hollywood. They seem to hate life. {Witness what they are doing to Sarah Palin and her family with their smears and character assassination. They fear a leader in life. And she is a badge of honor for the pro-life movement.}
Yesterday, I attended the funeral of my friend Leroy Anderson. He was a prayer associate at the abortion sites. Here is what I wrote.
“I’ll Remember Leroy
For over a two year period I picked up Leroy on Wednesdays at about nine in morning at St. Ireneaus, Cypress. He accompanied me to this place about 20 minutes away at the Northwest Corner of the 57 Freeway and Chapman Avenue in the city of Orange.
In about an hour we were able to pray two or three mysteries of the Rosary. This place is an abortion site, and it is also on Sunday mornings. We had Joan Hosek a sidewalk counselor. (One year she recorded 100 ladies who changed their minds.)
Do you know who else will remember Leroy? It will be the babies who with the grace of God and Leroy’s prayers were born and are rooting for Leroy on judgment day.
What a precious Honor Guard Leroy will have!
Finally, it is ironic that today Wednesday at the Southwest corner of the 22 Freeway and Tustin Street at this place, “A Planned Parenthood Site.” “40 Days of Prayers and Fasting” begins to end the acceptance of abortion by many Americans.
George H. Kubeck,
Pro-Life Chairman, Knights of Columbus, San Juan Capistrano Council and member of the Knights of Columbus Council 8599, St. Ireneaus.”
P.S.To participate Contact PatsyDubriel@hotmail.com or Tel. 949-632-6680
For South Orange County contact Alejandra: 949-69—7315, alejandra.baker@gmail.com
++++++++++++++++++++++
Now let me share some information and action items on the issues in this election for this blog’s 40 days. Thanks to Mecki:
As we have read in Faithful Citizenship we are called to vote on Catholic principles. The most important of all these principles is the Right to Life (the most basic issue) and related family issues.
Catholic voters should use Catholic teaching to examine candidates positions on ISSUES. A great website about these Catholic teachings is Priest for Life. It has a comparison of the candidates’ positions in English and Spanish. www.priestsforlife.org.org/elections/index.htm
Finally, we are blessed in the 47th Congressional District with “A Champion for the Unborn,” www.VoteRosie.com. Info: Deborah Courtney, (714)-508.5789 or400-7170
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
The Case against Loretta Sanchez - 4
The Case against Loretta Sanchez – 4
Words of Wisdom, 10 years ago: cinops be gone Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Loretta has repeatedly defied Bishop McFarland since he counseled Sanchez in a March 1998 letter.”… I also earnestly pray that you will heed the Church’s call for a comprehensive culture of life. The fact that you are a public person makes it even more incumbent upon you to give witness to the consistent ethic of life that should animate all conduct, but most especially political conduct.
“You visits to various local Catholic parishes as public official and the incumbent candidate, in my judgment are not in accord with these aspirations, particularly in light of the March 13th Los Angeles Times article on your allegiance to the Democratic Party’s duplicitous abortion strategy. I am disheartened that you would deliberately choose to leave the unborn on the margins of our society. “Becoming increasingly alarmed by your visits, I wanted to share with you my inquietude in this matter before more public gestures on my part become necessary.”
Most Reverend Norman McFarland,
Bishop of Orange, California
“Loretta Sanchez (D-Garden Grove) has consistently chosen to vote with her party rather than represent her district on this fundamental issue of life. Her votes against the ban on Partial-Birth Abortions perpetuate an ethic that can undermine many other issues affecting her community, placing families and the most vulnerable among us at risk.”
Monsignor Jaime Soto, Episcopal Vicar for the
Hispanic Community Diocese of Orange
“As election day approaches, we must be reminded that Catholics cannot support candidates for office, who like modern day Herods, advocate abortion legalization.”
Monsignor Lawrence J. Baird,
Diocese of Orange
Common human decency requires members of Congress (Loretta Sanchez) to reject the barbarity of partial-birth-infanticide. A Catholic in public office has a compelling obligation to oppose the elitist abortion agenda. To claim that one can be a Catholic in a state of grace and is not sinning while at the same time favoring “the choice to kill” by abortion is tantamount to saying “God is not God.”
Father Frank Pavone, Archdiocese of New York
Director, Priests for Life, Vatican City
The Pro-Life position is the ONLY pro-woman position on abortion. The pre-born are human beings also! It is scientifically undisputed. So the only ‘feminist’ position on abortion, the logical and moral position is to reject the killing of pre-born girls and boys.
Helen Alvare, National Spokesman Pro-Life Secretariat
National Conference of Catholic Bishops
“A nation that destroys the life of an unborn child, who has been created in the image of God, is in a tremendous poverty. What hope is there in stopping wars if mothers kill their own children? Every life is precious to God. Isaiah 43:4”
Mother Teresa
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Words of Wisdom, 10 years ago: cinops be gone Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Loretta has repeatedly defied Bishop McFarland since he counseled Sanchez in a March 1998 letter.”… I also earnestly pray that you will heed the Church’s call for a comprehensive culture of life. The fact that you are a public person makes it even more incumbent upon you to give witness to the consistent ethic of life that should animate all conduct, but most especially political conduct.
“You visits to various local Catholic parishes as public official and the incumbent candidate, in my judgment are not in accord with these aspirations, particularly in light of the March 13th Los Angeles Times article on your allegiance to the Democratic Party’s duplicitous abortion strategy. I am disheartened that you would deliberately choose to leave the unborn on the margins of our society. “Becoming increasingly alarmed by your visits, I wanted to share with you my inquietude in this matter before more public gestures on my part become necessary.”
Most Reverend Norman McFarland,
Bishop of Orange, California
“Loretta Sanchez (D-Garden Grove) has consistently chosen to vote with her party rather than represent her district on this fundamental issue of life. Her votes against the ban on Partial-Birth Abortions perpetuate an ethic that can undermine many other issues affecting her community, placing families and the most vulnerable among us at risk.”
Monsignor Jaime Soto, Episcopal Vicar for the
Hispanic Community Diocese of Orange
“As election day approaches, we must be reminded that Catholics cannot support candidates for office, who like modern day Herods, advocate abortion legalization.”
Monsignor Lawrence J. Baird,
Diocese of Orange
Common human decency requires members of Congress (Loretta Sanchez) to reject the barbarity of partial-birth-infanticide. A Catholic in public office has a compelling obligation to oppose the elitist abortion agenda. To claim that one can be a Catholic in a state of grace and is not sinning while at the same time favoring “the choice to kill” by abortion is tantamount to saying “God is not God.”
Father Frank Pavone, Archdiocese of New York
Director, Priests for Life, Vatican City
The Pro-Life position is the ONLY pro-woman position on abortion. The pre-born are human beings also! It is scientifically undisputed. So the only ‘feminist’ position on abortion, the logical and moral position is to reject the killing of pre-born girls and boys.
Helen Alvare, National Spokesman Pro-Life Secretariat
National Conference of Catholic Bishops
“A nation that destroys the life of an unborn child, who has been created in the image of God, is in a tremendous poverty. What hope is there in stopping wars if mothers kill their own children? Every life is precious to God. Isaiah 43:4”
Mother Teresa
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Personal Letters to Barack Obama - # 2
Personal Letters to Barack Obama – # 2
cinops be gone Saturday, September 20, 2008
“Justice is both the aim and the intrinsic criterion of all politics.” Benedict XVI.
Barack, I believe your love for justice is equal or better than any candidate that has run for President of the United States. However, justice is truth in action. So when you were helping the poor in Chicago with different private and government programs, did you teach them how to fish, instead of giving them fish all the time? For example, in the 1980’s I put out a flyer in Long Beach which was titled, Weekly Consumer Buyline.
On one side I had the best food buys at the markets and on the other side, the best non-food buys. Besides distributing to businesses who advertised on the flyer, I had it posted in about 25 or more Laundromats weekly. It directed the poor to choose the markets with the best buys. It taught them how to fish, save money and move out of poverty. Were there any of your programs that moved the poor into the middle class?
You have a very serious fatal blind spot and state of mind on the life issues. And I don’t blame you for having it. For example, when driving a car there is a blind spot. You are aware of it but if the passenger sees it and doesn’t tell you; he is the villain. Now that passenger is the Catholic-in-name-only politician. Example:
In an article “I am not Changing”, on one of your supporters Father Michael Pfleger in the Catholic World Reporter – August –September 2008, p. 26, “It is worth noting that almost all the leading politicians in Chicago & the state are liberal, pro-abortion Democrats who are Catholic.” Now if you hang around with guys like that including Catholic label fraud-politician & Senator Dick Durbin, you can come up with the following remarks: {I apologize for their influence on you.}
“I’ve got two daughters 9 years old and 6 years old,” “I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Or the comment by Senator Thompson in reference to you, “We don’t need a President who doesn’t think that the protection of the unborn or a newly born baby is above his pay grade.”
Or the comment by David Freddoso in the National Review on your acceptance speech for change, “The man who misled the public for 4 years about his vote to let Chicago-area based hospital continue leaving premature abortion survivors to die, and who promised that his first act as president will be to re-legalize partial-birth abortions,…” {Barack that is the Freedom of Choice Act. It would prevent and harass me and thousands of others from providing information to those seeking an abortion at the abortion mills. Ghk)
I am sorry that you came under the influence of radical liberation theology. Whether it is black, white or brown, it is a false Christianity. I wish the Baptists, Evangelicals or Catholics got hold of you first, as you claim to be a Christian.
Finally, of the 50 million abortions since 1973, about 17 million were of black American women. I don’t understand your support for NARAL and Planned Parenthood. Abortionists getting public money for genocide of black Americans.
Respectfully yours,
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Saturday, September 20, 2008
“Justice is both the aim and the intrinsic criterion of all politics.” Benedict XVI.
Barack, I believe your love for justice is equal or better than any candidate that has run for President of the United States. However, justice is truth in action. So when you were helping the poor in Chicago with different private and government programs, did you teach them how to fish, instead of giving them fish all the time? For example, in the 1980’s I put out a flyer in Long Beach which was titled, Weekly Consumer Buyline.
On one side I had the best food buys at the markets and on the other side, the best non-food buys. Besides distributing to businesses who advertised on the flyer, I had it posted in about 25 or more Laundromats weekly. It directed the poor to choose the markets with the best buys. It taught them how to fish, save money and move out of poverty. Were there any of your programs that moved the poor into the middle class?
You have a very serious fatal blind spot and state of mind on the life issues. And I don’t blame you for having it. For example, when driving a car there is a blind spot. You are aware of it but if the passenger sees it and doesn’t tell you; he is the villain. Now that passenger is the Catholic-in-name-only politician. Example:
In an article “I am not Changing”, on one of your supporters Father Michael Pfleger in the Catholic World Reporter – August –September 2008, p. 26, “It is worth noting that almost all the leading politicians in Chicago & the state are liberal, pro-abortion Democrats who are Catholic.” Now if you hang around with guys like that including Catholic label fraud-politician & Senator Dick Durbin, you can come up with the following remarks: {I apologize for their influence on you.}
“I’ve got two daughters 9 years old and 6 years old,” “I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Or the comment by Senator Thompson in reference to you, “We don’t need a President who doesn’t think that the protection of the unborn or a newly born baby is above his pay grade.”
Or the comment by David Freddoso in the National Review on your acceptance speech for change, “The man who misled the public for 4 years about his vote to let Chicago-area based hospital continue leaving premature abortion survivors to die, and who promised that his first act as president will be to re-legalize partial-birth abortions,…” {Barack that is the Freedom of Choice Act. It would prevent and harass me and thousands of others from providing information to those seeking an abortion at the abortion mills. Ghk)
I am sorry that you came under the influence of radical liberation theology. Whether it is black, white or brown, it is a false Christianity. I wish the Baptists, Evangelicals or Catholics got hold of you first, as you claim to be a Christian.
Finally, of the 50 million abortions since 1973, about 17 million were of black American women. I don’t understand your support for NARAL and Planned Parenthood. Abortionists getting public money for genocide of black Americans.
Respectfully yours,
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Friday, September 19, 2008
10 Truths - 4 - Without God, Government is a Fearful Master - 1
10 Truths – 4 – Without God,
Government is a Fearful Master - 1
cinops be gone Friday, September 19, 2008
We continue with “Coral Ridge Ministries”, 10 Truths about Christians & Politics:
Bursting with confidence, a small group composed mostly of Unitarian clergymen and academics issued their “Humanist Manifesto” in 1933. Advances in science and economics, they announced, had made it possible to reject God and traditional religions in favor of their new “religious humanism.”
“Man is at last becoming aware,” they burbled, “that he alone is responsible for the realization of the world of his dreams that he has within himself the power for its achievement.”
Humanism in Practice:
That same year, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, approved the genocide of seven million Ukrainians, and Adolf Hitler seized power in Germany. While American humanists enthused about “a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good,” their ideological cousins in the Kremlin were imposing policies that wiped out almost 25 percent of the Ukraine population, including some three million children.
In 1933, while these American humanists were joining is a chorus of praise to man’s potential to realize his dreams without the help of God, Europe’s two largest nations, led by Stalin and Hitler, were “firmly in the grip of totalitarian regimes which preached and practiced and indeed embodied, moral relativism, with all its horrifying potentialities,” While the American humanist were heralding a social vision that banished God, across the Atlantic that vision was being put into practice.
Both Stalin, who had become an atheist after reading Darwin, and Hitler, who tried to speed up evolution by eliminating “inferior” humans, ruled without moral restraint. They lived out what Lenin called the “the scientific concept of dictatorship.” By that he meant “power without limit, resting directly upon force, restrained by no laws, absolutely unrestricted by rules.”
“Don’t Stop Clapping”
Under their rule, “Fear by night, and a feverish effort by day to pretend enthusiasm for a system of lies, was the permanent condition,” according to historian Robert Conquest. Soviet cruelty included a sentence of ten years prison time to man who was first to stop clapping for Comrade Stalin after he spoke. An unfortunate tailor received a sentence of ten years because when he laid aside his needle, he “stuck it into a newspaper on the wall so it wouldn’t get lost and happened to stick it in the eye of portrait of Kaganovich {a member of the Soviet Politburo}.
Hitler, who made it his business to commandeer the church to his purposes, was pitiless toward all of so-called inferior race. “Our strength is in our quickness and our brutality,” he told 55 troops just before the invasion of Poland in August 1939, According to Hitler:
‘Genghis Khan had millions of women and children killed by his own will and with a gay heart. History sees in him only a great state builder. Thus, for the time being, I have sent to the East only my “Death’s Head Units” with orders to kill without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of Polish race or image.’ P. 39-41
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Government is a Fearful Master - 1
cinops be gone Friday, September 19, 2008
We continue with “Coral Ridge Ministries”, 10 Truths about Christians & Politics:
Bursting with confidence, a small group composed mostly of Unitarian clergymen and academics issued their “Humanist Manifesto” in 1933. Advances in science and economics, they announced, had made it possible to reject God and traditional religions in favor of their new “religious humanism.”
“Man is at last becoming aware,” they burbled, “that he alone is responsible for the realization of the world of his dreams that he has within himself the power for its achievement.”
Humanism in Practice:
That same year, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, approved the genocide of seven million Ukrainians, and Adolf Hitler seized power in Germany. While American humanists enthused about “a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good,” their ideological cousins in the Kremlin were imposing policies that wiped out almost 25 percent of the Ukraine population, including some three million children.
In 1933, while these American humanists were joining is a chorus of praise to man’s potential to realize his dreams without the help of God, Europe’s two largest nations, led by Stalin and Hitler, were “firmly in the grip of totalitarian regimes which preached and practiced and indeed embodied, moral relativism, with all its horrifying potentialities,” While the American humanist were heralding a social vision that banished God, across the Atlantic that vision was being put into practice.
Both Stalin, who had become an atheist after reading Darwin, and Hitler, who tried to speed up evolution by eliminating “inferior” humans, ruled without moral restraint. They lived out what Lenin called the “the scientific concept of dictatorship.” By that he meant “power without limit, resting directly upon force, restrained by no laws, absolutely unrestricted by rules.”
“Don’t Stop Clapping”
Under their rule, “Fear by night, and a feverish effort by day to pretend enthusiasm for a system of lies, was the permanent condition,” according to historian Robert Conquest. Soviet cruelty included a sentence of ten years prison time to man who was first to stop clapping for Comrade Stalin after he spoke. An unfortunate tailor received a sentence of ten years because when he laid aside his needle, he “stuck it into a newspaper on the wall so it wouldn’t get lost and happened to stick it in the eye of portrait of Kaganovich {a member of the Soviet Politburo}.
Hitler, who made it his business to commandeer the church to his purposes, was pitiless toward all of so-called inferior race. “Our strength is in our quickness and our brutality,” he told 55 troops just before the invasion of Poland in August 1939, According to Hitler:
‘Genghis Khan had millions of women and children killed by his own will and with a gay heart. History sees in him only a great state builder. Thus, for the time being, I have sent to the East only my “Death’s Head Units” with orders to kill without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of Polish race or image.’ P. 39-41
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Chicago's Stealth Hate-America # 2 of 2
Chicago’s Stealth Hate-America Network # 2 of 2
cinops be gone Thursday, September 18, 2008
We conclude with the article in National Review. Sept. 1st issue by Stanley Kurtz titled Senator Stealth – How to advance the radical causes when no one is looking. Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. P. 33-34
He (Jacobsen) recounts being present at the Pentagon “to fast and vigil with a group of religious resisters against the madness of nuclear build-up and militarism generated in that place” and is horrified when he sees that many in the American military actually think of themselves as Christians. For Jacobsen, this means that the church has “aligned itself with oppressive forces and crucified its Lord anew.”
Jacobsen has a low opinion of the food pantries, homeless shelters, and walk-a-thons that make up so much religious charitable activity in the United States. All that charity, says Jacobsen, tends to suppress the truth that the system itself is designed to benefit the prosperous and keep the poor down…
“Most churches do not operate on the basis of healthy agitation,” he says, but instead “on the basis of manipulation, authoritarianism, or guilt-tripping.”
The solution, says Jacobsen, is community organizing: “Metropolitan organizing offers a chance to end the warfare against the poor and to heal the divisions of class and race that separate this sick society.” Militant mass action …fueled by righteous anger, he maintains, offers authentic community, and therefore “the possibility of fulfillment in a vacuous society.”… Jacobsen invokes the communal property and absence of private ownership that prevailed among early Christians as a possible model….
These, then, are the beliefs at the spiritual heart of the Gamaliel Foundation’s community organizing effort. They show clear echoes of Jeremiah Wright’s and James Cone’s black-liberation theology and it’s evident that Obama has an affinity for organizations that embody this point of view. But a question arises. Gamaliel’s goal is to build church-based coalitions capable of wielding power on behalf of the poor. These congregation-based organizations are supposed to counterbalance and undercut America’s oppressive power structures. Yet if most American Christians are deluded servants of a sinful and oppressive system, how can they be molded into a majority coalition for change? Given the privatistic, insular, and individualistic character of American culture, theological frankness might backfire and drive away potential allies, exactly as happened with Reverend Wright. THUS ARISES THE NEED FOR STEALTH….
Although Gamaliel and ACORN have significantly different tactics and styles, Rutgers political scientist Heidi Swarts notes that their political goals and ideologies are broadly similar. Both groups press the state for redistribution. The tactics of Gamaliel and ACORN have bee shaped in a “post Alinsky” era of welfare reform and conservative resurgence, posing a severe challenge to those who wish to expand the welfare state. The answer these activists have hit upon, says Swarts, is to work incrementally in urban areas, while deliberately downplaying the far-left ideology that stands behind their carefully targeted campaigns. …
P.S, Instead of teaching the poor how to fish and get them out of poverty, they want to use the poor to get into power, as a base for permanent power. Ghk
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Thursday, September 18, 2008
We conclude with the article in National Review. Sept. 1st issue by Stanley Kurtz titled Senator Stealth – How to advance the radical causes when no one is looking. Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. P. 33-34
He (Jacobsen) recounts being present at the Pentagon “to fast and vigil with a group of religious resisters against the madness of nuclear build-up and militarism generated in that place” and is horrified when he sees that many in the American military actually think of themselves as Christians. For Jacobsen, this means that the church has “aligned itself with oppressive forces and crucified its Lord anew.”
Jacobsen has a low opinion of the food pantries, homeless shelters, and walk-a-thons that make up so much religious charitable activity in the United States. All that charity, says Jacobsen, tends to suppress the truth that the system itself is designed to benefit the prosperous and keep the poor down…
“Most churches do not operate on the basis of healthy agitation,” he says, but instead “on the basis of manipulation, authoritarianism, or guilt-tripping.”
The solution, says Jacobsen, is community organizing: “Metropolitan organizing offers a chance to end the warfare against the poor and to heal the divisions of class and race that separate this sick society.” Militant mass action …fueled by righteous anger, he maintains, offers authentic community, and therefore “the possibility of fulfillment in a vacuous society.”… Jacobsen invokes the communal property and absence of private ownership that prevailed among early Christians as a possible model….
These, then, are the beliefs at the spiritual heart of the Gamaliel Foundation’s community organizing effort. They show clear echoes of Jeremiah Wright’s and James Cone’s black-liberation theology and it’s evident that Obama has an affinity for organizations that embody this point of view. But a question arises. Gamaliel’s goal is to build church-based coalitions capable of wielding power on behalf of the poor. These congregation-based organizations are supposed to counterbalance and undercut America’s oppressive power structures. Yet if most American Christians are deluded servants of a sinful and oppressive system, how can they be molded into a majority coalition for change? Given the privatistic, insular, and individualistic character of American culture, theological frankness might backfire and drive away potential allies, exactly as happened with Reverend Wright. THUS ARISES THE NEED FOR STEALTH….
Although Gamaliel and ACORN have significantly different tactics and styles, Rutgers political scientist Heidi Swarts notes that their political goals and ideologies are broadly similar. Both groups press the state for redistribution. The tactics of Gamaliel and ACORN have bee shaped in a “post Alinsky” era of welfare reform and conservative resurgence, posing a severe challenge to those who wish to expand the welfare state. The answer these activists have hit upon, says Swarts, is to work incrementally in urban areas, while deliberately downplaying the far-left ideology that stands behind their carefully targeted campaigns. …
P.S, Instead of teaching the poor how to fish and get them out of poverty, they want to use the poor to get into power, as a base for permanent power. Ghk
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Planned Parenthood - Early Years - 3
Planned Parenthood – Early Years – 3
cinops be gone Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Continue with Jonah Goldberg’s classic, “Liberal Fascism” p. 273-4.
In 1939 Sanger created the previously mentioned “Negro Project,” which aimed to get blacks to adopt birth control. Through the Birth Control Federation, she hired black ministers (including the Reverend Adam Powell Sr.), doctors, and other leaders to help pare down the supposedly surplus black population.
The project’s racist intent is beyond doubt. “The mass of significant Negroes,” read the project’s report, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes … is {in} that portion of the population least intelligent and fit.” Sanger’s intent is shocking today, but she recognized its extreme radicalism even then. “We do not want word to get out,” she wrote to a colleague, “that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
It is still possible that Sanger didn’t really want to “exterminate” the Negro population so much as merely limit its growth. Still, many in the black community saw it that way and remained rightly suspicious of the progressives’ motives. It wasn’t difficult to see that middle-class white who consistently spoke of “race suicide” at the hand of dark, subhuman savages might not have the best interests of blacks in mind. This skepticism persisted within the black community for decades.
Someone who saw the relationship between, for example, abortion and race from a less trusting perspective telegrammed Congress in 1977 to tell them that abortion amounted to “genocide against the black race.” And he added in block letters,
“AS A MATTER OF CONSCIENCE I MUST OPPOSE THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR A POLICY OF KILLING INFANTS.” THIS WAS JESSE JACKSON, WHO CHANGED HIS POSITION WHEN HE DECIDED TO SEEK THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION.
Just a few years ago, the racial eugenic “bonus” of abortion rights was something one could only admit among those fully committed to the cause, and even then in politically correct whispers. No more. Increasingly, this argument is acceptable on the left, as are arguments in favor of eugenics generally.
In 2005 the acclaimed University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt broke the taboo with his critical and commercial hit Freakonomics (co-written with Stephen Dubner). The most sensational chapter in the book updated a paper Levit had written in 1999 which argued that abortion cuts crime. “Legalized abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness lead to high crime; legalized abortion, therefore, led to less crime.”
Freakonomics excised all references to race and never connected the facts and blacks disproportionately black and blacks disproportionately contribute to the crime rate, reducing the size of the black population reduces crime. Yet the press coverage acknowledged this reality and didn’t seem to mind….
P.S. Jesse Jackson’s betrayal of Life; and Obama, WEEP FOR BLACK AMERICA.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Continue with Jonah Goldberg’s classic, “Liberal Fascism” p. 273-4.
In 1939 Sanger created the previously mentioned “Negro Project,” which aimed to get blacks to adopt birth control. Through the Birth Control Federation, she hired black ministers (including the Reverend Adam Powell Sr.), doctors, and other leaders to help pare down the supposedly surplus black population.
The project’s racist intent is beyond doubt. “The mass of significant Negroes,” read the project’s report, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with the result that the increase among Negroes … is {in} that portion of the population least intelligent and fit.” Sanger’s intent is shocking today, but she recognized its extreme radicalism even then. “We do not want word to get out,” she wrote to a colleague, “that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
It is still possible that Sanger didn’t really want to “exterminate” the Negro population so much as merely limit its growth. Still, many in the black community saw it that way and remained rightly suspicious of the progressives’ motives. It wasn’t difficult to see that middle-class white who consistently spoke of “race suicide” at the hand of dark, subhuman savages might not have the best interests of blacks in mind. This skepticism persisted within the black community for decades.
Someone who saw the relationship between, for example, abortion and race from a less trusting perspective telegrammed Congress in 1977 to tell them that abortion amounted to “genocide against the black race.” And he added in block letters,
“AS A MATTER OF CONSCIENCE I MUST OPPOSE THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR A POLICY OF KILLING INFANTS.” THIS WAS JESSE JACKSON, WHO CHANGED HIS POSITION WHEN HE DECIDED TO SEEK THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION.
Just a few years ago, the racial eugenic “bonus” of abortion rights was something one could only admit among those fully committed to the cause, and even then in politically correct whispers. No more. Increasingly, this argument is acceptable on the left, as are arguments in favor of eugenics generally.
In 2005 the acclaimed University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt broke the taboo with his critical and commercial hit Freakonomics (co-written with Stephen Dubner). The most sensational chapter in the book updated a paper Levit had written in 1999 which argued that abortion cuts crime. “Legalized abortion led to less unwantedness; unwantedness lead to high crime; legalized abortion, therefore, led to less crime.”
Freakonomics excised all references to race and never connected the facts and blacks disproportionately black and blacks disproportionately contribute to the crime rate, reducing the size of the black population reduces crime. Yet the press coverage acknowledged this reality and didn’t seem to mind….
P.S. Jesse Jackson’s betrayal of Life; and Obama, WEEP FOR BLACK AMERICA.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Monday, September 15, 2008
Chicago's Stealth Hate America Network # 1 of 2
Chicago’s Stealth Hate America Network # 1of 2
cinops be gone Monday, September 15, 2008
Preface:
I recall a story about secular philosopher Voltaire when he was a student. He said or did something seriously wrong and his teachers had him wear a dunce hat with following pinned on his back. “I am a fool.” The problem is that je suis in French also means, “I follow” a fool.
I remember with dismay the American anti-war protestors during the Vietnam War. At the forefront of all their pro Ho Chi Min demonstrations I see their leaders: professors from the Ivy League universities. They didn’t have the courage to be there. These so-called teachers and professors still indoctrinate and manipulate honest public education.
This is not a happy article. Barack does not represent the traditions of Black Americans. When a corrupt media doesn’t do its job of informing the public on a presidential candidate like Obama you end up with at least 8 articles in the Sep. 1st issue of National Review. Hope you can still buy the issue. The issues never arrived at Barnes & Noble at the Long Beach Towne Center.
The following are excerpts from an article by Stanley Kurtz titled Senator Stealth - How to advance radical causes when no one is looking. Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. P. 32-7
After hearing about Barack Obama’s ties to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Fr. Michael Pfleger, and the militant activists of ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), It should be clear to everyone that his extremist roots run deep. But the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee has yet another connection with the world of far-Left radicalism. Obama has long been linked – through foundation grants, shared political activism, collaboration on legislation and tactics, and mutual praise and support – with the Chicago-base Gamaliel Foundation, one of the least known yet most influential national umbrella groups, for church-base “community organizers.”
The same separatist, anti-American theology of liberation that was so boldly and bitterly proclaimed by Obama’s pastor is shared, if more quietly, by Obama’s Gamaliel Colleagues. THE OPERATIVE WORD HERE IS “QUIETLY.” …
Before outlining Gamaliel’s techniques of political stealth, we need to identify the views that they are camouflaging. These can be found in Dennis Jacobsen’s book, Doing Justice: Congregations and Community Organizing. Jacobsen is the pastor of “Incarnation Lutheran Church” in Milwaukee and director of the Gamaliel National Clergy Caucus. Jacobsen’s book, which is part of the first-year reading list for new Gamaliel organizers, lays out the underlying theology of Gamaliel’s activities….
In Jacobsen’s conception, America is a sinful and fallen nation whose pervasive classism, racism, and militarism authentic Christianity must constantly resist…. The United States Jacobsen maintains, employs nationalism, propaganda, racism, bogus “civil religion,” and class enmity to bolster its entrenched and oppressive corporate system. Authentic Christians forced to live in such a nation can “come out of Babylon,” says Jacobsen only by entering into “a perpetual state of internal exile.”…
According to Jacobsen, the desire of most Americans to create a safe, secure life for themselves and their families constitutes an unacceptable emotional distancing from the sufferings of the urban poor… p. 32-33
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Monday, September 15, 2008
Preface:
I recall a story about secular philosopher Voltaire when he was a student. He said or did something seriously wrong and his teachers had him wear a dunce hat with following pinned on his back. “I am a fool.” The problem is that je suis in French also means, “I follow” a fool.
I remember with dismay the American anti-war protestors during the Vietnam War. At the forefront of all their pro Ho Chi Min demonstrations I see their leaders: professors from the Ivy League universities. They didn’t have the courage to be there. These so-called teachers and professors still indoctrinate and manipulate honest public education.
This is not a happy article. Barack does not represent the traditions of Black Americans. When a corrupt media doesn’t do its job of informing the public on a presidential candidate like Obama you end up with at least 8 articles in the Sep. 1st issue of National Review. Hope you can still buy the issue. The issues never arrived at Barnes & Noble at the Long Beach Towne Center.
The following are excerpts from an article by Stanley Kurtz titled Senator Stealth - How to advance radical causes when no one is looking. Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. P. 32-7
After hearing about Barack Obama’s ties to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Fr. Michael Pfleger, and the militant activists of ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), It should be clear to everyone that his extremist roots run deep. But the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee has yet another connection with the world of far-Left radicalism. Obama has long been linked – through foundation grants, shared political activism, collaboration on legislation and tactics, and mutual praise and support – with the Chicago-base Gamaliel Foundation, one of the least known yet most influential national umbrella groups, for church-base “community organizers.”
The same separatist, anti-American theology of liberation that was so boldly and bitterly proclaimed by Obama’s pastor is shared, if more quietly, by Obama’s Gamaliel Colleagues. THE OPERATIVE WORD HERE IS “QUIETLY.” …
Before outlining Gamaliel’s techniques of political stealth, we need to identify the views that they are camouflaging. These can be found in Dennis Jacobsen’s book, Doing Justice: Congregations and Community Organizing. Jacobsen is the pastor of “Incarnation Lutheran Church” in Milwaukee and director of the Gamaliel National Clergy Caucus. Jacobsen’s book, which is part of the first-year reading list for new Gamaliel organizers, lays out the underlying theology of Gamaliel’s activities….
In Jacobsen’s conception, America is a sinful and fallen nation whose pervasive classism, racism, and militarism authentic Christianity must constantly resist…. The United States Jacobsen maintains, employs nationalism, propaganda, racism, bogus “civil religion,” and class enmity to bolster its entrenched and oppressive corporate system. Authentic Christians forced to live in such a nation can “come out of Babylon,” says Jacobsen only by entering into “a perpetual state of internal exile.”…
According to Jacobsen, the desire of most Americans to create a safe, secure life for themselves and their families constitutes an unacceptable emotional distancing from the sufferings of the urban poor… p. 32-33
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Pope Benedict XVI and Supreme Knight Carl Anderson
Pope Benedict XVI and Supreme Knight Carl Anderson
cinops be gone Saturday, September 13, 2008
These two Catholic leaders have a message for Catholic Americans. Besides living our Catholic Faith; it has something to do with voting.
From the writings of Pope Benedict XVI: “Co-Workers of the Truth” Meditations for Every Day of the Year. Ignatius Press, 1992
To faith belongs the readiness to suffer but also the courage to do battle…. The Church opposes the real powers of this age; when the Church condemns the disintegration of marriage, the destruction of the family, the killing of unborn children, the distortion of the Faith….
“I have not come to bring peace, but a sword” (Mt 10:34). He (Jesus) opposed the convenient lie, the easy-going injustice. He exalted the superiority of truth over the merely comfortable getting-along-together that leads ultimately to the power of injustice, to the domination of the lie. July 18th entry
It is impossible to act rightly without truth. That is why the will to know the truth, to seek it humbly and with a readiness to learn it, is the basic requisite of all morality. Where profit or success leads to the neglect of truth, the world is fragmented into interest groups because profit always depends on the viewpoint of the one acting. July 27th entry
We have lost sight of the fact that Christians cannot live like “everyone else.” … We have confused renewal with comfort…. Christians must realize today more than ever before that they belong to a minority and are in opposition to all that appears good, natural and logical, to what the New Testament calls “the spirit of the world.” Aug. 27th entry
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
By Peter J. Smith, Quebec City, Canada, August 7, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com)
Supreme Knight Carl Anderson addressed the 126th annual convention of the Knights of Columbus, the world’s largest Catholic fraternal organization, in Quebec city and pledged the Knights to fight abortion politicians, who buy Catholic votes with their stand on other issues….
“We will never succeed in building a culture of life if we continue to vote for politicians who defend and support a culture of death,” said Anderson to thunderous applause from the assembly. “It’s time that Catholics shine a bright line of separation between themselves and all those politicians of every political party who defend the abortion regime of Roe v. Wade.” …
P.S. RMGiuseffi, “Tonight, please pray for the baby of Samantha to be spared from a planned abortion in the morning. She has already cancelled two prior appointments. Baby is 12 weeks old and parents are pressuring for an abortion. The boyfriend wants to save his baby … parents will raise it. This girl is torn up… but then so will the baby, if we don’t pray, ANYTHING… a decade of the Rosary…”
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Saturday, September 13, 2008
These two Catholic leaders have a message for Catholic Americans. Besides living our Catholic Faith; it has something to do with voting.
From the writings of Pope Benedict XVI: “Co-Workers of the Truth” Meditations for Every Day of the Year. Ignatius Press, 1992
To faith belongs the readiness to suffer but also the courage to do battle…. The Church opposes the real powers of this age; when the Church condemns the disintegration of marriage, the destruction of the family, the killing of unborn children, the distortion of the Faith….
“I have not come to bring peace, but a sword” (Mt 10:34). He (Jesus) opposed the convenient lie, the easy-going injustice. He exalted the superiority of truth over the merely comfortable getting-along-together that leads ultimately to the power of injustice, to the domination of the lie. July 18th entry
It is impossible to act rightly without truth. That is why the will to know the truth, to seek it humbly and with a readiness to learn it, is the basic requisite of all morality. Where profit or success leads to the neglect of truth, the world is fragmented into interest groups because profit always depends on the viewpoint of the one acting. July 27th entry
We have lost sight of the fact that Christians cannot live like “everyone else.” … We have confused renewal with comfort…. Christians must realize today more than ever before that they belong to a minority and are in opposition to all that appears good, natural and logical, to what the New Testament calls “the spirit of the world.” Aug. 27th entry
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
By Peter J. Smith, Quebec City, Canada, August 7, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com)
Supreme Knight Carl Anderson addressed the 126th annual convention of the Knights of Columbus, the world’s largest Catholic fraternal organization, in Quebec city and pledged the Knights to fight abortion politicians, who buy Catholic votes with their stand on other issues….
“We will never succeed in building a culture of life if we continue to vote for politicians who defend and support a culture of death,” said Anderson to thunderous applause from the assembly. “It’s time that Catholics shine a bright line of separation between themselves and all those politicians of every political party who defend the abortion regime of Roe v. Wade.” …
P.S. RMGiuseffi, “Tonight, please pray for the baby of Samantha to be spared from a planned abortion in the morning. She has already cancelled two prior appointments. Baby is 12 weeks old and parents are pressuring for an abortion. The boyfriend wants to save his baby … parents will raise it. This girl is torn up… but then so will the baby, if we don’t pray, ANYTHING… a decade of the Rosary…”
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Friday, September 12, 2008
"Above My Pay Grade"
“Above My Pay Grade”
cinops be gone Friday, September 12, 2008
From Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life: e-mail via RI.Sassone
We were recently treated to a remark by Barack Obama that the question of when a baby receives human rights was beyond his pay grade. At the public forum at Saddleback Church, he said: “… whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity … is above my pay grade.”
That, of course, is exactly what the Supreme Court said in Roe vs. Wade, the decision that legalized abortion in America throughout all nine months of pregnancy. Faced with a question it found too uncomfortable, the majority said:
“We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man’s knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.”
{410 U.S. 113, 159}
So what are we think of those who speak this way? Is it vice or virtue? Do they display a careful effort not to play God, or a cowardly unwillingness to assert the rights of their fellow human beings?
Some say that the government should not be involved in the personal, private decision of abortion. They don’t know how right they are. The government got “too involved” in the abortion decision when they legalized it.
Despite its profession of ignorance about whether what is aborted is in fact human life that has already begun, the Court nevertheless declared, “the word ‘person,’ as used in the 14th Amendment, does not include the unborn” {410 U.S. 113, 158}. What part of the pay grade of government is the right to define the boundaries of human rights or the limits of protection for the human family? Since when does the government get involved in deciding who qualifies for human rights?
Claiming ignorance about who has human rights is a frightening abandonment of responsibility. Some think it’s an effort not to “play God,” But it is actually just the opposite: the claim to be God. We may claim not to decide, but in practice, we cannot escape deciding: either every human being will be protected, or we will start deciding whom to exclude.
This gives rise to two thoughts, one from common sense and one from Scripture. Common sense tells us that that of someone is hunting and doesn’t know whether what’s moving behind the bush is a bear or a man; he should refrain from shooting until he is sure. Doubt, in other words, leads to an abundance of caution, not an abandonment of it.
Scripture, moreover, tells us that the man who committed the first murder claimed ignorance about the one he had killed, “Where is your brother?” God asked Cain, “I don’t know” was his answer. It was a lie, and it doesn’t allow either Cain or the Supreme Court or anyone else to escape their responsibility to protect their vulnerable brothers and sisters.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Friday, September 12, 2008
From Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life: e-mail via RI.Sassone
We were recently treated to a remark by Barack Obama that the question of when a baby receives human rights was beyond his pay grade. At the public forum at Saddleback Church, he said: “… whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity … is above my pay grade.”
That, of course, is exactly what the Supreme Court said in Roe vs. Wade, the decision that legalized abortion in America throughout all nine months of pregnancy. Faced with a question it found too uncomfortable, the majority said:
“We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man’s knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer.”
{410 U.S. 113, 159}
So what are we think of those who speak this way? Is it vice or virtue? Do they display a careful effort not to play God, or a cowardly unwillingness to assert the rights of their fellow human beings?
Some say that the government should not be involved in the personal, private decision of abortion. They don’t know how right they are. The government got “too involved” in the abortion decision when they legalized it.
Despite its profession of ignorance about whether what is aborted is in fact human life that has already begun, the Court nevertheless declared, “the word ‘person,’ as used in the 14th Amendment, does not include the unborn” {410 U.S. 113, 158}. What part of the pay grade of government is the right to define the boundaries of human rights or the limits of protection for the human family? Since when does the government get involved in deciding who qualifies for human rights?
Claiming ignorance about who has human rights is a frightening abandonment of responsibility. Some think it’s an effort not to “play God,” But it is actually just the opposite: the claim to be God. We may claim not to decide, but in practice, we cannot escape deciding: either every human being will be protected, or we will start deciding whom to exclude.
This gives rise to two thoughts, one from common sense and one from Scripture. Common sense tells us that that of someone is hunting and doesn’t know whether what’s moving behind the bush is a bear or a man; he should refrain from shooting until he is sure. Doubt, in other words, leads to an abundance of caution, not an abandonment of it.
Scripture, moreover, tells us that the man who committed the first murder claimed ignorance about the one he had killed, “Where is your brother?” God asked Cain, “I don’t know” was his answer. It was a lie, and it doesn’t allow either Cain or the Supreme Court or anyone else to escape their responsibility to protect their vulnerable brothers and sisters.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Barack Obama in His Own Words - Part 3 of 3
Barack Obama in His Own Words - Part 3 of 3
cinops be gone Thursday, September 11, 2008
Final excerpts from National Review, Sept. 1st issue, Who is Barack Obama?
“Obama comes to define and identify himself as a black man…. The dozens of cultural and historic figures appearing throughout Dreams are almost all black. (White author Joseph Conrad makes a token appearance as a deranged racist.) Obama identifies his principle role models: Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, and W.E.B. Dubois. He states that while he might love his white grandfather and Indonesian stepfather, he could “never emulate” them because of the racial difference: They were “white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own.” p. 39
Obama is fascinated by his black ancestry. When he journeys to Kenya he has a deep sense of joy and belonging – he feels he has very little interest in his white ancestors or in history of white America. He views U.S. history simply as a melodrama in which whites crush blacks (although class oppression and brutality against other minorities provide secondary plotlines.) …
Dreams does present one exception to Obama’s black exclusiveness. As Obama studies radical Marxist-Leninist literature (Franz Fanon, neocolonialism, etc.), he comes to see himself as the champion not just of blacks but of the downtrodden of all races. …
Generally, Obama sees an unbridgeable gulf between races: “The other race would always remain just that: alien and apart.” …
As a youth, Obama is shocked when a black mentor tells him that “black people have reason to hate,” but later comes to accept this view….
Candidate Obama declared that he was shocked when he heard Rev. Jeremiah’s Wright’s outrageous remarks about American society….
But in the autobiography, Wright rants are in plain view. It is obvious that Obama is drawn to Wright’s ministry not in ignorance, but precisely because of the Reverend’s politics. In Dreams, Wright asserts: “Life’s not safe for a black man in the country, Barack. Never has been. Probably never will be.” …
Black well-being therefore requires that the blame for black behavior always be placed in historic context – that is, shifted to whites. If 69 percent of black children are born out of wedlock, if blacks kill blacks, if black-run schools don’t teach, it is the white man’s fault. Alternative explanations will only relieve white guilt while raising black self-doubt. p. 40
Self-Portrait of the Author:
Dreams from My Father reveals Barack Obama as a self-constructed, racially obsessed man who regards most whites as oppressors. It is the work of a clever but shallow thinker who confuses ideological cliché for insight – a man who sees U.S. history as a narrow, bitter tale of race and class victimization. The Barack Obama presented in these pages is not electable to national office. No wonder that Obama, aided by a compliant media, has created a new self for public view, one that Obama of Dreams wouldn’t recognize and probably would disdain.”
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Thursday, September 11, 2008
Final excerpts from National Review, Sept. 1st issue, Who is Barack Obama?
“Obama comes to define and identify himself as a black man…. The dozens of cultural and historic figures appearing throughout Dreams are almost all black. (White author Joseph Conrad makes a token appearance as a deranged racist.) Obama identifies his principle role models: Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, and W.E.B. Dubois. He states that while he might love his white grandfather and Indonesian stepfather, he could “never emulate” them because of the racial difference: They were “white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own.” p. 39
Obama is fascinated by his black ancestry. When he journeys to Kenya he has a deep sense of joy and belonging – he feels he has very little interest in his white ancestors or in history of white America. He views U.S. history simply as a melodrama in which whites crush blacks (although class oppression and brutality against other minorities provide secondary plotlines.) …
Dreams does present one exception to Obama’s black exclusiveness. As Obama studies radical Marxist-Leninist literature (Franz Fanon, neocolonialism, etc.), he comes to see himself as the champion not just of blacks but of the downtrodden of all races. …
Generally, Obama sees an unbridgeable gulf between races: “The other race would always remain just that: alien and apart.” …
As a youth, Obama is shocked when a black mentor tells him that “black people have reason to hate,” but later comes to accept this view….
Candidate Obama declared that he was shocked when he heard Rev. Jeremiah’s Wright’s outrageous remarks about American society….
But in the autobiography, Wright rants are in plain view. It is obvious that Obama is drawn to Wright’s ministry not in ignorance, but precisely because of the Reverend’s politics. In Dreams, Wright asserts: “Life’s not safe for a black man in the country, Barack. Never has been. Probably never will be.” …
Black well-being therefore requires that the blame for black behavior always be placed in historic context – that is, shifted to whites. If 69 percent of black children are born out of wedlock, if blacks kill blacks, if black-run schools don’t teach, it is the white man’s fault. Alternative explanations will only relieve white guilt while raising black self-doubt. p. 40
Self-Portrait of the Author:
Dreams from My Father reveals Barack Obama as a self-constructed, racially obsessed man who regards most whites as oppressors. It is the work of a clever but shallow thinker who confuses ideological cliché for insight – a man who sees U.S. history as a narrow, bitter tale of race and class victimization. The Barack Obama presented in these pages is not electable to national office. No wonder that Obama, aided by a compliant media, has created a new self for public view, one that Obama of Dreams wouldn’t recognize and probably would disdain.”
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Barack Obama in His Own Words - Part 2 of 3
Barack Obama in His Own Words – Part 2 of 3
cinops be gone Wednesday, September 9, 2008
We continue with excerpts from one of several classic articles in the Sept. 1st issue, 2008 of National Review. It is by Michael Gledhill, pseudonym of the writer based in Washington, D.C. Who is Barack Obama? P. 38
Earlier this year, Michelle Obama made headlines by declaring that her husband’s primary victories were the first time she had ever been “proud of my country.” Michelle’s remark simply echoes the assessment Barack presents in his 442-page autobiography….
Obama is touted as a post-racial statesman who sees beyond the narrow issue of white versus black. The Obama of his autobiography is, to the contrary, obsessed with race: Almost all of Dreams is about race and race conflict.
Obama’s early life is marked by uncertainty and rootlessness. Born in Hawaii, he is abandoned by his black Kenyan father at age two. At six he goes to live in Indonesia with his white mother and Indonesian stepfather. At age ten, he leaves his mother and returns to Hawaii, where he spends the rest of his youth, living mainly with his lower-middle white grandparents and attending an expensive, almost all-white prep school….
A turning point in the narrative occurs when some of his white teenage friends attend an otherwise all-black party with him but feel uncomfortable and ask to leave. Obama is enraged and wants to punch his friends.
He begins to inundate himself in black literature: Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison, James Baldwin, and W.E.B. Dubois. Saturated with themes of anger and alienation Obama withdraws into a “smaller and smaller coil of rage.” He suffers a “nightmare vision” of black powerlessness and feels white have maimed blacks with a tragic “self contempt.” Malcolm X becomes his favorite author, although he admits all the talk about “blue-eyed devils and apocalypse” is a bit much….
Today, Candidate Obama presents himself as a multiracial American who is proud of his mixed ancestry and can comfortably draw from both of his white and his black roots. In Dreams, he takes the opposite stance. He deliberately and repeatedly rejects a multiracial identity. For example, attending an expensive private college in California, he meets many young people of mixed and white ancestry who view themselves, not as black, but as multiracial. Obama specifically rejects this option as a sellout. He also rejects integration as a goal because it is “one-way street. The minority is assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around.” …
P.S. Thus far may I share three verifiable truths?
1.) No U.S. immigrant, legal or illegal would ever write a book like Barack’s. We love this country too much. As an American by choice, a retired public school teacher with an M.A. in U.S. history from Pepperdine University, Barack’s book is disturbing and insulting to naturalized immigrant citizens and native Americans.
2,) Barack made choices. He is responsible for his bad choices & judgment. I believe he does not speak for Black Americans and will not be elected President.
3.) There is a cancer with the required readings in the U.S. educational system. The readings are not only anti-American but hateful leftist hogwash.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Wednesday, September 9, 2008
We continue with excerpts from one of several classic articles in the Sept. 1st issue, 2008 of National Review. It is by Michael Gledhill, pseudonym of the writer based in Washington, D.C. Who is Barack Obama? P. 38
Earlier this year, Michelle Obama made headlines by declaring that her husband’s primary victories were the first time she had ever been “proud of my country.” Michelle’s remark simply echoes the assessment Barack presents in his 442-page autobiography….
Obama is touted as a post-racial statesman who sees beyond the narrow issue of white versus black. The Obama of his autobiography is, to the contrary, obsessed with race: Almost all of Dreams is about race and race conflict.
Obama’s early life is marked by uncertainty and rootlessness. Born in Hawaii, he is abandoned by his black Kenyan father at age two. At six he goes to live in Indonesia with his white mother and Indonesian stepfather. At age ten, he leaves his mother and returns to Hawaii, where he spends the rest of his youth, living mainly with his lower-middle white grandparents and attending an expensive, almost all-white prep school….
A turning point in the narrative occurs when some of his white teenage friends attend an otherwise all-black party with him but feel uncomfortable and ask to leave. Obama is enraged and wants to punch his friends.
He begins to inundate himself in black literature: Richard Wright, Ralph Ellison, James Baldwin, and W.E.B. Dubois. Saturated with themes of anger and alienation Obama withdraws into a “smaller and smaller coil of rage.” He suffers a “nightmare vision” of black powerlessness and feels white have maimed blacks with a tragic “self contempt.” Malcolm X becomes his favorite author, although he admits all the talk about “blue-eyed devils and apocalypse” is a bit much….
Today, Candidate Obama presents himself as a multiracial American who is proud of his mixed ancestry and can comfortably draw from both of his white and his black roots. In Dreams, he takes the opposite stance. He deliberately and repeatedly rejects a multiracial identity. For example, attending an expensive private college in California, he meets many young people of mixed and white ancestry who view themselves, not as black, but as multiracial. Obama specifically rejects this option as a sellout. He also rejects integration as a goal because it is “one-way street. The minority is assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around.” …
P.S. Thus far may I share three verifiable truths?
1.) No U.S. immigrant, legal or illegal would ever write a book like Barack’s. We love this country too much. As an American by choice, a retired public school teacher with an M.A. in U.S. history from Pepperdine University, Barack’s book is disturbing and insulting to naturalized immigrant citizens and native Americans.
2,) Barack made choices. He is responsible for his bad choices & judgment. I believe he does not speak for Black Americans and will not be elected President.
3.) There is a cancer with the required readings in the U.S. educational system. The readings are not only anti-American but hateful leftist hogwash.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Barack Obama in His Own Words - Part 1 of 3
Barack Obama in His Own Words Part 1 of 3
cinops be gone Sunday, September 7, 2008
What are Obama’s core believes? You decide. The September 1st issue of National Review is a classic on Barack. The following are excerpts from p. 37-8
Obama published his autobiography, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance in 1995, when he was in his mid-thirties….
Dreams is a complex, introspective book. Its theme is how Obama, born in Hawaii to a white student mother and Kenyan student father, grows to view himself and the white society around him. The Obama of Dreams abandons his multiracial roots to forge an alienated black identity – that of a man steeped in radical ideology who views history in terms of a huge chasm separating oppressor from oppressed, white from black, and rich from poor; a man who is never more emotionally at home than when sitting in the church pew listening to Rev. Jeremiah Wright rant about white racism….
In Dreams, his heart swells at many things but sight of a flag certainly isn’t one of them. There he presents a warts-only history of the U.S., a story of evil and suffering. U.S. society is a “racial caste system” where “color and money” determine where you end up in life.
Obama says the Hawaiian islands, where he grew up, are beautiful, but quickly reminds us that behind the beauty lurks the “ugly conquest of native Hawaiians …. crippling disease brought by missionaries … the indenturing system that kept Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino immigrants stooped sunup to sunset in {the fields}.”
Candidate Obama proudly tells audiences that his white grand-parents were raised in the American heartland. But in Dreams he describes this heartland as the “landlocked center of the country, a place where decency and endurance and the pioneer spirit were joined at the hip with conformity and suspicion and the potential for unblinking cruelty.”…
American affluence offends Obama. The vast upper-middle class lives in a land of isolation and sterility. As a teenager, he envies the white homes in the suburbs but senses that the big pretty homes contain “quiet depression” and “loneliness,” represented by “a mother sneaking a tumbler of gin in the afternoon.” American consumer culture is comforting but mentally and spiritually numbing, yielding a “long hibernation.” … Finishing Dreams, I could not recall a single positive sentence about the United States or European society. I {the author} reread the book specifically looking for positive remarks….
P.S. And this man wants to be elected President of the U.S.A. How is it possible that the American public did not know of the above during the primary elections? Hillary would have won the primaries. Is the news media that corrupt, biased and politically correct? Remember, the corrupt news-media has not informed us about Planned Parenthood or about the evils of abortion on women. Let’s end it! Down with censorship and political correctness!
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish or Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Sunday, September 7, 2008
What are Obama’s core believes? You decide. The September 1st issue of National Review is a classic on Barack. The following are excerpts from p. 37-8
Obama published his autobiography, Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance in 1995, when he was in his mid-thirties….
Dreams is a complex, introspective book. Its theme is how Obama, born in Hawaii to a white student mother and Kenyan student father, grows to view himself and the white society around him. The Obama of Dreams abandons his multiracial roots to forge an alienated black identity – that of a man steeped in radical ideology who views history in terms of a huge chasm separating oppressor from oppressed, white from black, and rich from poor; a man who is never more emotionally at home than when sitting in the church pew listening to Rev. Jeremiah Wright rant about white racism….
In Dreams, his heart swells at many things but sight of a flag certainly isn’t one of them. There he presents a warts-only history of the U.S., a story of evil and suffering. U.S. society is a “racial caste system” where “color and money” determine where you end up in life.
Obama says the Hawaiian islands, where he grew up, are beautiful, but quickly reminds us that behind the beauty lurks the “ugly conquest of native Hawaiians …. crippling disease brought by missionaries … the indenturing system that kept Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino immigrants stooped sunup to sunset in {the fields}.”
Candidate Obama proudly tells audiences that his white grand-parents were raised in the American heartland. But in Dreams he describes this heartland as the “landlocked center of the country, a place where decency and endurance and the pioneer spirit were joined at the hip with conformity and suspicion and the potential for unblinking cruelty.”…
American affluence offends Obama. The vast upper-middle class lives in a land of isolation and sterility. As a teenager, he envies the white homes in the suburbs but senses that the big pretty homes contain “quiet depression” and “loneliness,” represented by “a mother sneaking a tumbler of gin in the afternoon.” American consumer culture is comforting but mentally and spiritually numbing, yielding a “long hibernation.” … Finishing Dreams, I could not recall a single positive sentence about the United States or European society. I {the author} reread the book specifically looking for positive remarks….
P.S. And this man wants to be elected President of the U.S.A. How is it possible that the American public did not know of the above during the primary elections? Hillary would have won the primaries. Is the news media that corrupt, biased and politically correct? Remember, the corrupt news-media has not informed us about Planned Parenthood or about the evils of abortion on women. Let’s end it! Down with censorship and political correctness!
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish or Vietnamese.
Friday, September 5, 2008
10 Truths - 3 - Christianity Gives Guidance to Govern.
10 Truths – 3 – Christianity
Gives Guidance to Government
cinops be gone Friday, September 5, 2008
Separation of Church and State in the Bible: continued, 31-34 - (Coral Ridge M.)
Jesus acknowledged the separation of Church and State when a few of his adversaries tried to corner him by asking if it was lawful for an observant Jew to pay taxes to Caesar. Christ saw their true agenda and answered them by pointing to a Roman coin which bore the image of Caesar.
“Render to Caesar the things of Caesar’s,” he told his questioners, “and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17).
Along with showing the image of Caesar, the coin in Christ’s hand bore an inscription that was “virtually an ascription of deity to the reigning emperor….” The blasphemous Roman requirement to worship Caesar, which was indicated on the coin, was a “thing” owed to God, not to man. Christians, then, are obligated to obey the state when it acts within the limits of the “things that are Caesar’s.” But when Caesar invades the sanctuary and exceeds his authority, Christians have a duty to resist.
Duty to Obey and to Disobey:
Paul instructed Christians in Rome to “be subject to the governing authorities” (Romans 13:1) and pay their taxes. Those who disobey the state, resist “the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves” (Romans 13:2)
However, the Bible also demonstrates that unrighteous decrees are not to be obeyed. The Hebrews midwives feared God more than the king of Egypt and disobeyed his cruel command to kill newborn Hebrew boys. God blessed them as a result: “And so it was, because the midwives feared God, that he provided households for them” (Exodus 1:21).
Shortly after the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, Jewish authorities grew troubled at the growth of his followers and strictly instructed Peter and the other apostles against teaching about Christ. The apostles refused, telling the high priest, “We ought to obey God rather than men”(Acts 5:29).
Along with the duty to disobey unrighteous commands, the Bible indicates that God’s people have a duty to confront political authorities who stray from God’s moral standard. The Old Testament often recounts how the prophets confronted the Jewish Monarchs with God’s verdict upon their unrighteous behavior.
The prophet Samuel announced God’s judgment on King Saul for his disregard of God’s word to him (1 Samuel 15:22-23). Elijah challenged wicked King Ahab over his Baal worship and was called the “troubler of Israel” for his effort (1 Kings 18:17). Nathan confronted David for his sin with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband, Uriah (2 Samuel 12).
Besides confronting evil and refusing to go along with it, there is another role outlined for the saints in both the Old and New Testament – to be “salt and light.” God, through Jeremiah, told the Jewish exiles in Babylon to “seek the peace of the city where I have caused you to be carried away captive, and pray to the Lord for it; for in its peace you will have peace” (Jeremiah 29:7). The exiles were not to withdraw from their ungodly environment into a cultural enclave, but rather to seek its peace or shalom – a Hebrew term also translated as “welfare.”…
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Gives Guidance to Government
cinops be gone Friday, September 5, 2008
Separation of Church and State in the Bible: continued, 31-34 - (Coral Ridge M.)
Jesus acknowledged the separation of Church and State when a few of his adversaries tried to corner him by asking if it was lawful for an observant Jew to pay taxes to Caesar. Christ saw their true agenda and answered them by pointing to a Roman coin which bore the image of Caesar.
“Render to Caesar the things of Caesar’s,” he told his questioners, “and to God the things that are God’s” (Mark 12:17).
Along with showing the image of Caesar, the coin in Christ’s hand bore an inscription that was “virtually an ascription of deity to the reigning emperor….” The blasphemous Roman requirement to worship Caesar, which was indicated on the coin, was a “thing” owed to God, not to man. Christians, then, are obligated to obey the state when it acts within the limits of the “things that are Caesar’s.” But when Caesar invades the sanctuary and exceeds his authority, Christians have a duty to resist.
Duty to Obey and to Disobey:
Paul instructed Christians in Rome to “be subject to the governing authorities” (Romans 13:1) and pay their taxes. Those who disobey the state, resist “the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves” (Romans 13:2)
However, the Bible also demonstrates that unrighteous decrees are not to be obeyed. The Hebrews midwives feared God more than the king of Egypt and disobeyed his cruel command to kill newborn Hebrew boys. God blessed them as a result: “And so it was, because the midwives feared God, that he provided households for them” (Exodus 1:21).
Shortly after the resurrection and ascension of Jesus, Jewish authorities grew troubled at the growth of his followers and strictly instructed Peter and the other apostles against teaching about Christ. The apostles refused, telling the high priest, “We ought to obey God rather than men”(Acts 5:29).
Along with the duty to disobey unrighteous commands, the Bible indicates that God’s people have a duty to confront political authorities who stray from God’s moral standard. The Old Testament often recounts how the prophets confronted the Jewish Monarchs with God’s verdict upon their unrighteous behavior.
The prophet Samuel announced God’s judgment on King Saul for his disregard of God’s word to him (1 Samuel 15:22-23). Elijah challenged wicked King Ahab over his Baal worship and was called the “troubler of Israel” for his effort (1 Kings 18:17). Nathan confronted David for his sin with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband, Uriah (2 Samuel 12).
Besides confronting evil and refusing to go along with it, there is another role outlined for the saints in both the Old and New Testament – to be “salt and light.” God, through Jeremiah, told the Jewish exiles in Babylon to “seek the peace of the city where I have caused you to be carried away captive, and pray to the Lord for it; for in its peace you will have peace” (Jeremiah 29:7). The exiles were not to withdraw from their ungodly environment into a cultural enclave, but rather to seek its peace or shalom – a Hebrew term also translated as “welfare.”…
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Catholics for Rosie Avila for U.S. Congress
Catholics for Rosie Avila for U.S. Congress
cinops be gone Friday, September 5, 2008
Why? It’s about marriage and parental notification!
1.) It’s about passing Proposition 8 and Proposition 4
As a retired public school teacher, these two propositions are a
Life and death matter for your children and grandchildren.
2.) It’s about the great cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Santa Ana
Providing huge majorities for these propositions. Why?
To overcome the majorities for the San Francisco Values in
Other California counties.
3.) It’s about replacing a clone of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who is a
Certified Catholic-Label Fraud Politician. She is Loretta Sanchez.
Together we must replace Loretta Sanchez who is for Gay Marriage
And voted for Partial-Birth abortions three times.
4.) It is about the honor and integrity of Orange County to finally vote
Out of office Loretta Sanchez who has in office denigrated Family Values
And Traditional America with her votes in Congress.
5.) Rosie Avila is right for Orange County. She is Pro-Life, the Marriage
Amendment and Lower Taxes for Families. On Education, she is for Local
Parental Control, Teach in English First, and Sex-Education – Honors
Marriage. On the Economy, Drill for American Oil to lower gas prices. And create new jobs. www.VoteRosie.com
6.) I volunteered in the precincts for the last two Saturdays @ the Garden Grove HQ. Judy Ahrens, (714) – 891- 5695. Please consider Anaheim HQ.Anita Hynds, (714) – 779-6256, Lisa McCain, (714) 858-8275; Fullerton HQ Sharon Paiz, (714) 879-8831, and Santa Ana HQ, Lupe Moreno.
7.) Sanchez has millions of dollars of support from the Culture of Death
Advocates: Please consider a donation to Rosie Avila For Congress,
1070 South Via de Rosa, Anaheim Hills, CA 92807
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Friday, September 5, 2008
Why? It’s about marriage and parental notification!
1.) It’s about passing Proposition 8 and Proposition 4
As a retired public school teacher, these two propositions are a
Life and death matter for your children and grandchildren.
2.) It’s about the great cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Santa Ana
Providing huge majorities for these propositions. Why?
To overcome the majorities for the San Francisco Values in
Other California counties.
3.) It’s about replacing a clone of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who is a
Certified Catholic-Label Fraud Politician. She is Loretta Sanchez.
Together we must replace Loretta Sanchez who is for Gay Marriage
And voted for Partial-Birth abortions three times.
4.) It is about the honor and integrity of Orange County to finally vote
Out of office Loretta Sanchez who has in office denigrated Family Values
And Traditional America with her votes in Congress.
5.) Rosie Avila is right for Orange County. She is Pro-Life, the Marriage
Amendment and Lower Taxes for Families. On Education, she is for Local
Parental Control, Teach in English First, and Sex-Education – Honors
Marriage. On the Economy, Drill for American Oil to lower gas prices. And create new jobs. www.VoteRosie.com
6.) I volunteered in the precincts for the last two Saturdays @ the Garden Grove HQ. Judy Ahrens, (714) – 891- 5695. Please consider Anaheim HQ.Anita Hynds, (714) – 779-6256, Lisa McCain, (714) 858-8275; Fullerton HQ Sharon Paiz, (714) 879-8831, and Santa Ana HQ, Lupe Moreno.
7.) Sanchez has millions of dollars of support from the Culture of Death
Advocates: Please consider a donation to Rosie Avila For Congress,
1070 South Via de Rosa, Anaheim Hills, CA 92807
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
We Have a Pro-Life Platform!
We Have a Pro-Life Platform
cinops be gone Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Congratulations to National Right to Life political director Karen Cross and other NRLC officials who have been involved in shaping the GOP Pro-Life Platform at the Minneapolis convention. And what a pro-life platform it is!
You will remember this platform years from now. Maybe one day in your lifetime, not mine, the Democratic party will come up with a similar one.
NOW HERE IS THE FINAL GOP PRO-LIFE PLATFORM;
Faithful to the first guarantee of the Declaration of Independence, we assert the inherent dignity and sanctity of all human life and affirm that the unborn has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.
We support a human life amendment to the Constitution, and we endorse legislation to make clear that the 14th Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.
We oppose using public revenues to promote or perform abortion and will not fund organizations which advocate it. We support the appointment of judges who respect traditional family values & the sanctity and dignity of innocent human life.
We have made progress. The Supreme Court has upheld prohibitions against the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion.
States are now permitted to extend health-care coverage to children before birth.
And the Born Alive Infants Protection Act has become law, this law ensures that infants who are born alive during an abortion receive all treatment and care that is provided to all newborn infants and are not neglected and to die.
We must protect girls from exploitation and statutory rape through a parental notification requirement.
We have a moral obligation to assist, not to penalize, women struggling with the challenges of an unplanned pregnancy.
At its core, abortion is a fundamental assault on the sanctity of innocent human life. Women deserve better than abortion.
Every effort should be made to work with women considering abortion to enable and empower them to choose life.
We salute those who provide them alternatives, including pregnancy care centers, and we take pride in the tremendous increase in adoptions that has followed Republican legislative initiatives.
Respect for life requires efforts to include persons with disabilities in education, employment, the justice system, and civic participation. In keeping with that commitment, we oppose the non-consensual withholding of care or treatment from people with disabilities, as well as the elderly and inform, just as we oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide, which endanger especially those on the margins of society. (from LifeNews.com editor Steven Ertelt, Aug. 27, 2008)
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Congratulations to National Right to Life political director Karen Cross and other NRLC officials who have been involved in shaping the GOP Pro-Life Platform at the Minneapolis convention. And what a pro-life platform it is!
You will remember this platform years from now. Maybe one day in your lifetime, not mine, the Democratic party will come up with a similar one.
NOW HERE IS THE FINAL GOP PRO-LIFE PLATFORM;
Faithful to the first guarantee of the Declaration of Independence, we assert the inherent dignity and sanctity of all human life and affirm that the unborn has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed.
We support a human life amendment to the Constitution, and we endorse legislation to make clear that the 14th Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children.
We oppose using public revenues to promote or perform abortion and will not fund organizations which advocate it. We support the appointment of judges who respect traditional family values & the sanctity and dignity of innocent human life.
We have made progress. The Supreme Court has upheld prohibitions against the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion.
States are now permitted to extend health-care coverage to children before birth.
And the Born Alive Infants Protection Act has become law, this law ensures that infants who are born alive during an abortion receive all treatment and care that is provided to all newborn infants and are not neglected and to die.
We must protect girls from exploitation and statutory rape through a parental notification requirement.
We have a moral obligation to assist, not to penalize, women struggling with the challenges of an unplanned pregnancy.
At its core, abortion is a fundamental assault on the sanctity of innocent human life. Women deserve better than abortion.
Every effort should be made to work with women considering abortion to enable and empower them to choose life.
We salute those who provide them alternatives, including pregnancy care centers, and we take pride in the tremendous increase in adoptions that has followed Republican legislative initiatives.
Respect for life requires efforts to include persons with disabilities in education, employment, the justice system, and civic participation. In keeping with that commitment, we oppose the non-consensual withholding of care or treatment from people with disabilities, as well as the elderly and inform, just as we oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide, which endanger especially those on the margins of society. (from LifeNews.com editor Steven Ertelt, Aug. 27, 2008)
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Monday, September 1, 2008
Personal Letters to Barack Obama - 1
Personal Letters to Barack Obama – 1
Happy Labor Day! cinops be gone Monday, September 1, 2008
I don’t know where to start. Why write to you? I think the thought began with your Saddleback appearance and your comments on when does life first begin? Then there was a Washington, DC (LifeNews.com), August 22nd, 2008 article by Steve Ertelt:
“How strongly does Barack Obama believe in unlimited abortions? Strongly enough that the only article he wrote for the “Harvard Law Review” while he was a law student talked about how reverently he believed in legalized abortion. … Obama wrote that government has more important business than “ensuring that any particular fetus is born.” He also decried any limits on abortion, saying the government has an interest in “preventing increasing numbers of children from being born into lives of pain and despair.”
“According to Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt, Obama “remains committed to” the sentiments he expressed in the piece.” I wondered why later, on becoming a Christian, you did not change your mind. Or how about Mother Teresa’s retort, “What do you think Jesus would say of abortion?”
So these letters are a process to inform, persuade and change your mind on abortion.
May I share some things I jotted down this past week? I believe that the mindset of abortion destroys the survival of a stable Black American family; and lends itself to the genocide of Black Americans not only by Planned Parenthood, but by Black American themselves. It is a kind of black person suicide.
This could be a series of letters in understanding the mind and heart of a person who believes in abortion. For him or her, it is like having a tooth ache and then going to the dentist and having a root canal. Or someone who believes that pregnancy is an inconvenience when it interferes with one’s life style. And my life style and career is the most important thing in the world. Unfortunately, women have allowed themselves to be brainwashed and misled on the serious consequences to their health with abortion.
Also in our culture, abortion is a sacred cow and not even scientific evidence can change it. ABORTION IS TO WOMEN WHAT THE SERPENT’S APPLE WAS TO EVE.
This subject on abortion is similar to the study which I have made on the Catholic-in-name-only politician. This Catholic-label fraud-politician does not believe in abortion but in the public arena supports and promotes the two A’s, two E’s, and two SS’s. These are intrinsic evils: abortion on demand, assisted suicide, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage. May I remind you that your V.P. nominee Senator Joe Biden is a CINOP? Check out the blog on Google – cinops be gone.
For predatory singles, abortion is essentially a rip-off by men to take advantage of women in general. It is essentially using women for personal gratification in the dating process. If they should get pregnant then bring them to the abortion mill. There are no smiling faces going to an abortion site. I have been there a couple of times a week for more than 14 years. It is not fair. Abortion harms women and reduces men to wimps. Real men put women back on the pedestal with honor and respect.
Take for example, breast cancer. There is scientific evidence that abortion causes breast cancer. But it suppressed because it is not politically correct. That’s wrong, Barack. I don’t think you have spent much time studying this matter of abortion, the harm it does to women, future mothers and in particular black families.
In closing, we agree with Martin Luther King Jr., that “the ark of the moral universe ends towards justice.” But remember that “Justice is truth in action.”
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish or Vietnamese.
Happy Labor Day! cinops be gone Monday, September 1, 2008
I don’t know where to start. Why write to you? I think the thought began with your Saddleback appearance and your comments on when does life first begin? Then there was a Washington, DC (LifeNews.com), August 22nd, 2008 article by Steve Ertelt:
“How strongly does Barack Obama believe in unlimited abortions? Strongly enough that the only article he wrote for the “Harvard Law Review” while he was a law student talked about how reverently he believed in legalized abortion. … Obama wrote that government has more important business than “ensuring that any particular fetus is born.” He also decried any limits on abortion, saying the government has an interest in “preventing increasing numbers of children from being born into lives of pain and despair.”
“According to Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt, Obama “remains committed to” the sentiments he expressed in the piece.” I wondered why later, on becoming a Christian, you did not change your mind. Or how about Mother Teresa’s retort, “What do you think Jesus would say of abortion?”
So these letters are a process to inform, persuade and change your mind on abortion.
May I share some things I jotted down this past week? I believe that the mindset of abortion destroys the survival of a stable Black American family; and lends itself to the genocide of Black Americans not only by Planned Parenthood, but by Black American themselves. It is a kind of black person suicide.
This could be a series of letters in understanding the mind and heart of a person who believes in abortion. For him or her, it is like having a tooth ache and then going to the dentist and having a root canal. Or someone who believes that pregnancy is an inconvenience when it interferes with one’s life style. And my life style and career is the most important thing in the world. Unfortunately, women have allowed themselves to be brainwashed and misled on the serious consequences to their health with abortion.
Also in our culture, abortion is a sacred cow and not even scientific evidence can change it. ABORTION IS TO WOMEN WHAT THE SERPENT’S APPLE WAS TO EVE.
This subject on abortion is similar to the study which I have made on the Catholic-in-name-only politician. This Catholic-label fraud-politician does not believe in abortion but in the public arena supports and promotes the two A’s, two E’s, and two SS’s. These are intrinsic evils: abortion on demand, assisted suicide, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage. May I remind you that your V.P. nominee Senator Joe Biden is a CINOP? Check out the blog on Google – cinops be gone.
For predatory singles, abortion is essentially a rip-off by men to take advantage of women in general. It is essentially using women for personal gratification in the dating process. If they should get pregnant then bring them to the abortion mill. There are no smiling faces going to an abortion site. I have been there a couple of times a week for more than 14 years. It is not fair. Abortion harms women and reduces men to wimps. Real men put women back on the pedestal with honor and respect.
Take for example, breast cancer. There is scientific evidence that abortion causes breast cancer. But it suppressed because it is not politically correct. That’s wrong, Barack. I don’t think you have spent much time studying this matter of abortion, the harm it does to women, future mothers and in particular black families.
In closing, we agree with Martin Luther King Jr., that “the ark of the moral universe ends towards justice.” But remember that “Justice is truth in action.”
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish or Vietnamese.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)