Buchanan's Obama and the Diaz Nomination 1 of 3

Buchanan’s Obama and the Diaz’s Nomination 1 of 3

In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Friday, June 12, 2009

Imagine if we elected McCain and Palin. Definitely we would not be suffering through an ACLU dominated regime and its agenda. (Many Americans are just itching to vote in 2010). On the other hand, we would never, never have changed America from a pro-choice nation to a pro-life nation this year in May with the Gallup Poll: 51% pro-life to 44% pro-choice. This is first time this has happened in 19 years. The 4 month American experience with Obama DID IT.

Voters pay a price for electing a person who had no executive or managerial experience. He was a great orator. Catholics helped break the color barrier. That’s it, no more. We have now a very liberal progressive Democrat and his Catholic-in-name-only political allies who can and must be defeated in 2010.

The Classic Article: Pat Buchanan’s analysis will ring a bell in your mind. Of course if you believe in relativism and making up your own ideological truth, you can ignore Buchanan’s The Anti-Reagan – Human Events.com – Posted 6-9-09.

Let’s start with one-third of the article, and then unto Miguel H. Diaz, tentative nominee ambassador to the Vatican via the Senate confirmation process.

Despite his boldness, Barrack Obama seems as fated to fail as were Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter. And for the same reason: a belief in his own righteousness and moral superiority, and a belief that his ideals and his persona count mightily in the modern world.

Wilson declaimed about America’s fight to “make the world safe for democracy” when in harness with the British, French, Russian, Japanese and Italian empires, all slavering to feast on the carcasses of the Hohenzollern, Habsburg and Ottoman empires.

By 1920, Wilson was a tragic figure, mocked by ex-allies and reviled by former enemies for having dishonored his own 14 Points.
Jimmy Carter declared in 1977 that “we have gotten over our inordinate fear of communism that caused us to embrace any dictator who shared in that fear.” SO, WE UNDERMINED NICARAGUA’S ANASTASIO SOMOZA AND THE SHAH, AND GOT THE SANDINISTAS AND THE AYATOLLAH KHOMEINI.

As for Barack, he behaves on the world state like some Ivy League kid ashamed of the people he came from, letting one and all on campus know that he is nothing like his benighted family with its sordid history. (Continue in letter # 2)

Pro-life may be forced to eat crow, with Diaz’s possible acceptance by the Vatican. We have another example of the duplicity of Obama with this political nominee. Can we change this negative into a positive?

Miguel H. Diaz is married and has four children. He is a Cuban-American theologian. HE IS A LIBERATION THEOLOGIAN. He advised the Obama presidential campaign and donated $1000. to the Obama victory. He is one of 27 theologians (with Fr. Reese) who publicly supported (bloody) Kathleen Sebelius for the position of Secretary of Health and Human Services and said she was a faithful Catholic. Isn’t all of this interesting?
George H. Kubeck