IT'S IN YOUR FACE, AMERICA! # 1 OF 2

  

  IT'S IN YOUR FACE - AMERICA # 1 of 2

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com -

Ref. https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/transgender-madness-is-sweeping-our-schools-parents-protect-your-children (I see this matter will become a major presidential issue.)

Preface:                                                                                                                                                 It's the ideology of Transgender Genderism. Whether you like it or not, Big Brother (Government) will legalize and push it into our values and lives.  "Every cultural influence faced by children: Hollywood films, the music industry, television shoes, the state school system, and in many cases, even the government promotes values that run directly contrary to the Christian worldview."

Here is one mother's analysis at one school # 1 of 2

"Multiple kindergartners were pulled out of school due to the confusion (and even trauma) they experienced from watching a boy "transform" into a girl. Five year old children know there are differences between boys and girls and this was beyond the ability to comprehend. Parents reported that their kindergartners were asking if the could grow up to become the opposite sex."

  What is most dangerous is still the fact that the state is making an active attempt to stand between parents and children, utilizing the public school system not simply to teach, but to pass on a new set of value, values rooted not in Christian tradition but in the Sexual Revolution.... sex education in Ontario, Canada.... The state is insisting that their educational arm should teach children about sexuality, from their own perspective, with no right "to opt out." Parents recognize that they are fighting for the religious and cultural identity of their children, and are insisting that the state stay out.

    The state has no intention of doing so, of course. One particularly stark example is a letter published by Alberta's Education Minister on August 16, titled "An Open Letter to Alberta's Students," which was then posted to Facebook:

"A few weeks from now, you and thousands of other Alberta (Canada) students will head back to class. And when you do you have the rights that your schools will respect.

You have the right to feel safe and welcome at school. You have the right to create a Gay-Straight Alliance or a Queer-Straight Alliance, and you have the right to name your clubs this way.

You have the right to use the washroom that is consistent with your gender identity.  I want you to know that I will support each and every one of you. Together, we will make sure that the rights you have, &  the policies your school boards have worked on, are being lived out in your schools.

As we stand together, let's embrace the differences in one another. We will all be better for it in the long run. And remember, I'm with you one hundred percent.

David Eggen, Minister of Education, Alberta, Canada

... Bob Mosier, the chief communications officer for the country school system in Maryland, U.S.A, informed his audience that transgender ideology trumps everything, even safety....

Here is one mother's analysis at one school # 2 of 2

The high school saw similar confusion. Two girls spoke out at a board meeting.... There was much discussion at lunch and on the playground of the transgender issue , even among the younger children. My fourth-grader chose not to talk about it all after he determined he was in disagreement with most of his friends. Parents started wearing bright purple buttons to school every day indicating their support of gender ideology. They were impossible to miss and prompted questions from any of the students.

Keep in mind here that not only is the science not "in" on the transgender issue, the available science that we do have is a direct odds with the prevailing gender ideology. The Head Psychiatrist at John Hopkins University announced that they would no longer do sex reassignment surgery because it was damaging and dangerous. Gender dysphoria is still recognized as a diagnosable mental illness - but you won't have heard that recently, so loud is the din coming from the gender ideologues who feel that the science is "transphobic."

At the end of the day  Christian parents are going to have to make the difficult decision to pull their children out of the state system, or risk losing them. ...

George H. Kubeck 

CLINTON FOUNDATION DONORS MET HER AT STATE

CLINTON FOUNDATION OWERS MET WITH HER AT STATE

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com -  Thursday, August 25, 2016

 

Ref. Associated Press: By Stephen Braun and Eileen Sullivan - Many Donors To Clinton Foundation Met with Her at State Department - August 23, 2016

Preface:

    Everything possible must be done to prevent the historic great Democratic Party from becoming the party of lies and corruption. It is not fair to all American. It was a fatal mistake indirectly  for the U.S. Catholic Church and the country when Bill Clinton was reelected President in 1996.

  

  Catholic-in-name-only politicians and their supporters elected Bill Clinton. All other religious beliefs voted in a majority No to Clinton. If Hillary Clinton is elected, we will have a corrupt presidency. . Prevention is worth a pound of cure and tragedies for the nation. (GHK)

 

Washington (AP) -- More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money - either personally or through companies or groups - to the Clinton Foundation. It's an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible Ethics challenges if elected president.

 

    At least 85 of 154 from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to the Associated Press. "Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million."

 

    Donors who were granted time with Clinton included an internationally known economist who asked for help as the Bangladesh government pressured him to resign from a nonprofit bank he ran; a Wall Street executive who sought Clinton's help with a visa problem; and Etee Lauder executives who were listed as meeting with Clinton while to counter gender-based violence in South Africa.

 

    The meetings between  Democratic presidential nominee and foundation do not appear to violate legal agreements Clinton and former president Bill Clinton signed before she joined the state department in 2009. But the frequency of the of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton. "Her calendars and emails released as recently as this week describes scores of contacts she and her top aides had with foundation donors.

 

    The AP's findings represent the first systematic effort to calculate the scope of the intersecting interests of Clinton foundation donors and people who met personally with Clinton or spoke to her by phone about their needs.

 

    The 154 did not include U.S. federal employees or foreign government representatives. Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but were not included in AP's calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties.

 

    Clinton's campaign said the AP analysis was flawed because it did not include in its calculations meetings with foreign diplomats or U.S. government officials, and the meetings AP examined covered only the first half of Clinton's tenure as secretary of state...

 

    Last week, the Clinton Foundation moved to head off ethics concerns about future donations by announcing changes planned if Clinton is elected. On Monday, Bill Clinton said in a statement that if his wife were to win, he would step down from foundation's board and stop all fundraising for it. The foundation would also accept donations only from U.S. citizens and what it described as independent philanthropies, while no longer taking gifts from foreign groups, U.S. companies or corporate charities.

 

    Clinton said the foundation would no longer hold annual meetings of its international aid program, the Clinton Global Initiative, and it would spin off its foreign-based programs to other charities. Those planned would not affect more than 6,000 donors who have already provided the Clinton charity with more than $2 billion in funding since its creation in 2000.....

 

GEORGE H. KUBECK

GUIDANCE FOR THIS ELECTION BY PRIESTS FOR LIFE

GUIDANCE FOR THIS ELECTION BY PRIESTS FOR LIFE

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegone.blogspot.com - Friday, August 19, 2016

 

    "The following may be useful as guidance for those who are unsure of how to vote - or even whether to vote.

    Unless Jesus and the Blessed Mother are on the ballot, we are always going to be choosing imperfect candidates. In this life, everything - including politics - is a messy mixture of good and evil, virtue and sin, of truth and falsehood.

 

    At the same time, there are always differences that can be found between the candidates. When we feel that one is just as bad as the other, that must not become an occasion to lose interest in the process but rather can occasion for focusing even more effort on learning the positions of the candidates.

    These candidates need to focus on distinguishing themselves from their opponent. You can be sure there are things they have said and done to highlight the differences, and so one can is always going to be closer to our values and viewpoints than the other.

 

    In evaluating this, we look also at the differences between parties that those candidates represent. Each party is an entire universe of philosophies, ideologies, causes, positions and people. Each party is a whole army of people who are going to surround and advise the candidates, and fill many positions of influence if that candidate is elected.

    For instance, in case of the presidential race, we have to ask what kind of people this President would nominate on the Supreme Court and other federal courts. We have to ask what direction they lean towards on the most fundamental issues of life, religious freedom, marriage and family - and again what direction their party leans on those issues.

 

    Remember, it is not just that the candidates shapes the office; the office also shapes the candidates, so does the party and its prevailing positions. What kind of people would this President, furthermore, appoint as Surgeon General, Attorney General, Secretary of State, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and so many more. ...

    As the US Bishops stated again at the end of last year in the document "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship":  "Decisions about political life are complex and require the exercise of a well-formed conscience aided by prudence. This exercise of conscience begins with outright opposition to laws and other policies that violate human life or weaken its protection. Those who knowingly, willingly. and directly support public policies or legislation that undermines fundamental moral principles cooperate with evil." (n.31) ...

 

    Even when we conclude that whichever candidates wins will do damage, the analogy of the runaway train may help us. Imagine that you are at the controls of a runaway train and you cannot stop it. But imagine, too, that what you can do is to change the track that is on. At the end of one track you know that it will kill a large number people, and at the end of the other track, a small number of people. What do you do?

    Obviously, you do not want to kill anyone. But you cannot stop the train. In this case, you would obviously change the train to the track where it is going to do the least damage. You are not choosing to kill anyone - the death and destruction are beyond your intentions and beyond your ability to stop. But you are able to decrease the damage ...

 

    Very often elections present us with the choice between a candidate we know we don't want and an alternative about whom we are not sure...

    So the bottom line is that we should not skip an election; we should vote. Sometimes we may think that we are doing wrong by voting for either candidate. But we have to consider the fact that we influence the election whether we like it or not. Skipping a vote also influences the election, because it takes a vote away from the better of the two candidate. So don't sit out the election. Go and vote, and help change the train to the best available track. ..."

 

GEORGE H. KUBECK,

REF. FATHER FR. PAVONE'S "PRIESTS FOR LIFE GOSPEL OF LIFE MINISTERIES" JUL-AUG 2016 #4 WWW.PRIESTFORLIFE.ORG

 

 

WHY IS DR. JIM DOBSON OPTIMISTIC WITH A TRUMP VICTOR?

 WHY IS DR. JIM DOBSON OPTIMISTIC  WITH A TRUMP ELECTION?

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Sunday, August 14, 2016

Ref. http://www.westernjournalism.com/dobson-electing-trump-white-house-unleash-christian-activists/?ulm_source=Email&utm_medium=THENew  ..

 

    FOCUS ON THE FAMILY CHRISTIAN ACTIVIST DR. JAMES DOBSON BELIEVES THAT A DONALD TRUMP PRESIDENCY "WOULD UNLEACH CHRISTIAN ACTIVISTS TO FIGHT FOR THEIR BELIEFS."

 

( WAIT A MINUTE! CHRISTIAN ACTIVIST MUST BEGIN TODAY AND SPEND ALL THEIR TIME DAILY TO REGISTER THE THOUSANDS OF CHRISTIANS WHO ARE NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE. THAT IS THE ONLY WAY TRUMP GETS ELECTED. FOCUS ON VALUES AND ISSUES INVOLVED. GHK)

 

WRITING ON THE WEBSITE WND, DOBSON RECOUNTED A JUNE MEETING IN WHICH HE MET WITH TRUMP AND OTHER CHRISTIAN LEADERS AT TRUMP TOWER IN NEW YORK CITY.

 

AT THE MEETING, HE TOLD TRUMP, "OUR SUPREME COURT HAS STRUCK DOWN BIBLE READING IN SCHOOLS ANE EVEN PROHIBITED PRAYER TO AN UNIDENTIFIED GOD. THEN, THEY BANNED THE POSTING OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ON BULLETING BOARDS. FROM THERE, THE LIMITATION OG RELIGIOUS LIBERTIES HAS BECOME EVEN MORE EGREGIOUS," HE WROTE.

 

"Most recently, President Obama and Hillary Clinton have been referring to "freedom of worship," rather than freedom of religion." Do you understand their motive?They are suggesting that Americans are free to worship in their churches and synagogues, but not in the public square," he told Trump.

 

HE SAID THAT TRUMP RESPONDED BY CALLING IT AN "OUTRAGE THAT CHRISTIANS HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF THEIR RIGHTS TO SPEAK OPENLY ON BEHALF OF THEIR VALUES AND PRINCIPLES IN WHICH THEY BELIEVE."

 

Dobson noted that Trump criticized the Johnson Amendment, a 1954 piece of tax code that bans political participation by churches, as well as other tax-exempt not-for-profit groups. The amendment was supported by then-Senator Lyndon Johnson, D. Texas.

 

Dobson said Trump's promise to overturn the amendment "would have a great impact on Washington because it would unleash Christian activists to fight for their beliefs." Trump has kept faith with the ministers with whom he met. The Republican platform includes a plan to abolish the amendment.

 

"We're going to get rid of that horrible Johnson amendment and we're going to let evangelicals, we're going to let Christians and Jews and people of religion talk without being afraid to talk," Trump said last month.

 

Jerry Falwell Jr., president of Liberty University, has said that eliminating the amendment "is almost as important as the appointment of Supreme Court justices." Trump himself said that ending the ban can be a catalytic moment for religion in America.

 

"I think maybe that will be my greatest contribution to Christianity - and other religions - is to allow you, when you talk religious liberty, to go and speak openly, and if you like somebody to represent you, you should have the right to do it," Trump told Dobson and other clergy at their June meeting, saying religious leaders in America were "petrified" of running afoul of the ban.

 

"You talk about religious liberty and religious freedom, you don't have any religious freedom if you think about it," Trump said then.

 

GEORGE H. KUBECK

 

 

 

AMERICA'S MORAL CRISES ARE MORE THAN TRUMP VS. CLINTON @ 1

America's Moral Crises are More Than Trump vs. Clinton # 1

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Saturday, August 6, 2012

    The tentative tyrannical law SB 1146 in the California legislature is an example of a most serious moral crisis in our nation. It show us how important the results of the November the 8th presidential elections are. It must persuade each one of us on the message of Dante Alighieri, philosopher, scholar and poet.

    "THE HOTTEST PLACES IN HELL ARE RESERVED FOR THOSE WHO, IN TIME OF GREAT MORAL CRISIS, MAINTAIN THEIR NEUTRALITY."

    What does it all mean? As an American and a Christian, you are obligated to vote in this year's presidential elections whether you like the candidate or not. There are many fundamental issues besides the Supreme Court appointments that your vote decides. Here's what SB 1160 is all about?

1.) SB 1146 is so radical, it permits homosexual and transsexual "students" at religious colleges, universities, bible colleges, and seminaries to file harmful and destructive lawsuits against these religious institutions for "unfair discrimination." Simply for upholding Biblical values and principles on sexual behavior.

2.) If SB 1146 becomes law, say good-bye to man-woman married housing on campus and hello to man-man and woman-woman "married" housing.

3.) If SB 1146 becomes law, it's "so long" to female-only dorms and restrooms, since biological males who claim they're "female" can move in and walk in.

4.) If SB 1146 becomes law, it will be illegal for a Christian college to counsel a student struggling with homosexuality.

5.) If SB 1146 becomes law, Christian colleges cannot get rid of a professor who become a homosexual or transsexual activist, indoctrinating students to sin.

6.) And if SB 1146 becomes law, Christian colleges would be required to give homosexual and transsexual activists a "soapbox" on campus to preach their lies.

Bottom line SB 1146 would turn Christian colleges "Unchristian" by forcing upon them the entire homosexual-bisexual-transsexual agenda through court lawsuits.

A) Here's SaveCalifornia.com's strategy: In August, there will be close votes on Assembly and Senate floors. You can help me "pick off" the swing Democrats who are uncomfortable with the thought of violating "separation of Church and State."

Leave voicemails 6 P.M. to 8 A.M. for these 8 members:

1. Lorena Gonzales (Dem) (916) 319-2080 Capitol - (619) 338-8090 district

2. Susan Bonilla (Dem) (916) 319-2014 - Capitol - (925) 521-1511 district

3. Ling Ling Chang (Rep) (916) 319-2055 Capitol - (714) 529-5502 district

4. Tom Daly (Dem) (916) 319-2069 Capitol - (714) 939--8469 district

5. Eduardo Garcia (Dem) (916) 319-2056 - (760) 347-2360 and (760) 355-8656 district

6. Chris Holden (916) 319-2041 Capitol - (626) 351-1947 and (909) 624-7876 district

7. Miguel Santiago (Dem) (916) 319-2053 Capitol - (213) 620-4646 district

8. Shirley Weber (Dem) (916) 319-2079 Capitol - (619) 531-7913 district

GEORGE H. KUBECK - Financial support:  SaveCalifornia.com, P.O. 511, Sacramento, CA 95812 - Tel. 916.265.565050Americas's Moral Crises are More Than Trump vs. Clinton # 1

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Saturday, August 6, 2012

    The tentative tyrannical law SB 1146 in the California legislature is an example of a most serious moral crisis in our nation. It show us how important the results of the November the 8th presidential elections are. It must persuade each one of us on the message of Dante Alighieri, philosopher, scholar and poet.

    "THE HOTTEST PLACES IN HELL ARE RESERVED FOR THOSE WHO, IN TIME OF GREAT MORAL CRISIS, MAINTAIN THEIR NEUTRALITY."

    What does it all mean? As an American and a Christian, you are obligated to vote in this year's presidential elections whether you like the candidate or not. There are many fundamental issues besides the Supreme Court appointments that your vote decides. Here's what SB 1160 is all about?

1.) SB 1146 is so radical, it permits homosexual and transsexual "students" at religious colleges, universities, bible colleges, and seminaries to file harmful and destructive lawsuits against these religious institutions for "unfair discrimination." Simply for upholding Biblical values and principles on sexual behavior.

2.) If SB 1146 becomes law, say good-bye to man-woman married housing on campus and hello to man-man and woman-woman "married" housing.

3.) If SB 1146 becomes law, it's "so long" to female-only dorms and restrooms, since biological males who claim they're "female" can move in and walk in.

4.) If SB 1146 becomes law, it will be illegal for a Christian college to counsel a student struggling with homosexuality.

5.) If SB 1146 becomes law, Christian colleges cannot get rid of a professor who become a homosexual or transsexual activist, indoctrinating students to sin.

6.) And if SB 1146 becomes law, Christian colleges would be required to give homosexual and transsexual activists a "soapbox" on campus to preach their lies.

Bottom line SB 1146 would turn Christian colleges "Unchristian" by forcing upon them the entire homosexual-bisexual-transsexual agenda through court lawsuits.

A) Here's SaveCalifornia.com's strategy: In August, there will be close votes on Assembly and Senate floors. You can help me "pick off" the swing Democrats who are uncomfortable with the thought of violating "separation of Church and State."

Leave voicemails 6 P.M. to 8 A.M. for these 8 members:

1. Lorena Gonzales (Dem) (916) 319-2080 Capitol - (619) 338-8090 district

2. Susan Bonilla (Dem) (916) 319-2014 - Capitol - (925) 521-1511 district

3. Ling Ling Chang (Rep) (916) 319-2055 Capitol - (714) 529-5502 district

4. Tom Daly (Dem) (916) 319-2069 Capitol - (714) 939--8469 district

5. Eduardo Garcia (Dem) (916) 319-2056 - (760) 347-2360 and (760) 355-8656 district

6. Chris Holden (916) 319-2041 Capitol - (626) 351-1947 and (909) 624-7876 district

7. Miguel Santiago (Dem) (916) 319-2053 Capitol - (213) 620-4646 district

8. Shirley Weber (Dem) (916) 319-2079 Capitol - (619) 531-7913 district

GEORGE H. KUBECK - Financial support:  SaveCalifornia.com, P.O. 511, Sacramento, CA 95812 - Tel. 916.265.565050

JUDICIAL WATCH REPORT: FRAUD IN NATIONAL ELECTIONS

  JUDICIAL WATCH REPORT: FRAUD IN NATIONAL ELECTIONS

In pursuit of the truth - http://www.cinopsbegoneblogspot.com - Thursday, August 5, 2016

Excerpts from "Representative Democracy in Crisis" by Judicial Watch June 15, 2016

1) America's voter registration system is outdated, inaccurate and riddled with opportunities for voter fraud on a massive scale. To wit:

2) Significant numbers of non-U.S. citizens are voting in American elections, despite laws in all 50 states that prohibit voting by non-citizens.

 

In 2012, the highly respected and non-partisan Pew Center on the States, a division of the Pew Charitable Trusts, released a stunning report entitled "Inaccurate, Costly, and Inefficient: Evidence That America's Voter Registration System Needs and Upgrade."

Their study detailed massive inefficiencies and inaccuracies that exist in our nation's voter registration system. Regardless of one's political opinions, the findings of this study are pf deep concern to every American who believes that our elections should be conducted honestly, efficiently and according to the law...

 

1. Approximately 12.7 million voter records nationwide were identified that appeared to be out of date and do not reflect the voter's current information.

2.  Over 2.6 million people were registered to vote in two states, and more than 68,000 people were registered to vote in three states. In all, more than 2.75 million people are registered to vote in more than one state.

 

3. 1.8 million deceased individuals were still listed on current voter registration rolls.

4. About 12 million current voter registration records were identified as having incorrect addresses, meaning that either voters had moved or that errors in the information made it unlikely that the United Postal Service could reach them in order to update their voter records.

 

5. Once duplicates in these categories were eliminated, approximately 24 million voter records (nearly 13% of the national total) were estimated to be inaccurate or no longer valid.

6. The Pew study points to two other studies that found 8 to 12 percent of all voter registration records contain errors.

 

    A case in point is in Virginia. While helping Virginia successfully defend its participation in a multi-state "crosscheck" of voter registrations, Judicial Watch learned that tens of thousands of Virginia registrants had subsequently registered in another state - and that about 17,000 Virginia registrants were registered in at least three states...

 

    The continuing failure of state election officials (Republican and Democrats) to follow federal law and "clean" their voter rolls of deceased, moved and other ineligible voters between elections is open invitation to massive voter fraud.

 

    For example, in May 2016 CBS News in Los Angeles aired a stunning expose' of how California's failure to clean voter rolls resulted in votes being cast by literally hundreds (215 in Los Angeles County alone) of DEAD people....

    In 2000, a shift of less than 600 vote in Florida would have given that state's Electoral College votes and the White House to Al Gore instead of George W. Bush.

 

    Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted released a study that identified 20 local races -- 14 elections and 6 ballot issues - that were decided in Ohio in 2014 by a single vote or by a tie-breaking procedure. A similar Ohio study for 2013 found that 43 local races - 35 elections and 8 ballot issues) were decided in that state by one vote or by tie-break. It is no exaggeration that the lawful votes of thousands of Americans can be "canceled" by illegal votes. Astonishing!

 The three distinguished academicians (Jesse T. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha and David C. Earnest) from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, published their peer-reviewed and detailed scholarly study entitles "Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections?" based on date from the 2008 and 2019 elections.

 

    Their research showed that about 25 % of the U.S. non citizen population was registered to vote in 2010 - including legal and illegal aliens! The same study showed that 6.4 percent on non-citizens had illegally voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent had voted in 2010.

 

GEORGE H. KUBECK -- www.judicialwatch.org --Tel. 202-646-5172 --- 425 Third Street, SW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20024