(4) LETTERS TO "AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"

                                 (4) LETTERS TO "AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"                                   IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH- CINOPS BE GONE -  WED. APRIL 28, 2021

 

 

Dear U.N. Ambassador Greenfield,

 

    This is a short and last letter for now.(The hope is that Ms. Greenfield will change her mind about America.)  Everything possible must be done to promote Dr. Ben Carson, Euro-Surgeon as our next U.N. ambassador in the next administration. He is the ideal symbol and candidate on the Conservative side. I will be repeating this over and over again. All candidates running for the Conservative (Republican) presidency of the United States must promote Ben Carson to be our next U.N. Ambassador. (I will be using the term Conservative for there are conservative independents, democrats, libertarians etc.)

 

   At this time in history, Carson has two main ideas he wants to share with the American people. Firstly, from his personal Black American experience, America is the least racist country in the world. Secondly, anything that needs to be studied and investigated, needs to proceed and not threatened or bullied into censorship. If possible, I plan to quote excerpts of his book, One Nation.

 

    The biggest price, Ben Carson will pay is that the American anarchists and communists may threaten his life, and the FBI's job is to protect him. That is asking a lot of Uero-Surgeon Ben Carson. All of us in his audience need to be observant. Again American communists are masters of deceit, deception and diabolical. The three D's! Karl Marx as a diabolical man. In America, Veritas!

 

++++++++++++

 

Ref. Hillsdale College, "IMPRIMIS" Christopher F. Ruf, "Critical Race Theory: How to Fight It." May 2021 - Volume 50 Number 3 (continued)

 

    In terms of principles, we need to employ our own moral language rather than allow ourselves to be confined by the categories of critical race theory. For example, we often find ourselves debating "diversity." Diversity as most as most of us understand it is generally good, all things being equal, but is of secondary value.

 

    We should be talking about and aiming at excellence a common standard that challenges people of all backgrounds to achieve their potential. On the scale of desirable ends, excellence beats diversity every time. Similarly, in addition to pointing out the dishonesty of the historical narrative which critical race theory us predicated, we must promote the true history of America- a story that is honest about injustices in American history, but that places them in the context of our nation's high ideals and the progress we have made towards realizing them.

 

   Genuine American history is rich with stories of achievements and sacrifice that will move the hearts of Americans - in stark to the grim and pessimistic narrative pressed by critical race theorists. Above all we must have courage - the fundamental virtue required in our time. Courage to stand and speak the truth. Courage to withstand epithets. Courage to face the mob. Courage to shrug off the scorn of the elites. When enough of us overcome the fear that currently prevents so many from speaking out, the hold of critical race theory will begin to slip. And courage begets courage. 

 

    It's much harder to stop 10, 20, 100, 1,000, 1,000,000 or more who stand up together for the principles of America. Truth and justice are on our side. I we can muster the courage, we will win.

 

Respectfully yours,

 

George H. Kubeck

(3) LETTERS TO "AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"

 (3) LETTERS TO "AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM SAT. APR. 24/21

 

Dear Ambassador Greenfield,

     "The George Floyd Video" made a deep impression on me. I recall when I got married in Metz, France with my fiancee from Massachusetts, a black American soldier whom we invited to our wedding did not attend. Someone put him on duty for that day. And then again back in Long Beach, a black American teacher had trouble renting a home in Belmont Shore in the early 1960s. As a new citizen, I saw that.

   

     But that doesn't mean that we are all white racists and deserve the the Marxist/Communist interpretation of American History. And that is what Critical Race Theory is all about. Furthermore, every U.N. member that you will meet and talk to has had thousands of their own citizens move to the U.S.A. and become citizens. They just love this country and the foundational principles of this nation. U.N officials will listen to you with their left ear and it will all go out in their right ear. Also, if the communists can do this propaganda to America, they can do it to each nation in the U.N.

 

    The truth is our most powerful weapon. Everything possible must be done to keep Ben Carson, neuro-surgeon and at one time 1916 Presidential Candidate in the news. Why? He must be our future United Nations Ambassador. Mrs. Greenfield is no Ken Carson. It is the duty of the National Tea Party to get involved in this matter. Have as many interviews with Ben Carson on TV.  "Critical Race Theory" is  Putin's revenge on America for losing the Cold War. Gutfield is great with his analysis on the Big Five 2-3 P.M. and in the evening. also with Laura Ingraham on the Fox News Channel.

 

    Also, a special studies program for all Americans must include the following: Recall we have had real American traitors and useful Idiots in the past. Research the following on this blog.

 

1) "Enemies of Permanent Things" 1969, Dr. Russell Kirk

2) "The Venona Secrets: Exposing Soviet Espionage and America's Traitors, Herbert Romerstine and        Eric Breindl.  2000  Check this book out and find out if Senator McCarthy was right or wrong!  There were many Americans who sold their souls to Communist Russia.

3) "Useful Idiots" How Liberals Got It Wrong in the Cold War and Still Blame America First, 2003, by

     Mona Charen

4) "Blood Letters" 2018, The Untold Story of Lin Zhao, A Martyr in Mao's China, by Lian XI

++++++++++++

Ref. Hillsdale College. "IMPRIMIS" Christopher F. Rufo, "Critical Race Theory: How to Fight It." 

May 2021 - Volume 50 Number 3  (continued)

    There are three parts to a successful strategy to defeat the forces of critical race theory: government action, grass roots mobilization, and an appeal to principle. We already see examples of governmental action. Last year, one of my reports led President Trump to issue an executive order banning critical-race theory-based in the federal government.

    President Biden  rescinded this order on his first day in office, but it provides a model for governors and municipal leaders to follow. This year, several state legislatures have introduced bills to achieve the same goals; preventing public institutions to achieve the same goal: preventing public institutions from conducting programs that stereotype, scapegoat, or demean people on the basis of race.

 

    And have organized a coalition of attorneys to file law suits against school and government agencies that impose critical race-theory-based programs on grounds of the First Amendment (which protects citizens from compelled speech) the Fourteenth Amendment (which provides equal protection under the law) and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Which prohibits public institutions from discriminating on the basis of race)

    On the grassroots level, a multiracial and bipartisan coalition is emerging to do battle against critical race theory. Parents are mobilizing against racially divisive curricula in public schools and employees are increasingly speaking out against Orwellian reeducation in the workplace. When they see what is happening, Americans are naturally outraged that critical thinking promotes three crap ideas - race essentialism, collective guilt, and neo segregation - which violate the basic principles of equality and justice. Anecdotally, many Chinese-Americans have told me that having survived the 
Cultural Revolution in their former country, they refuse to let the same thing happen here....

George H. Kubeck

# 17 -A SERIOUS REPORT ON BLESSED CASTELLO, O.P.

 # 17 - A SERIOUS REPORT ON BLESSED CASTELLO, O.P.

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - FRI. APR. 23,2021

 

THE LIFE OF BLESSED MARGARET CASTELLO, O.P.

By Father William R. Bonneville O.P.Tan Books, Carolina, 2016, Chapter 7, p.32-4

 

    It did not take them long to get ready, as every possible preparation had been made the day before. Their mounted escort, consisting of a dozen men-at-arms whom Parisio had carefully chosen, was already outside the main entrance, their horses neighing and pawing the ground, impatient to get started. At the sight of the soldiers, Lady Emilia was reassured; she would have nothing to fear from the bandits who lurked in the lonelier stretches of the forest, waiting to attack unprotected travelers.

 

    The church bell had barely begun to sound the hour of Prime when  Parisio gave the order and all mounted their horses. In the dim uncertain light of early morning, as the party approached the southern gate of the city, a challenge out. Instantly the travelers halted. The Parisio advanced at slow pace, while he shook back his fur-trimmed hood so that the guards might see his face. The officer of the guard stepped forward to question him; as he did so, he recognized his commander and saluted him. "Your Excellency! The Captain of the People!"

 

    "Open the gate," ordered Parisio curtly, " and lower the drawbridge. Quick! It's urgent." The soldiers ran to comply with his orders, and they watched with curiosity as the party, everyone completely muffled in their cloaks as protection against the cold morning air, silently filed through the gate... but contrary to their expectation of the guard, the travelers turned in the opposite direction and soon were swallowed up in the morning fog. 

 

    Until the rising sun had dispelled the fog, progress was slow because of the wretchedness of the road. The present-day tourist, journeying from Mercatello to Citta di Castello, travels over a wide, splendid highway that crosses the Apennine ranges in long, easy grades. But the only road available to Parisio was a miserable unpaved one, barely wide enough for a cart. There were no bridges across the occasional mountain streams, but fortunately, during autumn the waters was low. As the road took a fairly direct line to Citta di Castello, many of the grades were steep and dangerous. It was a journey that put to sever test both the endurance and surefootedness of the horses....

 

    Unlike Perugia Assisi, the town was on level ground and the travelers could see the entire cityprocure accommodations at the best inn, for Lady Emilia declared herself exhausted by the long arduous journey. So, while the womenfolk rested, the Captain set forth to gather what information he might concerning the Franciscan shrine. He began his inquiries at the Church of San Francisco, and before he finished his investigation he had visited a considerable part of the town. As a result he became convinced that genuine cures were being effected at the shrine of Fra Giacomo. For the first time he began to entertain hope that Margaret might be cured.

 

    Returning to the inn, he recounted to his wife and daughter what he had learned. "I have talked to three people who claim they were cured. I have checked their statements with their relatives and with neighbors, and in two cases, with their physicians. I am now convinced that genuine miracles have been performed." "Tomorrow morning, Margaret," said Parisio, "your mother and I will take you to Franciscan church. We can go to Confession and Confession and receive Holy Communion before we pray for a cure....

    Lady Emilia stared in astonishment at her husband. Confession? Communion? Noticing her stunned look. Parisio gave her a reassuring gesture; with relief, Emilia realized the talk about the Sacraments had been solely for their daughter's benefit.

 

    "I want you, my dear child," continued Parisio, "to pray tonight and tomorrow morning with your whole heart and soul for a complete cure. You will obey me in this matter won't you, Margaret?"

It was the first time her father had ever called her his "dear child!" Never had her parents spoken so kindly to her, and - what was more important to her - never had she heard them mention Confession and Communion until this day. She was so happy that tears of joy began to trickle down her cheeks. How fortunate she was to have such wonderful parents! 

   

She would soon learn just how fortunate she was and how wonderful her parents could be.

 

George H. Kubeck

 (2) LETTERS TO "AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - Thurs. Apr. 22/21

The Wall Street Journal, Friday, April 16, 2021, excerpts from 

"The Ambassador of Blame America First"

 

"She said one of her priorities will be addressing racial injustice and spoke of her own experience with discrimination... I share these stories and others to acknowledge, on the international stage, that I have personally experienced one of America's greatest imperfections, I have seen for myself how the original sin of slavery weaved white supremacy into our Founding documents and principles."...

      "Racism is the problem of the racist. And it is the problem of the society that produces the racist. And   in today's world, that is every society." she added. "In Ahmaud Arbery, and so many other black Americans."

Preamble:

    "Somehow, it was easier for public figures to speak of their faith a century ago. Said poet John Greenleaf Whittier:  "My ground of hope - for myself and for humanity - is in that Divine fullness which was manifested in the life, teachings, and self-sacrifice of Christ.  In the infinite mercy of God so revealed, and not in any work or merit of my own nature, I humbly, yet hopefully, trust." 

Northrop, Witnesses, 501

Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among them these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

 

Dear Ambassador Greenfield,

     Bishop Fulton Sheen would turn over in his grave concerning your thoughts about America. In his weekly program "Life is Worth Living." he educated and informed Americans about the evils of communism. Yesterday,  on Cavuto, Fox News, there was an interview of Ben Carson.  He said we are the least racist society in the world. 600,000 Americans died in the Civil War to stop it. Slavery was outlawed in 1865. Ben wrote a book about America called, "One Nation." I did book reports on it.

 

 Critical Race Theory is a  Communist/Marxist interpretation of American history. Historically, Communism itself is recognized as an evil interpretation of human nature, deliberately atheistic and in your face God, natural law, common sense and reason. I believe the original intent was to use this mindset of White Racism (Critical Race Theory) against us  in the Cold War we had with Communist Russia. (1945-1989)

      When Communist Russia lost the Cold War (Thank God for President Reagan), KBG Vladimir Secret Agent Putin sought revenge. Critical Race Theory is KGB Putin's  Revenge upon America!  If it weren't for the existence of President Ronald Reagan, the Cold War would still be on. 

++++++++++++

    Ref. Hillsdale College, IMPRIMIS, Chris. F. Rufo, "Critical Race Theory: and How to Fight It."

May 2021 - Volume 50 Number 3 

" An equity-based form of government would mean the end not only of private property, but also of individual rights, equality under the law, federalism, and free speech... The Treasury Department held a training session telling staff members that "virtually all white people contribute to racism" and that they must convert "everyone in the Federal government to the ideology of "anti-racism." ...

 

    And the Sandia National Laboratories, which designs America's nuclear arsenal, sent white male executives to a three-day reeducation camp, where they were told that "white male culture" was analogous to the "KKK," "white supremacists," and "mass killings."  The executives were then forced to renounce their "white male privilege" and write letters of apology to fictitious women and people of color."...

 

    English-speaking Christian males are members of the oppressor class and must atone for their privilege and "covert white supremacy." In Philadelphia, an elementary school forced fifth graders to celebrate "Black Communism" and simulated a Black Power rally to free 1960s radical Angela Davis from prison, where she had been held on charges of murder. And in Seattle, the school teachers told white teachers that they are guilty of "spirit murder" against black children and must "bankrupt [their] privilege in  acknowledgment of [their] thieved inheritance." ... This ideology will not stop until it has devoured all of our institutions. 

George H. Kubeck

(8) REPORT ON THE CATALYST - APRIL, 2021 - EQUALITY ACT IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN

 (8) REPORT ON THE CATALYST - APRIL, 2021 - EQUALITY ACT IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - WED. APRIL 21, 2021

 

    According to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the Equality Act is "about ending discrimination"; may be its intent, but its effect is to promote the most comprehensive assault on Christianity ever written into law. This explains why the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has been fighting this proposed law for years. Most recently it said the Equality Act "would discriminate against people of faith." The Catholic League and many other civil rights and religious organizations have also sounded the alarm.

    The Equality Act has two major goals: It would amend the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include sexual orientation and gender identity to definition of sex; it would also undermine the Religious Freedom Restoration Act by allowing gay rights to trump religious rights.

 

    The 1964 Civil Rights Act was primarily motivated by a desire to end racial segregation. It banned discrimination based on race, sex or national origin. That was it. It said absolutely nothing about sexual orientation, and it certainly didn't address transgender rights - it wan't even a concept in 1960s. Adding sexual orientation and gender identity to this law not only violates the intent of legislation, it unduly burdens houses of worship and other religious organizations.

     In order to end racial segregation, the 1964 Civil Rights Act banned discrimination in Public accommodations. Blacks had historically been denied services in many public facilities, ranging from diners to hotels. The Equality Act goes way beyond this, so much so that it disfigures the meaning of this historic 1964 law.

 

    The Equality Act not only covers homosexuals and transgender persons, it expands public accommodation to include consumer services such as healthcare. In practice this would a disaster. It would mean, for example, that healthcare providers woulds be forced to provide hormone therapy and surgical procedures that are required to change the physical characteristics associated with sex changes.

      One does not have to be a Catholic healthcare practitioner to register moral and religious objections to this "healthcare" initiative. Will anyone be allowed to voice objections to these procedures pointing out the long-term physical and mental problems associated with sex reassignment? What about parents who learn that their child wants to switch his or her sex? Will their rights be respected or eviscerated.

    It has been increasingly clear that the expansion of rights to transgender women - really biological males who identify as female - has come at the expense of rights for biological females, Take sports.  Boys and men would be allowed to compete in sports with girls and women, thus unfairly altering women's athletics. Females would also loose their primary rights. These biological males can use their locker rooms, rest rooms and shower facilities that have always been reserved for females. None of this has anything to do with why the 1962 Civil Rights Act was passed. There are other problems with this bill that alone should be enough to stop it from ever becoming law. 

    In 1993, Re. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Chuck Schumer co-sponsored the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA); It was signed by Clinton. This was a major victory for religious liberty. But now Pelosi and Schumer regret their vote, even to the point of supporting the Equality Act, knowing full well that it exempts itself from RFRA! This is perverse. There could be no more serious undercutting of religious liberty than what they are proposing.

 

    It would mean that Catholics, evangelicals, Orthodox Jews, Mormons, Muslims and many other religious communities could not raise religious liberty objections to any of the aforementioned rights to any of the aforementioned rights of transgender women. In effect, religious entities would be secularized.

     For example, if the Equality Act were to become law, Catholic foster care programs would be shut down. They would have to agree to allow two men to adopt children - a clear violation of Church teachings or lose Federal funding. This is the kind of gotcha type element that makes this bill so pernicious.

 

    Currently, Catholic hospitals can legally refuse to perform abortions. Under the Equality Act, they would either lose federal funding or be forced to get into the abortion business. That is because refusing abortion services would be declared "pregnancy" discrimination.... Catholic schools, for instance, would be expected to change their teachings on sexual ethics to suit the radical LGBT agenda.... George H. Kubeck

P.S. For more information on "Catalyst" tel. (212) 371 - 3191

(1) LETTERS TO AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"

 (1) LETTERS TO "AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST"

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - TUES. APR. 20, 2021

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2021 - EDITORIAL:

THE AMBASSADOR OF BLAME AMERICA FIRST

       "The U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations is supposed to speak for American values and interests. But judging by her recent remarks, new ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield is going to speak mainly about the faults of her own country.

    President Biden' Ambassador spoke to Al Sharpton's National Action Network, and her recitation of America's sins could have come from China's Global Times. She said one of her priorities will be addressing racial injustice and spoke of her own experience with discrimination.

     Fair enough, but then she kept going: "I share these stories and others to acknowledge, on the international stage, that I have personally experienced on of America's greatest imperfections, I have seen for myself how the original sin of slavery weaved white supremacy into our founding documents and principles."

   How about American progress on race since the founding, such as the Civil War that ended slavery or the civil-rights movement? Ms. Thomas-Greenfield has other ideas. "Racism is the problem of the racist. And it is the problem of the society that produces the racist. And in today's world, that is every society," she added. "In America, that takes many forms. It's the white supremacy that led to the killings of George Floyd, Brenna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and so many other Black Americans. It's the spike in hate crimes over the past three years - against Latino Americans, Sikh and Muslim Americans, Jewish Americans, and immigrants. [This part is a lie]  And it is the bullying, discrimination, brutality, and violence that Asian Americans face everyday especially since the outbreak of Covid - 19. [This part is an exaggeration.]

      Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield managed to work in a passing reference to Burma's treatment of the Rhingya and China's "genocide" of the Ughurs. But she put the Biden Administration's decision to rejoin the U.N. Human Rights Council - with members like Cuba, China, Russia, Venezuela - largely in the context of the moral equivalence of the U.S. and those offenders."

 

Dear Ambassador Greenfield,                                                                        Tuesday, April 20, 2021

 

    My purpose in writing to you is to change your mind about America. Think of America the way immigrant Founding Father Alexander Hamilton saw it. I don't think he was white. He never owned slaves. For myself, I am a proud legal immigrant from Canada.  In less than five years via membership in the U.S. Army, 3 years three months, U.S. Citizen, Apr. 4, 1962.

    I write on behalf of the millions of of legal immigrants who are U.S. citizens today. We believe that it was a tragedy in your life when you came in contact with Marxist/Communist teachers. The Marxist/Communists are Masters of Deceit and Deception. There are numerous books written about them. Will share them with you!  Sadly, you and many others have been duped.

 

Ref. "Hillsdale College, IMPRIMIS, Chris. F. Rufo, "Critical Race Theory: What It Is & How to Fight It. " May 2021 - Volume 50 Number 3

 

"By the mid-1960s, Marxist intellectuals in the West had begun to acknowledge these failures. They recoiled at revelations of Soviet atrocities and came to realize that workers revelations of Soviet atrocities and came to realize that workers' revolutions would never occur in Western Europe or the United States... But rather than abandon their Leftist political project, Marxist scholars in the West simply adapted their revolutionary theory to the social and racial unrest of the 1960s.

 Abandoning Marx's economic dialectic of capitalist and workers, then substituted race for class and sought to create a revolutionary coalition of the dispossessed based on racial and ethnic categories....

    Critical race theory is an academic discipline, formulated in the 1990's built on the intellectual framework of identity-based Marxism... There are a series of euphemisms deployed by its supporters to describe critical race theory including "equity," "social justice," "diversity and inclusion," and "culturally responsive teaching." Critical race theorists, masters of language construction  realize that "neo-Marxism" would be hard sell. equity on the other hand, sounds non-threatening and is easily confused with the American principle of equality....

     In contrast to equality, equity as defined and promoted by critical race theorists is little more than reformulated Marxism. In the name of equity, UCLA Law Professor and critical race theorist Cheryl Harris has proposed suspending private property rights, seizing land & wealth & redistributing them along racial lines. George H. Kubeck

(7) CATALYST ISSUE APRIL 2021 - CATHOLIC CHURCHES ROLE IN ENDING SLAVERY!

 (7) CATALYST ISSUE APRIL 2021 - CATHOLIC CHURCHES ROLE IN ENDING SLAVERY

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOSGSPOT.COM - SUN. APR. 18/21

 

    The Catholic is the nation's largest civil rights organization. It defends individual Catholics and institutional Catholics against defamation and discrimination. Annual membership dues are $30., Senior citizens $20., and student dues are $20. Members receive Catalyst, the League Journal/. The Catalyst is published monthly except for combined issues of Jan.-Feb. and July-August. Today's report in on p. 13. "Catholic Churches Roe In Ending Slavery. Here is their address:

"Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights," 450 Seventh Ave. 34th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10123

     "During Black History Month, the subject of slavery was discussed in many forums. In some ubiquitous and historically accepted institutions in history. There is not a place on the globe where slavery did not exist and protests against it have been extremely rare. The Hebrews, Greeks and Romans saw nothing wrong with it, and neither did the Africans, Chinese and Japanese. Aristotle thought slavery was a normal way of life.

 

    It is important to recognize that, notwithstanding the American experience, slavery has almost had to do anything to do with race: people of the same race: people of the same race, ethnicity, tribe, or clan enslaved each other. Moreover it was not uncommon for former slaves to enslave others. That slavery still exists today in parts of Africa (which did not make it illegal until the 1980s) is proof of its tenacious legacy. 

     The first person in history to condemn slavery publicly was Saint Patrick. A former slave himself, he enunciated the wisdom of natural law without specifically invoking it. All men were created equal in the eyes of God, he said, and should therefor be treated as equal in the eyes of God, he said, and should therefor be treated as equals in law. It was this quintessentially Catholic concept  all humans possess equal dignity - all humans possess equal dignity - that eventually proved to be triumphant.

 

    In antiquity, slavery was so common that Pope Pius I in the second century and Pope Callistus I in the third century were slaves. It wasn't until the fourth century that a bishop rejected slavery, and that was Gregory of Nyssa,

    In practice, the Church's opposition to slavery began with its objections to the inhuman treatment of slaves; only later did it condemn the institution itself. But by protesting, it did more to lay the groundwork for the eventual demise of slavery than any other institution, secular or religious.     

 

    Given the Church's role in opposing slavery it was troubling to read a recent Washington Post article posted on line by Shannon Dee Williams, a professor of history at Villanova University. Apparently unaware of Saint Patrick and Gregory of Nyssa (who later become a saint), she claims the Church played "the leading role" in the history of slavery. She even goes on to say that the Church was "the first global institution to declare that Black lives did not matter."

    This is not simply an example of shoddy scholarship - it is a vicious lie.To make her case she cites papal bulls by Pope Nicholas V 1452 and Pope Alexander VI in 1493 as evidence that "the Catholic Church authorized enslavement of Africans and seizure on 'non-Christian lands." This account is seriously flawed. 

    Nicholas V's "Dum Diveras" was a response to those who sought "to extinguish [the] Christian religion." The pope argued that the King of Portugal had a right to protect his people and to hold in "perpetual servitude" the Saracens (Muslims) and pagans who threatened Christianity. The pope did not make sweeping statements about enslaving Africans, as Williams contends.

    Pope Alexander VI's "Inter Caetera" awarded colonial rights over newly discovered lands to Spain and Portugal. Nowhere in the Papal Bull does the pope even mention slaves or slavery. For Williams to imply otherwise is scurrilous.

 

    Had Williams dug a little deeper she would have cited Pope Paul III's decision to forbade slavery in the New World under penalty of excommunication. This was in 1537, at a time when no other leader, secular or religious, was denouncing slavery. In 1839, Pope Gregory XVI also condemned slavery, but it was Pope Leo XIII in 1888 who took the most authoritative steps to abolish this institution.

     It was the Catholic Church's teaching on natural law - all humans possess equal dignity dignity and equal rights - that proved to be determinative in the end. Aristotle may be the father of natural law but he thought it was normal for slaves to obey their masters. The Church disagreed. It invoked natural law rights - our equal rights come from God, not government - thus making the case to undermine slavery.... George H. Kubeck     

(6) CATALYST ISSUE APRIL 2021 - "BECERRA IS A MENACE TO LIFE AND LIBERTY"

 (6) CATALYST ISSUE APRIL 2021 - "BECERRA IS A MENACE TO LIFE AND LIBERTY"

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - SAT. APR. 17, 2021

 

Excerpts from "Catalyst Issue of April, 2021, p.6- 7 "Journal of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights," Vol. 48, #3: President : William A. Donahue

HERE ARE REASONS 11 TO 16 WHY WE OPPOSED BECERRA:`

 

11) Few Attorneys General in the U.S. fought more ferociously to deny the Little Sisters of the Poor their religious rights than Becerra. The nuns objected to being forced to pay for abortion-inducing drugs, contraception and sterilization in their Healthcare Plan. At every stage, Becerra hounded them. He even filed lawsuits against the Trump administration for shielding the nuns from HHS mandate passed under the Obama administration.

 

12) Should a baker be forced against his will to make a wedding cake for two men planning to marry? The owner did not object to selling his products to gay men. What he found objectionable, on religious grounds, was being ordered to inscribe a wedding for two homosexuals:to do so would force him to affirm their status. Becerra said too bad for him - his religious should be overridden. This explains why he filed an amicus brief on the part of the gay men. But once again he lost. 

 

13) Practicing Catholics, among others do not believe that people of the same sex should be adoptive parents. Anyone is free to disagree, but respect for the diversity that Catholicism affords suggest that Catholic foster care agencies should be entitled to practice what they preach. Becerra disagrees. He is so weeded to the LGBT agenda that as Calif. Attorney General he even supported a law to deny California  public agencies, public university and boards the right to fund work-related trips to states that respect the religious liberty interests of Foster Care Agencies.

 

14) In Jan, 2017, at his confirmation hearings as Calif. Attorney General, Becerra stunned lawyers when he said that it was one thing to respect the religious rights of individuals, quite another to extend these rights to organization. Thus he tried to marginalize houses of worship, faith-based organizations and religious non-profits. It doesn't get more absurd, or constitutionally wrongheaded than this.

 

15) The Equality Act is not law but it is strongly supported by Biden. If passed, it would be the most serious assault on religious liberty liberty ever enacted. [ Pelosi passed it. ghk ] As a congressman, Becerra was cosponsor of this bill. In the name of abortion and LBGT rights, it would not only devastate the autonomy of Catholic hospitals, it  would ensure that boys who claim to be girls could compete against biological girls in sports. It would even allow them to shower with girls. When religious liberty objections were made, Becerra dismissed them outright.

 

16) Over the past year, California Governor Gavin Newsom imposed the most draconian Covid-19 restrictions on Houses of Worship in the nation. His limitation on occupancy have been so severe as to abolish the rights of churchgoers. Becerra was delighted to enforce these restrictions.

    For all of these reasons, it would be hard to think of a more unfit person in the United States to serve as Secretary of HHS than Xavier Becerra. His position on life and religious liberty make him an outlier and should have automatically disqualified him from serving in this capacity. But Biden got his way. 

BECERRA IS NO VICTIM OF BIGOTRY

We have a one-half page on support of Becessa by Sister Carol Keehan ... Becerra is no victim of anti-Catholicism. In fact he is a master sponsor of it.

George H. Kubeck

   

P.S.The Becerra vote to confirm was 50 to 49 U.S. Senators. It demonstrated a painful truth for all Catholic Bishops and members of the American Catholic Church. All Catholic Republican Senators voted against Becerra. All Democratic Catholic-in-name-only Senators voted YES for Becerra to get to the 50 vote. They voted to promote the Culture of Death in America and the Leftist/Marxist Agenda which our country is suffering through today. 

(5) CATALYST ISSUE APRIL, 2021 - "BECERRA IS A MENACE TO LIFE AND LIBERTY"

 (5) CATALYST ISSUE APRIL, 2021 - "BECERRA IS A MENACE TO LIFE AND LIBERTY"

VERITAS - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - FRI. APR. 16, 2021

 

Excerpts from "Catalyst" Issue of April, 2021, p. 6, "Journal of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights," Vol. 48, # 3:  President: William A. Donahue, PhD.

   

    Xavier Becerra was President Biden's worst nominee for a Cabinet post. On March 18, he was confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). We did our best to fight him, pressing legislators to do their job. The Senate voted 50-49 to confirm him. The man is a menace to life and liberty and has no business serving in this capacity. Here are 16 reasons why we opposed Becerra.

 

1.) It would be impossible to find a more enthusiastic advocate of abortion-on-demand.... Indeed, he is an extremist. That is why he secures a 100% rating from NARAL and Planned Parenthood and 0% score from National Right to Life.

 

2) Beccera's lust for abortion even allows him to support partial-birth abortion... allows the abortionist to crush the skull of a baby who is 80% born to that the child can exist the woman's birth canal.

 

3.) For all the talk about allowing pregnant women the right to choose, Becerra is on record seeking to prevent them from choosing life... he lost in the U.S. Supreme Court in his attempt to effectively close down crisis pregnancy centers across the state.

 

4.) If someone who assaults a pregnant woman winds up killing the unborn child, that would seem to make him a criminal. But not to Becerra. As a congressman, he voted against a bill that would criminalize the killing of the unborn child...

 

5.) Though it is hard to believe there are underground railroads run by abortion extremists that literally transport minors to states where they can easily get an abortion... Becerra voted against a ban on this hideous practice. 

 

6.) Beccera proved himself to be a pro-abortion zealot once again when he brought charges against pro-life activists who went under cover to film Planned Parenthood Officials trafficking in aborted baby parts. He brought felony charges them... In 2017, a judge dismissed 14 of the 15 charges...

 

7.) Embryonic stem cell research, unlike other kinds of stem research, is a life and death issue. Science tells us that that nascent human life is evident at the embryonic stage, making it impossible to do embryonic stem cell research without killing the embryo. This does not matter to Becerra, which explains his vote to approve it. 

 

8.) Human cloning is an issue that most lawmakers and judges have decline to address... moral and legal dilemmas are associated with it. Becerra  ... when he was in Congress, he approved human cloning for research purposes.

 

9.) End of Life: ... When he was Attorney General in California, his strong support for doctor-assisted suicide won him the kudos of the most radical proponents of this cause.

 

10.) Religious Liberty: Conscience rights are at the very heart of religious liberty. To put it mildly, Becerra is not a fan. When those who owned Hobby Lobby were pleading their case invoking their conscience rights as grounds for objecting for paying for birth control in their healthcare plan, Becerra maintained that such rights should not matter.... Fortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court did not ratify such contorted logic and sustained the conscience rights of the business owners.

 

George H. Kubeck

 

(4) REPORT ON THE "CATALYST" BIDEN'S CURIOUS CATHOLIC CREDENTIALS - APRIL, 2021

 (4) REPORT ON THE "CATALYST" BIDEN'S CURIOUS CATHOLIC CREDENTIALS - APRIL, 2021

VERITAS - HTTP://WWW.CINOPS BEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - THURS. APR. 15/21

   

        The Catholic League is the nation's largest civil rights organization. It defends individual Catholics & institutional Church against defamation *& discrimination. Pres. William A. Donahue, PhD.

 

    Annual membership are $30. Senior citizens $20., and students $20. Members receive the "Catalyst" the league Journal. The "Catalyst" is published monthly except for the combined issues of Jan-Feb. & July - Aug. Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, 450 Seventh Ave., 34th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10123. Today"s report is on page 9 of 16 pages.  

 

"Those on the left have an ideological interest in selling Biden to the public as a loyal son of the Church. Their goal is to undermine the authority of the bishops by promoting the false idea that the bishops do not have the last word on what constitutes a Catholic in good standing. They seek to persuade the public, especially Catholics, that it is perfectly acceptable to reject the Church teachings on life, marriage and religious liberty - the way Biden does - and still be a model Catholic.

 

    One of their favorite tactics is to contend that Biden is more similar to Pope Francis than are the bishops. David Gibson, who directs an institute at Fordham University, claims that Biden is "more in line with the pope than the American bishops." That would surely come as news to priests who have denied Biden communion.

 

    Paul Elie, a Georgetown professor, says the pope and Biden have much in common. "Their informality, the fact that they were elected late in life, the fact that they seem to have issues as they come, listening, discerning and then acting." He fails to note that the pope and  Biden have nothing in common when it comes to their fidelity to the Church's moral teachings. But that evidently matters less than their "informality."

 

    Elie is more accurate when he gets to the heart of why it is necessary for Catholics like him to rescue Biden from his critics.'"The hope is that the Biden Administration will invigorate American Catholicism and vice versa." Translated this means that Catholic dissidents want the Biden brand of Catholicism to prove triumphant.

 

    It angers Catholic malcontents that some criticize Biden's Catholic credentials. Julia Maloney, who works at the University of Michigan, gets incensed when she hears someone say that Biden is "Catholic in name only." Mark Silk, who is not Catholic, wants us to know that the president's pro-abortion record "doesn't necessarily make Biden a bad Catholic."

 

    Sister Simone Campbell, the Democrats' favorite nun, is bolder than Silk. The star of "nuns on the bus" tries to bail out Biden by saying his views on abortion are "very developed." By that she means "he will not force his religious beliefs on the whole nation." Not exactly reassuring considering his desire to force his anti-Catholic beliefs on the Little Sisters of the Poor (as well as everyone else.)

 

    Joe Sweeney of the University of California at Davis says it is "incredibly offensive and absurd" to call into question Biden's Catholicity simply because he has a "moderate approach to issues like abortion and same-sex marriage." One wonders what position Biden must take for Sweeney to label him an extremist. After all, Biden supports infanticide- babies killed in partial-birth abortions are 80% born - and he has officiated at gay weddings.

 

    Jamie Manson, who heads an anti-Catholic organization, Catholics for Choice, says a majority of American Catholics agree with Biden on abortion. They do not. Practicing Catholics, as a recent survey disclosed, are pro-life by a 2-1 margin, and even non-practicing Catholics do not support late-term abortions.

 

    The Catholic left has an uphill battle. Most people know that someone who identifies as Catholic yet rejects the Church's teachings on abortion, gay marriage and the First Amendment cannot realistically be regarded as a loyal Catholic. The fact that these dissidents are working over time to convince us that Biden in good standing is proof that he isn't."

 

George H. Kubeck

(3) REPORT ON THE "CATALYST" BIDEN'S CURIOUS CATHOLIC CREDENTIALS - APRIL, 2021

 (3) REPORT ON THE "CATALYST" BIDEN'S CURIOUS CATHOLIC CREDENTIALS - APRIL, 2021

VERITAS - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONE.BLOGSPORT.COM - WED. APRIL 14, 2021

 

    The Catholic League is the nation's largest civil rights organization. It defends individual Catholics & Institutional Church against defamation & discrimination. President: William A. Donahue, PhD. 

 

    Annual membership dues are $30. Senior citizens - $20., and students -$20. Members receive the "Catalyst" the league journal. The "Catalyst is published monthly except for the combines issues of Jan.-Feb. & July-Aug. Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, 450 Seventh Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10123. Today's report is on page 8 and 9 of 16 pages.

 

    OBSESSING OVER BIDEN'S RELIGION - P. 8 AND 9

    "Biden's private conception of religion is not a stunt - it is who he is. The first time he publicly mentioned his rosary beads was in 1995, twenty two years after he became U.S. Senator from Delaware. What he said at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on religious freedom was classic Biden.

    

 "I am one of those guys who's never talked about my religion. I carry a thing called a rosary bead with me all the time - I say it all the time. I say it on the train - to me, it's a comforting thing. I don't suggest it to anybody else." He did not explain why, if the rosary beads meant so much to him, he did not want to "suggest it to anybody else." Perhaps in his mind such a suggestion could be read as an imposition. But that wouldn't explain his support for forcing nuns to pay for abortion-inducing drugs in their healthcare plans. That was not a suggestion - it was a mandate. It was also one that violated Catholic moral teaching. 

   

     It seems a little strange for a "devout  Catholic" to keep private his religion. After all Biden is not a monk - he has been a public office holder for 47 years. This accounts, however, for the fact that when he was running for president, the majority of the public had no idea he was a Catholic. [A minority of pro-life Catholic believers figured this guy Biden out. ghk] Newsweek released a poll showing that 56% were unaware that Biden was Catholic.

 

    Biden's long-time secretive Catholic status is a secret no more. Indeed his fans are touting his "devout Catholic" status whenever they can. Given the President's strong opposition to the life issues and religious liberty, they have little choice. It is precisely this kind of Catholic that the New York times loves. [They hate and try to destroy pro-life Catholic politicians. ghk)

The Politics of Branding Biden a Catholic

    Everyone knew that Sen. Joe Lieberman was proudly Jewish, so there was no need to persuade the public of his religious status. Similarly, it was widely recognized that Sen. Mitt Romney is a practicing Mormon, therefore making moot attempts to prove he is. President Biden is different. Not a day goes by with some commentators, usually left-wing Catholics, trying to convince the public that he is a model Catholic.

 

    This is disingenuous. If Biden were a model Catholic, there would be no need to ensure us that he is. Even his fans know he isn't, otherwise they would not waste so much energy on this issue. What galvanizes them is their war with the bishops. 

 

    Los Angeles Archbishop Jose Gomez is president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). When Biden was elected, he congratulated him. However, when Biden was inaugurated Gomez expressed concern about the president's position on various issues, explicitly wondering whether he "will advance moral evils."

   

     Most bishops agreed with Gomez, but a few did not. Among the laity, those on the left were furious. Immediately, a campaign was launched by the National Catholic Reporter, a rogue Catholic publication.

 

    On Jan. 28, the Reporter asked the Vatican to investigate the USCCB for its alleged "staunch Republican support." On. Feb. 5, Faith America, a George Soros creation, started a petition online in support of the Reporter's efforts. It will have no effect - Vatican won't even acknowledge their game - but their intent matters greatly.  What's driving the campaign against the Bishops?

George H. Kubeck

(2) REPORT ON THE CATLYST, BIDEN'S CURIOUS CATHOLIC CREDENTIALS -APRIL, 2021

 (2) REPORT ON THE CATALYST, BIDEN'S CURIOUS CATHOLIC CREDENTIALS - APRIL, 2021

VERITAS - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT,COM - TUES, APRIL 13, 2021

 

    The Catholic league is the nation's largest civil rights organization. It defends individual Catholics and institutional Church against defamation and discrimination.  President William A. Donahue, PhD.

 

    Annual membership dues are $30. Senior citizens dues are $20. and student dues are $20.Members receive "Catalyst" the league journal. The Catalyst is published monthly except for combined issues Jan.-Feb. and July and August. Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, 450 Seventh Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10123 Today's report is on page 8 and 9 of 16 pages. 

 

OBSESSING OVER BIDEN'S RELIGION

    The obsession with President Biden's religion is everywhere apparent, especially among democrats, liberal pundits, reporters and activists. They are working overtime to convince the public that he is a good Catholic. {He won the presidency this way.ghk}

    On Biden's first day in office, W.H. press secretary Jen Psaki addressed his religion at a press conference. "I will just take the opportunity to mind all of you that he is a devout Catholic, and somebody who attends church regularly." "Devout Catholic." A lexis-nexis search reveals that his descriptive term has been used by the press hundred of times in the last three months.  [This is absolutely not true.ghk}

 

    The day after Biden was inaugurated, the New York Times gushed that he is "perhaps the most religiously commander in chief in half a century." Usually this newspaper is apprehensive, if not alarmed, about religious observant public officials (especially Catholic ones), yet for some reason they made an exemption. [ No exemption, they promoted a Catholic Fraud. ghk]

 

        Sister Carol Keehan is the former head of the Catholic Health Association. She says Biden is a "man who clearly loves his faith." To get an idea of what she considers to be a model Catholic, she recently showered Xavier Becerra with praise when she was grilled by a Senate Committee over his nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services. It does not bother her one iota that Becerra supports partial-birth abortions and is known for his never-ending crusades against the Little Sisters of the Poor.

 

    Another Biden admirer is John Carr, co-director of a Catholic project at Georgetown University; he is a reliable liberal Catholic voice. He is impressed between Biden and his predecessor. "We're going for one of the least overtly religious presidents in modern times to the one of the most overtly religious presidents in recent times.  [ Yes from one of the most overtly, to dupe Catholics to vote for him and the least Christian President who passed laws pro-life, pro-marriage, and pro-family, center-stage in America in his presidency. ghk)

 

    If there is one thing that makes Biden "overtly religious," it is his habit of carrying a rosary. That puts a smile on the face of liberal Catholics like Father Tom Reese, a prominent Jesuit writer. "This is a guy who carries a rosary around in his pocket and talks about his faith." The media also loves this story. This explains why there is so much chatter about Biden's rosary beads.

    

    Let's concede that Biden is rosary-carrying "devout Catholic." What does that have to do with his public policy decisions that are of interest to the Catholic Church? Biden's lust for abortion rights, and his steadfast opposition to religious liberty legislation - as his defense of the Equality Act - are incontestable. In other words, if a "devout" Catholic doesn't connect the dots between his faith and his public policy decisions, how excited should Catholics be about him? And does this not explain why secularists adore this kind of Catholic.? 

 

    At the individual level, Biden is the embodiment of what privatization of religion means. In this view, religion is solely an interview exercise, having no public role to play. It must be said there is nothing Catholic about such a position. Indeed every pope in recent times, including Pope Francis, has spoken against this insular view. Catholicism, they contend must have a robust presence in the public square....   

George H. Kubeck                          

REPORT ON THE "CATALYST" - CATHOLIC LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS - APRIL, 2021

 REPORT ON THE "CATALYST" - CATHOLIC LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS & CIVIL RIGHTS - APRIL, 2021

VERITAS - HTTP://WWW.CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - Friday, April 9, 2021

 

    The Catholic League is the nation's largest civil rights organization. It defends individual Catholics and institutional Church against defamation and discrimination. President: William A. Donohue, Ph.D.

    Annual membership dues are $30. Senior citizen dues are $20. and student dues are $ 20. Members receive Catalyst the league journal. The Catalyst is published monthly except for combined issues Jan.-Feb. and July-August.  Today's Report is page one of 16 pages.  

    I have been a member for more than 50 years. Because of the kind of society, we live in today, I strongly urge you to become a member. Here is the address.

Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights

450 Seventh Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10123

USCCB REJECTS COVID BILL:  ++++++++++++ PAGE ONE OF SIXTEEN

    The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) formally opposed the American Rescue Plan Act, more commonly known as the "Stimulus Bill" or the "Covid Relief Bill."

    USCCB president Jose Gomez wrote the letter on March 6 to all U.S. Senators urging them to vote against the bill; Several USCCB committee chairmen co-signed the letter.

    This came the day after the USCCB released a letter by Gomez (and the committee chairmen)stating they could not support the bill unless it prohibited funding for abortions. The sponsor of the bill refused to accede to the bishops request.

   The bishops were unequivocal in their opposition to the bill. "This grievous result gives us heavy hearts because it leaves us with no choice but to urge you to oppose final passage of the American Rescue Plan Act." 

    The big story here is the decision of the bishops to make good on their promise that abortion is the "preeminent issue." For those Catholics who prioritize social justice issue, this is a stunning loss. After all, this was their dream bill, packed with money for all their favorite programs.

    There are many elements of the bill that are very appealing to the bishops, and to Catholics in general. But to ask Catholics to support legislation that helps the needy while denying the unborn the right to life is offensive. The most basic human right is the right to life, not income assistance.

VATICAN REJECTS GAY UNIONS; DISSIDENTS REBEL

       Pope Francis has been under considerable pressure by gay activists, in and out of the Church to give the green light to gay marriage. On March 15, the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith released a statement to queries on this issue that is the most decisive rejection of those efforts ever written. Dissident Catholics were enraged.

    The Church's top doctrinal office said, "It is not licit to impart a blessing on relationships, partnerships, even stable, that involve sexual activity outside of marriage(i.e. outside of the indissoluble union if a man and a woman open in itself to the transmission of life), as in the case of th unions between persons of the same sex,"

    The statement made it clear that this "does not preclude the blessings given to individual persons with homosexual inclinations, who manifest the will to live in fidelity to the revealed plans of God as proposed by the Church teachings." It is homosexual unions that are the problem, not homosexuals.

 

    With regard to homosexuality, the Vatican said it cannot "approve and encourage a choice and way of life" that is "objectively disordered." God, the document declared, "does not and cannot bless sin." In short, "the Church does not have, and cannot have the power to bless unions of persons of the same sex." In other words, the Church must follow Scripture.

    This does not sit well with those Catholics who have been at war with the Church's teachings on sexuality. The German bishops, in particular, were unhappy; many are prepared to sanction gay unions. In the U.S., so-called progressive Catholics were beside themselves.

    The statement simply reaffirmed the Catholic Church's teaching on marriage.... Pope Francis has been welcoming to homosexuals. In fairness to the Pope, it is not his fault that some interpret his friendly approach as signifying an interest in changing Church doctrine. That's their problem.

    To put it differently, it is one thing to say all persons possess equal dignity in the eyes of God; it is quite another to say that whatever they do is acceptable to God. Human status and human behavior are not identical......                   George H. Kubeck

(1) LETTERS TO COKE, DELL, DELTA BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON FEDERALIST!

 (1) LETTERS TO COKE, DELL, DELTA BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON FEDERALISTS

IN PURSUIT OF THE TRUTH - HTTP://CINOPSBEGONEBLOGSPOT.COM - Thurs, Aug. 8, 2021

Dear C.E.O.,

Preface: 

    In the Hamilton Play or Movie, his contemporaries commented, "It would be nice to have Hamilton on your side." and "As long as he can hold a pen, he is a threat." Concerning the integrity of Hamilton's "Free Enterprise Economics" according to President Jefferson, there is nothing to change.

   

    When I first heard about your MLB decision to move out of Georgia, I thought of the book, "Useful Idiots" How liberals Got it Wrong in the Cold War and Still Blame America First" by Mona Charen, 2003, Regnery Publishing, Inc. Fortunately, this is a book at home, I can lend you. 

    

    This is the book you need to read right now to figure things out for what is happening. You've been duped. I am a  legal immigrant and proud U.S. citizen and your mindset will divide and destroy our country. Be prepared for some real charges of cowardice and treason to our U.S.A.Constitution.                In your mind, it is a matter of life and death for your company and your job. You've being intimidated and bullied. There is a planned psychological Marxist hogwash of the mind existing in America. How about American Founding Principles to solve any of our past history race problems?

    One thing we must learn from J. Edgar Hoover, "Communists are masters of deceit and deception."

From what group in the world do you think all of this hogwash originated from? Only a Marxist/Communist mind could hate America with such intensity and seek to destroy it with Critical Race Theory, White Racism and Cancel Culture narratives. 

 

    Besides George Soros, there are groups within the U.S.A. that want to transform America into a country similar to Sweden in Europe. Your decision helps that group. Sadly, the followers of the Mona Charen's Useful Idiots are now in power in the U.S.A.  The conflict is also between the truth and lies. Check out the following:

 

1. We have the most corrupt News Media in American History. They deliberately do not want to be fair and honest when reporting the news particularly on Conservatism and Traditional American Values. The New York Times is to the Demo Party what Pravda was to the Commie party of Stalin's time.

 

2. In the border crisis, President Biden is waging a psychological warfare against the American people. How else can you explain what is happening at the border? The criminal cartels are making one-half billion dollars a month. 

 

3. As a Catholic,  I believe that a communist mindset deception came up with catholic liberation theology within today's  Roman Catholic Church. (The two previous pontiffs recognized this.) It handcuffs us when dealing with communist Cuba. Without free supervised free elections, Communist Cuba has no legal right to exist in our hemisphere. It is today's political cancer in each of the Latin American country. They don't deserve that evil.

 

4. Today's Democratic Party is controlled by the Useful Idiots that Mona Charen talks about in her book "Useful Idiots." Presidential elections have consequences.

 

    Let's read from the book cover from Mona Charen's book: MEET THE "USEFUL IDIOTS"

Jane Fonda, Dan Rather, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Jimmy Carter, Jesse Jackson, and all the other liberals who were - and are - always willing to blame America first and defend its enemies as simply "misunderstood."

    

     These are the liberals who flocked to Castro's Cuba and called it paradise, just as a previous generation of liberals visited the Soviet Union and proclaimed its glorious future. They are the liberal

who saw communist Vietnam and Cambodia - in fact  Communism everywhere - as generally a beneficial force, and blamed America a gross, blind, and blundering giant.

    

    Now that the Cold War has been won, these liberals, amazingly, are proud to claim credit for the victory - conveniently forgetting their apologies for the Communists and their vicious attacks on Cold War Warriors such as Ronald Reagan. But nationally syndicated columnist Mona Charen isn't about to let them rewrite history.... she exposes: (to be continued)

 

Respectfully yours,

 

George H. Kubeck