Excerpts of Testimony of Dr. Charmaine Yoest - 1 of 2
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Wednesday, June 30th, 2010
She is President and CEO of Americans United for Life. This is the testimony before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on the Nomination of ELENA KAGAN to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I am here to express AUL’s opposition to the nomination of Solicitor General ELENA KAGAN to the U.S. Supreme Court. Based on our research, we believe that Solicitor General KAGAN will be an AGENDA-DRIVEN JUDGE on the court, and she will strongly oppose even the most widely-accepted protections for the unborn human life. .. A nominee’s judicial philosophy goes to the heart of his or her qualifications to serve to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. Second, we believe that … Solicitor General KAGAN’s agenda-driven judicial philosophy makes her unqualified to serve on the Court. Third, Solicitor General KAGAN has an extensive record that demonstrates her hostility to regulations of abortion and any protections for the unborn…
a.) The role of the Justice is not to make policy:
Supreme Court justices should exercise restraint by applying our laws, not directing policy, or pursuing their own agendas… Agenda-driven judging entails deciding cases based on one’s own political and social ideology rather than the Constitution… As Justice Thurgood Marshall (an ardent and unabashed agenda-driven judge and one of KAGAN’S mentors) described his judicial philosophy, “You do what you think is right and let the law catch up.”That philosophy is simply lawlessness, substituting one’s personal preferences for a written rule of law… Recent polling data confirms that Americans want judges who follow the law and are not driven by their own agendas… (Agreement: 87% Total, 84% of Democrats, 86% of Independents, 92% of Republicans, 80% of liberals, 85% of moderates, 91% of conservatives).
b.) Justices must respect precedent, but may overturn it.
Supreme Court Justices must have a respect for prior Supreme Court decisions, but also recognize that following precedent is “not an inexorable command.”… Under the principles of stare decisis, Roe is a prime example of precedent on shaky ground… Third, the purported justification of Roe, flimsy as they were, have dramatically eroded with further in-depth scientific information about when life begins and prenatal development, as well as public health data showing the substantial and negative physical and psychological impact of abortion on women…
George H. Kubeck
American Family Association: ‘Obama’s Court picks Kagan a dangerous judicial activist’, 6/ 25, contact@afa.net 1.) She agrees with former Justice Thurgood Marshall that the Constitution given to us by the Framers was defective and that it contained outdated notions of liberty, justice and equality.2.) Her judicial hero is former Israeli justice Aharon Barack, who said a judge “may give a statute a new meaning…{t}he statute remains as it was, but its meaning changes, because the court has given it a new meaning that suits new social needs.” 3.) She is anti-military and pro-homosexual… she kicked military recruiters off campus, in defiance of a federal law...
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Mindszenty Report: Mexico - 5 of 5
Mindszenty Report: Mexico – 5 of 5
In pursuit of the truth- www.cinopsbegone.com – Tuesday, June 29, 2010
The Church and Drug Cartels: cont’d +++ (Mindszenty Report – April 2009 – Vol. LI – No. 4) +++
“The Church in Mexico has not been silent under the guidance of its prelate, Cardinal Roberta Rivera Carrera, the Archbishop of Mexico City, the largest Catholic diocese in the world. Installed in 1995, Cardinal has sharply rebuked both the drug cartels and government corruption in the drug trade on numerous occasions. In his Ash Wednesday homily decried the deep governmental corruption that characterized drug trafficking.
“He urged Catholics to fight violence and corruption with all the weapons of prayer, penance, fasting and a morally sound life. Archbishop Jose Luis Chavez Botello of Antequera, Oaxaca echoed his message when he underscored the drug trade’s deep corruption of our political system and its connection with organized crime.
Illegal Zones of Protection:
“In America, Catholic prelates complicate the important border issues with their unrealistic attacks on America’s Mexican immigration policies. Their defiant opposition to legitimate American law has jeopardized local law enforcement agencies’ ability to police American borders and ferret out drug dealers from the human tide of illegal aliens that regularly breach the United States border.
“Prior to Vatican II papal statements prudently recognized the need to reconcile migration rights with national protection and common good. Since 1965 the Church’s concept of immigration rights has moved more closely to the extreme. Many Catholic leaders have denied any limitation on Mexicans’ right to cross national borders in search of work or for family reunions. Los Angeles’ Cardinal Roger Mahony and Washington’s Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, both of whose stance on abortion laws are much more passive, have led the vanguard of what many view to be an unconstitutional position that holds the right to immigrate as more fundmental than that of a nation to protect its borders from illegal invasions. They have done this without citing any authority, moral or …, where a state’s right to regulate its own borders has to be sacrificed for the mass invasion of citizens from a foreign country.
“Cardinal Mahony is also a leader in the Church’s Sanctuary Movement, which provides a zone of protection, especially in many urban areas, where illegal immigrants are shielded from police apprehension, prosecution and deportation. While designed to stimulate needed immigration reform, The Sanctuary Movement, in effect, encourages Catholics to defy the valid laws of their nation. It has also distracted government officials from the larger border issues of drugs & violence. ‘The Catechism of the Church’ teaches Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.
“The narcotic allure of the Magic Dragon has tested the strength of American tolerance and resourcefulness. Billions in appropriations have not helped. The Mexican border is a festering problem with serious human consequences that cannot be left to the whimsy of negotiation. On March 24th (2009) a new White House initiative was announced to deploy and additional 450 law enforce officers to the border. The situation is very volatile, things are changing every day. With few viable options, Mexico might just be the first foreign test of Obama’s presidential mettle.” Posted by George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth- www.cinopsbegone.com – Tuesday, June 29, 2010
The Church and Drug Cartels: cont’d +++ (Mindszenty Report – April 2009 – Vol. LI – No. 4) +++
“The Church in Mexico has not been silent under the guidance of its prelate, Cardinal Roberta Rivera Carrera, the Archbishop of Mexico City, the largest Catholic diocese in the world. Installed in 1995, Cardinal has sharply rebuked both the drug cartels and government corruption in the drug trade on numerous occasions. In his Ash Wednesday homily decried the deep governmental corruption that characterized drug trafficking.
“He urged Catholics to fight violence and corruption with all the weapons of prayer, penance, fasting and a morally sound life. Archbishop Jose Luis Chavez Botello of Antequera, Oaxaca echoed his message when he underscored the drug trade’s deep corruption of our political system and its connection with organized crime.
Illegal Zones of Protection:
“In America, Catholic prelates complicate the important border issues with their unrealistic attacks on America’s Mexican immigration policies. Their defiant opposition to legitimate American law has jeopardized local law enforcement agencies’ ability to police American borders and ferret out drug dealers from the human tide of illegal aliens that regularly breach the United States border.
“Prior to Vatican II papal statements prudently recognized the need to reconcile migration rights with national protection and common good. Since 1965 the Church’s concept of immigration rights has moved more closely to the extreme. Many Catholic leaders have denied any limitation on Mexicans’ right to cross national borders in search of work or for family reunions. Los Angeles’ Cardinal Roger Mahony and Washington’s Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, both of whose stance on abortion laws are much more passive, have led the vanguard of what many view to be an unconstitutional position that holds the right to immigrate as more fundmental than that of a nation to protect its borders from illegal invasions. They have done this without citing any authority, moral or …, where a state’s right to regulate its own borders has to be sacrificed for the mass invasion of citizens from a foreign country.
“Cardinal Mahony is also a leader in the Church’s Sanctuary Movement, which provides a zone of protection, especially in many urban areas, where illegal immigrants are shielded from police apprehension, prosecution and deportation. While designed to stimulate needed immigration reform, The Sanctuary Movement, in effect, encourages Catholics to defy the valid laws of their nation. It has also distracted government officials from the larger border issues of drugs & violence. ‘The Catechism of the Church’ teaches Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.
“The narcotic allure of the Magic Dragon has tested the strength of American tolerance and resourcefulness. Billions in appropriations have not helped. The Mexican border is a festering problem with serious human consequences that cannot be left to the whimsy of negotiation. On March 24th (2009) a new White House initiative was announced to deploy and additional 450 law enforce officers to the border. The situation is very volatile, things are changing every day. With few viable options, Mexico might just be the first foreign test of Obama’s presidential mettle.” Posted by George H. Kubeck
Monday, June 28, 2010
Enemies of Freedom
Enemies of Freedom
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Monday, June 28th, 2010
The Obama mindset is so screwed up and alien to American values that you don’t know where to start. One of the best sources of info is the “American Family Association Journal,” July 2010, edition. www.afajournal.org. Here are some excerpts from one of the pages titled “Freedom Unplugged” which I changed to “Enemies of Freedom.”
Let’s reflect on the source of our freedoms. Our nation’s 234th birthday, Independence Day July 4th: “On December 15, 1787, the Founding Fathers ratified the Bill of Rights into the U.S. Constitution. On top of the list was, as we refer to it today, the First Amendment… For within that short paragraph are the freedoms of religion, speech, press and peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
1.) “According to NewsBusters.com, while at the White House Correspondence Dinner 2009, Emmanuel {Rahm is Obama’s chief of staff} instructed an unnamed reporter: ‘When you think about the First Amendment, you think it’s highly overrated.’ There is great irony in telling a reporter he thinks too highly of the freedom that guarantees his right to do his job…”
2.) “Marc Lloyd is the chief diversity officer of the Federal Communications Commission. In his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce, he said, ‘It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.’ Lloyd authored a report titled The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio. According to his report, Lloyd believes that all talk radio should be forced to offered equal time to progressive,” or liberal, personalities and conservative personalities. If station owners do not comply, the station should be fined, …”
3.) “Likewise, Supreme Court nominee ELENA KAGAN wrote a 1996 article titled, “Private Speech, Public Service. The Role of Government Motive Doctrine.” She wrote, “if there is an ‘overabundance’ of an idea in the absence of indirect government action – which there well might be when compared with some ideal state of public debate – then action disfavoring that idea might ‘un-skew’ and help public discourse along.” The article also revealed that KAGAN believes there are too many conservative voices. She contends that the government should step in to ‘unskew,’ and help public discourse along.”
4.) Harold Koh, legal advisor for the State Department believes that the high court should look to how other countries view free speech rather than our own Constitution when making their decisions.
George H. Kubeck
P.S. Let’s repeat this over again. We are a pro-life center-right nation. Conservatives make up 42% of our country, Liberals 20%, and 36% are Moderates. This is from the most recent GALLUP POLL. The hearings this week on ELENA KAGAN are simple. Do you want an Obama clone on the Supreme Court for the next 30 years or more? She disrespects our military, life and Constitution. IT’S IN YOUR FACE!
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Monday, June 28th, 2010
The Obama mindset is so screwed up and alien to American values that you don’t know where to start. One of the best sources of info is the “American Family Association Journal,” July 2010, edition. www.afajournal.org. Here are some excerpts from one of the pages titled “Freedom Unplugged” which I changed to “Enemies of Freedom.”
Let’s reflect on the source of our freedoms. Our nation’s 234th birthday, Independence Day July 4th: “On December 15, 1787, the Founding Fathers ratified the Bill of Rights into the U.S. Constitution. On top of the list was, as we refer to it today, the First Amendment… For within that short paragraph are the freedoms of religion, speech, press and peaceful assembly, and the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
1.) “According to NewsBusters.com, while at the White House Correspondence Dinner 2009, Emmanuel {Rahm is Obama’s chief of staff} instructed an unnamed reporter: ‘When you think about the First Amendment, you think it’s highly overrated.’ There is great irony in telling a reporter he thinks too highly of the freedom that guarantees his right to do his job…”
2.) “Marc Lloyd is the chief diversity officer of the Federal Communications Commission. In his 2006 book, Prologue to a Farce, he said, ‘It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press.’ Lloyd authored a report titled The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio. According to his report, Lloyd believes that all talk radio should be forced to offered equal time to progressive,” or liberal, personalities and conservative personalities. If station owners do not comply, the station should be fined, …”
3.) “Likewise, Supreme Court nominee ELENA KAGAN wrote a 1996 article titled, “Private Speech, Public Service. The Role of Government Motive Doctrine.” She wrote, “if there is an ‘overabundance’ of an idea in the absence of indirect government action – which there well might be when compared with some ideal state of public debate – then action disfavoring that idea might ‘un-skew’ and help public discourse along.” The article also revealed that KAGAN believes there are too many conservative voices. She contends that the government should step in to ‘unskew,’ and help public discourse along.”
4.) Harold Koh, legal advisor for the State Department believes that the high court should look to how other countries view free speech rather than our own Constitution when making their decisions.
George H. Kubeck
P.S. Let’s repeat this over again. We are a pro-life center-right nation. Conservatives make up 42% of our country, Liberals 20%, and 36% are Moderates. This is from the most recent GALLUP POLL. The hearings this week on ELENA KAGAN are simple. Do you want an Obama clone on the Supreme Court for the next 30 years or more? She disrespects our military, life and Constitution. IT’S IN YOUR FACE!
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Cardinal Ratzinger's Message to the Bishops - 1979*
Cardinal Ratzinger’s Message to the Bishops – 1979*
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Sunday, June 27th, 2010
“One who preaches to the people the word of faith is not saying things that are going to please, but must expect to meet with opposition. Jesus did not promise upholstered chairs or Cabinet post, but only his Baptism and his chalice. In saying that, we have identified the two fundamental sacraments, Baptism and Holy Eucharist, as the essence of his gifts to humanity. But we have also made clear what it means to receive Baptism and Holy Eucharist: being ready to suffer for the truth and for love. The Pope knows this.
“That is why, in an address to the American bishops, he (Pope John Paul II) alluded to the words of St. Paul: “Brothers in Christ, when we preach the truth in love, we must expect to be criticized, for we cannot please everyone. But we do nevertheless; have a genuine contribution to make to the salvation of everyone. For that reason, we are humbly convince that God is with us in our service to the truth and that he ‘does not give us the spirit of cowardice, but rather a spirit of power and of love and of self-discipline’ (2 Tim 1:7)”
“The spirit of cowardice – that is assuredly not a characteristic that one attributes to John Paul II. That is why it had to be realized from the beginning {of his papacy} that one day, sooner or later, he would have to face opposition. Significantly, that opposition was stronger when the Pope, in his talks in America, addressed the world that typically Western – when he addressed our world, when he brought into it the salt of the Gospel, when he exposed our wounds to the light of Christ’s message and revealed them as wounds. In this criticism there are some elements that we might even find humorous.
“In the so-called ‘position papers’ with which we were bombarded before the papal election, we were told: above all, a Pope must be open to the world. And I find it somewhat comical that the same people are telling him now that he should not go so much into the world, but should spend more time at home and read. We were also told the Pope must be charismatic, not bureaucratic. And I find it amusing that it is precisely the individual who customarily speaks of the hierarchy as a “Church of wolves” who now reminds the Pope that the Church cannot be led by charism alone… We are told that the Pope is the product of a conservative theology that is appropriate for a conservative country, but he is obviously not familiar with the West and its quite different situation.
“It is said, moreover, that, by reason of his pastoral role, he should not simply decree and decide, he should discuss and convince. But one who truly listens knows that this Pope has not spent his life in a small and narrow world … he has always been surrounded by young people whose enthusiasm, problems, and questions about a world that is, in this sense, still undivided are everywhere the same, but also, more especially, because, as a man, he has himself known and endured all the depths of human life and its sufferings. .. By reason of such journeying into the adventure of human existence, he can speak with intimate knowledge and can make the word of faith perceptible again in all its permanence, the word that, in that sense, is certainly conservative, for it protects the ground of human nature… One who listens carefully to the Pope’s words, sees as well that they are not issued as commands, but bear within them the whole history of life that has been nourished by the centuries long history of the Faith, Thus the Pope makes visible to us why what is permanent is also always something new.” * Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Co-Workers of the Truth, Meditations Daily, Ignatius, June 26th
George H. Kubeck
Who wrote those positions papers? Had we demonstrated FIDELITY to the words of Pope John Paul II, we would today be a spiritually and financially thriving Church. 10% of the U.S.A. population would not be ex-Catholics.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Sunday, June 27th, 2010
“One who preaches to the people the word of faith is not saying things that are going to please, but must expect to meet with opposition. Jesus did not promise upholstered chairs or Cabinet post, but only his Baptism and his chalice. In saying that, we have identified the two fundamental sacraments, Baptism and Holy Eucharist, as the essence of his gifts to humanity. But we have also made clear what it means to receive Baptism and Holy Eucharist: being ready to suffer for the truth and for love. The Pope knows this.
“That is why, in an address to the American bishops, he (Pope John Paul II) alluded to the words of St. Paul: “Brothers in Christ, when we preach the truth in love, we must expect to be criticized, for we cannot please everyone. But we do nevertheless; have a genuine contribution to make to the salvation of everyone. For that reason, we are humbly convince that God is with us in our service to the truth and that he ‘does not give us the spirit of cowardice, but rather a spirit of power and of love and of self-discipline’ (2 Tim 1:7)”
“The spirit of cowardice – that is assuredly not a characteristic that one attributes to John Paul II. That is why it had to be realized from the beginning {of his papacy} that one day, sooner or later, he would have to face opposition. Significantly, that opposition was stronger when the Pope, in his talks in America, addressed the world that typically Western – when he addressed our world, when he brought into it the salt of the Gospel, when he exposed our wounds to the light of Christ’s message and revealed them as wounds. In this criticism there are some elements that we might even find humorous.
“In the so-called ‘position papers’ with which we were bombarded before the papal election, we were told: above all, a Pope must be open to the world. And I find it somewhat comical that the same people are telling him now that he should not go so much into the world, but should spend more time at home and read. We were also told the Pope must be charismatic, not bureaucratic. And I find it amusing that it is precisely the individual who customarily speaks of the hierarchy as a “Church of wolves” who now reminds the Pope that the Church cannot be led by charism alone… We are told that the Pope is the product of a conservative theology that is appropriate for a conservative country, but he is obviously not familiar with the West and its quite different situation.
“It is said, moreover, that, by reason of his pastoral role, he should not simply decree and decide, he should discuss and convince. But one who truly listens knows that this Pope has not spent his life in a small and narrow world … he has always been surrounded by young people whose enthusiasm, problems, and questions about a world that is, in this sense, still undivided are everywhere the same, but also, more especially, because, as a man, he has himself known and endured all the depths of human life and its sufferings. .. By reason of such journeying into the adventure of human existence, he can speak with intimate knowledge and can make the word of faith perceptible again in all its permanence, the word that, in that sense, is certainly conservative, for it protects the ground of human nature… One who listens carefully to the Pope’s words, sees as well that they are not issued as commands, but bear within them the whole history of life that has been nourished by the centuries long history of the Faith, Thus the Pope makes visible to us why what is permanent is also always something new.” * Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Co-Workers of the Truth, Meditations Daily, Ignatius, June 26th
George H. Kubeck
Who wrote those positions papers? Had we demonstrated FIDELITY to the words of Pope John Paul II, we would today be a spiritually and financially thriving Church. 10% of the U.S.A. population would not be ex-Catholics.
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Mindszenty Report: Mexico - 4 of 5
Mindszenty Report: Mexico – 4 of 5
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 26th, 2010
Preface: “I have a dream! One day in your lifetime the sandy beaches of Baja California in Mexico will be the Vacationland of the World. American families will flock down there freely and joyfully to enjoy the beautiful sunrises and sunsets in a foreign country. The French, Italian and Spanish Riviera is too far away. All the roadblocks to this dream will have been resolved.” (GHK)
A Homeland Invasion: cont’d from Mindszenty Report, ‘April 2009’ –W. Borst, BBPROF@sbcglobal.net
“The Zetas, former Mexican soldiers who have become the paramilitary wing of Gulf Cartel, have been linked to killings as far north of the border as Dallas, according to court records and press accounts. The Sinaloa Cartel is flourishing in the Houston drug trade. In Phoenix, suspected Mexican traffickers dressed as SWAT police Officers recently attacked a home with high-caliber weapons. Fred Burton say Mexican cartels not only utilize U.S. street gangs as dealers and enforcers, they already control street drug traffic in cities like Atlanta.
Jeremy Schwartz Cox, writing in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution points out that officials fear the cartels will bring not just drug violence, but peripheral cash-generating crimes like kidnapping, extortion and protection rackets, all common problems in Mexico. According to ABC our federal government has virtually ignored the use of kidnapping by Mexican drug cartels for ransom or revenge. This is already happening in Arizona. Phoenix is now the second most notorious city in the world for kidnappings with brutal dismemberments if the ransom is not paid fast enough.
A Security Priority: “A former Arizona Governor Jane Napolitano, the new Homeland Security chief has called for stationing National Guard troops along the border permanently, while Michael Chertoff, the former Homeland Security chief says a contingency plan for border violence has been developed that would include use of U.S. military assets, which is probably officialspeak for U.S. military forces. Retired drug czar General Barry McCaffrey recognized the seriousness of this issue in his recent report, which warned that the dangerous and worsening problems in Mexico … fundamentally threatens U.S. national security. He reiterated the fact that the United States cannot afford to have a Narco state as a neighbor.
“The steady flow of illegal immigrants, fueled by American business have failed to secure them. Now American leaders have failed to secure them. Now American citizens are paying a high price for this lack of diligence. This southern border is under siege from a heavily armed enemy that is well funded and is ruthless and barbaric.
This homeland threat is far greater than Iraq, Iran, or Afghanistan has ever been. Fences are only a band-aid solution to a problem that permeates the business-government alliance that influences much of American government.
“The Church and the Drug Cartels: The Catholic Church not only champions the cause of the millions of Mexico’s poor, but also condemns the drug violence that has caught the poor in crossfire. Last September Pope Benedict XVI expressed his concern that due to the eagerness for power, healthy ways of living together and to the phenomena of corruption, impunity, infiltration of narcotic trafficking doing things politically and organized crime have increased. The Pontiff sympathized with the Mexican poor’s need to migrate from places where many work in precarious conditions, defenseless and confronting difficulties different in cultural context to their social and religious idiosyncrasies…. To be continued. Posted by George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 26th, 2010
Preface: “I have a dream! One day in your lifetime the sandy beaches of Baja California in Mexico will be the Vacationland of the World. American families will flock down there freely and joyfully to enjoy the beautiful sunrises and sunsets in a foreign country. The French, Italian and Spanish Riviera is too far away. All the roadblocks to this dream will have been resolved.” (GHK)
A Homeland Invasion: cont’d from Mindszenty Report, ‘April 2009’ –W. Borst, BBPROF@sbcglobal.net
“The Zetas, former Mexican soldiers who have become the paramilitary wing of Gulf Cartel, have been linked to killings as far north of the border as Dallas, according to court records and press accounts. The Sinaloa Cartel is flourishing in the Houston drug trade. In Phoenix, suspected Mexican traffickers dressed as SWAT police Officers recently attacked a home with high-caliber weapons. Fred Burton say Mexican cartels not only utilize U.S. street gangs as dealers and enforcers, they already control street drug traffic in cities like Atlanta.
Jeremy Schwartz Cox, writing in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution points out that officials fear the cartels will bring not just drug violence, but peripheral cash-generating crimes like kidnapping, extortion and protection rackets, all common problems in Mexico. According to ABC our federal government has virtually ignored the use of kidnapping by Mexican drug cartels for ransom or revenge. This is already happening in Arizona. Phoenix is now the second most notorious city in the world for kidnappings with brutal dismemberments if the ransom is not paid fast enough.
A Security Priority: “A former Arizona Governor Jane Napolitano, the new Homeland Security chief has called for stationing National Guard troops along the border permanently, while Michael Chertoff, the former Homeland Security chief says a contingency plan for border violence has been developed that would include use of U.S. military assets, which is probably officialspeak for U.S. military forces. Retired drug czar General Barry McCaffrey recognized the seriousness of this issue in his recent report, which warned that the dangerous and worsening problems in Mexico … fundamentally threatens U.S. national security. He reiterated the fact that the United States cannot afford to have a Narco state as a neighbor.
“The steady flow of illegal immigrants, fueled by American business have failed to secure them. Now American leaders have failed to secure them. Now American citizens are paying a high price for this lack of diligence. This southern border is under siege from a heavily armed enemy that is well funded and is ruthless and barbaric.
This homeland threat is far greater than Iraq, Iran, or Afghanistan has ever been. Fences are only a band-aid solution to a problem that permeates the business-government alliance that influences much of American government.
“The Church and the Drug Cartels: The Catholic Church not only champions the cause of the millions of Mexico’s poor, but also condemns the drug violence that has caught the poor in crossfire. Last September Pope Benedict XVI expressed his concern that due to the eagerness for power, healthy ways of living together and to the phenomena of corruption, impunity, infiltration of narcotic trafficking doing things politically and organized crime have increased. The Pontiff sympathized with the Mexican poor’s need to migrate from places where many work in precarious conditions, defenseless and confronting difficulties different in cultural context to their social and religious idiosyncrasies…. To be continued. Posted by George H. Kubeck
Thursday, June 24, 2010
The Irresponsible and Out of Control Presidency - 2 of 2
The Irresponsible and Out-of-control Presidency – 2 of 2
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Thursday, June 24th, 2010
Preface: In Part 1 of yesterday’s letter the comment was made, “Comparing Obama to Hitler is like comparing George W. Bush to Satan, Stupid.” I think the writer misses the content of the article by Thomas Sowell. OneNewsNow.com titled the story, Degeneration of Democracy. Here is Part 2:
“With vastly expanded powers of government available at the discretion of politicians and bureaucrats private individuals and organizations can be forced into accepting imposition of powers that were granted to the government by the Constitution.
“If you believe that the end justifies the means, then you don’t believe in constitutional government.
“And, without constitutional government freedom cannot endure. There will always be a “crisis” which, at the president’s chief of staff has said, cannot be allowed to “go to waste” as an opportunity to expand the government’s power.
“The power will of course not be confined to BP or to the particular period of crisis that gave rise to the use of that power, much less to the particular issues.
“When Franklin D. Roosevelt arbitrarily took the United States off the gold standard, he cited a law passed during the First World War to prevent trading with country’s wartime enemies. But there was no war when FDR ended the gold standard’s restrictions on the printing of money.
“At about the same time, during the World Wide Great Depression, the German Reichstag passed a law “for the relief of the German people.”
“That law gave Hitler dictatorial powers that were used for things going far beyond the relief of the German people – indeed, powers that ultimately brought a rain of destruction down on the German people and on others.
“If the agreement with BP was an isolated event, perhaps we might hope that it would not be a precedent. But there is nothing isolated about it.
“The man appointed by President Obama to dispense BP’s money as the administrator sees fit, is only the latest in a long line of presidential appointed “czars” controlling different parts of the economy, without even having to be confirmed by the Senate, as Cabinet members are.
“Those who cannot see beyond the immediate events to the issues of arbitrary power vs. the rule of law and the preservation of freedom – are the “useful idiots” of our time. But useful to whom?
George H. Kubeck
LET ME REPEAT AGAIN YESTERDAY’S P.S.: AMERICAN CATHOLIC WRITERS SHOULD STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND WRITE ABOUT THE GERMAN CATHOLIC- IN- NAME- ONLY POLITICIANS VOTING WITH THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT IN GERMANY IN THE 1930’S. IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE CINOP WORKING WITH OBAMA SOCIALISTS
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Thursday, June 24th, 2010
Preface: In Part 1 of yesterday’s letter the comment was made, “Comparing Obama to Hitler is like comparing George W. Bush to Satan, Stupid.” I think the writer misses the content of the article by Thomas Sowell. OneNewsNow.com titled the story, Degeneration of Democracy. Here is Part 2:
“With vastly expanded powers of government available at the discretion of politicians and bureaucrats private individuals and organizations can be forced into accepting imposition of powers that were granted to the government by the Constitution.
“If you believe that the end justifies the means, then you don’t believe in constitutional government.
“And, without constitutional government freedom cannot endure. There will always be a “crisis” which, at the president’s chief of staff has said, cannot be allowed to “go to waste” as an opportunity to expand the government’s power.
“The power will of course not be confined to BP or to the particular period of crisis that gave rise to the use of that power, much less to the particular issues.
“When Franklin D. Roosevelt arbitrarily took the United States off the gold standard, he cited a law passed during the First World War to prevent trading with country’s wartime enemies. But there was no war when FDR ended the gold standard’s restrictions on the printing of money.
“At about the same time, during the World Wide Great Depression, the German Reichstag passed a law “for the relief of the German people.”
“That law gave Hitler dictatorial powers that were used for things going far beyond the relief of the German people – indeed, powers that ultimately brought a rain of destruction down on the German people and on others.
“If the agreement with BP was an isolated event, perhaps we might hope that it would not be a precedent. But there is nothing isolated about it.
“The man appointed by President Obama to dispense BP’s money as the administrator sees fit, is only the latest in a long line of presidential appointed “czars” controlling different parts of the economy, without even having to be confirmed by the Senate, as Cabinet members are.
“Those who cannot see beyond the immediate events to the issues of arbitrary power vs. the rule of law and the preservation of freedom – are the “useful idiots” of our time. But useful to whom?
George H. Kubeck
LET ME REPEAT AGAIN YESTERDAY’S P.S.: AMERICAN CATHOLIC WRITERS SHOULD STEP UP TO THE PLATE AND WRITE ABOUT THE GERMAN CATHOLIC- IN- NAME- ONLY POLITICIANS VOTING WITH THE NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT IN GERMANY IN THE 1930’S. IN AMERICA WE HAVE THE CINOP WORKING WITH OBAMA SOCIALISTS
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
The Irresponsible Out-of-Control Presidency - 1 of 2
THE IRRESPONSIBLE OUT-OF-CONTROL PRESIDENCY – 1 of 2
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010
Why would the respected writer Thomas Sowell have written this foreboding article? Does he perceive things that we don’t yet see? Do you believe that President Obama’s Czars think and operate within the framework of our Constitution? From the Investors.com and posted 06-13 PM ET we have:
Is U.S. Now on Slippery Slope to Tyranny?
“When Adolf Hitler was building up the Nazi movement in the 1920s, leading up to his taking power in the 1930s, he deliberately sought to activate people who did not normally pay attention to politics.
“Such people were a valuable addition to his political base, since they were particularly susceptible to Hilter’s rhetoric and far less basis for questioning his assumptions or his conclusions.
“’Useful Idiots’ was the term supposedly coined by V.I. Lenin to describe similarly unthinking supporters of his dictatorship in the Soviet Union. Put differently, a democracy needs informed citizens if it is to thrive or ultimately even survive.
“In our times American democracy is being dismantled piece by piece, before our very eyes by the current administration in Washington, and few people seem to be concerned about it.
“The president’s poll numbers are going down because increasing numbers of people disagree with particular policies of his, but the damage to the fundamental structure of his nation goes far beyond particular counterproductive policies.
“Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that the president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a private enterprise and distribute it with to whomsoever he deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere.
“And yet that is precisely what is happening with a $20 billion fund to be provided by BPs oil spill has damaged many people who ought to be compensated. But our government is supposed to be ‘a government of laws and not of men.’ If our laws and institutions determine that BP ought to pay $20 billion – or $50 or $100 billion – then so be it.
“But the Constitution says that private property is not to be confiscated by the government without “due process of law.” Technically, it has not been confiscated by Barack Obama but it is a distinction without a difference… to be continued
George H. Kubeck
P.S. American Catholic writers should step up to the plate research and write about the German Catholic-in-name-only politicians voting with the National Socialist movement in Germany in the 1930s. In America we have the CINOP working with the Obama Socialist movement. Think of Pelosi, Sanchez, DeLauro, Markey, Kucinich, Kennedy P., Rangel, Dodd, Durbin, Leahy, Kerry, Mikulski, etc.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010
Why would the respected writer Thomas Sowell have written this foreboding article? Does he perceive things that we don’t yet see? Do you believe that President Obama’s Czars think and operate within the framework of our Constitution? From the Investors.com and posted 06-13 PM ET we have:
Is U.S. Now on Slippery Slope to Tyranny?
“When Adolf Hitler was building up the Nazi movement in the 1920s, leading up to his taking power in the 1930s, he deliberately sought to activate people who did not normally pay attention to politics.
“Such people were a valuable addition to his political base, since they were particularly susceptible to Hilter’s rhetoric and far less basis for questioning his assumptions or his conclusions.
“’Useful Idiots’ was the term supposedly coined by V.I. Lenin to describe similarly unthinking supporters of his dictatorship in the Soviet Union. Put differently, a democracy needs informed citizens if it is to thrive or ultimately even survive.
“In our times American democracy is being dismantled piece by piece, before our very eyes by the current administration in Washington, and few people seem to be concerned about it.
“The president’s poll numbers are going down because increasing numbers of people disagree with particular policies of his, but the damage to the fundamental structure of his nation goes far beyond particular counterproductive policies.
“Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that the president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a private enterprise and distribute it with to whomsoever he deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere.
“And yet that is precisely what is happening with a $20 billion fund to be provided by BPs oil spill has damaged many people who ought to be compensated. But our government is supposed to be ‘a government of laws and not of men.’ If our laws and institutions determine that BP ought to pay $20 billion – or $50 or $100 billion – then so be it.
“But the Constitution says that private property is not to be confiscated by the government without “due process of law.” Technically, it has not been confiscated by Barack Obama but it is a distinction without a difference… to be continued
George H. Kubeck
P.S. American Catholic writers should step up to the plate research and write about the German Catholic-in-name-only politicians voting with the National Socialist movement in Germany in the 1930s. In America we have the CINOP working with the Obama Socialist movement. Think of Pelosi, Sanchez, DeLauro, Markey, Kucinich, Kennedy P., Rangel, Dodd, Durbin, Leahy, Kerry, Mikulski, etc.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Memorial St.Thomas More, Martyr
Memorial St. Thomas More, Martyr
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Ref. also St. Thomas More # 1 to 8 - Dec. 21, 2008 to Jan. 26, 2009 on the blog:
Today is a Memorial to St. Thomas More. Thomas More was an outstanding statesman and is an appropriate religious role model for all Catholic-label politicians. He is also the patron of this blog.
FROM SPIRITUALITY OF ST. THOMAS MORE: A SUMMARY BY JAMES MONTI –MAGNIFICAT –JUNE /1 0
“Closely related to Thomas More’s devotion to the passion of Christ was his love for the Eucharist. As a layman who attended Mass daily, he composed an entire treatise on the subject of Holy Communion. In his Treatise to Receive the Blessed Body of our Lord, More advocates the worthy and fruitful reception of Holy Communion,…
“More’s devotion to the reserved Eucharist is implicit in numerous passages from his writings. Thus in his Dialogue concerning Heresies, he observed that just as God supported the Israelites in their earthly pilgrimage by “walking with them in the cloud by day and in the pillar of fire by night,” so does more does now “assist and comfort us with the continued presence of his precious Body in the Holy Sacrament.
Other motifs of spirituality:
“There are several other major motifs in Thomas More’s spirituality. He stressed the remembrance of death as a medicine for the soul, prescribed for us by God, “the Divine Physician,” as an antidote to false allurements of sin and earthly pleasure. His devotion to the Sacred Hear of Jesus is deductible from his writings…
Vocation:
“In the duties of his career, Thomas More made a point of going to confession and receiving Holy Communion before making any important decision. More brought to the married state of life a deeply spiritual understanding of his vocation, which he was later to express when commenting upon Saint Paul’s discussion of marriage in his letter to the Ephesians (Eph 5; 25-27): … In a letter to his four children, More reveals his devotion as a father :
“It is not so strange that I love you with my whole heart, for being a father is not a tie which can be ignored. Nature in her wisdom has attached the parent to the child and bound their minds together with a Herculean knot… Ah, brutal and unworthy to be called father is he who does not himself weep at the tears of his child… But now my love has grown so much that it seems to me I did not love you at all before.
Personal piety:
“As already mentioned, Thomas More attended Mass daily, often serving the priest at the altar. Rising at two in the morning, he spent the first five hours of his day in prayer and study. Twice a day he gathered the children to pray with them – in the morning, the penitential psalms and the Litany of the Saints, and in evening, four more psalms and the Salve Regina…”
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Ref. also St. Thomas More # 1 to 8 - Dec. 21, 2008 to Jan. 26, 2009 on the blog:
Today is a Memorial to St. Thomas More. Thomas More was an outstanding statesman and is an appropriate religious role model for all Catholic-label politicians. He is also the patron of this blog.
FROM SPIRITUALITY OF ST. THOMAS MORE: A SUMMARY BY JAMES MONTI –MAGNIFICAT –JUNE /1 0
“Closely related to Thomas More’s devotion to the passion of Christ was his love for the Eucharist. As a layman who attended Mass daily, he composed an entire treatise on the subject of Holy Communion. In his Treatise to Receive the Blessed Body of our Lord, More advocates the worthy and fruitful reception of Holy Communion,…
“More’s devotion to the reserved Eucharist is implicit in numerous passages from his writings. Thus in his Dialogue concerning Heresies, he observed that just as God supported the Israelites in their earthly pilgrimage by “walking with them in the cloud by day and in the pillar of fire by night,” so does more does now “assist and comfort us with the continued presence of his precious Body in the Holy Sacrament.
Other motifs of spirituality:
“There are several other major motifs in Thomas More’s spirituality. He stressed the remembrance of death as a medicine for the soul, prescribed for us by God, “the Divine Physician,” as an antidote to false allurements of sin and earthly pleasure. His devotion to the Sacred Hear of Jesus is deductible from his writings…
Vocation:
“In the duties of his career, Thomas More made a point of going to confession and receiving Holy Communion before making any important decision. More brought to the married state of life a deeply spiritual understanding of his vocation, which he was later to express when commenting upon Saint Paul’s discussion of marriage in his letter to the Ephesians (Eph 5; 25-27): … In a letter to his four children, More reveals his devotion as a father :
“It is not so strange that I love you with my whole heart, for being a father is not a tie which can be ignored. Nature in her wisdom has attached the parent to the child and bound their minds together with a Herculean knot… Ah, brutal and unworthy to be called father is he who does not himself weep at the tears of his child… But now my love has grown so much that it seems to me I did not love you at all before.
Personal piety:
“As already mentioned, Thomas More attended Mass daily, often serving the priest at the altar. Rising at two in the morning, he spent the first five hours of his day in prayer and study. Twice a day he gathered the children to pray with them – in the morning, the penitential psalms and the Litany of the Saints, and in evening, four more psalms and the Salve Regina…”
George H. Kubeck
Monday, June 21, 2010
The CINOP carries the water for the Culture of Death
The CINOP carries the water for the Culture of Death
In pursuit of the truth – Cinops be gone – Monday, June 21st, 2010
The CINOP carries the water for the Culture of Death agenda in America. “Culture of Death” is a phrase used by Pope John Paul II in his 1995 Encyclical, Gospel of Life.
I REMEMBER THIS ENCYCLICAL WELL! I had 50 copies made of this encyclical. It was a special by a new printing business. The charge was only one cent a page. I do not understand the Catholic-in-name-only politician (CINOP). We are a center-right pro-life nation AND YOU SHOULD BE ON OUR SIDE.
Why sell your soul, character and integrity for the values of this death agenda? I can understand and respect President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer. The Culture of Death is part of their secular religion, SERIOUSLY misguided as it is.
MARRIAGE IS IN THE NEWS. IT IS A KEY FOUNDATION OF ANY SOCIETY. THE CINOP IS AN ENEMY OF MARRIAGE. SAME-SEX UNIONS ARE LEGAL BUT THEY ARE NOT MARRIAGE. HAVE YOU HEARD THE CINOP SPEAK OUT PUBLICLY FOR MARRIAGE? IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, WE HAVE CINOPs LORETTA SANCHEZ, LOU CORREA, AND JOSE SOLARIO. THERE ARE CLONES LIKE THEM IN THE STATE.
HAS THE CINOP SUPPORTED OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS? THE CINOP IS THE ENEMY OF LIFE, BOTH THE UNBORN AND THE BORN. HE PROMOTES ABORTION ON DEMAND, INFANTICIDE, ASSISTED-SUICIDE, EUTHANSIA AND EMBRYONIC STEM-CELL RESEARCH. ALL OF THE THESE ARE ON THE AGENDA OF THE OBAMA DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO WHICH (CINOPs) ARE LOYAL MEMBERS. IT IS SUICIDAL FOR COUNTRY & CHURCH TO VOTE FOR THE CINOP!
IF IT IS NOT ONE THING IT IS SOMETHING ELSE. THE U.S. CATHOLIC BISHOPS HAVE COME OUT IN FULL FORCE AGAINST THE FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT NONDISCRIMINATION ACT (ENDA). I DON’T KNOW WHY THE BISHOPS WAITED UNTIL IT WAS PASSED BY CONGRESS. WELL, LORETTA SANCHEZ VOTED FOR IT. Then there is the so-called ‘hate crime’ legislation HR. 254 which was passed. The intent of the law is to force the acceptance and approval of homosexuality on every American regardless of their religious views. Churches will have their tax-exempt status revoked if they oppose homosexuality.
WHAT WE HAVE WRITTEN IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG OF THIS FALSE CHANGE FROM THE OBAMA ADMINSTRATION. I HATE A RAW DEAL, FRAUD AND THE GREAT PRETEND OF THE CINOP!
The CINOP is clever. The news media loves him. He will use ANY politicized immigration law to try to win reelection. BESIDES THERE ARE “CATHOLIC-CON ORGANIZATIONS” LIKE “CATHOLICS UNITED” AND “CATHOLICS IN ALLIANCE FOR THE COMMON GOOD,” THEY WILL SUPPORT ANY CINOP THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.
George H. Kubeck, There is an insightful, sad and disturbing article on President Obama by Mortimer Zuckerman. Ref. http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2010/06/18mort-zuckerman-world-sees - Also there is Michael Barone’s article on Obama in the washingtonexaminer.com – June 20.
In pursuit of the truth – Cinops be gone – Monday, June 21st, 2010
The CINOP carries the water for the Culture of Death agenda in America. “Culture of Death” is a phrase used by Pope John Paul II in his 1995 Encyclical, Gospel of Life.
I REMEMBER THIS ENCYCLICAL WELL! I had 50 copies made of this encyclical. It was a special by a new printing business. The charge was only one cent a page. I do not understand the Catholic-in-name-only politician (CINOP). We are a center-right pro-life nation AND YOU SHOULD BE ON OUR SIDE.
Why sell your soul, character and integrity for the values of this death agenda? I can understand and respect President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer. The Culture of Death is part of their secular religion, SERIOUSLY misguided as it is.
MARRIAGE IS IN THE NEWS. IT IS A KEY FOUNDATION OF ANY SOCIETY. THE CINOP IS AN ENEMY OF MARRIAGE. SAME-SEX UNIONS ARE LEGAL BUT THEY ARE NOT MARRIAGE. HAVE YOU HEARD THE CINOP SPEAK OUT PUBLICLY FOR MARRIAGE? IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, WE HAVE CINOPs LORETTA SANCHEZ, LOU CORREA, AND JOSE SOLARIO. THERE ARE CLONES LIKE THEM IN THE STATE.
HAS THE CINOP SUPPORTED OUR INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS? THE CINOP IS THE ENEMY OF LIFE, BOTH THE UNBORN AND THE BORN. HE PROMOTES ABORTION ON DEMAND, INFANTICIDE, ASSISTED-SUICIDE, EUTHANSIA AND EMBRYONIC STEM-CELL RESEARCH. ALL OF THE THESE ARE ON THE AGENDA OF THE OBAMA DEMOCRATIC PARTY TO WHICH (CINOPs) ARE LOYAL MEMBERS. IT IS SUICIDAL FOR COUNTRY & CHURCH TO VOTE FOR THE CINOP!
IF IT IS NOT ONE THING IT IS SOMETHING ELSE. THE U.S. CATHOLIC BISHOPS HAVE COME OUT IN FULL FORCE AGAINST THE FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT NONDISCRIMINATION ACT (ENDA). I DON’T KNOW WHY THE BISHOPS WAITED UNTIL IT WAS PASSED BY CONGRESS. WELL, LORETTA SANCHEZ VOTED FOR IT. Then there is the so-called ‘hate crime’ legislation HR. 254 which was passed. The intent of the law is to force the acceptance and approval of homosexuality on every American regardless of their religious views. Churches will have their tax-exempt status revoked if they oppose homosexuality.
WHAT WE HAVE WRITTEN IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG OF THIS FALSE CHANGE FROM THE OBAMA ADMINSTRATION. I HATE A RAW DEAL, FRAUD AND THE GREAT PRETEND OF THE CINOP!
The CINOP is clever. The news media loves him. He will use ANY politicized immigration law to try to win reelection. BESIDES THERE ARE “CATHOLIC-CON ORGANIZATIONS” LIKE “CATHOLICS UNITED” AND “CATHOLICS IN ALLIANCE FOR THE COMMON GOOD,” THEY WILL SUPPORT ANY CINOP THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY.
George H. Kubeck, There is an insightful, sad and disturbing article on President Obama by Mortimer Zuckerman. Ref. http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2010/06/18mort-zuckerman-world-sees - Also there is Michael Barone’s article on Obama in the washingtonexaminer.com – June 20.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
FIRST THINGS
FIRST THINGS
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Sunday, June 20th, 2010
Preface: This page is dedicated to the local Catholic-in-name-only politicians (CINOP) Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez; State Senator Lou Correa and Assemblyman Jose Solario. Thanks to the politics of President Barack Obama, we are today a center-right pro-life nation. Abortion is a sacrament to the secular religion of America. They are anathema to traditional America, but also to the Catholic faith.
“Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being’s entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign.” Recalling America by Mother Teresa, May 1994 “First Things” – Twentieth Anniversary Issue – March 2010 * Number 201
“What natural law theory essentially opposes is the notion that moral law is subjective, evolutionary, pragmatic, or existential. What it excludes is a distillation of moral law from the transcendent supernatural, that is, from divine revelation. What it affirms is that all human beings share a set of ethical norms and imperative that they commonly perceive without dependence on supernatural disclosure and illumination.” “Natural Law and a Nihilistic Culture” by Carl E.H. Henry. January 1995 issue
“Late one night, as I viewed an abortion slide, my youngest child, then a sleepy three-year-old, unexpectedly entered the room. I heard his sharp intake of breadth as he saw the body of a three-month-old, dismembered by a D & C abortion. With great sadness in his voice, he asked, “Who broke the baby?” Here was a child too young to have his sight clouded by semantic subterfuge, and, with a wisdom that often escapes the learned, he could mentally assemble the body parts and call what he saw a broken baby.” “Who broke the Baby?” by Jean Garton, June/July 1995 issue
“The United States of America was founded on the conviction that an inalienable right to life was a self-evident moral truth, fidelity to which was a primary criterion of social justice … Whenever a certain category of people - the unborn or the sick or old –are excluded from that protection, a deadly anarchy subverts the original understanding of justice. The credibility of the United States will depend more and more on its promotion of a genuine culture of life and on a renewed commitment to building a world in which the weakest and most vulnerable are welcomed and protected.” “The American Experiment” by John Paul II, April 1998 issue
“Elective abortion changes everything. Abortion absolutely prevents the birth of a child. A woman’s choice for or against abortion breaks the casual link between conception and birth. It matters little what or who caused conception or whether the male insisted on having unprotected intercourse. It is she alone who finally decides whether the child comes into the world. For the first time in history, the father and the doctor and the health-insurance actuary can point a finger at her as the person who allowed an inconvenient human being to come into the world.” “Her Choice, Her Problem” by Richard Stith, August/September 2009 issue
George H. Kubeck, Please support the candidates running against the above 3 CINO politicians.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Sunday, June 20th, 2010
Preface: This page is dedicated to the local Catholic-in-name-only politicians (CINOP) Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez; State Senator Lou Correa and Assemblyman Jose Solario. Thanks to the politics of President Barack Obama, we are today a center-right pro-life nation. Abortion is a sacrament to the secular religion of America. They are anathema to traditional America, but also to the Catholic faith.
“Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being’s entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign.” Recalling America by Mother Teresa, May 1994 “First Things” – Twentieth Anniversary Issue – March 2010 * Number 201
“What natural law theory essentially opposes is the notion that moral law is subjective, evolutionary, pragmatic, or existential. What it excludes is a distillation of moral law from the transcendent supernatural, that is, from divine revelation. What it affirms is that all human beings share a set of ethical norms and imperative that they commonly perceive without dependence on supernatural disclosure and illumination.” “Natural Law and a Nihilistic Culture” by Carl E.H. Henry. January 1995 issue
“Late one night, as I viewed an abortion slide, my youngest child, then a sleepy three-year-old, unexpectedly entered the room. I heard his sharp intake of breadth as he saw the body of a three-month-old, dismembered by a D & C abortion. With great sadness in his voice, he asked, “Who broke the baby?” Here was a child too young to have his sight clouded by semantic subterfuge, and, with a wisdom that often escapes the learned, he could mentally assemble the body parts and call what he saw a broken baby.” “Who broke the Baby?” by Jean Garton, June/July 1995 issue
“The United States of America was founded on the conviction that an inalienable right to life was a self-evident moral truth, fidelity to which was a primary criterion of social justice … Whenever a certain category of people - the unborn or the sick or old –are excluded from that protection, a deadly anarchy subverts the original understanding of justice. The credibility of the United States will depend more and more on its promotion of a genuine culture of life and on a renewed commitment to building a world in which the weakest and most vulnerable are welcomed and protected.” “The American Experiment” by John Paul II, April 1998 issue
“Elective abortion changes everything. Abortion absolutely prevents the birth of a child. A woman’s choice for or against abortion breaks the casual link between conception and birth. It matters little what or who caused conception or whether the male insisted on having unprotected intercourse. It is she alone who finally decides whether the child comes into the world. For the first time in history, the father and the doctor and the health-insurance actuary can point a finger at her as the person who allowed an inconvenient human being to come into the world.” “Her Choice, Her Problem” by Richard Stith, August/September 2009 issue
George H. Kubeck, Please support the candidates running against the above 3 CINO politicians.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
LETTER TO THE U.S.A. CATHOLIC BISHOPS - PART 2 OF 2
LETTER TO THE U.S.A. CATHOLIC BISHOPS – PART 2 OF 2
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 19, 2010
We conclude with Part 2 of 2 Draft. This letter was handed out by the Tea Party Patriots 405/605. It better to send this letter to the Bishops than not to send it.
The Church should work to bring God back into the family, community and schools and should give our children hope that they will have a future. It should work with charities and volunteers to help the poor and underprivileged, and assist them to contribute to the economy instead of being dependent on the government. Social issues of the Church should be totally different from the social agenda described by the present political administration. The Bishops are supporting President Obama and his administration with whom we do not agree. We do not want to go the way of Europe, where churches are empty because the population has become secularized.
Although our government is based on Judeo-Christian values, it must be remembered that the role of government and the role of the Church are two separate things. The Church should value the concepts of moral law and deliver charitable works. The government should preserve and protect its citizenry. When Church leaders become mouthpieces for a morally corrupt government, condone or fail to condemn the actions of Catholic public figures that are in conflict with Catholic teachings, and support government programs that will deny the people self-governance, then the Church itself will have become morally bankrupt and will cease to serve God.
Church leaders, by their silence, condone the immoral speeches and actions of public figures. Although God is the ultimate judge, should church leaders attend events celebrated by the unrepentant and morally corrupt? It gives a sense of approval of scandal to people unfamiliar with our beliefs.
As Bishop Charles J. Chaput so eloquently urges in his book, Render Unto Caesar, the Catholic community must take to the public square but with a conservative voice that matches our beliefs and traditions, not one that moves us towards the slippery slope of Social Justice, socialism, and finally communism where God is not welcome. The world has seen that system fail already, we do not need to repeat it. We should also not repeat the failures of the past that emerged from the fascist and communist governments that lead to untold human suffering, not the utopia that was promised.
Sincerely and Respectfully Yours,
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 19, 2010
We conclude with Part 2 of 2 Draft. This letter was handed out by the Tea Party Patriots 405/605. It better to send this letter to the Bishops than not to send it.
The Church should work to bring God back into the family, community and schools and should give our children hope that they will have a future. It should work with charities and volunteers to help the poor and underprivileged, and assist them to contribute to the economy instead of being dependent on the government. Social issues of the Church should be totally different from the social agenda described by the present political administration. The Bishops are supporting President Obama and his administration with whom we do not agree. We do not want to go the way of Europe, where churches are empty because the population has become secularized.
Although our government is based on Judeo-Christian values, it must be remembered that the role of government and the role of the Church are two separate things. The Church should value the concepts of moral law and deliver charitable works. The government should preserve and protect its citizenry. When Church leaders become mouthpieces for a morally corrupt government, condone or fail to condemn the actions of Catholic public figures that are in conflict with Catholic teachings, and support government programs that will deny the people self-governance, then the Church itself will have become morally bankrupt and will cease to serve God.
Church leaders, by their silence, condone the immoral speeches and actions of public figures. Although God is the ultimate judge, should church leaders attend events celebrated by the unrepentant and morally corrupt? It gives a sense of approval of scandal to people unfamiliar with our beliefs.
As Bishop Charles J. Chaput so eloquently urges in his book, Render Unto Caesar, the Catholic community must take to the public square but with a conservative voice that matches our beliefs and traditions, not one that moves us towards the slippery slope of Social Justice, socialism, and finally communism where God is not welcome. The world has seen that system fail already, we do not need to repeat it. We should also not repeat the failures of the past that emerged from the fascist and communist governments that lead to untold human suffering, not the utopia that was promised.
Sincerely and Respectfully Yours,
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Letter to the U.S.A. Catholic Bishops - Part 1 of 2
LETTER TO THE U.S.A. CATHOLIC BISHOPS – PART 1 OF 2
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 12th, 2010
We are a group of Catholics who are concerned about the intrusion of the United States government into our lives both on a secular as well as religious level. We are concerned that the Catholic Church approves some of these intrusions. In 2009 we formed an organization called Conservative Patriots for Freedom and Liberty. Our group is open to all who subscribe to our conservative Judeo-Christian core values.
We are also part of the Tea Party movement, but as Catholics, we maintain our Catholic values in the scope of our political pursuits.
We believe in minimal government, a free market system, and a government founded on Judeo-Christian values. We believe that freedom and a respect for life are essential to a civil society. We believe that capitalism and a free market are vital to human dignity, economic order and human progress. We believe that charity should be the responsibility of the individual and not the state. The confiscation through taxes by the state of assets from one individual to give to another is a double theft. It forcibly takes one’s rightful possession and simultaneously deprives that person the opportunity and means to be charitable and give of one’s own free will.
We believe that Judeo-Christian values should underlie the foundation family, education and morals. We believe our rights come from God and not from the government. We believe in the importance of limited government so tenaciously held by our country’s Founding Fathers. We use the U.S. Constitution as guide, as well as the words of our Founding Fathers, who were influenced by God and the Holy Bible. And we are committed to the preservation of the United States of America.
We are disappointed that some bishops and priests are showing a total disregard for the laws of the United States and the true traditions of the Church. The so called Progressive agenda being imposed on this country is draining our resources without concern for what this country will look like in the future. These policies will burden the nation with debt and cripple the economy so that we will no longer have a strong economy. The Progressive agenda has no regard for the future generations who will have to pay for the failed social programs such as health care and illegal immigration. Many clergy promote the misnamed “Social Justice” concepts that are really the means of creating social injustice through the forced redistribution of honorably earned assets…
George H. Kubeck,
The above is Part I of 2 DRAFT. The letter was handed out by John from the Tea Party Patriots 405/605. It is a letter appropriate for our times. You can study it and make any additions or corrections and send to all bishops.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 12th, 2010
We are a group of Catholics who are concerned about the intrusion of the United States government into our lives both on a secular as well as religious level. We are concerned that the Catholic Church approves some of these intrusions. In 2009 we formed an organization called Conservative Patriots for Freedom and Liberty. Our group is open to all who subscribe to our conservative Judeo-Christian core values.
We are also part of the Tea Party movement, but as Catholics, we maintain our Catholic values in the scope of our political pursuits.
We believe in minimal government, a free market system, and a government founded on Judeo-Christian values. We believe that freedom and a respect for life are essential to a civil society. We believe that capitalism and a free market are vital to human dignity, economic order and human progress. We believe that charity should be the responsibility of the individual and not the state. The confiscation through taxes by the state of assets from one individual to give to another is a double theft. It forcibly takes one’s rightful possession and simultaneously deprives that person the opportunity and means to be charitable and give of one’s own free will.
We believe that Judeo-Christian values should underlie the foundation family, education and morals. We believe our rights come from God and not from the government. We believe in the importance of limited government so tenaciously held by our country’s Founding Fathers. We use the U.S. Constitution as guide, as well as the words of our Founding Fathers, who were influenced by God and the Holy Bible. And we are committed to the preservation of the United States of America.
We are disappointed that some bishops and priests are showing a total disregard for the laws of the United States and the true traditions of the Church. The so called Progressive agenda being imposed on this country is draining our resources without concern for what this country will look like in the future. These policies will burden the nation with debt and cripple the economy so that we will no longer have a strong economy. The Progressive agenda has no regard for the future generations who will have to pay for the failed social programs such as health care and illegal immigration. Many clergy promote the misnamed “Social Justice” concepts that are really the means of creating social injustice through the forced redistribution of honorably earned assets…
George H. Kubeck,
The above is Part I of 2 DRAFT. The letter was handed out by John from the Tea Party Patriots 405/605. It is a letter appropriate for our times. You can study it and make any additions or corrections and send to all bishops.
Tea Party's Star Parker
Tea Party’s Star Parker
In pursuit of the truth - www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 12, 2010
Preface: Tea Party Patriots 405/605 were honored to have Star Parker at their meeting on Wed. June 9th at St. Isidore’s Hall in Los Alamitos, Ca. at 7 P.M. I attended and took some notes and from her literature.
Star Parker stands for traditional values: Limited Government: Free Markets: Strong National Defense: She is a Republican running in California’s 37th Congressional District, which encompasses Long Beach, Signal Hill, Carson, Compton, and parts of Los Angeles
Star is an author and a syndicated columnist for Scripps Howard News Service, offering weekly opeds to more than 400 newspapers worldwide, including the Boston Herald, The Dallas Morning News, The Orange County Register, San Diego Union, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, and the Washington Examiner. She has written two books on urban policies and one book about her life.
I (Star Parker) received 8, 413 votes. Only 28% of the Republicans voted. I want to meet those voters. I want to meet the other 39,000 who did not vote this past Tuesday. Limited Government: I have already lived the life of the Left. It comes to dictating – tells us what to do. {Read all about it in her book “Uncle Sam’s Plantation”} - Capitalism for the rich and socialism for the poor. What welfare will do to a person’s life?
After my Christian conversion I got a college degree. Choice loses its meaning when we don’t understand what is going to happen to you. Has an office in Bixby Knolls – doing a radio show – was involved in the Welfare Reform in 1996. Consulted on the bill: I lived the life of welfare. Involved in “The Center for Urban Renewal” –
Remove government barriers from people’s lives. We can do better for them. They can start the first step. Help people address poverty. Freedom and responsibility is the answer.
2006 – Congress in charge by Nancy Pelosi. 2008 – Something critical has gone wrong in the country. We must demand a high quality of legislation. Have been to over 200 colleges as a speaker. “I was on the path of self-destruction.” General MacArthur, “We are not retreating. We advance in another direction.” …
Get angry enough to protect the interests of the people. Social engineering began in the 1960’s… In 1960, 78% of the black fathers were with the family. Today we have 7 out of 10 born without marriage… We are addicted to the government with the health care bill. In education we are teaching secular humanism. Personal lives are falling apart. Commitment is not important. Somebody is going to clean up the mess… “Have got that call.” Got endorsement from many – Boone and Hannity –
Learn how to take our nation back. {Attend Tea Party Meetings! ghk} We need to become educated concerning finances. It’s not yours to give. “REDISTRIBUTION” Cap and trade passed with AB 32 – We are dumping money into a bureaucracy to figure out what to do. The idea out of Washington has never worked for you. We need a strong national defense. People need to be afraid of America. Right now they are not. I support my second amendment rights. Government has a role to protect our interests and not to plunder us. Believe in economic enterprise zones. Once you have destroyed family, the minority believe the lies of the left: sold the idea of minority and special interests. The left are the masters of the Poverty Plantation and are their Overseers…
George H. Kubeck. Historically, Star Parker is a pioneer and possibly the first U.S.A. Tea Party Member.
In pursuit of the truth - www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 12, 2010
Preface: Tea Party Patriots 405/605 were honored to have Star Parker at their meeting on Wed. June 9th at St. Isidore’s Hall in Los Alamitos, Ca. at 7 P.M. I attended and took some notes and from her literature.
Star Parker stands for traditional values: Limited Government: Free Markets: Strong National Defense: She is a Republican running in California’s 37th Congressional District, which encompasses Long Beach, Signal Hill, Carson, Compton, and parts of Los Angeles
Star is an author and a syndicated columnist for Scripps Howard News Service, offering weekly opeds to more than 400 newspapers worldwide, including the Boston Herald, The Dallas Morning News, The Orange County Register, San Diego Union, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, and the Washington Examiner. She has written two books on urban policies and one book about her life.
I (Star Parker) received 8, 413 votes. Only 28% of the Republicans voted. I want to meet those voters. I want to meet the other 39,000 who did not vote this past Tuesday. Limited Government: I have already lived the life of the Left. It comes to dictating – tells us what to do. {Read all about it in her book “Uncle Sam’s Plantation”} - Capitalism for the rich and socialism for the poor. What welfare will do to a person’s life?
After my Christian conversion I got a college degree. Choice loses its meaning when we don’t understand what is going to happen to you. Has an office in Bixby Knolls – doing a radio show – was involved in the Welfare Reform in 1996. Consulted on the bill: I lived the life of welfare. Involved in “The Center for Urban Renewal” –
Remove government barriers from people’s lives. We can do better for them. They can start the first step. Help people address poverty. Freedom and responsibility is the answer.
2006 – Congress in charge by Nancy Pelosi. 2008 – Something critical has gone wrong in the country. We must demand a high quality of legislation. Have been to over 200 colleges as a speaker. “I was on the path of self-destruction.” General MacArthur, “We are not retreating. We advance in another direction.” …
Get angry enough to protect the interests of the people. Social engineering began in the 1960’s… In 1960, 78% of the black fathers were with the family. Today we have 7 out of 10 born without marriage… We are addicted to the government with the health care bill. In education we are teaching secular humanism. Personal lives are falling apart. Commitment is not important. Somebody is going to clean up the mess… “Have got that call.” Got endorsement from many – Boone and Hannity –
Learn how to take our nation back. {Attend Tea Party Meetings! ghk} We need to become educated concerning finances. It’s not yours to give. “REDISTRIBUTION” Cap and trade passed with AB 32 – We are dumping money into a bureaucracy to figure out what to do. The idea out of Washington has never worked for you. We need a strong national defense. People need to be afraid of America. Right now they are not. I support my second amendment rights. Government has a role to protect our interests and not to plunder us. Believe in economic enterprise zones. Once you have destroyed family, the minority believe the lies of the left: sold the idea of minority and special interests. The left are the masters of the Poverty Plantation and are their Overseers…
George H. Kubeck. Historically, Star Parker is a pioneer and possibly the first U.S.A. Tea Party Member.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Mindszenty Report: Mexico - 3 of 4
Mindszenty Report: Mexico – 3 of 4
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Thursday, June 10th, 2010
Be forewarned that this article by William A. Borst in last year’s Mindszenty Report – April - 2009 will shock you. For Obama to play politics in this matter is divisive and destructive to our national unity.
An Open Civil War: cont’d
“Each day the media reports the carnage of beheadings, mutilation and other gruesome murders. The constant barrage of bloody violence often rivals the news from Baghdad or Fallujah during the worst months in Iraq. Over 10,000 people have been killed in drug related violence, with over 6,000 deaths in 2008 alone. That same year there were 950 kidnappings in Mexico, making Mexico City the # 1 city for kidnapping in the world.
“… The town of Ciudad Juarez, a city of 1.3 million across the border from El Paso, is purported to be one of the most violent spots on the face of the earth. The drug cartels have created an atmosphere of violence that has made it virtually impossible to enforce local drug laws… Thanks to the violence and the widespread bribing of Mexican officials, all leading social and economic indicators warn that Mexico, which has the world’s 12th largest economy, is teetering on a slippery slope of economic uncertainty that points to its eventual collapse. According to Fred Burton, a former State Department counterterrorism official, as Mexican economy worsens; there will be increased violence….
A Homeland Invasion:
“If Mexico does dissolve into a drugocracy, the consequences for the U.S. would be extremely ominous. The situation in Mexico is so serious it cannot help but penetrate America’s porous border with a steady stream of violence that will disrupt its Southwest. Mexican gangs are already running billions of dollars of drugs into the United States and funding violent criminal organizations in many towns and cities.
“The U.S. Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence Center reported that Mexican drug gangs are killing people in towns from El Paso to Brownville. El Paso has also experienced an influx of upper middle income Mexicans fleeing the violence in Juarez, Mexico, one of the most dangerous and deadly m places on earth. In a Birmingham, Alabama suburb, the bodies of five Mexican men were found slain and brutally mutilated. Their murders appear to be the work of Narco-terrorists, according to DEA officials on the scene. Narco-terrorism has seeped as far inland as Florida and Wisconsin.
“According to a recent report by the National Drug Intelligence Center, the influence of Mexican drug trafficking organizations over domestic drug trafficking is unrivaled. Mexican drug cartels now control most of the U.S. drug market, with an amazing sophisticated communication system that has organized over 230 gangs across America. Membership in these gangs is over one million with the Mexican drug lords playing major roles in U.S. crimes rings. This threat is increased by the fact that in some areas of U.S. the cartels have entered into partnerships with local gangs…”
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Thursday, June 10th, 2010
Be forewarned that this article by William A. Borst in last year’s Mindszenty Report – April - 2009 will shock you. For Obama to play politics in this matter is divisive and destructive to our national unity.
An Open Civil War: cont’d
“Each day the media reports the carnage of beheadings, mutilation and other gruesome murders. The constant barrage of bloody violence often rivals the news from Baghdad or Fallujah during the worst months in Iraq. Over 10,000 people have been killed in drug related violence, with over 6,000 deaths in 2008 alone. That same year there were 950 kidnappings in Mexico, making Mexico City the # 1 city for kidnapping in the world.
“… The town of Ciudad Juarez, a city of 1.3 million across the border from El Paso, is purported to be one of the most violent spots on the face of the earth. The drug cartels have created an atmosphere of violence that has made it virtually impossible to enforce local drug laws… Thanks to the violence and the widespread bribing of Mexican officials, all leading social and economic indicators warn that Mexico, which has the world’s 12th largest economy, is teetering on a slippery slope of economic uncertainty that points to its eventual collapse. According to Fred Burton, a former State Department counterterrorism official, as Mexican economy worsens; there will be increased violence….
A Homeland Invasion:
“If Mexico does dissolve into a drugocracy, the consequences for the U.S. would be extremely ominous. The situation in Mexico is so serious it cannot help but penetrate America’s porous border with a steady stream of violence that will disrupt its Southwest. Mexican gangs are already running billions of dollars of drugs into the United States and funding violent criminal organizations in many towns and cities.
“The U.S. Justice Department’s National Gang Intelligence Center reported that Mexican drug gangs are killing people in towns from El Paso to Brownville. El Paso has also experienced an influx of upper middle income Mexicans fleeing the violence in Juarez, Mexico, one of the most dangerous and deadly m places on earth. In a Birmingham, Alabama suburb, the bodies of five Mexican men were found slain and brutally mutilated. Their murders appear to be the work of Narco-terrorists, according to DEA officials on the scene. Narco-terrorism has seeped as far inland as Florida and Wisconsin.
“According to a recent report by the National Drug Intelligence Center, the influence of Mexican drug trafficking organizations over domestic drug trafficking is unrivaled. Mexican drug cartels now control most of the U.S. drug market, with an amazing sophisticated communication system that has organized over 230 gangs across America. Membership in these gangs is over one million with the Mexican drug lords playing major roles in U.S. crimes rings. This threat is increased by the fact that in some areas of U.S. the cartels have entered into partnerships with local gangs…”
George H. Kubeck
Pope Benedict XVI on the Priesthood
Pope Benedict XVI on the Priesthood
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Thursday, June 10, 2010
“What exactly is ordination? …“Are you prepared to unite yourself daily more closely with Christ, our High Priest, and to become with him a sacrificial offering for the glory of God and the salvation of mankind?” Although it is not expressly stated, the concept of the Eucharistic ministry as the center of the priest’s existence is at the root of this question…
“The first and main requirement is that the priest makes himself the servant of the God who is greater than he is, that he learns to transcend himself and to offer the gift that no one can invent for himself and for which we are all waiting; for whether we know it not, we all long to transcend the works of our own spirit, our own hands, and to receive the festive gift. This last question: “Are you prepared … to become a sacrificial offering …? Means “Are you prepared to let yourself be drawn into this mystery and so to drink the festive wine of Jesus Christ, the wine of the Godhead…?” June 8th
“To make present Christ’s Resurrection and our own – can be accomplished only through the power of the priestly ministry …For that reason the innermost center of the priestly ministry is and will always be to celebrate the Eucharist of the Lord, to ratify among us , in the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, his death and the victory of love. Life must henceforth be measured from and to this standard, must find its way from this center. June 9th
“The great and always necessary role of the priest consists in this: that, in a world fragmented by specialization and therefore sick and suffering and disintegrated, the priest continues to be someone who is there for everyone, who holds humanity together from within…
“There is the real beauty, the profoundly human and, at the same time, holy and sacramental aspect of the priesthood, he is, in the last analysis, not just one specialist among many, but a servant of all creatures, of all humans, who guide us over the rough places of life in to God’s merciful love, into unity of the body of Christ… “June 10th
The above is from a classic book by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, “Co-Workers of the Truth” – Meditations for Every Day of the Year – 1992 Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Thursday, June 10, 2010
“What exactly is ordination? …“Are you prepared to unite yourself daily more closely with Christ, our High Priest, and to become with him a sacrificial offering for the glory of God and the salvation of mankind?” Although it is not expressly stated, the concept of the Eucharistic ministry as the center of the priest’s existence is at the root of this question…
“The first and main requirement is that the priest makes himself the servant of the God who is greater than he is, that he learns to transcend himself and to offer the gift that no one can invent for himself and for which we are all waiting; for whether we know it not, we all long to transcend the works of our own spirit, our own hands, and to receive the festive gift. This last question: “Are you prepared … to become a sacrificial offering …? Means “Are you prepared to let yourself be drawn into this mystery and so to drink the festive wine of Jesus Christ, the wine of the Godhead…?” June 8th
“To make present Christ’s Resurrection and our own – can be accomplished only through the power of the priestly ministry …For that reason the innermost center of the priestly ministry is and will always be to celebrate the Eucharist of the Lord, to ratify among us , in the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, his death and the victory of love. Life must henceforth be measured from and to this standard, must find its way from this center. June 9th
“The great and always necessary role of the priest consists in this: that, in a world fragmented by specialization and therefore sick and suffering and disintegrated, the priest continues to be someone who is there for everyone, who holds humanity together from within…
“There is the real beauty, the profoundly human and, at the same time, holy and sacramental aspect of the priesthood, he is, in the last analysis, not just one specialist among many, but a servant of all creatures, of all humans, who guide us over the rough places of life in to God’s merciful love, into unity of the body of Christ… “June 10th
The above is from a classic book by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, “Co-Workers of the Truth” – Meditations for Every Day of the Year – 1992 Ignatius Press, San Francisco.
George H. Kubeck
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
The Leftists Elite: The Arrogance of Power: Mindszenty REport
The Leftist Elite: The Arrogance of Power: Mindszenty Report
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Again William A. Borst, Phd. has written an insightful article in the Mindszenty Report, June 2010 on President Barack Obama’s presidency. BBPROF@sbcglobal.net - Here are several excerpts:
“The Arrogance of Power In the ordinary parlance of politics the term liberal elite is a controversial phrase that describes people, often well-educated wealthy members of a left-leaning political group whose wide influence is vastly disproportionate to their numbers. In less than two years President Obama, his cabinet and auxiliary czars have demonstrated an uncanny sense of superiority that has characterized the left for generations. Without prompting they exude what the late Senator from Arkansas William J. Fulbright called the arrogance of power.
“During the 2008 campaign in San Francisco, Obama noted that decades of dissatisfaction with Washington’s unfulfilled promises had left many Americans, bitter and clinging to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustration. Later there was the snide remark that the people should be thanking me for raising their taxes. Or in recent remarks to Wall St. that at some point you have made enough money!
“Nothing better illustrates the president’s elitist attitude than his antipathy toward the Tea Party Movement and the election of Scott Brown to fill the vacancy left by the death of Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts. The Obama regime erroneously interpreted Brown’s election as just another angry reaction against all incumbents because of the failures of the Bush administration.
“Obama failed to see that it was the paternalistic pandering of his tyrannical policies that cause their recalcitrant reaction. He was so blinded by his own arrogance that he failed to understand his forced-fed agenda and his aggrandizement of power caused the Tea Parties and voter rebellion at the polls….
The Conscience of Humanity: From the Enlightenment, liberal elitism has spread throughout American society. Outside of the Beltway, no area of American culture has exercised its elitist sense of importance more than the ivy-covered walls of academia where thousands of scholarly professors whose high intelligence often reflects their abject disdain for ordinary people.
For generations many professors had sautéed in their own jealous juices because society had not properly recognized them… Countless polls and surveys over the years have demonstrated that the vast majority of these professors held extreme liberal political and social viewpoints that separate from mainstream Americans. Many of them are atheists or agnostics, who believe that their superior intelligence have set them above the rabble. The polls also underscore how few conservatives have faculty positions on the elite university campuses…
George H. Kubeck, Our nation’s most powerful weapon is the truth.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Again William A. Borst, Phd. has written an insightful article in the Mindszenty Report, June 2010 on President Barack Obama’s presidency. BBPROF@sbcglobal.net - Here are several excerpts:
“The Arrogance of Power In the ordinary parlance of politics the term liberal elite is a controversial phrase that describes people, often well-educated wealthy members of a left-leaning political group whose wide influence is vastly disproportionate to their numbers. In less than two years President Obama, his cabinet and auxiliary czars have demonstrated an uncanny sense of superiority that has characterized the left for generations. Without prompting they exude what the late Senator from Arkansas William J. Fulbright called the arrogance of power.
“During the 2008 campaign in San Francisco, Obama noted that decades of dissatisfaction with Washington’s unfulfilled promises had left many Americans, bitter and clinging to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustration. Later there was the snide remark that the people should be thanking me for raising their taxes. Or in recent remarks to Wall St. that at some point you have made enough money!
“Nothing better illustrates the president’s elitist attitude than his antipathy toward the Tea Party Movement and the election of Scott Brown to fill the vacancy left by the death of Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts. The Obama regime erroneously interpreted Brown’s election as just another angry reaction against all incumbents because of the failures of the Bush administration.
“Obama failed to see that it was the paternalistic pandering of his tyrannical policies that cause their recalcitrant reaction. He was so blinded by his own arrogance that he failed to understand his forced-fed agenda and his aggrandizement of power caused the Tea Parties and voter rebellion at the polls….
The Conscience of Humanity: From the Enlightenment, liberal elitism has spread throughout American society. Outside of the Beltway, no area of American culture has exercised its elitist sense of importance more than the ivy-covered walls of academia where thousands of scholarly professors whose high intelligence often reflects their abject disdain for ordinary people.
For generations many professors had sautéed in their own jealous juices because society had not properly recognized them… Countless polls and surveys over the years have demonstrated that the vast majority of these professors held extreme liberal political and social viewpoints that separate from mainstream Americans. Many of them are atheists or agnostics, who believe that their superior intelligence have set them above the rabble. The polls also underscore how few conservatives have faculty positions on the elite university campuses…
George H. Kubeck, Our nation’s most powerful weapon is the truth.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Flies in the Obama White House
Flies in the Obama White House
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Sunday, June 6, 2010
Occasionally you get a fly in your kitchen or dining room. It really bugs me. You wait for the fly to land on the walls or table. But this smart one didn’t. I spotted it on the rug and killed it.
Well in the Obama White House of elites and czars we have at least five flies. They consider these flies normal. I do not understand. We are a pro-life center-right nation. We view these flies abnormal. But who are we to voice our objections? WE ARE AMERICA!
The same-sex marriage fly drives me up the wall. The President wants to change the two thousand year old definition of marriage between a man and woman to include same-sex unions. That is absolutely wrong. Feelings don’t make a thing right. Natural Law, common sense and the Ten Commandments make it right. {The CINOPs are subversive and also promotes same-sex marriage.}
Then there is the White House religion of Global Warming and Cap and Trade Fly. This happens to the elites who have lost faith in the Judeo-Christian religion and traditional America and need a substitute religion. The problem is that the President wants to force this new secular religion down our pocket books and our minds. There is no scientific basis for this religion.
Congress passed the ENDA Employment Non-Discrimination Act Fly Legislation. Churches, religious schools and other institutions will be forced to hire people who openly defy their core beliefs. It is in your face legislation promoted by gay extremists. I believe that the gay extremists do not speak for the homosexuals in America. I have never seen any poling by Gallup or Rasmussen on this matter.
Congress also passed the so-called Hate-Crime Fly Bill. It makes sexual orientation a protected class, alongside race, religion and gender. We already have laws on the books protecting and respecting the rights of homosexuals. But this law is to harass and muzzle any Christian to express his religious beliefs because of 2% of the population feels hurt by the Ten Commandments.
The President wants to repeal DADT FLY “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law in the military. I served in the Army for almost three and one-half years. {Berlin Crisis} I think the present law is OK. Why change it for political and false social engineering purposes and undermine our military effectiveness.
Well we come now to Election Day in California, Tuesdays, June 8th and Nov. 2nd. From which political party do all the above flies originate? Which is the political party that put California into bankruptcy? Some of their candidates look like a teacher’s polished Red Apple. But the core of the party they belong to is rotten. You Decide! Please vote them out of office?
George H. Kubeck - e-mail to relatives and friends
P.S. The albatross around our country’s neck are political correctness and the mass media.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Sunday, June 6, 2010
Occasionally you get a fly in your kitchen or dining room. It really bugs me. You wait for the fly to land on the walls or table. But this smart one didn’t. I spotted it on the rug and killed it.
Well in the Obama White House of elites and czars we have at least five flies. They consider these flies normal. I do not understand. We are a pro-life center-right nation. We view these flies abnormal. But who are we to voice our objections? WE ARE AMERICA!
The same-sex marriage fly drives me up the wall. The President wants to change the two thousand year old definition of marriage between a man and woman to include same-sex unions. That is absolutely wrong. Feelings don’t make a thing right. Natural Law, common sense and the Ten Commandments make it right. {The CINOPs are subversive and also promotes same-sex marriage.}
Then there is the White House religion of Global Warming and Cap and Trade Fly. This happens to the elites who have lost faith in the Judeo-Christian religion and traditional America and need a substitute religion. The problem is that the President wants to force this new secular religion down our pocket books and our minds. There is no scientific basis for this religion.
Congress passed the ENDA Employment Non-Discrimination Act Fly Legislation. Churches, religious schools and other institutions will be forced to hire people who openly defy their core beliefs. It is in your face legislation promoted by gay extremists. I believe that the gay extremists do not speak for the homosexuals in America. I have never seen any poling by Gallup or Rasmussen on this matter.
Congress also passed the so-called Hate-Crime Fly Bill. It makes sexual orientation a protected class, alongside race, religion and gender. We already have laws on the books protecting and respecting the rights of homosexuals. But this law is to harass and muzzle any Christian to express his religious beliefs because of 2% of the population feels hurt by the Ten Commandments.
The President wants to repeal DADT FLY “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law in the military. I served in the Army for almost three and one-half years. {Berlin Crisis} I think the present law is OK. Why change it for political and false social engineering purposes and undermine our military effectiveness.
Well we come now to Election Day in California, Tuesdays, June 8th and Nov. 2nd. From which political party do all the above flies originate? Which is the political party that put California into bankruptcy? Some of their candidates look like a teacher’s polished Red Apple. But the core of the party they belong to is rotten. You Decide! Please vote them out of office?
George H. Kubeck - e-mail to relatives and friends
P.S. The albatross around our country’s neck are political correctness and the mass media.
Saturday, June 5, 2010
The Case against Elena Kagan
The Case against Elena Kagan
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 5, 2010
1.) As a White House adviser, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan indicated support for affirmative action as good law and good politics. Kagan supports public abortion funding.
2.) A newly produced document from the Clinton archives is the second to show Elena Kagan defending ex-president Bill Clinton’s veto of a bill to ban partial-birth abortions.
3.) 31 senators voted against Kagan’s confirmation as solicitor general about a year ago, finding her too inexperienced for even that less important job. { Phyllis Schlafly}
4.) In Kagan’s prior hearing before the Judiciary Committee, she declared her support for using foreign law to interpret U.S. Constitution. {THIS ALONE SHOULD DISQUALIFY HER. GHK}
5.) A Gallup poll released 3 weeks ago showed that 42% of Americans want a new Supreme Court justice who will move the court in the conservative direction, while only 27% want a new justice who will make it more liberal. {We are a pro-life center right nation. GHK}
6.) Kagan excluded military recruiters from Harvard Law School, where she was appointed dean despite having published almost nothing scholarly. Kagan even joined a brief submitted to the Supreme Court that attempted to obtain a constitutional right for schools to exclude military recruiters. In Rumsfeld v. FAIR, the Supreme Court rejected her argument by a stunning 8-0 vote, demonstrating how out of touch is her judicial philosophy. BUT HARVARD CONTINUES TO BAN ROTC TO THIS DAY. (Phyllis Schlafly)
7.) During the Clinton administration Kagan was intimately involved in anti-gun initiatives pushed by Clinton. In 1997, Kagan drafted an executive order banning the importation of certain “dangerous” semi-automatic assault rifles. A year later Clinton banned over 58 types of firearms and accessories. All the guns she helped ban were HUNTING RIFLES. I guess hunters pose such a threat to our national security that they deserve to have their Second Amendment Rights hijacked. info@antigunalerts.com
8.) There is abundant evidence that on the Supreme Court Kagan would legalize same-sex marriage and overturn “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Rule” against open homosexuals in the military.
9.) Kagan’s Princeton thesis outlines the New York socialist movement at the beginning of the 20th century. Kagan wrote, “Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’[s greatness. Conformity overrides dissent, the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation … The story {of the downfall of the New York socialist movement} is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still want to change America. In unity lies their only hope.” LifeSiteNews.com – Fri. May 21st.
10.) Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins posted a petition at www.iopposekagan.com .
11.) Kagan has no experience as a judge. She has spent most of her career in academia and government. She reminds us of President Obama with no leadership experience.
George H. Kubeck- “IT’S A NO TO A CLONE OF OBAMA ON THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE NEXT 40 YEARS!”
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Saturday, June 5, 2010
1.) As a White House adviser, Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan indicated support for affirmative action as good law and good politics. Kagan supports public abortion funding.
2.) A newly produced document from the Clinton archives is the second to show Elena Kagan defending ex-president Bill Clinton’s veto of a bill to ban partial-birth abortions.
3.) 31 senators voted against Kagan’s confirmation as solicitor general about a year ago, finding her too inexperienced for even that less important job. { Phyllis Schlafly}
4.) In Kagan’s prior hearing before the Judiciary Committee, she declared her support for using foreign law to interpret U.S. Constitution. {THIS ALONE SHOULD DISQUALIFY HER. GHK}
5.) A Gallup poll released 3 weeks ago showed that 42% of Americans want a new Supreme Court justice who will move the court in the conservative direction, while only 27% want a new justice who will make it more liberal. {We are a pro-life center right nation. GHK}
6.) Kagan excluded military recruiters from Harvard Law School, where she was appointed dean despite having published almost nothing scholarly. Kagan even joined a brief submitted to the Supreme Court that attempted to obtain a constitutional right for schools to exclude military recruiters. In Rumsfeld v. FAIR, the Supreme Court rejected her argument by a stunning 8-0 vote, demonstrating how out of touch is her judicial philosophy. BUT HARVARD CONTINUES TO BAN ROTC TO THIS DAY. (Phyllis Schlafly)
7.) During the Clinton administration Kagan was intimately involved in anti-gun initiatives pushed by Clinton. In 1997, Kagan drafted an executive order banning the importation of certain “dangerous” semi-automatic assault rifles. A year later Clinton banned over 58 types of firearms and accessories. All the guns she helped ban were HUNTING RIFLES. I guess hunters pose such a threat to our national security that they deserve to have their Second Amendment Rights hijacked. info@antigunalerts.com
8.) There is abundant evidence that on the Supreme Court Kagan would legalize same-sex marriage and overturn “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Rule” against open homosexuals in the military.
9.) Kagan’s Princeton thesis outlines the New York socialist movement at the beginning of the 20th century. Kagan wrote, “Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’[s greatness. Conformity overrides dissent, the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation … The story {of the downfall of the New York socialist movement} is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still want to change America. In unity lies their only hope.” LifeSiteNews.com – Fri. May 21st.
10.) Students for Life President Kristan Hawkins posted a petition at www.iopposekagan.com .
11.) Kagan has no experience as a judge. She has spent most of her career in academia and government. She reminds us of President Obama with no leadership experience.
George H. Kubeck- “IT’S A NO TO A CLONE OF OBAMA ON THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE NEXT 40 YEARS!”
Friday, June 4, 2010
California's Eight Scarlet Women
California’s Eight Scarlet Women
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Friday, June 4, 2010
Preface:
These eight California Congresswomen use the Catholic-label when they run for office. One figures they know who they are. But when they vote and open their mouths they are at times incomprehensible. They seem like puppets and stooges for the people around them. My beef is that I don’t like American Catholic-label politicians behaving and voting like idiots for the culture of death. Had they used the Baptist or Evangelical-label they would have been thrown out of their congregations years ago? As Catholics, they possibly excommunicated themselves.
We are going to talk about the Democratic Party mindset before Obama became President of the United States. I think he got some of his ideas from prominent Catholic-label politicians like Nancy Pelosi and Senators Ted Kennedy, Dick Durbin, John Kerry, etc.
The eight scarlet women voted for the Obama Health Care Bill on March 21, 2010. Without their vote the bill would not have passed. That’s why they are scarlet. The bill is government intrusion into our personal health care and it also gives free abortion coverage and hardly any protection of conscience for doctors and health care workers. We are a pro-life center-right nation!
Who are these women? In the dock we have Nancy Pelosi (8th District), Jackie Speier (12th), Anna Eshoo (14th)Diane Watson (33rd), Lucille Roybal-Allard (34th), Grace Napolitano (38th), Linda Sanchez (39th), and Loretta Sanchez (47th). Their health care vote is just the tip of the evil iceberg.
Their newest member is Jackie Speier. Let’s check out the votes of the other seven congresswomen. They voted against the Stem-Cell Research Enhancement Act-passage (110th) and the Marriage Amendment Act (109th). {Ref. Catholic Advocate: …Morley Institute for Church & Culture}
They voted against ++++ A.) Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act: passage (109th); ++++ B.) Human Cloning Ban: passage (108th); ++++ C.) Partial-Birth Abortion Ban: passage (108th): passage (108th); ++++D.) Unborn Victims of Violence Act (109th). Wait a Minute! What’s going on here? It’s like voting against Common Sense, Natural Law, Motherhood, Fatherhood, Marriage and Family. The Seven Scarlets have gotten away with murder not only of the unborn but also of the living.
In all fairness and justice to the voters in their district, the 8 Congresswomen should not use the Catholic label when they run for office this Nov. 2nd. Otherwise it is hypocritical and fraudulent. In all areas of politics, voters are fed up with this kind of representation not only religious but political.
As I check the newspaper clippings of Loretta Sanchez from the Orange County Register, she is for women in combat; and repealing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell law. For any culture not only Latino that kind of mindset is pathetic, disgusting, and shameful. You decide! Vote Nov. 2nd.
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com – Friday, June 4, 2010
Preface:
These eight California Congresswomen use the Catholic-label when they run for office. One figures they know who they are. But when they vote and open their mouths they are at times incomprehensible. They seem like puppets and stooges for the people around them. My beef is that I don’t like American Catholic-label politicians behaving and voting like idiots for the culture of death. Had they used the Baptist or Evangelical-label they would have been thrown out of their congregations years ago? As Catholics, they possibly excommunicated themselves.
We are going to talk about the Democratic Party mindset before Obama became President of the United States. I think he got some of his ideas from prominent Catholic-label politicians like Nancy Pelosi and Senators Ted Kennedy, Dick Durbin, John Kerry, etc.
The eight scarlet women voted for the Obama Health Care Bill on March 21, 2010. Without their vote the bill would not have passed. That’s why they are scarlet. The bill is government intrusion into our personal health care and it also gives free abortion coverage and hardly any protection of conscience for doctors and health care workers. We are a pro-life center-right nation!
Who are these women? In the dock we have Nancy Pelosi (8th District), Jackie Speier (12th), Anna Eshoo (14th)Diane Watson (33rd), Lucille Roybal-Allard (34th), Grace Napolitano (38th), Linda Sanchez (39th), and Loretta Sanchez (47th). Their health care vote is just the tip of the evil iceberg.
Their newest member is Jackie Speier. Let’s check out the votes of the other seven congresswomen. They voted against the Stem-Cell Research Enhancement Act-passage (110th) and the Marriage Amendment Act (109th). {Ref. Catholic Advocate: …Morley Institute for Church & Culture}
They voted against ++++ A.) Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act: passage (109th); ++++ B.) Human Cloning Ban: passage (108th); ++++ C.) Partial-Birth Abortion Ban: passage (108th): passage (108th); ++++D.) Unborn Victims of Violence Act (109th). Wait a Minute! What’s going on here? It’s like voting against Common Sense, Natural Law, Motherhood, Fatherhood, Marriage and Family. The Seven Scarlets have gotten away with murder not only of the unborn but also of the living.
In all fairness and justice to the voters in their district, the 8 Congresswomen should not use the Catholic label when they run for office this Nov. 2nd. Otherwise it is hypocritical and fraudulent. In all areas of politics, voters are fed up with this kind of representation not only religious but political.
As I check the newspaper clippings of Loretta Sanchez from the Orange County Register, she is for women in combat; and repealing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell law. For any culture not only Latino that kind of mindset is pathetic, disgusting, and shameful. You decide! Vote Nov. 2nd.
George H. Kubeck
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
What is Nancy Pelosi?
What is Nancy Pelosi?
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com –
Here are the facts! YOU DECIDE! Imagine, you call yourself Catholic and you vote as follows:
+++ VOTED AGAINST THE CATHOLIC POSITION: REF. “SCORECARD OF CATHOLICS IN CONGRESS”++++ A. - 1.) “Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007” (S.5) (6-707) Roll Call 443 110th Congress.
2.) Stupak-Pitts Amendment – HR 3962 (11-7-09) Government run health insurance plan cannot cover abortion – 111th Congress 3.) Marriage Amendment Act (109th) 4.) Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (109th) 5.)Abortion in Military medical facilities (109th) 6.) Coercive abortion / United Nations Population Fund (109th) 7.) Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act: passage (109th) 8.) Human Cloning Ban: passage (108th) 9.) Partial-Birth Abortion Ban: passage (108th) 10.) Unborn Victims of Violence Act (108th) – Ref. Catholic Advocate – A Project of the Morley Institute for Church & Culture.
B. - CNSNews.com: “Pelosi Says She Has a Duty to Pursue Policies With The Values of Jesus, ‘The Word Made Flesh’ Tues. June 1, 2010 by Nicholas Ballasy. Video Reporter
“Pelosi who is a Catholic and who favors legalized abortion voted against the ban on partial-birth abortion that was enacted into law in 2003.
“At a May 6 Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill, the speaker said. They ask me all the time. ‘What is your favorite this? What is your favorite that? And one time. What is your favorite word? And I said, ‘My favorite word? That is really easy. My favorite word is the Word. Is the Word. And that is everything. It says it all for us. And you know the biblical reference. You know the Gospel reference of the Word.” And that Word, Pelosi said, “is we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word. The Word isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers everything. …
“John 1-14 states, ‘And the word was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (and we saw his glory, the glory as it were of the only begotten of the Father) full of grace and truth.” …
“After Pope Benedict met privately with Speaker-Pelosi in February 2009, the Vatican issued a statement saying, “His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church’s consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death in enjoin all Catholics and especially legislators, jurists and those responsible for the common good of society, to work in cooperation with all men and women of good will in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development.”
C. – Fr. John Malloy, the pastor of Saints Peter and Paul Church in Nancy Pelosi’s hometown, “Nancy, you are fooling yourself and I fear many good Catholics. You are simply not in sync with the Catholic Church. Until you change your non-Catholic positions, you should stop calling yourself Catholic.”
George H. Kubeck – Loretta Sanchez is a clone of Pelosi and likewise is also a horrendous scandal and fraud.
In pursuit of the truth – www.cinopsbegone.com –
Here are the facts! YOU DECIDE! Imagine, you call yourself Catholic and you vote as follows:
+++ VOTED AGAINST THE CATHOLIC POSITION: REF. “SCORECARD OF CATHOLICS IN CONGRESS”++++ A. - 1.) “Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007” (S.5) (6-707) Roll Call 443 110th Congress.
2.) Stupak-Pitts Amendment – HR 3962 (11-7-09) Government run health insurance plan cannot cover abortion – 111th Congress 3.) Marriage Amendment Act (109th) 4.) Child Interstate Abortion Notification Act (109th) 5.)Abortion in Military medical facilities (109th) 6.) Coercive abortion / United Nations Population Fund (109th) 7.) Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act: passage (109th) 8.) Human Cloning Ban: passage (108th) 9.) Partial-Birth Abortion Ban: passage (108th) 10.) Unborn Victims of Violence Act (108th) – Ref. Catholic Advocate – A Project of the Morley Institute for Church & Culture.
B. - CNSNews.com: “Pelosi Says She Has a Duty to Pursue Policies With The Values of Jesus, ‘The Word Made Flesh’ Tues. June 1, 2010 by Nicholas Ballasy. Video Reporter
“Pelosi who is a Catholic and who favors legalized abortion voted against the ban on partial-birth abortion that was enacted into law in 2003.
“At a May 6 Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill, the speaker said. They ask me all the time. ‘What is your favorite this? What is your favorite that? And one time. What is your favorite word? And I said, ‘My favorite word? That is really easy. My favorite word is the Word. Is the Word. And that is everything. It says it all for us. And you know the biblical reference. You know the Gospel reference of the Word.” And that Word, Pelosi said, “is we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word. The Word isn’t it a beautiful word when you think of it? It just covers everything. …
“John 1-14 states, ‘And the word was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (and we saw his glory, the glory as it were of the only begotten of the Father) full of grace and truth.” …
“After Pope Benedict met privately with Speaker-Pelosi in February 2009, the Vatican issued a statement saying, “His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church’s consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death in enjoin all Catholics and especially legislators, jurists and those responsible for the common good of society, to work in cooperation with all men and women of good will in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development.”
C. – Fr. John Malloy, the pastor of Saints Peter and Paul Church in Nancy Pelosi’s hometown, “Nancy, you are fooling yourself and I fear many good Catholics. You are simply not in sync with the Catholic Church. Until you change your non-Catholic positions, you should stop calling yourself Catholic.”
George H. Kubeck – Loretta Sanchez is a clone of Pelosi and likewise is also a horrendous scandal and fraud.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Mindszenty Report: Mexico - 2 of 4
Mindszenty Report: Mexico – 2of 4
In pursuit of the truth – Cinops Be Gone –The Most Holy Trinity Solemnity, Sunday, May 30, 2010
Preface:
To solve our immigration problems we need leadership and the participation of both political parties. Tragically, we do not have that. On the one hand, we have President Obama seeking to reconnect young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women for 2010; {this alone is worthy of a posted letter.}
On the other hand, Americans are dealing with a Chicago political mindset that has tried historically to obliterate anyone left of center. These are the Conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians and Independents. The Obama elitists are not comfortable with the above points of view.
Please note that in George Washington’s Farewell Address, we were warned of FACTIONS. Today the factions are class, gender and race. Founding Father Alexander Hamilton who wrote the Farewell Address would make mincemeat of the whole Obama Liberal American Agenda. One problem is we have a two-faced media which is gutless and a lap-dog for the Obama administration.
Enter now the furtive-smiling CINOP Nancy Pelosi. Recall and see how she passed the Obama Health Care. She twisted, cajoled and lied to the so-called pro-life Democrat Congressmen who turned out to be traitors to the unborn citizens of America. PELOSI will come UP with a Comprehensive Immigration Reform Package which will be a LEFTIST political solution par excellence. Desperate European progressive-minded Leftists will do anything to retain power with divide and rule, ETC.
Now let’s go back in history TO 2007 with more of Pelosi’s success. She prostituted members of the Knights of Columbus in the Massachusetts’ Legislature. {This alone is worthy of several posted letters, starting with Judy Brown of “American Life League.”?}
This diabolical politician changed the whole dynamics of the 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS! She succeeded IN keeping off the Massachusetts’ ballot a petition of 170,000 to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. WHY? BECAUSE THAT WOULD HURT THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008. THIS WOULD BECOME A NATIONAL ISSUE.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Now let’s continue with the Mindszenty Report of April 2009 titled “The Magic Dragon –Drug Cartels and the Mexican Border War”: www.mindszenty.org – info@mindzenty.org
An Open Civil War: cont’d
According to Clayton Reid in the March 2009 Newsmax, corrupt government officials use massive piles of money gleaned from illegal drugs to bribe local government officials into turning a blind eye to the carnage while terrified citizens flee to safe havens. Journalist George Friedman warns that Mexico is near the point of an open civil war. Heavily armed with weapons purchased in America, drug traffickers wage a constant war with each other and Mexico’s police force… to be continued - ghk
In pursuit of the truth – Cinops Be Gone –The Most Holy Trinity Solemnity, Sunday, May 30, 2010
Preface:
To solve our immigration problems we need leadership and the participation of both political parties. Tragically, we do not have that. On the one hand, we have President Obama seeking to reconnect young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women for 2010; {this alone is worthy of a posted letter.}
On the other hand, Americans are dealing with a Chicago political mindset that has tried historically to obliterate anyone left of center. These are the Conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians and Independents. The Obama elitists are not comfortable with the above points of view.
Please note that in George Washington’s Farewell Address, we were warned of FACTIONS. Today the factions are class, gender and race. Founding Father Alexander Hamilton who wrote the Farewell Address would make mincemeat of the whole Obama Liberal American Agenda. One problem is we have a two-faced media which is gutless and a lap-dog for the Obama administration.
Enter now the furtive-smiling CINOP Nancy Pelosi. Recall and see how she passed the Obama Health Care. She twisted, cajoled and lied to the so-called pro-life Democrat Congressmen who turned out to be traitors to the unborn citizens of America. PELOSI will come UP with a Comprehensive Immigration Reform Package which will be a LEFTIST political solution par excellence. Desperate European progressive-minded Leftists will do anything to retain power with divide and rule, ETC.
Now let’s go back in history TO 2007 with more of Pelosi’s success. She prostituted members of the Knights of Columbus in the Massachusetts’ Legislature. {This alone is worthy of several posted letters, starting with Judy Brown of “American Life League.”?}
This diabolical politician changed the whole dynamics of the 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS! She succeeded IN keeping off the Massachusetts’ ballot a petition of 170,000 to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. WHY? BECAUSE THAT WOULD HURT THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008. THIS WOULD BECOME A NATIONAL ISSUE.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Now let’s continue with the Mindszenty Report of April 2009 titled “The Magic Dragon –Drug Cartels and the Mexican Border War”: www.mindszenty.org – info@mindzenty.org
An Open Civil War: cont’d
According to Clayton Reid in the March 2009 Newsmax, corrupt government officials use massive piles of money gleaned from illegal drugs to bribe local government officials into turning a blind eye to the carnage while terrified citizens flee to safe havens. Journalist George Friedman warns that Mexico is near the point of an open civil war. Heavily armed with weapons purchased in America, drug traffickers wage a constant war with each other and Mexico’s police force… to be continued - ghk
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)