Plain Talk about the Gay Agenda

Plain Talk about the Gay Agenda
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010

It wasn’t too long ago that this question was asked. Would you choose to be homosexual? A huge majority of homosexuals would answer No! Also to the question, “Would you choose to be brought up in a home with a mother and father and not a home of same-sex couples?” The answer would be yes! Also, to the question, “Does the environment, culture and people around you have an influence on one becoming homosexually oriented?”

My concern is with the gay agenda and its promotion of same-sex marriage. {My beef is with the Catholic-label Democratic politicians that support same-sex laws. They did in Canada.}

I do not believe that a majority of homosexuals want these same-sex marriage laws to be passed in any state of the union. This is a wedge issue used by the Culture of Death advocates for their agenda. Let’s check out excerpts from a great Zenith article, - http://www.zenit.org/article-30118?!=english

“Muehlenberg, secretary of the Family Council of Victoria, set forth a series of reasons (on same-sex marriage & contrary to Judge Walker’s decision), none of them based on religious grounds.

1.It negates what marriage is. Marriage is not just a social contract, but a cultural universal. Marriage is the basis for family formation and is not simply a way of legitimizing sex. Evolutionary biologists acknowledge that male-female bonding in lasting pairs was the critical step in human evolution and is something built into us by nature.

2.The percentage of homosexuals who want to marry is very small and in places where it has already been legalized there have been relatively few same-sex marriages. It has been legal in the Netherlands since 2001 and only 4 % of homosexuals married during the first five years. {This is the same in Canada.}

3.There is another agenda here. A fundamental goal of the homosexual lobby is the complete social and public endorsement of them. Being able to marry is like having a stamp of approval from government and society. It changes the institution of the family and essentially redefines marriage out of existence.

4.Not all relationships are alike. Homosexual relationships are much more unstable and promiscuous than heterosexual ones. Research has also found that among married homosexual couples the rate of divorce is much higher than for heterosexual couples.

5.Claims of discrimination and denial of rights are spurious. People are entitled to the benefits of marriage if they meet the requirements. Just as family members and minors cannot marry, so too homosexuals cannot. Social goods are denied to all sorts of people and that life operates. Societies discriminate in favor of heterosexual unions because of the social good derived from them. Homosexuals are seeking to re-write the rules to get all the benefits, which avoiding the obligations.

6.The arguments used to justify legal same-sex marriage could be used to legislate incest, polygamy or any number of sexual combinations.

7.It is not good for children. In most cases a child will do better with a mother and a father. As well children need role models as they are growing up. Children should be given priority, and not used as political footballs.”

These arguments above are amply documented in the book, “Gay Marriage,” published in May by Australian publisher Pantera Press. Bill Muehlenberg took up the case against same-sex marriage.

George H. Kubeck, “CINOP Loretta Sanchez is a horrible nightmare within our community.”