Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship:

Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship:
Presentation of Mary --Wednesday, Nov. 21, 2007
(From the L.A. Times Staff Writer, Theo Milonopoulos, Nov. 18, 2007)
Baltimore: Catholic voters who back candidates because of their support for abortion or other ‘assaults on human life’ would be ‘guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil,’ according to a statement adopted Wednesday (Nov. 14th) by the U.S. Catholic bishops.

The bishops defined what they called ‘threats to the sanctity and dignity of human life’ as human cloning, embryonic stem cell research, racism, torture and genocide.

In the midst of the 2008 presidential campaign season, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops overwhelmingly endorsed an updated statement on faith and politics designed to help Catholics fulfill their political responsibilities to vote and run for office.

‘It is not a voter guide,’ said Bishop Nicholas DiMarzio of Brooklyn, N.Y. who presented a final version of the statement before the conference here. ‘It calls us as bishops to help form consciences for political life, not tell people how to vote or whom to vote for or against.’

The statement, titled “Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility,’ outlined the bishops’ consensus on various topics such as opposition to same-sex marriage and the death penalty while providing ‘a consistent framework’ for assessing political platforms.

‘A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter’s intent is to support that position,’ said the text. ‘In such cases, a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil.’

The bishops acknowledged there may be times when Catholics reject a candidate’s ‘unacceptable position ‘on one issue, but vote for the candidate anyway. The bishops said such a choice would ‘be permissible only for truly grave moral reasons, not to advance narrow interests or partisan preferences or to ignore fundamental moral evil.’

‘Unless we are going to give up our right to vote … it may be that we never find the perfect candidate,’ said Bishop Michael J. Sheridan of Colorado Springs, Colo. ‘So there’s where we have to try to decide which of the candidates do we think is at least going to propose and move toward the greatest good.’
The bishop’s statement went beyond earthly concerns, saying political choices ‘ may affect the individuals’ salvation.’

‘One of the responsibilities that I believe we have as bishops is to let our people know that the choices and the decisions that they make in their lives hear on earth do impact their salvation,’ said Bishop Samuel J Aquila of Fargo, N.D. ‘And we as bishops are really called to be about the salvation of souls, eternal life, and for Catholics who choose to support intrinsic evils … they may be putting their salvation at risk.’
Bishops said the reference to salvation is meant not to cast judgment on individuals but make them aware of the possible effects of their choices. Sheridan said he suggests Catholics at odds with the Church’s positions seek clerical counsel….

Comment: Tragically, one party is promoting five intrinsic evils: abortion, same-marriage, assisted-suicide, euthanasia, and embryonic stem cell research.
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish.

1 comment:

MDHichborn said...

Hi,
My name is Michael Hichborn, and I'm the media director for American Life League. I noticed that you have posted articles from us before in the past, and I was wondering if we could send out video releases to you for posting on your blog. I have recently established a regular webcast for American Life League, and I would be most honored if you would share it with your readers as they come out (every 2 weeks). If you are interested in this, please e-mail me at mhichborn@all.org.
Thanks, and God bless!
--Michael