A LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS
The website – cinops be gone – October 31, 2008
ROSIE AVILA
FOR U.S CONGRESS, 47TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT (www.VoteRosie.com)
GET LORETTA SANCHEZ OUT OF OFFICE
SHE VOTED FOR PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTIONS.
SHE IS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.
OPPOSES PROPOSITION 8 – THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT.
COME AND JOIN THE TEAM
SATURDAY, NOV. 1 – TUESDAY, NOV. 4
CAMPAIGN OFFICE OPEN: 9 A.M. TO 9 P.M.
12964 HISTORIC MAIN ST., GARDEN GROVE
(NEAR THE CORNER OF EUCLID & GARDEN GROVE
CALLS TO VOTERS ARE BEING MADE EVERY DAY AND EVENING. COME INFORM VOTERS.
JOIN ROSIE IN CONTACTING VOTERS IN PRECINCTS
STAFF OFFICE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER 714-492-9307
(47TH DISTRICT, SANTA ANA, GARDEN GROVE, AND ANAHEIM)
ALSO PLEASE HELP WITH YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT
ROSIE AVILA FOR CONGRESS
1070 SOUTH VIA DE ROSA
ANAHEIM HILLS, CA. 92807
George H. Kubeck, See you at the Campaign Office.
Friday, October 31, 2008
THIS PRESENT DARKNESS
THIS PRESENT DARKNESS
The website – cinops be gone – Friday, October 31, 2008
“Trust in the Lord with all thine heart and lean not on your own understanding.”
“Our struggle is not with flesh and blood but with the principalities, with the powers, with the world rulers of this present darkness, with the evil spirits in the heavens.” (Eph 6:12)
Saint Paul stresses that the “world ruler” of fallen humanity, of that fallen world we call “darkness,” are “principalities and powers” that are superior (in their nature) to man. (“flesh and blood”). They are the “evil spirits” those mysterious but real spiritual intelligences that Scripture calls “angels.” They are fallen angles who refuse to serve God “in the beginning” when God created “the heavens.” (Gn 1:1)
They are the enemies of the human race, and by leading men into sin, they gained a certain “power” over the fallen world. This power should be recognized, but not exaggerated God rules even the fallen world, and, especially since the victory of Christ, he limits the influence of the devil….
It is clear that human beings superior to human nature who are evil, intelligent, and ruthless have a hand in the affairs of the world. This can be seen even by looking at historical events, in which it is clear that individuals and groups have surrendered their wills to some superior, sinister power, with the result being the perpetration of evil on a monstrous scale…. 218
+++++++
HOLD YOUR GROUND
“Put on the armor of God, that you may be able to resist on the evil day and, having done everything, to hold your ground.” (Eph 6:13)
Jesus is the new Adam, the “new man,” the head of the “new” redeemed human race. The first Adam listened to the deceptions of the devil, disobeyed, and brought sin and death to the world… In Jesus’ death and resurrection, the defeat of the devil – promised from the beginning – accomplished. It has now become possible for us to participate in this victory…. If we “wear” Christ, if we let him live in us and through us, we will persevere in the face of any assault. 219
Praying with Saint Paul, Daily Reflections… Edited by Fr. Peter John Cameron, O.P. Magnificat
GHK
The website – cinops be gone – Friday, October 31, 2008
“Trust in the Lord with all thine heart and lean not on your own understanding.”
“Our struggle is not with flesh and blood but with the principalities, with the powers, with the world rulers of this present darkness, with the evil spirits in the heavens.” (Eph 6:12)
Saint Paul stresses that the “world ruler” of fallen humanity, of that fallen world we call “darkness,” are “principalities and powers” that are superior (in their nature) to man. (“flesh and blood”). They are the “evil spirits” those mysterious but real spiritual intelligences that Scripture calls “angels.” They are fallen angles who refuse to serve God “in the beginning” when God created “the heavens.” (Gn 1:1)
They are the enemies of the human race, and by leading men into sin, they gained a certain “power” over the fallen world. This power should be recognized, but not exaggerated God rules even the fallen world, and, especially since the victory of Christ, he limits the influence of the devil….
It is clear that human beings superior to human nature who are evil, intelligent, and ruthless have a hand in the affairs of the world. This can be seen even by looking at historical events, in which it is clear that individuals and groups have surrendered their wills to some superior, sinister power, with the result being the perpetration of evil on a monstrous scale…. 218
+++++++
HOLD YOUR GROUND
“Put on the armor of God, that you may be able to resist on the evil day and, having done everything, to hold your ground.” (Eph 6:13)
Jesus is the new Adam, the “new man,” the head of the “new” redeemed human race. The first Adam listened to the deceptions of the devil, disobeyed, and brought sin and death to the world… In Jesus’ death and resurrection, the defeat of the devil – promised from the beginning – accomplished. It has now become possible for us to participate in this victory…. If we “wear” Christ, if we let him live in us and through us, we will persevere in the face of any assault. 219
Praying with Saint Paul, Daily Reflections… Edited by Fr. Peter John Cameron, O.P. Magnificat
GHK
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Most Reverend Tod Brown, D.D.
Stanton, CA 90680
October 30, 2008
Most Reverend Tod Brown, D.D.
Marywood Pastoral Center
2811 East Villa Real Drive
PO Box 14195
Orange, CA 92863-1595
Your Excellency:
There is righteous anger with the Catholic-label politicians. In Canada, they passed same-sex marriage laws in July, 2005. In Massachusetts this year Catholic-label politicians blocked a marriage amendment from being on their state ballot this Nov. 4th. I don’t want the same thing happening in California. That is why the silence of Catholic-label politicians in California is threatening the passage of Proposition 8 the Marriage Amendment.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Let’s take a look at the 14 California Catholic-label politicians in Congress. They are Joe Baca, Xavier Becerra, Dennis Cardoza, George Miller, Grace Napolitano, Nancy Pelosi, Lucille Roybal Allard, Linda and Loretta Sanchez, Hilda Solis, Ellen Tauscher, Mike Thompson and Diane Watson.
ALL OF THE ABOVE VOTED AGAINST THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN: PASSAGE IN THE 108TH CONGRESS.
I perceive that these politicians do not care about the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman. I believe that if they want to attach the Catholic-label to their names when running for re-election this year, they need to stand up for marriage in a public press conference before this election on Nov. 4th. If they do not, they should strip themselves of their Catholic identity because it is already causing much scandal and confusion.
Other bishops in California are responsible for all of the above except one. You are our shepherd for Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez. You are also responsible for State Senator Lou Correa and Assemblyman Solorio. All three should publicly support Proposition 8 – the California Marriage Amendment even though their political party supports same-sex marriage.
Respectfully in Jesus Christ and His mother Mary,
George H. Kubeck
Knights of Columbus – 4th Degree
October 30, 2008
Most Reverend Tod Brown, D.D.
Marywood Pastoral Center
2811 East Villa Real Drive
PO Box 14195
Orange, CA 92863-1595
Your Excellency:
There is righteous anger with the Catholic-label politicians. In Canada, they passed same-sex marriage laws in July, 2005. In Massachusetts this year Catholic-label politicians blocked a marriage amendment from being on their state ballot this Nov. 4th. I don’t want the same thing happening in California. That is why the silence of Catholic-label politicians in California is threatening the passage of Proposition 8 the Marriage Amendment.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Let’s take a look at the 14 California Catholic-label politicians in Congress. They are Joe Baca, Xavier Becerra, Dennis Cardoza, George Miller, Grace Napolitano, Nancy Pelosi, Lucille Roybal Allard, Linda and Loretta Sanchez, Hilda Solis, Ellen Tauscher, Mike Thompson and Diane Watson.
ALL OF THE ABOVE VOTED AGAINST THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN: PASSAGE IN THE 108TH CONGRESS.
I perceive that these politicians do not care about the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman. I believe that if they want to attach the Catholic-label to their names when running for re-election this year, they need to stand up for marriage in a public press conference before this election on Nov. 4th. If they do not, they should strip themselves of their Catholic identity because it is already causing much scandal and confusion.
Other bishops in California are responsible for all of the above except one. You are our shepherd for Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez. You are also responsible for State Senator Lou Correa and Assemblyman Solorio. All three should publicly support Proposition 8 – the California Marriage Amendment even though their political party supports same-sex marriage.
Respectfully in Jesus Christ and His mother Mary,
George H. Kubeck
Knights of Columbus – 4th Degree
Journalism in America is Dead - 3
JOURNALISM IN AMERICA IS DEAD – 3
The website – cinops be gone – Thursday, October 30, 2008
What’s the difference between a Hollywood reporter and an American journalist? There isn’t any. They are both politically correct and locked into a straight jacket. They are unable to think out of the box.
There was a significant news story on Brit Hume Fox News yesterday. It was about a journalist Michael S. Malone with ABC NEWS. He perceived one-sided reporting and media bias. At one point he did not want to identify himself as journalist but rather as a writer. THE QUESTION AROSE: WHAT WOULD BE THE LONG TERM EFECT OF THE MEDIA BIAS? Barnes, Kondrake and Krauthammer felt it would amount to nothing.
NO! NO! NO! THESE SO-CALLED JOURNALISTS DIDN’T DO THEIR JOB. THEY HAVE BROUGHT OUR NATION TO THE BRINK OF POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS DISASTER IN THIS COMING ELECTION. THEY ALONG WITH THE MARXIST PROFESSORS WHO BRAINWASH THE JOURNALISTS IN THE ACADEMIA SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO THE ASHBIN OF AMERICAN HISTORY. WAIT A MINUTE! ACADEMIA HAS CHANGED HISTORY TO AMERICAN MARXIST INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY.
WHAT IS THEIR MANTRA? CAPITALISM (FREE ENTERPRISE) IS BAD. SOCIALISM IS GOOD. MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN ONLY IS BAD. SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS GOOD. LIBERTY, FRATERNITY AND EQUALITY ARE GOOD. LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ARE BAD. ROTTEN IDEAS AND EVIL HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
ALL OF THE ABOVE IS THE KIND OF AMERICAN HISTORY EDUCATION OUR CHILDREN ARE RECEIVING IN ACADEMIA. YOU WONDER WHERE THE YOUNG GET THEIR IDEAS VOTING OBAMA.
Before we go back to history; let’s go to newspaper censorship today of a tape owned by The L.A. Times. It concerns a party for Rashid Kahlidi, an American professor and former spokesman for the Palestinian organization. Barack Obama was at that party. While the L.A. Times did publish a transcript, they do not want to release the tape. Why? L.A. Times has endorsed Obama and releasing the tape would hurt Obama. Isn’t wonderful having a corrupt newspaper on your side?
Now let’s go from reality into the twilight zone. Obama is running for President and even friendly reporters are saying, “They do not know the man.” So we have “a spirit of the world image man” seeking the highest office of the land. He is spending 600 million dollars compared to 350 million for McCain. He has a Pravda type news media just rooting for him. It’s frightening! Can he buy this election?
Yes! However, each vote counts. Bush won in 2000 with 537 votes.(Florida)
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and e-mail to all.
The website – cinops be gone – Thursday, October 30, 2008
What’s the difference between a Hollywood reporter and an American journalist? There isn’t any. They are both politically correct and locked into a straight jacket. They are unable to think out of the box.
There was a significant news story on Brit Hume Fox News yesterday. It was about a journalist Michael S. Malone with ABC NEWS. He perceived one-sided reporting and media bias. At one point he did not want to identify himself as journalist but rather as a writer. THE QUESTION AROSE: WHAT WOULD BE THE LONG TERM EFECT OF THE MEDIA BIAS? Barnes, Kondrake and Krauthammer felt it would amount to nothing.
NO! NO! NO! THESE SO-CALLED JOURNALISTS DIDN’T DO THEIR JOB. THEY HAVE BROUGHT OUR NATION TO THE BRINK OF POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS DISASTER IN THIS COMING ELECTION. THEY ALONG WITH THE MARXIST PROFESSORS WHO BRAINWASH THE JOURNALISTS IN THE ACADEMIA SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO THE ASHBIN OF AMERICAN HISTORY. WAIT A MINUTE! ACADEMIA HAS CHANGED HISTORY TO AMERICAN MARXIST INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY.
WHAT IS THEIR MANTRA? CAPITALISM (FREE ENTERPRISE) IS BAD. SOCIALISM IS GOOD. MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN ONLY IS BAD. SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS GOOD. LIBERTY, FRATERNITY AND EQUALITY ARE GOOD. LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ARE BAD. ROTTEN IDEAS AND EVIL HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
ALL OF THE ABOVE IS THE KIND OF AMERICAN HISTORY EDUCATION OUR CHILDREN ARE RECEIVING IN ACADEMIA. YOU WONDER WHERE THE YOUNG GET THEIR IDEAS VOTING OBAMA.
Before we go back to history; let’s go to newspaper censorship today of a tape owned by The L.A. Times. It concerns a party for Rashid Kahlidi, an American professor and former spokesman for the Palestinian organization. Barack Obama was at that party. While the L.A. Times did publish a transcript, they do not want to release the tape. Why? L.A. Times has endorsed Obama and releasing the tape would hurt Obama. Isn’t wonderful having a corrupt newspaper on your side?
Now let’s go from reality into the twilight zone. Obama is running for President and even friendly reporters are saying, “They do not know the man.” So we have “a spirit of the world image man” seeking the highest office of the land. He is spending 600 million dollars compared to 350 million for McCain. He has a Pravda type news media just rooting for him. It’s frightening! Can he buy this election?
Yes! However, each vote counts. Bush won in 2000 with 537 votes.(Florida)
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and e-mail to all.
Journalism in America is Dead - 2
JOURNALISM IN AMERICA IS DEAD – 2
The website – cinops be gone – Thursday, October 30, 2008
Call a News Conference with This Headline!
DEAD JOURNALISM FOUND IN A CASKET!
Weapon Found – The Truth!
We gather together as we reminisce. What happened? We can agree that we do not live in a normal society. Things have changed since the 1960’s. In the 1950’s no one believed in abortion on demand, (infanticide), legalized assisted-suicide, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research or same-sex marriage.
You would have been considered crazy if you publicly voiced the above issues. What happened? Well once you believe in the above and make it part of your being then your mind is blinded. There is a lot of blindness to reality in America.
I saw some excerpts of the Obama’s one-half hour Hollywood commercial of a movie that’s coming out on Nov. 4th. IT IS THE “O” MOVIE. About ten days ago, Hollywood came out the “W” MOVIE. This movie turned out to be a flop. President Bush has had his revenge. I expect the “O” to be another Hollywood prepared movie flop.
However, before YOU send out Paul Revere’s across the nation; we can check out a little history as we view dead journalism lying in that casket.
Let’s go back to the presidential elections of 1960 between Kennedy and Nixon. If Nixon had won that election with the corrupt voting in the Chicago area and in Texas, would authentic journalists be concerned? There was huge evidence of fraud but it was the wrong candidate to focus on. {I will focus on Richard Daley Sr. and Jr. That’s where the cancer of voting fraud originates. Yes, IT IS with those sweet pro-choice Catholic corrupt politicians in Chicago.}
The journalist have HAD a double standard. It was one for the Democrats and another for the Republicans. The standard for the Republicans is higher so they can dig the knife deeper IN. Besides, journalists had no liking for Nixon ever since he got Alger Hiss convicted as a communist and spy for Stalin.
By the way that conviction was a badge of honor for all Americans who understand what communism is and they are going to vote on Nov. 4th. We don’t like people who associate with other Americans WHO HATE AND BETRAY THEIR AMERICA. WE LOVE AMERICA.
In my next letter, I hope to get to the story on journalists IN yesterday’s Brit Hume Fox Report. Also, Sean Hannity had a one hour program Sunday on Obama.
For your information Sean has a radio talk show program on KABC 790 from 12 noon to 3 P.M. By the way, anybody who tells you not to listen to talk radio is an idiot.
The one journalists hate the most is: Rush on 640 A.M. 9-12 Noon, M-F.
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to all newspapers, reporters and news agencies.
The website – cinops be gone – Thursday, October 30, 2008
Call a News Conference with This Headline!
DEAD JOURNALISM FOUND IN A CASKET!
Weapon Found – The Truth!
We gather together as we reminisce. What happened? We can agree that we do not live in a normal society. Things have changed since the 1960’s. In the 1950’s no one believed in abortion on demand, (infanticide), legalized assisted-suicide, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research or same-sex marriage.
You would have been considered crazy if you publicly voiced the above issues. What happened? Well once you believe in the above and make it part of your being then your mind is blinded. There is a lot of blindness to reality in America.
I saw some excerpts of the Obama’s one-half hour Hollywood commercial of a movie that’s coming out on Nov. 4th. IT IS THE “O” MOVIE. About ten days ago, Hollywood came out the “W” MOVIE. This movie turned out to be a flop. President Bush has had his revenge. I expect the “O” to be another Hollywood prepared movie flop.
However, before YOU send out Paul Revere’s across the nation; we can check out a little history as we view dead journalism lying in that casket.
Let’s go back to the presidential elections of 1960 between Kennedy and Nixon. If Nixon had won that election with the corrupt voting in the Chicago area and in Texas, would authentic journalists be concerned? There was huge evidence of fraud but it was the wrong candidate to focus on. {I will focus on Richard Daley Sr. and Jr. That’s where the cancer of voting fraud originates. Yes, IT IS with those sweet pro-choice Catholic corrupt politicians in Chicago.}
The journalist have HAD a double standard. It was one for the Democrats and another for the Republicans. The standard for the Republicans is higher so they can dig the knife deeper IN. Besides, journalists had no liking for Nixon ever since he got Alger Hiss convicted as a communist and spy for Stalin.
By the way that conviction was a badge of honor for all Americans who understand what communism is and they are going to vote on Nov. 4th. We don’t like people who associate with other Americans WHO HATE AND BETRAY THEIR AMERICA. WE LOVE AMERICA.
In my next letter, I hope to get to the story on journalists IN yesterday’s Brit Hume Fox Report. Also, Sean Hannity had a one hour program Sunday on Obama.
For your information Sean has a radio talk show program on KABC 790 from 12 noon to 3 P.M. By the way, anybody who tells you not to listen to talk radio is an idiot.
The one journalists hate the most is: Rush on 640 A.M. 9-12 Noon, M-F.
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to all newspapers, reporters and news agencies.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Journalism in America is Dead! - 1
JOURNALISM IN AMERICA IS DEAD! - 1
The website – cinops be gone – Wednesday, Oct. 29, 2008
Lord, show me your ways, teach me to walk in your footsteps, guide me in your truth. Psalm, 25:4-5, 16
Journalists have betrayed fairness and balance in their news reports. That insults and wounds the American soul, particularly in this presidential election year. We can put up with recognized bias and even political correctness, but not the prostitution of fairness and honest reporting. TODAY OBJECTIVE JOURNALISM IN NEWS-REPORTING IS A DEAD CORPSE.
Witness what is happening TODAY on your television screen. With all kinds of polls we see the exhilaration at the election of The Anointed One, the President of the World. He has already been elected by the U.S. Media. Wait a minute! Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 4th and we haven’t voted yet and we are voting for the President of the United States. I AM NOT GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS SECULAR RELIGIOUS ELECTION CON-OPERATION IN U.S. HISTORY.
I understand that The Messiah is going to give a one-half hour pied piper talk this evening. (BY THE WAY, OBAMA HAS ALREADY TAPED HIS TALK LAST WEEK.) Watch for sincere facial expressions, and the manipulated audio sound in the background to make THE MESSIAH sound inspirational, reasonable, moderate even conservative to your heart! THANK GOD WE HAVE SIX DAYS BEFORE VOTING! IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS GOD WILL DECIDE WHO WINS. PRAY FOR THE CITIZENS OF PENNSYLVANIA. PRAY FOR AN HONEST ELECTION THAT IS NOT DECIDED BY THE VOTES OF A.C.O.R.N.
IN THE DAYS AHEAD, THERE ARE THREE ABSOLUTE FACTS FOR TRADITIONAL AMERICA NEVER TO FORGET. AS ENUNCIATED BY COLUMNIST DENNIS PRAGER (CHECK THIS BLOG TITLED, UNDERSTANDING BARACK OBAMA’S SECUALAR AGENDA, 1-2-3:)
We have two irreconcilable Americas. One wants to impose same-sex marriage and change our motto: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness to the French European motto: Liberty, Fraternity and Equality. No matter who wins be prepared for battle. The enemy will attack, smear and try to destroy our religious and civil liberties. JOURNALISTS ARE THE MOUTHPIECES OF SECULAR AMERICA. PRO-LIFE HAS KNOWN THIS SINCE 1973.
JOURNALISTS AND THE U.S. MEDIA HAVE MOCKED REGULAR AMERICAN CITIZENS. I GUESS WE CAN COME UP WITH ALL KINDS OF SLOGANS: FOR OUR UNSURE AND DON’T KNOW VOTERS:
IT’S NO! NO! TO MEDIA AND HOLLYWOOD CANDIDATES AND ISSUES!
G. H. Kubeck, NO! NO! TO THE CULTURE OF DEATH ACROSS AMERICA!
The website – cinops be gone – Wednesday, Oct. 29, 2008
Lord, show me your ways, teach me to walk in your footsteps, guide me in your truth. Psalm, 25:4-5, 16
Journalists have betrayed fairness and balance in their news reports. That insults and wounds the American soul, particularly in this presidential election year. We can put up with recognized bias and even political correctness, but not the prostitution of fairness and honest reporting. TODAY OBJECTIVE JOURNALISM IN NEWS-REPORTING IS A DEAD CORPSE.
Witness what is happening TODAY on your television screen. With all kinds of polls we see the exhilaration at the election of The Anointed One, the President of the World. He has already been elected by the U.S. Media. Wait a minute! Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 4th and we haven’t voted yet and we are voting for the President of the United States. I AM NOT GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS SECULAR RELIGIOUS ELECTION CON-OPERATION IN U.S. HISTORY.
I understand that The Messiah is going to give a one-half hour pied piper talk this evening. (BY THE WAY, OBAMA HAS ALREADY TAPED HIS TALK LAST WEEK.) Watch for sincere facial expressions, and the manipulated audio sound in the background to make THE MESSIAH sound inspirational, reasonable, moderate even conservative to your heart! THANK GOD WE HAVE SIX DAYS BEFORE VOTING! IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS GOD WILL DECIDE WHO WINS. PRAY FOR THE CITIZENS OF PENNSYLVANIA. PRAY FOR AN HONEST ELECTION THAT IS NOT DECIDED BY THE VOTES OF A.C.O.R.N.
IN THE DAYS AHEAD, THERE ARE THREE ABSOLUTE FACTS FOR TRADITIONAL AMERICA NEVER TO FORGET. AS ENUNCIATED BY COLUMNIST DENNIS PRAGER (CHECK THIS BLOG TITLED, UNDERSTANDING BARACK OBAMA’S SECUALAR AGENDA, 1-2-3:)
We have two irreconcilable Americas. One wants to impose same-sex marriage and change our motto: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness to the French European motto: Liberty, Fraternity and Equality. No matter who wins be prepared for battle. The enemy will attack, smear and try to destroy our religious and civil liberties. JOURNALISTS ARE THE MOUTHPIECES OF SECULAR AMERICA. PRO-LIFE HAS KNOWN THIS SINCE 1973.
JOURNALISTS AND THE U.S. MEDIA HAVE MOCKED REGULAR AMERICAN CITIZENS. I GUESS WE CAN COME UP WITH ALL KINDS OF SLOGANS: FOR OUR UNSURE AND DON’T KNOW VOTERS:
IT’S NO! NO! TO MEDIA AND HOLLYWOOD CANDIDATES AND ISSUES!
G. H. Kubeck, NO! NO! TO THE CULTURE OF DEATH ACROSS AMERICA!
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
A Catholic Election Prayer
A Catholic Election Prayer
The website – cinops be gone – Tuesday, October 28, 2008
This prayer is an election prayer to Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ:
O Most Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of Mercy, at this most critical time in our history, we entrust the United States to your loving care.
Most Holy Mother, we beg you to reclaim this land for the glory of your Son, Jesus. Overwhelmed with the burden of sins of our nation, we cry to you from the depths or our hearts, and seek refuge in your motherly protection.
Look down with mercy upon us and touch the hearts of your people. Help us to recognize the great value of human life, and to accept the responsibilities that accompany human freedom. Mold our hearts after the heart of your Son, and make us meek and humble. Give us docile hearts that listens attentively and joyfully to the voice of Holy Mother Church, so that our consciences may be formed according to the truth. Give us pure hearts that that are willing to embrace what is truly good, and pleasing to Jesus.
Free us from the falsehoods that lead people to support directly or indirectly, the intrinsic evils of: abortion, euthanasia, cloning, destructive embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage. Grant the people of our country the wisdom to follow God’s law, the foundation on which this nation was established. Grant us the grace to knowledge that God alone is the true source of our cherished rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
O Merciful Mother, give us the courage to proclaim and build a new culture of life, and to reject the culture of death and immorality. Amen
Remember Judgment Day in the Voting Booth
Bishop Robert J. Herman, the administrator of the Archdiocese of St. Louis:
“Judgment Day is on its way,” the bishop wrote in the St. Louis Review. “We cannot stop it… For many, this coming election may very well be judgment day, for this election will measure us.”…
“The decision I make in the voting booth will reflect my value system. If I value the good of the economy and my current lifestyle more than I do the right to life itself, then I am in trouble.”…
“The right of our children to be protected from destruction is greater than my right to a thriving economy,” Bishop Herman continued, “ My desire for a good economy cannot justify my voting to remove all current restrictions on abortion. My desire to end the war in Iraq cannot justify my voting to remove all current restrictions on abortions.”
“Those 47 million children our nation destroyed are still living. We have destroyed their bodies but their souls are still alive. When our Lord comes again, they may very well be there to judge us. … “I was in my mother’s womb but you took my life!”
“It is quite possible that we might see these children, but, depending upon the choices we have made, we may very well be separated from them by a great chasm which cannot be crossed, much as the rich man who ignored Lazarus, the poor man, during his lifetime here on earth but was separated from him after death.”
“Save our children!” he wrote, “More than anything else, this election is about saving our children or killing our children. This life issue is the overriding issue facing each of us in this coming election. All other issues, including the economy, have to take second place to the issue of life.”
G.H.K.
The website – cinops be gone – Tuesday, October 28, 2008
This prayer is an election prayer to Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ:
O Most Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of Mercy, at this most critical time in our history, we entrust the United States to your loving care.
Most Holy Mother, we beg you to reclaim this land for the glory of your Son, Jesus. Overwhelmed with the burden of sins of our nation, we cry to you from the depths or our hearts, and seek refuge in your motherly protection.
Look down with mercy upon us and touch the hearts of your people. Help us to recognize the great value of human life, and to accept the responsibilities that accompany human freedom. Mold our hearts after the heart of your Son, and make us meek and humble. Give us docile hearts that listens attentively and joyfully to the voice of Holy Mother Church, so that our consciences may be formed according to the truth. Give us pure hearts that that are willing to embrace what is truly good, and pleasing to Jesus.
Free us from the falsehoods that lead people to support directly or indirectly, the intrinsic evils of: abortion, euthanasia, cloning, destructive embryonic stem-cell research, and same-sex marriage. Grant the people of our country the wisdom to follow God’s law, the foundation on which this nation was established. Grant us the grace to knowledge that God alone is the true source of our cherished rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
O Merciful Mother, give us the courage to proclaim and build a new culture of life, and to reject the culture of death and immorality. Amen
Remember Judgment Day in the Voting Booth
Bishop Robert J. Herman, the administrator of the Archdiocese of St. Louis:
“Judgment Day is on its way,” the bishop wrote in the St. Louis Review. “We cannot stop it… For many, this coming election may very well be judgment day, for this election will measure us.”…
“The decision I make in the voting booth will reflect my value system. If I value the good of the economy and my current lifestyle more than I do the right to life itself, then I am in trouble.”…
“The right of our children to be protected from destruction is greater than my right to a thriving economy,” Bishop Herman continued, “ My desire for a good economy cannot justify my voting to remove all current restrictions on abortion. My desire to end the war in Iraq cannot justify my voting to remove all current restrictions on abortions.”
“Those 47 million children our nation destroyed are still living. We have destroyed their bodies but their souls are still alive. When our Lord comes again, they may very well be there to judge us. … “I was in my mother’s womb but you took my life!”
“It is quite possible that we might see these children, but, depending upon the choices we have made, we may very well be separated from them by a great chasm which cannot be crossed, much as the rich man who ignored Lazarus, the poor man, during his lifetime here on earth but was separated from him after death.”
“Save our children!” he wrote, “More than anything else, this election is about saving our children or killing our children. This life issue is the overriding issue facing each of us in this coming election. All other issues, including the economy, have to take second place to the issue of life.”
G.H.K.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Understanding Barack Obama's Secular Agenda - 3 of 3
Understanding Barack Obama’s Secular Agenda – 3 of 3
The website – cinops be gone – Monday, October 27, 2008
We will close this classic article by Dennis Prager titled, No Reconciling the two Americas, “Washington Times”, Oct. 20th, 2008 with his exact words.
The left regards the notion of American exceptionalism as chauvinism; the United Nations and world opinion are regarded as better arbiters of what is good than is America.
The right has a low opinion of the U.N.’s moral compass and of world opinion, both of which it sees as having a much poorer record of stopping genocide and other evils than America has.
The left is ambivalent about and often hostile to overt displays of American patriotism. That is why, for example, one is far more likely to find American flags displayed in Orange County, Calif., on national holidays than in liberal neighborhoods in West Los Angeles, Manhattan or San Francisco….
The left envisions an egalitarian society. The right does not. The left values equality above other values because it yearns for an America in which all people have similar amounts of material possessions.
This is what propels the left to advocate laws that would force employers to pay women the same wages they pay men not only for the same job but for “comparable” jobs (as if that is objectively ascertainable)
The right values equality in opportunity and strongly believes that all people are created equal, but the right values liberty, a man-woman based family and other values above equality.
The left wants a world – and therefore an America – devoid of nuclear weapons. The right wants America to have the best nuclear weapons. The right trusts American might more than universal disarmament.
George H. Kubeck,
Remember what happened after the 9/11 terrorist attack?
During this election week, let’s fly our American flags!
The purpose is to persuade independent voters – for Rosie Avila and McCain-Palin.
The website – cinops be gone – Monday, October 27, 2008
We will close this classic article by Dennis Prager titled, No Reconciling the two Americas, “Washington Times”, Oct. 20th, 2008 with his exact words.
The left regards the notion of American exceptionalism as chauvinism; the United Nations and world opinion are regarded as better arbiters of what is good than is America.
The right has a low opinion of the U.N.’s moral compass and of world opinion, both of which it sees as having a much poorer record of stopping genocide and other evils than America has.
The left is ambivalent about and often hostile to overt displays of American patriotism. That is why, for example, one is far more likely to find American flags displayed in Orange County, Calif., on national holidays than in liberal neighborhoods in West Los Angeles, Manhattan or San Francisco….
The left envisions an egalitarian society. The right does not. The left values equality above other values because it yearns for an America in which all people have similar amounts of material possessions.
This is what propels the left to advocate laws that would force employers to pay women the same wages they pay men not only for the same job but for “comparable” jobs (as if that is objectively ascertainable)
The right values equality in opportunity and strongly believes that all people are created equal, but the right values liberty, a man-woman based family and other values above equality.
The left wants a world – and therefore an America – devoid of nuclear weapons. The right wants America to have the best nuclear weapons. The right trusts American might more than universal disarmament.
George H. Kubeck,
Remember what happened after the 9/11 terrorist attack?
During this election week, let’s fly our American flags!
The purpose is to persuade independent voters – for Rosie Avila and McCain-Palin.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Understanding Barack Obama's Agenda - 2
Understanding Barack Obama’s Secular Agenda – 2
The website – cinops be gone – Sunday, October 26, 2008 A.M.
The price of liberty in America MUST always BE eternal vigilance. We return to Dennis Prager’s article in The Washington Times, Monday, Oct. 20, 2008 – NO RECONCILING THE TWO AMERICAS.
The left subscribes to the French Revolution, whose guiding principles were “LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY. The right subscribes to the American formula, “LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.” The French/European notion of equality is not mentioned. The right rejects the French Revolution and does not hold Western Europe as model. The left does. That makes the right and left irreconcilable.
The left wants to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples for the first time in history. The right wants gays to have equal rights, but to keep marriage defined as man-woman. This, too, constitutes an irreconcilable divide.
(We will cover other areas of Prager’s article in letter 3.)
THE LEFT IS AT WAR WITH THE RIGHT AND THE RIGHT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT WAR AND IS ALWAYS ON THE DEFENSIVE.
WE WILL CUT THIS LETTER SHORT AND E-MAIL: THIS SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT:
SEAN HANNITY WIIL BE ON FOX NEWS THIS EVENING 6 P.M. PACIFIC TIME AND HAS A SPECIAL PROGRAM ON BARACK OBAMA. IT IS A MUST VIEW.
ALSO, YOU CAN’T GO WRONG WITH DENNIS PRAGER’S PROGRAM ON TALK RADIO IN ORANGE COUNTY AND THROUGHOUT THE NATION. LOCALLY, IT IS ON KLAC 870 TALK RADIO FROM 9 A.M. TO 12 NOON.
THAT STATION, HAS DECISION-MAKING INFORMATIONAL NEWS ALL DAY.
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to your friends back East.
The website – cinops be gone – Sunday, October 26, 2008 A.M.
The price of liberty in America MUST always BE eternal vigilance. We return to Dennis Prager’s article in The Washington Times, Monday, Oct. 20, 2008 – NO RECONCILING THE TWO AMERICAS.
The left subscribes to the French Revolution, whose guiding principles were “LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY. The right subscribes to the American formula, “LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.” The French/European notion of equality is not mentioned. The right rejects the French Revolution and does not hold Western Europe as model. The left does. That makes the right and left irreconcilable.
The left wants to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples for the first time in history. The right wants gays to have equal rights, but to keep marriage defined as man-woman. This, too, constitutes an irreconcilable divide.
(We will cover other areas of Prager’s article in letter 3.)
THE LEFT IS AT WAR WITH THE RIGHT AND THE RIGHT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT WAR AND IS ALWAYS ON THE DEFENSIVE.
WE WILL CUT THIS LETTER SHORT AND E-MAIL: THIS SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT:
SEAN HANNITY WIIL BE ON FOX NEWS THIS EVENING 6 P.M. PACIFIC TIME AND HAS A SPECIAL PROGRAM ON BARACK OBAMA. IT IS A MUST VIEW.
ALSO, YOU CAN’T GO WRONG WITH DENNIS PRAGER’S PROGRAM ON TALK RADIO IN ORANGE COUNTY AND THROUGHOUT THE NATION. LOCALLY, IT IS ON KLAC 870 TALK RADIO FROM 9 A.M. TO 12 NOON.
THAT STATION, HAS DECISION-MAKING INFORMATIONAL NEWS ALL DAY.
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to your friends back East.
Christians are Sunday People
Christians are Sunday People
The website – cinops be gone – Sunday, Oct. 26, 2008 A.M.
Christians are Sunday people. On this day Christ rose from the dead. The feast of Sunday is, therefore, above all a profession of faith in the Resurrection.
According to Jewish reckoning, Sunday was the first day of the week. It was therefore, the day on which God created the world.
Sunday is also the day on which we give thanks for creation.
We learn what a man thinks, who he is, from that for which he has time. To observe the Christian Sunday is to have time for God, to acknowledge him publicly and privately by reserving a piece of our time for him.
It follows then that our Sunday outings should be planned so that there is always time for divine worship.
Sunday should be a day for conversation, a day on which are present to one another and learn anew, to understand one another. Because Sunday is God’s day, it is also humanity’s day;
Integral to the observance of Sunday should always be a festive and religious-oriented meal that recalls the communal participation in the Eucharist and that, precisely by its religious form, by its turning to the giver of all good things, will also be the surest defense against a meaningless arrogance that is often an attempt to compensate for one’s spiritual hunger and spiritual emptiness.
The rediscovery of Sunday is of crucial importance for our future – the future of the individual, of the family, and society.
(Pope Benedict XV1), Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Co-Workers of the Truth, “Meditations for Every Day of the Year, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1992, Oct. 20th and 21st entry.
George H. Kubeck,
The website – cinops be gone – Sunday, Oct. 26, 2008 A.M.
Christians are Sunday people. On this day Christ rose from the dead. The feast of Sunday is, therefore, above all a profession of faith in the Resurrection.
According to Jewish reckoning, Sunday was the first day of the week. It was therefore, the day on which God created the world.
Sunday is also the day on which we give thanks for creation.
We learn what a man thinks, who he is, from that for which he has time. To observe the Christian Sunday is to have time for God, to acknowledge him publicly and privately by reserving a piece of our time for him.
It follows then that our Sunday outings should be planned so that there is always time for divine worship.
Sunday should be a day for conversation, a day on which are present to one another and learn anew, to understand one another. Because Sunday is God’s day, it is also humanity’s day;
Integral to the observance of Sunday should always be a festive and religious-oriented meal that recalls the communal participation in the Eucharist and that, precisely by its religious form, by its turning to the giver of all good things, will also be the surest defense against a meaningless arrogance that is often an attempt to compensate for one’s spiritual hunger and spiritual emptiness.
The rediscovery of Sunday is of crucial importance for our future – the future of the individual, of the family, and society.
(Pope Benedict XV1), Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger, Co-Workers of the Truth, “Meditations for Every Day of the Year, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 1992, Oct. 20th and 21st entry.
George H. Kubeck,
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Understanding Barack Obama's Secular Agenda # 1
Understanding Barack Obama’s Secular Agenda # 1
The website – cinops be gone – Saturday, October 25, 2008 A.M.
Dennis Prager has a razor sharp analysis of what is at stake in this Presidential election: a secular America vs. a traditional America. I am grateful for his article that appeared in The Washington Times, Monday, October 20, 2008 – NO RECONCILING THE TWO AMERICAS. Prager is a nationally syndicated columnists and radio talk show host on KLAC 870 A.M. daily from 9 A.M. to 12
The left and right differ in their visions of America and that is why they differ on policies. THE RIGHT AND LEFT DO NOT WANT THE SAME AMERICA.
There are two irreconcilable divisions which we will discuss in letter # 2. For these and other reasons, calls for a unity among Americans that transcends left and right are either naïve or disingenuous. AMERICA WILL BE UNITED ONLY WHEN ONE OF THEM PREVAILS OVER THE OTHER. THE LEFT KNOWS THIS. {UNFORTUNATEL} MOST ON THE RIGHT DO NOT.
{AND NO MATTER WHO WINS THIS ELECTION THE BATTLE FOR THE SOUL OF AMERICA MUST CONTINUE. ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND THAT FOR THE LEFT; POLITICS AND THE SECULAR AGENDA ARE ABSOLUTE DAILY RELIGIOUS BELIEVES AND GOALS. FOR THE TRADITIONAL AMERICANS, POLITICS IS NOT A RELIGION.}
HOW WILL BARACK’S OBAMA OF AMERICA LOOK?
The left wants America to look as much as possible like Western Europe countries. He wants Europe’s quasi-pacificism, cradle to grave socialism, egalitarianism and secularism.
{It is really a compliment to call Obama a socialist. When you consider the company he has kept, terrorists, anarchists, Marxists and Communists. We have to ask these questions considering that the corrupt News Media hasn’t got the guts to investigate and deliberately hides the information from all Americans.}
The left wants America not only to have a secular government, but to have a secular society. The left feels that if people want to be religious, they should do so at home and in their houses of prayer but never try to inject their religious values into society.
{Think of Obama on abortion and legalizing the Freedom of Choice Act.}
The left prefers to identify as citizens of the world. The left fears nationalism in general (this has been true for the European left since World War I), and since the 1960’s, the American left has come to fear American nationalism.
{Dear Senator Barack Obama. I have been reading your book, Dreams of My Father. I got to page 222. THERE ISN’T AN OUNCE OF PATRIOTISM OR LOVE FOR AMERICA THUS FAR. I STRONGLY SUGGEST READERS SHOULD GLANCE THROUGH THE BOOK IN THEIR LIBRARY OR BOOK SELLING STORES.}
George H. Kubeck, e-mail to friends before Halloween next week.
The website – cinops be gone – Saturday, October 25, 2008 A.M.
Dennis Prager has a razor sharp analysis of what is at stake in this Presidential election: a secular America vs. a traditional America. I am grateful for his article that appeared in The Washington Times, Monday, October 20, 2008 – NO RECONCILING THE TWO AMERICAS. Prager is a nationally syndicated columnists and radio talk show host on KLAC 870 A.M. daily from 9 A.M. to 12
The left and right differ in their visions of America and that is why they differ on policies. THE RIGHT AND LEFT DO NOT WANT THE SAME AMERICA.
There are two irreconcilable divisions which we will discuss in letter # 2. For these and other reasons, calls for a unity among Americans that transcends left and right are either naïve or disingenuous. AMERICA WILL BE UNITED ONLY WHEN ONE OF THEM PREVAILS OVER THE OTHER. THE LEFT KNOWS THIS. {UNFORTUNATEL} MOST ON THE RIGHT DO NOT.
{AND NO MATTER WHO WINS THIS ELECTION THE BATTLE FOR THE SOUL OF AMERICA MUST CONTINUE. ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND THAT FOR THE LEFT; POLITICS AND THE SECULAR AGENDA ARE ABSOLUTE DAILY RELIGIOUS BELIEVES AND GOALS. FOR THE TRADITIONAL AMERICANS, POLITICS IS NOT A RELIGION.}
HOW WILL BARACK’S OBAMA OF AMERICA LOOK?
The left wants America to look as much as possible like Western Europe countries. He wants Europe’s quasi-pacificism, cradle to grave socialism, egalitarianism and secularism.
{It is really a compliment to call Obama a socialist. When you consider the company he has kept, terrorists, anarchists, Marxists and Communists. We have to ask these questions considering that the corrupt News Media hasn’t got the guts to investigate and deliberately hides the information from all Americans.}
The left wants America not only to have a secular government, but to have a secular society. The left feels that if people want to be religious, they should do so at home and in their houses of prayer but never try to inject their religious values into society.
{Think of Obama on abortion and legalizing the Freedom of Choice Act.}
The left prefers to identify as citizens of the world. The left fears nationalism in general (this has been true for the European left since World War I), and since the 1960’s, the American left has come to fear American nationalism.
{Dear Senator Barack Obama. I have been reading your book, Dreams of My Father. I got to page 222. THERE ISN’T AN OUNCE OF PATRIOTISM OR LOVE FOR AMERICA THUS FAR. I STRONGLY SUGGEST READERS SHOULD GLANCE THROUGH THE BOOK IN THEIR LIBRARY OR BOOK SELLING STORES.}
George H. Kubeck, e-mail to friends before Halloween next week.
Friday, October 24, 2008
Other Enemies of Marriage
Other Enemies of Marriage
The website – cinops be gone – Friday, October 24, 2008 P.M.
THE ENEMIES OF MARRIAGE ARE OFTEN THE ENEMIES OF AMERICA;
ACLU;
Any listing of those dedicated to destroying marriage a union of one woman and one man must begin with the American Civil Rights Union. The ACLU has elevated the goal of achieving nation-wide same-sex “marriage” to the status of being a “special project” of their organization, and has dedicated untold hundreds of man hours to law suits challenging traditional marriage.
The ACLU recently announced the largest-raising campaign in their organization’s 88-year history centered on expanding its presence in such relatively conservative states as Texas and Florida. The overall goal of the $335 million campaign is mostly designated to strengthen the ACLU’s impact in the heartland. (THE ACLU IS IN ORANGE COUNTY. ANY LOCALLY PRACTICING-CHRISTIAN WHO IS A MEMBER IS AN IDIOT.)
LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE FUND:
The “official” activist law firm of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities, Lambda’s New York headquarters coordinates a nation-wide network of lawyers. Lambda has largely succeeded in positioning their group as a “civil rights” law firm, and has continually sought to cast their cause as being equivalent to that of the National racial minority. …
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN (HRC)
Founded in 1980, HRC claims to be the Nation’s largest gay, bisexual and transgender (GBLT) civil rights organization, and says that it has over 700,000 members and supporters. HRC has announced its 2008 “Year to Win campaign, attempting to build on its success in the 2006 elections during which it was named the “Number Two Most Effective Interest Group” by the National Journal. With massive funding from BILLIONNAIRE GEORGE SOROS and the backing of media and Hollywood elites… investing in many strategic political races in the months prior to 2008 general election…
GAY LESBIAN AND STRAIGHT EDUCATION NETWORK (GLSEN)
Founded in 1990 as a group dealing with alleged discrimination in public schools, GLSEN has become a specialized group desiring to introduce the pro-homosexual community’s influence into K-12 school systems. Now claiming more than 3,600 “Gay-Straight Alliance” student clubs in schools nationwide, GLSEN has a full-time staff of 400 coordinating events such as Day of Silence and No Name Calling Week. GLSEN’s main target has been the inclusion of “counseling” on homosexuality and the promotion of the “gay lifestyle” in school systems….
GILL FOUNDATION;
Tim Gill, a Denver-based software tycoon who founded Quark, has become the single largest financier of the complex of pro-homosexual activist groups. Gill’s massive fortune if being applied to … “strategic philanthropy.” … demonizing their opposition through relentless media attacks.
OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE;
Originally founded by billionaire George Soros to nurture the emerging democracies of Europe following the fall of communism… He ranks among the most influential leaders in today’s efforts to re-define the family in our society.
George H. Kubeck
The website – cinops be gone – Friday, October 24, 2008 P.M.
THE ENEMIES OF MARRIAGE ARE OFTEN THE ENEMIES OF AMERICA;
ACLU;
Any listing of those dedicated to destroying marriage a union of one woman and one man must begin with the American Civil Rights Union. The ACLU has elevated the goal of achieving nation-wide same-sex “marriage” to the status of being a “special project” of their organization, and has dedicated untold hundreds of man hours to law suits challenging traditional marriage.
The ACLU recently announced the largest-raising campaign in their organization’s 88-year history centered on expanding its presence in such relatively conservative states as Texas and Florida. The overall goal of the $335 million campaign is mostly designated to strengthen the ACLU’s impact in the heartland. (THE ACLU IS IN ORANGE COUNTY. ANY LOCALLY PRACTICING-CHRISTIAN WHO IS A MEMBER IS AN IDIOT.)
LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE FUND:
The “official” activist law firm of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities, Lambda’s New York headquarters coordinates a nation-wide network of lawyers. Lambda has largely succeeded in positioning their group as a “civil rights” law firm, and has continually sought to cast their cause as being equivalent to that of the National racial minority. …
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN (HRC)
Founded in 1980, HRC claims to be the Nation’s largest gay, bisexual and transgender (GBLT) civil rights organization, and says that it has over 700,000 members and supporters. HRC has announced its 2008 “Year to Win campaign, attempting to build on its success in the 2006 elections during which it was named the “Number Two Most Effective Interest Group” by the National Journal. With massive funding from BILLIONNAIRE GEORGE SOROS and the backing of media and Hollywood elites… investing in many strategic political races in the months prior to 2008 general election…
GAY LESBIAN AND STRAIGHT EDUCATION NETWORK (GLSEN)
Founded in 1990 as a group dealing with alleged discrimination in public schools, GLSEN has become a specialized group desiring to introduce the pro-homosexual community’s influence into K-12 school systems. Now claiming more than 3,600 “Gay-Straight Alliance” student clubs in schools nationwide, GLSEN has a full-time staff of 400 coordinating events such as Day of Silence and No Name Calling Week. GLSEN’s main target has been the inclusion of “counseling” on homosexuality and the promotion of the “gay lifestyle” in school systems….
GILL FOUNDATION;
Tim Gill, a Denver-based software tycoon who founded Quark, has become the single largest financier of the complex of pro-homosexual activist groups. Gill’s massive fortune if being applied to … “strategic philanthropy.” … demonizing their opposition through relentless media attacks.
OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE;
Originally founded by billionaire George Soros to nurture the emerging democracies of Europe following the fall of communism… He ranks among the most influential leaders in today’s efforts to re-define the family in our society.
George H. Kubeck
Another True Horrific Halloween Election Nighmare
Another True Horrific Halloween Election Nightmare
The website – cinops be gone – Friday, October 24, 2008 A.M.
This is not funny, this is most serious, and this will make you angry or weep for today’s America. This is about an American terrorist Bill Ayers and a Muslim terrorist Bin Laden. When did they meet? They met on the very day of the 7/11 terrorist attack on America. This news was published in the New York Times where the Ayers’s interview was released SEPT. 11, 2001. ‘I (AYERS) DON’T REGRET SETTING BOMBS. I FEEL WE DIDN’T DO ENOUGH.”
During his Weathermen days, Ayers once famously commented, “KILL ALL THE RICH PEOPLE … BRING THE REVOLUTION HOME. KILL YOUR PARENTS.”
Ayers, a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, has admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. government buildings in the 1970’s. The charges against him were dropped in 1974, however, because of prosecutorial misconduct, including illegal surveillance. AS A CITIZEN, I CALL UPON THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO REVIEW THAT CASE IMMEDIATELY! WHY?
AYERS AND HIS WIFE DORN GOT AWAY WITH THE FOLLOWING MURDERS!
As Worldnetnewsdaily reported, an FBI report claims that Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dorn, a co-conspirator with Ayers, built and planted the bomb that KILLED A SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER IN 1970.
DORN WAS ONCE ON THE FBI’S TOP 10 MOST WANTED LIST. J. EDGAR HOOVER DESCRIBED HER AS THE “MOST DANGEROUS WOMAN IN AMERICA.”
In addition, Ayers and Dohrn raised the son of Weatherman terrorist Kathy Boudin, who was serving a sentence for participating IN A 1981 MURDER AND ROBBERY THAT LEFT FOUR PEOPLE DEAD.
WHAT DOES ALL OF THE ABOVE MEAN FOR AMERICANS? WE ARE WITNESSING AN AMERICAN ELECTION UPSET. WITH YOUR JUDGMENT, AND VOTE IN AN HONEST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, OBAMA WILL BE DEFEATED. WHY?
In his early career, Obama had many associations with Ayers. In 1995, the first organizing meeting for Obama’s state senatorial campaign reportedly was held in Ayers apartment. In a widely circulated article, WND first reported Obama served on the board of the Wood’s Fund, a liberal Chicago nonprofit, alongside Ayers from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the fund’s website. Tax filings showed Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000. Ayer’s wife, Bernadine Dohrn, also served on panels with Obama.
For ordinary folks throughout America, the thought of associating with unrepentant terrorists is incomprehensible. A terrorist is an evil person.
WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT OBAMA’S JUDGMENT, JUDGMENT, AND JUDGMENT IN THE OVAL OFFICE?
The above info from WorldnetDaily.com, 9/15/08 and 10/21/08
George H. Kubeck, sadly, e-mail to your friends and relatives across America.
The website – cinops be gone – Friday, October 24, 2008 A.M.
This is not funny, this is most serious, and this will make you angry or weep for today’s America. This is about an American terrorist Bill Ayers and a Muslim terrorist Bin Laden. When did they meet? They met on the very day of the 7/11 terrorist attack on America. This news was published in the New York Times where the Ayers’s interview was released SEPT. 11, 2001. ‘I (AYERS) DON’T REGRET SETTING BOMBS. I FEEL WE DIDN’T DO ENOUGH.”
During his Weathermen days, Ayers once famously commented, “KILL ALL THE RICH PEOPLE … BRING THE REVOLUTION HOME. KILL YOUR PARENTS.”
Ayers, a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, has admitted to involvement in the bombings of U.S. government buildings in the 1970’s. The charges against him were dropped in 1974, however, because of prosecutorial misconduct, including illegal surveillance. AS A CITIZEN, I CALL UPON THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO REVIEW THAT CASE IMMEDIATELY! WHY?
AYERS AND HIS WIFE DORN GOT AWAY WITH THE FOLLOWING MURDERS!
As Worldnetnewsdaily reported, an FBI report claims that Ayers’ wife, Bernadine Dorn, a co-conspirator with Ayers, built and planted the bomb that KILLED A SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER IN 1970.
DORN WAS ONCE ON THE FBI’S TOP 10 MOST WANTED LIST. J. EDGAR HOOVER DESCRIBED HER AS THE “MOST DANGEROUS WOMAN IN AMERICA.”
In addition, Ayers and Dohrn raised the son of Weatherman terrorist Kathy Boudin, who was serving a sentence for participating IN A 1981 MURDER AND ROBBERY THAT LEFT FOUR PEOPLE DEAD.
WHAT DOES ALL OF THE ABOVE MEAN FOR AMERICANS? WE ARE WITNESSING AN AMERICAN ELECTION UPSET. WITH YOUR JUDGMENT, AND VOTE IN AN HONEST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, OBAMA WILL BE DEFEATED. WHY?
In his early career, Obama had many associations with Ayers. In 1995, the first organizing meeting for Obama’s state senatorial campaign reportedly was held in Ayers apartment. In a widely circulated article, WND first reported Obama served on the board of the Wood’s Fund, a liberal Chicago nonprofit, alongside Ayers from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the fund’s website. Tax filings showed Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000. Ayer’s wife, Bernadine Dohrn, also served on panels with Obama.
For ordinary folks throughout America, the thought of associating with unrepentant terrorists is incomprehensible. A terrorist is an evil person.
WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT OBAMA’S JUDGMENT, JUDGMENT, AND JUDGMENT IN THE OVAL OFFICE?
The above info from WorldnetDaily.com, 9/15/08 and 10/21/08
George H. Kubeck, sadly, e-mail to your friends and relatives across America.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
A True Halloween Election Nightmare
A True Halloween Election Nightmare
cinops be gone Thursday, October 23, 2008 P.M.
As Halloween approaches if the following doesn’t frighten you to death, nothing will. The following is in Obama’s own words on the Supreme Court from:
(Terry Eastland, “Night of the Living Constitution.” Weekly Standard, 10/20/08 V.0014 -06)
In sharp contrast to McCain, Obama is the nominee of a party that has embraced the activism of the Warren Court and its expansion under the Burger Court (think Roe vs. Wade) and which has hardened in its hostility to judicial conservatism during the Bush presidency. Obama’s has proved to be one of his party’s most determined opponents of judicially conservative nominees. He voted not only against Roberts and Alito but also against six circuit-court nominees and joined in the Democrats’ filibustering of such nominees – which filibustering was without precedent in Senate history.
Obama, a Harvard-trained lawyer who for a decade taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School, has said “my judges” should have “the heart, the empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor or African-American or gay or disabled or old.” He has characterized such people as being in “minority” and “on the outside” and not having “lot of clout.”
His judges should help them by importing to their deliberations their own “perspective,” “ethics,” and “moral bearings.” Thus his judges would carry out the judiciary’s “historic role” of protecting those who “may be vulnerable in the political process,” who have seen “the system not work for them,” who don’t “who don’t “have access to political power,” and who can’t protect themselves from being dealt with sometimes unfairly.”
For Obama, it would seem that what he calls minorities or outsiders would encompass not only those “vulnerable” in the political process and thus “subject to discriminatory legislation” … It appears for Obama that the courts must be involved in improving things for all of those “who needs protection,” and it could be a large group considering that Obama’s informal campaign-trail list hardly seems exhaustive.
Obama, who is a stout defender to the right to abortions announced in Roe, would seem to want judges sympathetic to arguments that the Constitution protects a fundamental right to education or health care or housing – perhaps even a right to credit. … And with regard to race-base preferences, judges who share his philosophy could push for their permanent institution in higher education, employment, and contracting as a way of making the system work better for certain minorities.
An Obama judiciary would be a plainly liberal one. Not surprisingly, Obama has endorsed the idea of a “living Constitution,” one judges adept to meet the needs of a changing society. A living Constitution has its analogue in what might be called a “living U.S. Code” by which judges rewrite federal statutes they regard as somewhat deficient, which for Obama could mean statutes having an adverse impact on people “who need protection.” Obama’s model justice is Earl Warren, who saw the role of the Court as that of doing justice, regardless of what the law at issue in a case might say. The senator must have cringed when John Roberts, … answer{ed} a question about what the biggest threats to the rule of law might be by saying that there is only one threat - that judges who take their “authority and extend it into areas where they are going beyond the interpretation of the Constitution, where they’re making the law…”
George H. Kubeck, e-mail for Halloween to friends and relatives across the nation.
cinops be gone Thursday, October 23, 2008 P.M.
As Halloween approaches if the following doesn’t frighten you to death, nothing will. The following is in Obama’s own words on the Supreme Court from:
(Terry Eastland, “Night of the Living Constitution.” Weekly Standard, 10/20/08 V.0014 -06)
In sharp contrast to McCain, Obama is the nominee of a party that has embraced the activism of the Warren Court and its expansion under the Burger Court (think Roe vs. Wade) and which has hardened in its hostility to judicial conservatism during the Bush presidency. Obama’s has proved to be one of his party’s most determined opponents of judicially conservative nominees. He voted not only against Roberts and Alito but also against six circuit-court nominees and joined in the Democrats’ filibustering of such nominees – which filibustering was without precedent in Senate history.
Obama, a Harvard-trained lawyer who for a decade taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School, has said “my judges” should have “the heart, the empathy to understand what it’s like to be poor or African-American or gay or disabled or old.” He has characterized such people as being in “minority” and “on the outside” and not having “lot of clout.”
His judges should help them by importing to their deliberations their own “perspective,” “ethics,” and “moral bearings.” Thus his judges would carry out the judiciary’s “historic role” of protecting those who “may be vulnerable in the political process,” who have seen “the system not work for them,” who don’t “who don’t “have access to political power,” and who can’t protect themselves from being dealt with sometimes unfairly.”
For Obama, it would seem that what he calls minorities or outsiders would encompass not only those “vulnerable” in the political process and thus “subject to discriminatory legislation” … It appears for Obama that the courts must be involved in improving things for all of those “who needs protection,” and it could be a large group considering that Obama’s informal campaign-trail list hardly seems exhaustive.
Obama, who is a stout defender to the right to abortions announced in Roe, would seem to want judges sympathetic to arguments that the Constitution protects a fundamental right to education or health care or housing – perhaps even a right to credit. … And with regard to race-base preferences, judges who share his philosophy could push for their permanent institution in higher education, employment, and contracting as a way of making the system work better for certain minorities.
An Obama judiciary would be a plainly liberal one. Not surprisingly, Obama has endorsed the idea of a “living Constitution,” one judges adept to meet the needs of a changing society. A living Constitution has its analogue in what might be called a “living U.S. Code” by which judges rewrite federal statutes they regard as somewhat deficient, which for Obama could mean statutes having an adverse impact on people “who need protection.” Obama’s model justice is Earl Warren, who saw the role of the Court as that of doing justice, regardless of what the law at issue in a case might say. The senator must have cringed when John Roberts, … answer{ed} a question about what the biggest threats to the rule of law might be by saying that there is only one threat - that judges who take their “authority and extend it into areas where they are going beyond the interpretation of the Constitution, where they’re making the law…”
George H. Kubeck, e-mail for Halloween to friends and relatives across the nation.
The Case against "Catholics United" # 3
The Case against “Catholics United” # 3
cinops be gone Thursday, October 23, 2008 A.M.
The truth hurts: Be not afraid: The truth will set you free from evil.
We continue with the article by Amy Sullivan. Dated Sat. Oct. 18, 2008 titled, How Catholics Are Judging Obama and the Democrats. My Comments:
(In the last paragraph, I will blow the whistle on C.U. and ask them to apologize for their fraudulent advertisements to the Catholic American people.)
Let’s go to Ohio and note that CINOP Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Tim Ryan voted against the Catholic position on 1. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act-passage (110th) and 2. Marriage Amendment Act (109th).
The 4 Catholic Republicans, Boehner, Chabot, Schmidt and Tiberi voted for the common good on these two positions.
Archbishop Chaput directly addresses the arguments made by Catholic supporters of Obama, including Prof. Doug Kmiec from two public statements, the latest titled “Little Murders.”
…who have done a disservice to the Church, confused the natural priorities of Catholic social teaching, undermined the progress pro-lifers have made, and provided an excuse for some Catholics to abandon the abortion issue instead of fighting within their parties and at the ballot box to protect the unborn.
GOD BLESS ARCHBISHOP CHAPUT, A TRUE SHEPHERD: AN EXEMPLAR OF POPE JOHN PAUL II.
Now let me go to another disservice to the Church done by Jesuit-Affiliated Santa Clara University and weep when reading this story from LifeSiteNews.com, Santa Clara, CA, October 20, 2008:
Jesuit-Affiliated Santa Clara Law to Honor Pro-Abortion Clinton Chief of Staff
At a celebration tomorrow evening, Oct. 21, Santa Clara School of Law, a Catholic Jesuit affiliated school, will bestow its Justice and Human Rights Award upon … Leon Panetta, who serves on the University’s board of trustees. The award will be presented at the University’s fifth annual “Diversity Gala: A Celebration of Diversity in the Legal Profession.
Leon Panetta’s terms as a US Congressman were stained by his pro-abortion voting record. He co-sponsored the dangerous Freedom of Choice Act in 1990.
During his tenure as White House Chief of Staff from 1994 to 1997, Panetta defended President Bill Clinton’s veto of H.R. 1833, the partial-birth abortion ban.
LifeNews: George Soros Funds Catholic Groups Making Obama Seem Pro-life on Abortion: Catholic Groups Corrupted, by George (FRC Action Update, 10-13-08)
It seems odd that a handful of Catholic organizations are supporting a pro-abortion candidate like Barack Obama, Catholic League President Bill Donohue said we need only to look at their list of contributors. In a surprising twist, it seems liberal financier George Soros has been pouring money into Catholic groups that are painting Obama in a favorable pro-life light. ACCORDING TO IRS RECORDS, BOTH CATHOLICS UNITED AND CATHOLICS IN ALLIANCE HAVE BENEFIT BY TENS OF THOUSANDS FROM THE UNLIKELY PARTNERSHIP WITH THE MOVE.ORG FOUNDER. Donahue who exposed the link, said, “The reason Soros funds the Catholic left is … {because} they all serve his agenda … to make support for abortion rights a respectable Catholic position.”
George H. Kubeck OPL, Veritas
cinops be gone Thursday, October 23, 2008 A.M.
The truth hurts: Be not afraid: The truth will set you free from evil.
We continue with the article by Amy Sullivan. Dated Sat. Oct. 18, 2008 titled, How Catholics Are Judging Obama and the Democrats. My Comments:
(In the last paragraph, I will blow the whistle on C.U. and ask them to apologize for their fraudulent advertisements to the Catholic American people.)
Let’s go to Ohio and note that CINOP Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Tim Ryan voted against the Catholic position on 1. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act-passage (110th) and 2. Marriage Amendment Act (109th).
The 4 Catholic Republicans, Boehner, Chabot, Schmidt and Tiberi voted for the common good on these two positions.
Archbishop Chaput directly addresses the arguments made by Catholic supporters of Obama, including Prof. Doug Kmiec from two public statements, the latest titled “Little Murders.”
…who have done a disservice to the Church, confused the natural priorities of Catholic social teaching, undermined the progress pro-lifers have made, and provided an excuse for some Catholics to abandon the abortion issue instead of fighting within their parties and at the ballot box to protect the unborn.
GOD BLESS ARCHBISHOP CHAPUT, A TRUE SHEPHERD: AN EXEMPLAR OF POPE JOHN PAUL II.
Now let me go to another disservice to the Church done by Jesuit-Affiliated Santa Clara University and weep when reading this story from LifeSiteNews.com, Santa Clara, CA, October 20, 2008:
Jesuit-Affiliated Santa Clara Law to Honor Pro-Abortion Clinton Chief of Staff
At a celebration tomorrow evening, Oct. 21, Santa Clara School of Law, a Catholic Jesuit affiliated school, will bestow its Justice and Human Rights Award upon … Leon Panetta, who serves on the University’s board of trustees. The award will be presented at the University’s fifth annual “Diversity Gala: A Celebration of Diversity in the Legal Profession.
Leon Panetta’s terms as a US Congressman were stained by his pro-abortion voting record. He co-sponsored the dangerous Freedom of Choice Act in 1990.
During his tenure as White House Chief of Staff from 1994 to 1997, Panetta defended President Bill Clinton’s veto of H.R. 1833, the partial-birth abortion ban.
LifeNews: George Soros Funds Catholic Groups Making Obama Seem Pro-life on Abortion: Catholic Groups Corrupted, by George (FRC Action Update, 10-13-08)
It seems odd that a handful of Catholic organizations are supporting a pro-abortion candidate like Barack Obama, Catholic League President Bill Donohue said we need only to look at their list of contributors. In a surprising twist, it seems liberal financier George Soros has been pouring money into Catholic groups that are painting Obama in a favorable pro-life light. ACCORDING TO IRS RECORDS, BOTH CATHOLICS UNITED AND CATHOLICS IN ALLIANCE HAVE BENEFIT BY TENS OF THOUSANDS FROM THE UNLIKELY PARTNERSHIP WITH THE MOVE.ORG FOUNDER. Donahue who exposed the link, said, “The reason Soros funds the Catholic left is … {because} they all serve his agenda … to make support for abortion rights a respectable Catholic position.”
George H. Kubeck OPL, Veritas
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
The Case against "Catholics United" # 2
The Case against “Catholics United” # 2
cinops be gone Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008 P.M.
Justice is Truth in action!
We continue with this morning’s article by Amy Sullivan, How Catholics Are Judging Obama and the Democrats. p. 3
Obama has also benefited from the resurgence of progressive Catholics. The Catholic Left used to be a vigorous social and political presence… But by the time Kerry ran in 2004, there were very few Catholic voices echoing his insistence that Church teaching addressed more than just abortion or pushing back against suggestions that he and other pro-choice Catholics should be denied communion.
This void, and Kerry’s defeat, prompted a group of progressive Catholics to create their own infrastructure after 2004. When two young graduate students first launched Catholics United, they had $1,000 in seed money and were operating out of a dorm room. Four years later, the nonpartisan organization has more than 30,000 members and a $200,000 budget. This month they are sending a direct mail piece titled “What Does Being Pro-Life Really Mean?” to 50,000 Catholic households in Pennsylvania and Ohio. (promoting pro-choice candidates) The same message is plastered across billboards in heavily Catholic swing states. p. 3
+++++++
(Now, let’s take the vote of 9 pro-choice Catholic Democrat politicians, Altmire, Brady, Carney, Doyle, Holden, Kanjorski, Murphy Patrick, Murtha, and Sestak. They voted against the Catholic position on 1. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act-passage (110th) House of Representatives Voting Record. The two Catholic- label Republican politicians English, and Murphy Timothy voted for the Catholic position. The 9 Democrats have now added another absolute evil to their names.
This kind of stem-cell research is one of the five absolute evils that are involved in this election campaign. The others are abortion, assisted-suicide, and euthanasia and same-sex marriage. And in your campaign advertisement “What Does Being Pro-Life Mean? you are mixing poisoned apples with oranges. THIS IS FALSE ADVERTISING! The oranges are prudential issues upon which serious Catholics and other Christians can disagree upon like, immigration reform, opposing the use of torture, focus more on the poor, education, health care and the war in Iraq. On the other hand, there is ALWAYS A NO on poisoned apples.
THE TRUTH IS THAT THE POISONED APPLES ARE DIRECTLY & INDIRECTLY PART AND PARCEL OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY AGENDA.
THE PRUDENTIAL ENDS ARE GREAT BUT THEY DO NOT JUSTIFY MIXING POISONED APPLES WITH ORANGES MEANS TO ACHIEVE THEM.
All of this is not fair and dishonest in “Catholics United” advertising campaign.
The Catholic goal in America is to vote out of office all of these pro-choice, CATHOLIC-IN-NAME-ONLY (CINOP) politicians. Let’s stop pretending that they are truly authentic and Catholic. Marriage is a life and death issue in this election. THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE BALLOT IN MASSACHUSETTS. YET PRO-CHOICE NANCY PELOSI CAME INTO TOWN AND BLOCKED IT. IT WOULD HURT THE DEMOCRATIC PESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE. SENATORS TED KENNEDY AND JOHN KERRY WERE SILENT.)
George H. Kubeck OPL, Veritas
cinops be gone Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008 P.M.
Justice is Truth in action!
We continue with this morning’s article by Amy Sullivan, How Catholics Are Judging Obama and the Democrats. p. 3
Obama has also benefited from the resurgence of progressive Catholics. The Catholic Left used to be a vigorous social and political presence… But by the time Kerry ran in 2004, there were very few Catholic voices echoing his insistence that Church teaching addressed more than just abortion or pushing back against suggestions that he and other pro-choice Catholics should be denied communion.
This void, and Kerry’s defeat, prompted a group of progressive Catholics to create their own infrastructure after 2004. When two young graduate students first launched Catholics United, they had $1,000 in seed money and were operating out of a dorm room. Four years later, the nonpartisan organization has more than 30,000 members and a $200,000 budget. This month they are sending a direct mail piece titled “What Does Being Pro-Life Really Mean?” to 50,000 Catholic households in Pennsylvania and Ohio. (promoting pro-choice candidates) The same message is plastered across billboards in heavily Catholic swing states. p. 3
+++++++
(Now, let’s take the vote of 9 pro-choice Catholic Democrat politicians, Altmire, Brady, Carney, Doyle, Holden, Kanjorski, Murphy Patrick, Murtha, and Sestak. They voted against the Catholic position on 1. Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act-passage (110th) House of Representatives Voting Record. The two Catholic- label Republican politicians English, and Murphy Timothy voted for the Catholic position. The 9 Democrats have now added another absolute evil to their names.
This kind of stem-cell research is one of the five absolute evils that are involved in this election campaign. The others are abortion, assisted-suicide, and euthanasia and same-sex marriage. And in your campaign advertisement “What Does Being Pro-Life Mean? you are mixing poisoned apples with oranges. THIS IS FALSE ADVERTISING! The oranges are prudential issues upon which serious Catholics and other Christians can disagree upon like, immigration reform, opposing the use of torture, focus more on the poor, education, health care and the war in Iraq. On the other hand, there is ALWAYS A NO on poisoned apples.
THE TRUTH IS THAT THE POISONED APPLES ARE DIRECTLY & INDIRECTLY PART AND PARCEL OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY AGENDA.
THE PRUDENTIAL ENDS ARE GREAT BUT THEY DO NOT JUSTIFY MIXING POISONED APPLES WITH ORANGES MEANS TO ACHIEVE THEM.
All of this is not fair and dishonest in “Catholics United” advertising campaign.
The Catholic goal in America is to vote out of office all of these pro-choice, CATHOLIC-IN-NAME-ONLY (CINOP) politicians. Let’s stop pretending that they are truly authentic and Catholic. Marriage is a life and death issue in this election. THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ON THE BALLOT IN MASSACHUSETTS. YET PRO-CHOICE NANCY PELOSI CAME INTO TOWN AND BLOCKED IT. IT WOULD HURT THE DEMOCRATIC PESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE. SENATORS TED KENNEDY AND JOHN KERRY WERE SILENT.)
George H. Kubeck OPL, Veritas
The Case against "Catholic United" # 1
The Case against “Catholics United” # 1
cinops be gone Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008 A.M.
Your love, Lord, reaches to heaven;
your truth to the skies.
Your justice is like God’s mountain,
Your judgments life the deep.
Time in Partnership with CNN has an article by Amy Sullivan, dated Sat., Oct. 18, 2008 titled, How Catholics Are Judging Obama and the Democrats. The author believes that at this year’s Al Smith Dinner, Obama’s presence on the dais at the Waldorf-Astoria is just a sign that this may be the Democrats’ best year for Catholic support in decades…. p. 1 of 4 pages.
They are the largest single constituency in the electorate (33 million voted in 2004) and have aligned themselves with the winner in every presidential election going back to 1960, with the exception of 2000. … 1
{In the year 2000, Al Gore won more Catholic votes than George Bush but in Florida he won with a large majority of the Catholic votes, thanks to the effort of many in the pro-life movement especially, Priests for Life.}
By 1984, … Reagan attended alone (The Al Smith Dinner), and, on Election Day, captured 61% of Catholic voters, the largest share that any Republican presidential candidate had ever earned. No GOP candidate has matched it since….
{In 2004, Bush won about 52% of the Catholic vote.}
In a hierarchical tradition like Catholicism, debates don’t happen very often. Right now, however, American Catholics are going through a revival of the arguments that took place in the 1980’s between bishops who believed abortion ought to be the top political and moral focus of the church and the camp led by the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin that argued for a more “consistent ethic of
life.”…
But just last fall, the American bishops released Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility, a document that reminded Catholics that “all life issues are connected.” Over the past few years, archbishops around the country have spoken out in favor of immigration reform, opposing the use of torture, and advancing policies that focus more on the poor. 3
As a result, many Catholics can now argue that neither party fits precisely with Catholic social teaching – the Democratic position on abortion is still unacceptable but so are GOP positions on education and health care and the war in Iraq…. – as of this past February – 41% of Catholic voters called themselves Independents, an 11- point increase since 2004. And in opinion polls, Catholics are even divided between Obama and McCain… 3
{We will compare the above six prudential issues with the five absolutely evil life issues. In fairness to his presidency, Bush has come out in favor of immigration reform but he has done something historic: his faith-based initiatives for the poor. A Democratic elected Presidency would not have started this.}
George H. Kubeck, OPL (We will continue.)
cinops be gone Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008 A.M.
Your love, Lord, reaches to heaven;
your truth to the skies.
Your justice is like God’s mountain,
Your judgments life the deep.
Time in Partnership with CNN has an article by Amy Sullivan, dated Sat., Oct. 18, 2008 titled, How Catholics Are Judging Obama and the Democrats. The author believes that at this year’s Al Smith Dinner, Obama’s presence on the dais at the Waldorf-Astoria is just a sign that this may be the Democrats’ best year for Catholic support in decades…. p. 1 of 4 pages.
They are the largest single constituency in the electorate (33 million voted in 2004) and have aligned themselves with the winner in every presidential election going back to 1960, with the exception of 2000. … 1
{In the year 2000, Al Gore won more Catholic votes than George Bush but in Florida he won with a large majority of the Catholic votes, thanks to the effort of many in the pro-life movement especially, Priests for Life.}
By 1984, … Reagan attended alone (The Al Smith Dinner), and, on Election Day, captured 61% of Catholic voters, the largest share that any Republican presidential candidate had ever earned. No GOP candidate has matched it since….
{In 2004, Bush won about 52% of the Catholic vote.}
In a hierarchical tradition like Catholicism, debates don’t happen very often. Right now, however, American Catholics are going through a revival of the arguments that took place in the 1980’s between bishops who believed abortion ought to be the top political and moral focus of the church and the camp led by the late Cardinal Joseph Bernardin that argued for a more “consistent ethic of
life.”…
But just last fall, the American bishops released Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility, a document that reminded Catholics that “all life issues are connected.” Over the past few years, archbishops around the country have spoken out in favor of immigration reform, opposing the use of torture, and advancing policies that focus more on the poor. 3
As a result, many Catholics can now argue that neither party fits precisely with Catholic social teaching – the Democratic position on abortion is still unacceptable but so are GOP positions on education and health care and the war in Iraq…. – as of this past February – 41% of Catholic voters called themselves Independents, an 11- point increase since 2004. And in opinion polls, Catholics are even divided between Obama and McCain… 3
{We will compare the above six prudential issues with the five absolutely evil life issues. In fairness to his presidency, Bush has come out in favor of immigration reform but he has done something historic: his faith-based initiatives for the poor. A Democratic elected Presidency would not have started this.}
George H. Kubeck, OPL (We will continue.)
A Victorious Boycott of McDonald's
A Victorious Boycott of McDonald’s
cinops be gone Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008 A.M.
How can we translate this great victory into one for Proposition 8 on the California ballot? Hope we can. Thank you American Family Association, and its Founder and Chairman, Donald E. Wildmon who began the boycott of McDonald’s in May, 2008. Let me review his two letters.
October, 2008 Message:
McDonald’s has become a major player in the drive to legalize homosexual marriage. It’s true and here are the sad details.
1. McDonald’s gave $20,000 to the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLC) for a seat on its board of directors. NGLC is pressuring federal and state lawmakers to pass laws legalizing same-sex marriage.
2. McDonald’s spokesman Bill Whitman publicly implied that those who oppose same-sex marriage are motivated by hate.
3. McDonald’s sponsors training for homosexuals on how to promote their agenda inside the corporations for which they work.
4. McDonald’s help sponsor the vulgar and profane S.F. Gay Pride Parade.
5. McDonald’s paid to have this statement placed in an ad that ran in a homosexual booklet: “FROM NEIGHBORHOOD TO NEGHBORHOOD, COAST TO COAST & AROUND THE WORLD, McDONALD’S IS PROUD TO CELEBRATE DIVERSITY.”CODE FOR “DIVERSITY” IS A CODE-SPEAK FOR HOMOSEXUALITY.
Let me quickly add that this boycott in NOT about …
…. whether or not McDonald’s wants to hire homosexuals, or whether or not homosexuals want to eat at McDonald’s; or how McDonald’s treats its homosexual employees.
RATHER THIS BOYCOTT IS ALL ABOUT THE FACT THAT, AS A CORPORATION, McDONALD’S ADAMANTLY REFUSES TO REMAIN TO REMAIN NEUTRAL IN THE CULTURE WAR.
And worse, McDonald’s has chosen to put its full weight behind the promotion of the homosexual agenda … including so-called “same-sex marriage.”
The bottom line for us as Christians is simply this:
Since God calls us to be good stewards for the blessings He gives us, we dare not use His blessings to support a company that intentionally and publicly undermines His Word:
My plan is to employ the same strategy against McDonald’s that we used effectively against Ford Motor Company. That strategy was, as you may remember, to encourage Ford dealers to send our message up the line to the company’s corporate office.
October 9, 2008 Message:
AFA ENDS BOYCOTT: McDONALD’S AGREES TO CHANGES
Great news! Because of AFA supporters like you, McDonald’s has told AFA they will remain neutral in the culture war regarding homosexual marriage. AFA is ending the boycott…. The company has not plans to renew their membership in NGLCC when it expires in December.
Personal: I have no respect for any company’s corporate office that promotes the gay agenda. They need to be taught a lesson. Financial size and or bankruptcy to half the size of their competitors. So pull your money out of McDonald’s.
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Wednesday, Oct. 22, 2008 A.M.
How can we translate this great victory into one for Proposition 8 on the California ballot? Hope we can. Thank you American Family Association, and its Founder and Chairman, Donald E. Wildmon who began the boycott of McDonald’s in May, 2008. Let me review his two letters.
October, 2008 Message:
McDonald’s has become a major player in the drive to legalize homosexual marriage. It’s true and here are the sad details.
1. McDonald’s gave $20,000 to the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLC) for a seat on its board of directors. NGLC is pressuring federal and state lawmakers to pass laws legalizing same-sex marriage.
2. McDonald’s spokesman Bill Whitman publicly implied that those who oppose same-sex marriage are motivated by hate.
3. McDonald’s sponsors training for homosexuals on how to promote their agenda inside the corporations for which they work.
4. McDonald’s help sponsor the vulgar and profane S.F. Gay Pride Parade.
5. McDonald’s paid to have this statement placed in an ad that ran in a homosexual booklet: “FROM NEIGHBORHOOD TO NEGHBORHOOD, COAST TO COAST & AROUND THE WORLD, McDONALD’S IS PROUD TO CELEBRATE DIVERSITY.”CODE FOR “DIVERSITY” IS A CODE-SPEAK FOR HOMOSEXUALITY.
Let me quickly add that this boycott in NOT about …
…. whether or not McDonald’s wants to hire homosexuals, or whether or not homosexuals want to eat at McDonald’s; or how McDonald’s treats its homosexual employees.
RATHER THIS BOYCOTT IS ALL ABOUT THE FACT THAT, AS A CORPORATION, McDONALD’S ADAMANTLY REFUSES TO REMAIN TO REMAIN NEUTRAL IN THE CULTURE WAR.
And worse, McDonald’s has chosen to put its full weight behind the promotion of the homosexual agenda … including so-called “same-sex marriage.”
The bottom line for us as Christians is simply this:
Since God calls us to be good stewards for the blessings He gives us, we dare not use His blessings to support a company that intentionally and publicly undermines His Word:
My plan is to employ the same strategy against McDonald’s that we used effectively against Ford Motor Company. That strategy was, as you may remember, to encourage Ford dealers to send our message up the line to the company’s corporate office.
October 9, 2008 Message:
AFA ENDS BOYCOTT: McDONALD’S AGREES TO CHANGES
Great news! Because of AFA supporters like you, McDonald’s has told AFA they will remain neutral in the culture war regarding homosexual marriage. AFA is ending the boycott…. The company has not plans to renew their membership in NGLCC when it expires in December.
Personal: I have no respect for any company’s corporate office that promotes the gay agenda. They need to be taught a lesson. Financial size and or bankruptcy to half the size of their competitors. So pull your money out of McDonald’s.
George H. Kubeck
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
An Issue Bigger than California # 1 of 2
An Issue Bigger Than California! # 1 of 2
cinops be gone Tuesday, October 21, 2008 A.M.
This is a major article that appeared in The Catholic World Report, Oct. 08 by Brian O’Neel, p. 34-6
The fate of Proposition 8, the initiative to protect traditional marriage on the state’s November ballot, has national implications.
In the dissent to the state Supreme Court 4-3 decision in the ruling that overturned Proposition 22, Justice Marvin Baker wrote:
Nothing in our {state} Constitution, express or implicit, compels the majority’s startling conclusion that the age-old understanding of marriage – an understanding recently confirmed by an initiative law – is no longer valid.
“California statutes already recognize same-sex unions and grant them all the substantive legal rights this state can bestow. If there is to be a further sea change in the social and legal understanding of the marriage itself, that evolution should occur by similar democratic means. The majority forecloses this ordinary democratic process, and, in doing so, oversteps its authority.”
As if to express his own dissenting opinion, Pope Benedict XVI noted the day after the court’s ruling:
“The union of love, based on matrimony between a man and woman, which makes up the family, represents the good for all society that cannot be substituted by, confused with, or compared to other types of unions.”
“Our basic strategy is to communicate the value and importance of marriage to society,” says Proposition 8 Campaign Manager Jeff Flint.
“We will also communicate how our measure is a positive affirmation of marriage and not a hateful campaign against homosexuals and the lifestyle they choose to live. They have a right to live that lifestyle. We’re not taking away that right, but similarly they don’t have a right to redefine marriage or have the courts do it for them.” …
“Ultimately, this battle is up to pastors in parishes,” says Bishop Salvatore Cordileone, auxiliary bishop of San Diego, who many credit with getting Proposition 8 on the ballot:
“That’s where most people meet in Church, so preaching about it, teaching about it, helping to distribute election materials, that all needs to happen. In some places, parishes are even becoming voter registration centers. Of course, we have to keep prayer paramount. There will be other, grassroots efforts, and pastors should encourage these. But the job of promoting this will ultimately rest with the pastors in their parishes.”…
Both sides also acknowledge that as California goes, so likely will go the rest of the nation. Fling says, “It would signal the beginning of the end of the fight if we lose here. This is an issue that is bigger than California. People who care about this issue need to understand that this is a national fight.”
Bishop Cordileone agrees. “Society has to understand that marriage and same-sex marriage cannot exist,” he says. “If Proposition 8 loses, those who believe in marriage will be deemed BIGOTS? There are consequences to pay in our society for those who are deemed bigots. Professional licenses aren’t given, you can’t open a school based on bigotry, a lot of privileges are denied. THAT’S HOW THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE WILL BE TREATED IF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS ALLOWED TO STAND. And it’s not a just a matter of letting people live their personal lives. CATHOLIC SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS WILL BE FORCED TO HIRE PEOPLE IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGES.”
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Tuesday, October 21, 2008 A.M.
This is a major article that appeared in The Catholic World Report, Oct. 08 by Brian O’Neel, p. 34-6
The fate of Proposition 8, the initiative to protect traditional marriage on the state’s November ballot, has national implications.
In the dissent to the state Supreme Court 4-3 decision in the ruling that overturned Proposition 22, Justice Marvin Baker wrote:
Nothing in our {state} Constitution, express or implicit, compels the majority’s startling conclusion that the age-old understanding of marriage – an understanding recently confirmed by an initiative law – is no longer valid.
“California statutes already recognize same-sex unions and grant them all the substantive legal rights this state can bestow. If there is to be a further sea change in the social and legal understanding of the marriage itself, that evolution should occur by similar democratic means. The majority forecloses this ordinary democratic process, and, in doing so, oversteps its authority.”
As if to express his own dissenting opinion, Pope Benedict XVI noted the day after the court’s ruling:
“The union of love, based on matrimony between a man and woman, which makes up the family, represents the good for all society that cannot be substituted by, confused with, or compared to other types of unions.”
“Our basic strategy is to communicate the value and importance of marriage to society,” says Proposition 8 Campaign Manager Jeff Flint.
“We will also communicate how our measure is a positive affirmation of marriage and not a hateful campaign against homosexuals and the lifestyle they choose to live. They have a right to live that lifestyle. We’re not taking away that right, but similarly they don’t have a right to redefine marriage or have the courts do it for them.” …
“Ultimately, this battle is up to pastors in parishes,” says Bishop Salvatore Cordileone, auxiliary bishop of San Diego, who many credit with getting Proposition 8 on the ballot:
“That’s where most people meet in Church, so preaching about it, teaching about it, helping to distribute election materials, that all needs to happen. In some places, parishes are even becoming voter registration centers. Of course, we have to keep prayer paramount. There will be other, grassroots efforts, and pastors should encourage these. But the job of promoting this will ultimately rest with the pastors in their parishes.”…
Both sides also acknowledge that as California goes, so likely will go the rest of the nation. Fling says, “It would signal the beginning of the end of the fight if we lose here. This is an issue that is bigger than California. People who care about this issue need to understand that this is a national fight.”
Bishop Cordileone agrees. “Society has to understand that marriage and same-sex marriage cannot exist,” he says. “If Proposition 8 loses, those who believe in marriage will be deemed BIGOTS? There are consequences to pay in our society for those who are deemed bigots. Professional licenses aren’t given, you can’t open a school based on bigotry, a lot of privileges are denied. THAT’S HOW THOSE WHO BELIEVE IN TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE WILL BE TREATED IF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS ALLOWED TO STAND. And it’s not a just a matter of letting people live their personal lives. CATHOLIC SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS WILL BE FORCED TO HIRE PEOPLE IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGES.”
George H. Kubeck
An Issue Bigger than California # 2 of 2
An Issue Bigger than California # 2 of 2
cinops be gone Tuesday, October 21, 2008 P.M.
We continue from this morning’s article:
Proposition 8 opponents don’t necessarily disagree. As Bill Press, former chairman of the California Democratic Party and a nationally known political commentator says:
“Proposition 8 is the death rattle of the homophobic religious right. They will lose, and that will end the ugly attempts of so-called Christian conservatives to sell discrimination to sell discrimination in this country.”
(The above hurts deeply because it is spoken by a CINOP commentator.)
One major factor affecting the initiative is the national election. United States Senator John McCain, the GOP candidate for president, has announced his support of the measure. California’s Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, on the other hand voices his support for the Supreme Court’s decision and his opposition to the ballot measure.
(The above hurts deeply because Governor Schwarzenegger is a CINOP.)
Also, as one California lobbyist told CWR, “If Obama is on a roll and the ‘yes’ side doesn’t have a lot of money to spend on TV, this thing probably goes down.”
One late-breaking and potentially decisive factor is a move by former governor and current Attorney General Jerry Brown to change the ballot title and summary language, which California law allows him to do. The title was to have been The Limit on Marriage Constitutional Amendment. However, Brown has changed the title to read, “Eliminates Right of Same-sex couples to Marry.”
Voters originally would have seen the description: “Amends the California to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” Now, because of Brown’s actions, they will be asked to vote on a measure that “{changes} the California Constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry in California.” …
The above hurts deeply because Brown is another most notorious CINOP; and while there is division with the Catholic Church on Catholic-in-name-only politicians, marriage is fundamental to our Faith. It would be wise for our California Bishops to censure these politicians in a one paragraph announcement.
+++++++
Headline News: California Teacher Unions contribute 1$ million to defeat Prop. 8
Personal: I have watched Jerry Brown in politics for more than 30 years. He is a rotten, despicable human being. He destroyed the Public School Teaching Profession that I was in for 23 years. I retired in 1986. He legalized the Rodda Act of 1975 which destroyed the independent-minded teacher, unionized and politicized the teaching profession. It is a personal insult to pay today the unions of NEA, CTA, and Westminster, about one thousand dollars a year as tribute to teach in the Public Schools. They use these monies to promote left-wing causes.
I retired in 1986. By the way, I was a voluntary member of the NEA, CTA and WTA for five years, 1963-68 when at time they were a professional teacher organization. My voluntary dues were about $50. yearly, for all 3 organizations.
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Tuesday, October 21, 2008 P.M.
We continue from this morning’s article:
Proposition 8 opponents don’t necessarily disagree. As Bill Press, former chairman of the California Democratic Party and a nationally known political commentator says:
“Proposition 8 is the death rattle of the homophobic religious right. They will lose, and that will end the ugly attempts of so-called Christian conservatives to sell discrimination to sell discrimination in this country.”
(The above hurts deeply because it is spoken by a CINOP commentator.)
One major factor affecting the initiative is the national election. United States Senator John McCain, the GOP candidate for president, has announced his support of the measure. California’s Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, on the other hand voices his support for the Supreme Court’s decision and his opposition to the ballot measure.
(The above hurts deeply because Governor Schwarzenegger is a CINOP.)
Also, as one California lobbyist told CWR, “If Obama is on a roll and the ‘yes’ side doesn’t have a lot of money to spend on TV, this thing probably goes down.”
One late-breaking and potentially decisive factor is a move by former governor and current Attorney General Jerry Brown to change the ballot title and summary language, which California law allows him to do. The title was to have been The Limit on Marriage Constitutional Amendment. However, Brown has changed the title to read, “Eliminates Right of Same-sex couples to Marry.”
Voters originally would have seen the description: “Amends the California to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” Now, because of Brown’s actions, they will be asked to vote on a measure that “{changes} the California Constitution to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry in California.” …
The above hurts deeply because Brown is another most notorious CINOP; and while there is division with the Catholic Church on Catholic-in-name-only politicians, marriage is fundamental to our Faith. It would be wise for our California Bishops to censure these politicians in a one paragraph announcement.
+++++++
Headline News: California Teacher Unions contribute 1$ million to defeat Prop. 8
Personal: I have watched Jerry Brown in politics for more than 30 years. He is a rotten, despicable human being. He destroyed the Public School Teaching Profession that I was in for 23 years. I retired in 1986. He legalized the Rodda Act of 1975 which destroyed the independent-minded teacher, unionized and politicized the teaching profession. It is a personal insult to pay today the unions of NEA, CTA, and Westminster, about one thousand dollars a year as tribute to teach in the Public Schools. They use these monies to promote left-wing causes.
I retired in 1986. By the way, I was a voluntary member of the NEA, CTA and WTA for five years, 1963-68 when at time they were a professional teacher organization. My voluntary dues were about $50. yearly, for all 3 organizations.
George H. Kubeck
VIP Memo to General Colin Powell
VIP MEMO TO GENERAL COLIN POWELL
Stanton, California
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 A.M.
Dear Honorable General Colin Powell,
1.) In today’s website, Sunday, Oct. 19, 2008, THE Drudge Report, the headline reads: Colin Powell backs Barack Obama for president. “It’s not about race,” Powell said, “I would have difficulty with two more Republican appointments to the Supreme Court.” What’s so frightening about pro-life to the Black elite in America?
I sincerely believe that they must be totally blind to the suicide and genocide of Black Americans since 1973. Of the 50 million abortions, 17 million of those are Black Americans. What’s so terrible about my pro-life sign which reads: LIFE: THE FIRST INALIENABLE RIGHT?
All across the country today, until Nov. 2nd we have 40 DAYS FOR LIFE campaign vigils at the abortion sites including PLANNED PARENTHOOD.
Of all the minorities, abortion has devastated Black families the most.
2.) ANOTHER QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA?
If Joe the plumber got his question answered on the economy with Barack’s judgment, SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND, Well George, the retired public school teacher has this question for OBAMA? IF ABORTION IS ABOVE YOUR PAY GRADE, WHOSE ADVICE ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE IN DECISION-MAKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
YOU ALREADY MADE YOUR DECISION ON ABORTION WITH THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT? Cardinal Rigali said abortion becomes a national entitlement. YOU PROMISED NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND EMILY’S LIST that it would be the first piece of legislation you would sign.
Are those the kind of advisors you will have in other decision-making? For heaven’s sake that is an evil decision for all Americans. You are going to set up a bubble at the abortion mills so counselors can’t talk to the ladies on the way in. You were a constitutional professor and know darn well that The Freedom of Choice Act legislation is unconstitutional. If counselors were not there since 1973, more than one-half of today’s living Black America would be dead by abortion.
3.) General, I don’t believe that there is anything in your religious faith that supports The Freedom of Choice Act. Do you not understand that the one major reason why most Americans will not vote for Obama is because ABORTION kills all Americans indiscriminately but Black Americans specifically?
Finally, we are in a culture war between traditional America and secular America. Marriage and family are the foundation pillars of any nation. Obama has come out against Proposition 8 in California. {Marriage is between a man and woman.} Also, Obama opposes the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) signed by President Clinton. I believe in your heart that you are for traditional America.
Respectfully yours,
George H. Kubeck
Stanton, California
Tuesday, October 21, 2008 A.M.
Dear Honorable General Colin Powell,
1.) In today’s website, Sunday, Oct. 19, 2008, THE Drudge Report, the headline reads: Colin Powell backs Barack Obama for president. “It’s not about race,” Powell said, “I would have difficulty with two more Republican appointments to the Supreme Court.” What’s so frightening about pro-life to the Black elite in America?
I sincerely believe that they must be totally blind to the suicide and genocide of Black Americans since 1973. Of the 50 million abortions, 17 million of those are Black Americans. What’s so terrible about my pro-life sign which reads: LIFE: THE FIRST INALIENABLE RIGHT?
All across the country today, until Nov. 2nd we have 40 DAYS FOR LIFE campaign vigils at the abortion sites including PLANNED PARENTHOOD.
Of all the minorities, abortion has devastated Black families the most.
2.) ANOTHER QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA?
If Joe the plumber got his question answered on the economy with Barack’s judgment, SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND, Well George, the retired public school teacher has this question for OBAMA? IF ABORTION IS ABOVE YOUR PAY GRADE, WHOSE ADVICE ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE IN DECISION-MAKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
YOU ALREADY MADE YOUR DECISION ON ABORTION WITH THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT? Cardinal Rigali said abortion becomes a national entitlement. YOU PROMISED NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND EMILY’S LIST that it would be the first piece of legislation you would sign.
Are those the kind of advisors you will have in other decision-making? For heaven’s sake that is an evil decision for all Americans. You are going to set up a bubble at the abortion mills so counselors can’t talk to the ladies on the way in. You were a constitutional professor and know darn well that The Freedom of Choice Act legislation is unconstitutional. If counselors were not there since 1973, more than one-half of today’s living Black America would be dead by abortion.
3.) General, I don’t believe that there is anything in your religious faith that supports The Freedom of Choice Act. Do you not understand that the one major reason why most Americans will not vote for Obama is because ABORTION kills all Americans indiscriminately but Black Americans specifically?
Finally, we are in a culture war between traditional America and secular America. Marriage and family are the foundation pillars of any nation. Obama has come out against Proposition 8 in California. {Marriage is between a man and woman.} Also, Obama opposes the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) signed by President Clinton. I believe in your heart that you are for traditional America.
Respectfully yours,
George H. Kubeck
Monday, October 20, 2008
Save our Children!
Save our Children!
cinops be gone Monday, October 20, 2008 P.M.
Bishop Robert Hermann’s homily, Sept. 28th in his column in St. Louis Review.
Save our children! More than anything else, this election is about saving our children or killing our children.
Save our children! Many people in Germany supported Hitler for economic reasons even though, as his programs advanced, he put to death millions of Jewish people. He ended up wrecking the economy together with Germany.
How are we different if we vote for pro-abortion candidates for office? How can we help change our political and legal situation to protect innocent children and support a culture of life?
Save our children! When I speak to some so-called good Catholics, I am shocked that they are quite ready to vote for a pro-abortion candidate under almost any circumstances.
Save our children! How can a so-called good Catholic vote for a candidate that supports law that justify the killing of a child that survived a botched abortion? How can such a so-called good Catholic receive the Holy Eucharist?
In Chapter 10 of St. Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians, he state: “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the Blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? … You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and also the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.”
Save our children! Have some of our so-called good Catholics become so hardened against the Gospel of Life that they believe that other issues outweigh the Gospel of Life? Have some of our so-called good Catholics put politics ahead of the Fifth Commandment, in which God states: “Thou shalt not kill!”?
Save our children! I have no doubt that there may some so-called good Catholics who are reading this column and who may be really angry about now, I ask the question “Why would such a person be angry?” If we do good deed, then our conscience is at peace. If we do evil deed, then our conscience bothers us. …
Save our children! “If today you hear his voice, harden not your heart!”
Save our children! I have used this terminology again and again penetrate the defenses of anyone who in the past may have put personal, economic or political interests above the issue of saving our children…. Police and firemen always risk their lives to save human life. Why should we not risk our own reputation to save our children?
Save our so-called good Catholics who ignore Catholic moral principle when applied to our political life. Pray the family Rosary for our so-called good Catholics who could use your love and your charity.
Prayer is our protection: Let it also be a protection for our country. If you want to make Satan angry, pray the Rosary for the sake of Life.
George H. Kubeck, E-mail to all Catholics.
cinops be gone Monday, October 20, 2008 P.M.
Bishop Robert Hermann’s homily, Sept. 28th in his column in St. Louis Review.
Save our children! More than anything else, this election is about saving our children or killing our children.
Save our children! Many people in Germany supported Hitler for economic reasons even though, as his programs advanced, he put to death millions of Jewish people. He ended up wrecking the economy together with Germany.
How are we different if we vote for pro-abortion candidates for office? How can we help change our political and legal situation to protect innocent children and support a culture of life?
Save our children! When I speak to some so-called good Catholics, I am shocked that they are quite ready to vote for a pro-abortion candidate under almost any circumstances.
Save our children! How can a so-called good Catholic vote for a candidate that supports law that justify the killing of a child that survived a botched abortion? How can such a so-called good Catholic receive the Holy Eucharist?
In Chapter 10 of St. Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians, he state: “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the Blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? … You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and also the cup of demons. You cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons.”
Save our children! Have some of our so-called good Catholics become so hardened against the Gospel of Life that they believe that other issues outweigh the Gospel of Life? Have some of our so-called good Catholics put politics ahead of the Fifth Commandment, in which God states: “Thou shalt not kill!”?
Save our children! I have no doubt that there may some so-called good Catholics who are reading this column and who may be really angry about now, I ask the question “Why would such a person be angry?” If we do good deed, then our conscience is at peace. If we do evil deed, then our conscience bothers us. …
Save our children! “If today you hear his voice, harden not your heart!”
Save our children! I have used this terminology again and again penetrate the defenses of anyone who in the past may have put personal, economic or political interests above the issue of saving our children…. Police and firemen always risk their lives to save human life. Why should we not risk our own reputation to save our children?
Save our so-called good Catholics who ignore Catholic moral principle when applied to our political life. Pray the family Rosary for our so-called good Catholics who could use your love and your charity.
Prayer is our protection: Let it also be a protection for our country. If you want to make Satan angry, pray the Rosary for the sake of Life.
George H. Kubeck, E-mail to all Catholics.
Supreme Knight vs. Barack Obama
Supreme Knight vs. Barack Obama
cinops be gone Monday, October 20, 2008 A.M.
I received a letter from the Supreme Knight, Carl A. Anderson urging Knights of Columbus members to support Proposition 8 on Marriage and Proposition 4 on Parental Notification. Barack Obama is opposed to Proposition 8 and 4 on the California ballot.
Now you may not have read the news item in The Washington Times, Monday, Sept. 1, 2008. What follows are excerpts of that article.
Obama’s abortion stance will be his downfall
In November, as we look back on the results of the 2008 presidential elections, I suspect that we’ll conclude that Aug. 16 was the day that Barack Obama lost the race.
At the Saddleback Civic Forum on the Presidency, evangelicals had their chance to meet Mr. Obama and to compare his brand of Christianity to theirs. When Mr. Obama said: “Jesus died for my sins, and {…} I am redeemed through him,” the evangelical audience was on the same page.
Pastor Rick Warren then posed his question about abortion – a pivotal issue for evangelical Christian and Catholic voters alike – this way: “At what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?” It was a question on how Mr. Obama’s faith would inform his conscience and his policy. The Illinois senator’s answer,
“ANSWERING THAT QUESTION WITH SPECIFICITY, YOU KNOW IS ABOVE MY
PAY GRADE.”
fell flat, both because it seemed to many people to be a casual answer to a very serious question, and because it simply did not connect with a Christian audience for whom it is an article of faith that God is the author of life.
Every member of the congregation sitting in the church could recite the familiar passage from Jeremiah 1:5 by heart. “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I dedicated you.” Or Psalm 139: “I formed you in your mother’s womb.” In fact, Mr. Warren quoted that psalm a day after the Saddleback Forum, shortly after saying “to just say ‘I don’t know” on the most divisive issue in America is not clear enough answer for me.”
… But Mr. Obama conspicuously declined to say abortion is wrong, saying simply, “I believe in Roe vs. Wade.” … He professed an interest in addressing the question, “how do we reduce the number of abortions?” But he made no effort to explain why they should be reduced, saying only that “there is a moral and ethical element to this issue.” …
But it is a scientific fact, not an “issue of faith,” that each human being’s life begins at conception. To suggest, as he did, that it is a more a matter of theology than biology was hardly the sympathetic attitude that this audience was looking for. Instead of connecting with them, he may well have alienated many of them.
The real question, posed precisely by Mr. Warren, is when “does a baby get human rights?” But even if there is disagreement over precisely when those rights should be recognized, can there really be recognized, can there really be any doubt when a baby is just weeks away from delivery? Why must late-term abortions remain free from restrictions?
Mr. Obama’s words at Saddle-back and actions as a legislator leave no doubt about where he stands. He opposed a partial-birth abortion bill that passed in the Senate by a 2-1 margin, and later criticized the Supreme Court for upholding the law. As an Illinois state senator, he was among a handful of legislators who oppose a state version of the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” And he has promised that the first thing he’d do as president is sign the “Freedom of Choice Act,” eliminates all existing restrictions on abortion, including the Hyde Amendment’s ban on federal funding. …
P.S. What more is there to say?
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to all members of the Knight of Columbus
cinops be gone Monday, October 20, 2008 A.M.
I received a letter from the Supreme Knight, Carl A. Anderson urging Knights of Columbus members to support Proposition 8 on Marriage and Proposition 4 on Parental Notification. Barack Obama is opposed to Proposition 8 and 4 on the California ballot.
Now you may not have read the news item in The Washington Times, Monday, Sept. 1, 2008. What follows are excerpts of that article.
Obama’s abortion stance will be his downfall
In November, as we look back on the results of the 2008 presidential elections, I suspect that we’ll conclude that Aug. 16 was the day that Barack Obama lost the race.
At the Saddleback Civic Forum on the Presidency, evangelicals had their chance to meet Mr. Obama and to compare his brand of Christianity to theirs. When Mr. Obama said: “Jesus died for my sins, and {…} I am redeemed through him,” the evangelical audience was on the same page.
Pastor Rick Warren then posed his question about abortion – a pivotal issue for evangelical Christian and Catholic voters alike – this way: “At what point does a baby get human rights, in your view?” It was a question on how Mr. Obama’s faith would inform his conscience and his policy. The Illinois senator’s answer,
“ANSWERING THAT QUESTION WITH SPECIFICITY, YOU KNOW IS ABOVE MY
PAY GRADE.”
fell flat, both because it seemed to many people to be a casual answer to a very serious question, and because it simply did not connect with a Christian audience for whom it is an article of faith that God is the author of life.
Every member of the congregation sitting in the church could recite the familiar passage from Jeremiah 1:5 by heart. “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I dedicated you.” Or Psalm 139: “I formed you in your mother’s womb.” In fact, Mr. Warren quoted that psalm a day after the Saddleback Forum, shortly after saying “to just say ‘I don’t know” on the most divisive issue in America is not clear enough answer for me.”
… But Mr. Obama conspicuously declined to say abortion is wrong, saying simply, “I believe in Roe vs. Wade.” … He professed an interest in addressing the question, “how do we reduce the number of abortions?” But he made no effort to explain why they should be reduced, saying only that “there is a moral and ethical element to this issue.” …
But it is a scientific fact, not an “issue of faith,” that each human being’s life begins at conception. To suggest, as he did, that it is a more a matter of theology than biology was hardly the sympathetic attitude that this audience was looking for. Instead of connecting with them, he may well have alienated many of them.
The real question, posed precisely by Mr. Warren, is when “does a baby get human rights?” But even if there is disagreement over precisely when those rights should be recognized, can there really be recognized, can there really be any doubt when a baby is just weeks away from delivery? Why must late-term abortions remain free from restrictions?
Mr. Obama’s words at Saddle-back and actions as a legislator leave no doubt about where he stands. He opposed a partial-birth abortion bill that passed in the Senate by a 2-1 margin, and later criticized the Supreme Court for upholding the law. As an Illinois state senator, he was among a handful of legislators who oppose a state version of the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” And he has promised that the first thing he’d do as president is sign the “Freedom of Choice Act,” eliminates all existing restrictions on abortion, including the Hyde Amendment’s ban on federal funding. …
P.S. What more is there to say?
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to all members of the Knight of Columbus
Sunday, October 19, 2008
EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT
ENDA- EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT
cinops be gone – Sunday, October 19, 2008 P.M.
If it’s not secular mind control like Hate Crime Legislation, it is something else. Thank you Tony Perkins, Family Research Council, 800-225-4008, www.frc.org – mail 801 G Street, NW, Washington, D.C. fax 202-393-2134.
From the June 2008 V. 20, No. 8 The Last Word, your article as follows:
As we note in our lead article, ENDA is one of the most threatening pieces of pro-homosexual legislation ever introduced on Capitol Hill. But the most disturbing aspect of the bill is not in its language.
It’s in a widely held notion that somehow this blatantly unconstitutional assault on the family and religious freedom will not actually do what it clearly promises it will do.
ENDA grants workplace protections that would enable homosexuals to bring down the full fury of the federal government on a supervisor, a colleague, or an entire company – essentially anyone who offends them for any reason at work.
It can’t happen, people tell me. It already is happening, I tell them.
In New Mexico, as we reported, the state Human Rights Commission punished a Christian photographer for declining to take pictures of a lesbian’s “commitment ceremony.” This Washington Watch mentions two other recent cases, but there are more:
In California, a state employee had to remove a “Marriage: One Man and One Woman” sticker because it violated his agency’s sexual harassment policy.
In Texas, a bank fired an employee who simply asked why the bank extended special workplace protections to homosexual colleagues.
In New York, a company fired an employee for refusing to participate in the company-sponsored “Coming Out Day” diversity celebration.
States and corporations already are granting homosexuals special rights – by stripping Christians of theirs. ENDA is already happening. Even so, the damage is still limited – FRC is fighting to keep it that way.
But imagine the nightmare when the full-scale federal government is unleached on America.
Homosexuals will have the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and other agencies flexing their enforcement muscles – muscles your tax dollars pay for, by the way behind them. All they have to do is complain.
In one swipe the radical homosexual agenda will become the law of the land.
Churches, religious schools, and other institutions will be forced to hire people who openly defy their core beliefs … or else.
Faith-base organizations will be forced to hire people whose behavior offends them … or else. (How long with it activists to target FRC and try to silence your voice that has been heard on Capitol Hill for 25 years.)
Every Christian in every office, factory, and store – YOU - will be forced to support behavior that is an affront to God … or else.
There are few threats to religious freedom more dangerous than ENDA, and the influential homosexual activists who helped liberals gain their congressional majorities are demanding action now. … VOTE PRO-LIFE!
George H. Kubeck, Please talk about it and e-mail to all friends and relatives.
cinops be gone – Sunday, October 19, 2008 P.M.
If it’s not secular mind control like Hate Crime Legislation, it is something else. Thank you Tony Perkins, Family Research Council, 800-225-4008, www.frc.org – mail 801 G Street, NW, Washington, D.C. fax 202-393-2134.
From the June 2008 V. 20, No. 8 The Last Word, your article as follows:
As we note in our lead article, ENDA is one of the most threatening pieces of pro-homosexual legislation ever introduced on Capitol Hill. But the most disturbing aspect of the bill is not in its language.
It’s in a widely held notion that somehow this blatantly unconstitutional assault on the family and religious freedom will not actually do what it clearly promises it will do.
ENDA grants workplace protections that would enable homosexuals to bring down the full fury of the federal government on a supervisor, a colleague, or an entire company – essentially anyone who offends them for any reason at work.
It can’t happen, people tell me. It already is happening, I tell them.
In New Mexico, as we reported, the state Human Rights Commission punished a Christian photographer for declining to take pictures of a lesbian’s “commitment ceremony.” This Washington Watch mentions two other recent cases, but there are more:
In California, a state employee had to remove a “Marriage: One Man and One Woman” sticker because it violated his agency’s sexual harassment policy.
In Texas, a bank fired an employee who simply asked why the bank extended special workplace protections to homosexual colleagues.
In New York, a company fired an employee for refusing to participate in the company-sponsored “Coming Out Day” diversity celebration.
States and corporations already are granting homosexuals special rights – by stripping Christians of theirs. ENDA is already happening. Even so, the damage is still limited – FRC is fighting to keep it that way.
But imagine the nightmare when the full-scale federal government is unleached on America.
Homosexuals will have the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and other agencies flexing their enforcement muscles – muscles your tax dollars pay for, by the way behind them. All they have to do is complain.
In one swipe the radical homosexual agenda will become the law of the land.
Churches, religious schools, and other institutions will be forced to hire people who openly defy their core beliefs … or else.
Faith-base organizations will be forced to hire people whose behavior offends them … or else. (How long with it activists to target FRC and try to silence your voice that has been heard on Capitol Hill for 25 years.)
Every Christian in every office, factory, and store – YOU - will be forced to support behavior that is an affront to God … or else.
There are few threats to religious freedom more dangerous than ENDA, and the influential homosexual activists who helped liberals gain their congressional majorities are demanding action now. … VOTE PRO-LIFE!
George H. Kubeck, Please talk about it and e-mail to all friends and relatives.
DREAMS FROM MY FATHER - 3
DREAMS FROM MY FATHER – 3
cinops be gone Sunday, October 19, 2008 P.M.
PREFACE:
1.) In today’s website, The Drudge Report the headline reads: Colin Powell supports Barack Obama for president. “It’s not about race,” Powell said, “I would have difficulty with two more Republican appointments to the Supreme Court.” What’s so frightening about pro-life to the Black elite in America?
I sincerely believe that they must be totally blind to the suicide and genocide of Black Americans since 1973. Of the 50 million abortions, 17 million of those are Black Americans. What’s so terrible about my pro-life sign which reads: LIFE: THE FIRST INALIENABLE RIGHT?
All across the country today, until Nov. 2nd we have 40 DAYS FOR LIFE campaign vigils at the abortion sites including PLANNED PARENTHOOD.
Of all the minorities, abortion has devastated Black families the most.
2.) ANOTHER QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA? If Joe the plumber got his question answered on the economy with Barack’s judgment, TO SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND, Well George, the retired public school teacher has this question for OBAMA? IF ABORTION IS ABOVE YOUR PAY GRADE, WHOSE ADVICE ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE IN DECISION-MAKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
YOU MADE YOUR DECISION ON ABORTION WITH THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT? Cardinal Rigali said abortion becomes a national entitlement. You promised NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND EMILY’S LIST that it would be the first piece of legislation you would sign. Are those the kind of advisors you will have in other decision-making? For heaven’s sake that is an evil decision for all Americans. You are going to set up a bubble at the abortion mills so counselors can’t talk to the ladies on the way in. You were a constitutional professor and know darn well that the Freedom of Choice Act legislation is unconstitutional. If counselors were not there since 1973, one-half more of today’s Black America would be dead by abortion.
EXCERPT:
That was the problem with people like Joyce. They talked about the richness of their multicultural heritage and it sounded real good, until you noticed that they avoided black people. It wasn’t a matter of conscious choice, necessarily, just a matter of gravitational pull, the way integration always worked, a one-way street. The minority assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around.
Only white culture could be neutral and objective. Only white culture could be nonracial, willing to adopt the occasional exotic into its ranks. Only white culture had individuals. And we, the half-breeds and the college-degreed, take a survey of the situation and think to ourselves, Why should be get lumped in with the losers if we don’t have to?
We become only so grateful to lose ourselves in the crowd, America’s happy, faceless marketplace, and we’re never so outraged as when a cabbie drives past us or to the woman in the elevator clutches her purse, not so much because we are bothered by the fact that such indignities are what less fortunate coloreds have to put up with every single day of their lives – although that’s what we tell ourselves – but because we’re wearing a Brooks Brothers suit and speak impeccable English and yet have somehow been mistaken for an ordinary nigger.
Don’t you know who I am? I’m an individual! 99-100
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to the Catholic, Christian and National press.
cinops be gone Sunday, October 19, 2008 P.M.
PREFACE:
1.) In today’s website, The Drudge Report the headline reads: Colin Powell supports Barack Obama for president. “It’s not about race,” Powell said, “I would have difficulty with two more Republican appointments to the Supreme Court.” What’s so frightening about pro-life to the Black elite in America?
I sincerely believe that they must be totally blind to the suicide and genocide of Black Americans since 1973. Of the 50 million abortions, 17 million of those are Black Americans. What’s so terrible about my pro-life sign which reads: LIFE: THE FIRST INALIENABLE RIGHT?
All across the country today, until Nov. 2nd we have 40 DAYS FOR LIFE campaign vigils at the abortion sites including PLANNED PARENTHOOD.
Of all the minorities, abortion has devastated Black families the most.
2.) ANOTHER QUESTION FOR BARACK OBAMA? If Joe the plumber got his question answered on the economy with Barack’s judgment, TO SPREAD THE WEALTH AROUND, Well George, the retired public school teacher has this question for OBAMA? IF ABORTION IS ABOVE YOUR PAY GRADE, WHOSE ADVICE ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE IN DECISION-MAKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
YOU MADE YOUR DECISION ON ABORTION WITH THE FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT? Cardinal Rigali said abortion becomes a national entitlement. You promised NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA, PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND EMILY’S LIST that it would be the first piece of legislation you would sign. Are those the kind of advisors you will have in other decision-making? For heaven’s sake that is an evil decision for all Americans. You are going to set up a bubble at the abortion mills so counselors can’t talk to the ladies on the way in. You were a constitutional professor and know darn well that the Freedom of Choice Act legislation is unconstitutional. If counselors were not there since 1973, one-half more of today’s Black America would be dead by abortion.
EXCERPT:
That was the problem with people like Joyce. They talked about the richness of their multicultural heritage and it sounded real good, until you noticed that they avoided black people. It wasn’t a matter of conscious choice, necessarily, just a matter of gravitational pull, the way integration always worked, a one-way street. The minority assimilated into the dominant culture, not the other way around.
Only white culture could be neutral and objective. Only white culture could be nonracial, willing to adopt the occasional exotic into its ranks. Only white culture had individuals. And we, the half-breeds and the college-degreed, take a survey of the situation and think to ourselves, Why should be get lumped in with the losers if we don’t have to?
We become only so grateful to lose ourselves in the crowd, America’s happy, faceless marketplace, and we’re never so outraged as when a cabbie drives past us or to the woman in the elevator clutches her purse, not so much because we are bothered by the fact that such indignities are what less fortunate coloreds have to put up with every single day of their lives – although that’s what we tell ourselves – but because we’re wearing a Brooks Brothers suit and speak impeccable English and yet have somehow been mistaken for an ordinary nigger.
Don’t you know who I am? I’m an individual! 99-100
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to the Catholic, Christian and National press.
HATE CRIMES
“Hate Crimes”
cinops be gone Sunday, Oct. 19, 2008 A.M.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SET TO VOTE ON ‘HATE CRIMES’ GIVING HOMOSEXUALS SPECIAL RIGHTS: WHEN RIGHT AFTER THE ELECTION?
The U.S. House of Representatives will soon vote on HR 254, which establishes ‘hate crime’ legislation. HR 254 will create new special rights for homosexuals under the guise of enhancing law enforcement. It would make ‘sexual orientation’ a protected class alongside race, religion, and gender….
The intent of the law is to force the acceptance and approval of homosexuality on every American, regardless of their religious views. Here is a short summary:
1.) Preaching that homosexuality is a sin from the pulpit will result in the preacher being charged with “hate speech?”
2.) Churches will have their tax-exempt status revoked if they oppose homosexuality.
3.) Homosexual marriage will be legalized and recognized in all states.
4.) Polygamy will be legalized.
5.) Landlords will be forced to rent to homosexuals.
6.) Scouts, and all non-profit organizations, will be required to hire homosexuals as leaders.
7.) Biblical language used to define homosexuality will be considered “hate speech” City officials have already had a billboard removed in Long Island, NY, because it was classified as “hate speech.” The billboard read: “If a man also with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed and abomination.” Leviticus 20:13
8.) Employees will not be allowed to say anything negative about homosexuality in their workplaces.
9.) Classes promoting the homosexual lifestyle will be included in school curricula beginning with the lower grades.
10.) Employers will be forced to hire homosexuals.
11) Adoption by homosexuals will be legalized in every state.
P.S. The above from Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman,
American Family Association. And while this message is dated Feb. 20, 2007, it is a major agenda item, sadly, of the Democratic Leadership in particular Catholic-Label Fraud- Politician Senator Ted Kennedy. President Bush was going to veto this legislation. Voting for Obama instead of McCain and Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez instead of Rosie Avila will make the above THE LAW OF THE LAND.
George H. Kubeck,
cinops be gone Sunday, Oct. 19, 2008 A.M.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SET TO VOTE ON ‘HATE CRIMES’ GIVING HOMOSEXUALS SPECIAL RIGHTS: WHEN RIGHT AFTER THE ELECTION?
The U.S. House of Representatives will soon vote on HR 254, which establishes ‘hate crime’ legislation. HR 254 will create new special rights for homosexuals under the guise of enhancing law enforcement. It would make ‘sexual orientation’ a protected class alongside race, religion, and gender….
The intent of the law is to force the acceptance and approval of homosexuality on every American, regardless of their religious views. Here is a short summary:
1.) Preaching that homosexuality is a sin from the pulpit will result in the preacher being charged with “hate speech?”
2.) Churches will have their tax-exempt status revoked if they oppose homosexuality.
3.) Homosexual marriage will be legalized and recognized in all states.
4.) Polygamy will be legalized.
5.) Landlords will be forced to rent to homosexuals.
6.) Scouts, and all non-profit organizations, will be required to hire homosexuals as leaders.
7.) Biblical language used to define homosexuality will be considered “hate speech” City officials have already had a billboard removed in Long Island, NY, because it was classified as “hate speech.” The billboard read: “If a man also with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed and abomination.” Leviticus 20:13
8.) Employees will not be allowed to say anything negative about homosexuality in their workplaces.
9.) Classes promoting the homosexual lifestyle will be included in school curricula beginning with the lower grades.
10.) Employers will be forced to hire homosexuals.
11) Adoption by homosexuals will be legalized in every state.
P.S. The above from Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman,
American Family Association. And while this message is dated Feb. 20, 2007, it is a major agenda item, sadly, of the Democratic Leadership in particular Catholic-Label Fraud- Politician Senator Ted Kennedy. President Bush was going to veto this legislation. Voting for Obama instead of McCain and Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez instead of Rosie Avila will make the above THE LAW OF THE LAND.
George H. Kubeck,
Saturday, October 18, 2008
McCain vs.Obama
McCain vs. Obama
cinops be gone Saturday, Oct. 18, 2008 P.M.
VOTER ISSUE GUIDE; 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: www.WallBuilders,com
TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE IN FEDERAL LAW: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
CLONING: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports human cloning
OPPOSES JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Support originalist Supreme
Court Justices
HOMOSEXUAL EDUCATION: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports curriculum that
promotes homosexuality
ENERGY: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports expanded drilling of oil
HUMAN LIFE McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports protecting the lives of children who
are born alive and survive a botched abortion
BUSINESS FREEDOM: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Opposes laws forcing businesses
to favor homosexuality
OPPOSES GAY PRIDE: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Refused to support Gay Pride Celebrations
IRAQ WAR: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports immediate removal of troops
from Iraq
YOUTH & ABORTION: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports transporting minor girls across
state line for a secret abortion without
parental knowledge
GUN RIGHTS: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Opposes an assault weapon ban
PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTIONS: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Opposes partial-birth abortions
TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE IN STATES: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports state and marriage amendments
in Ca and Fl.
PARENT RIGHTS IN EDUCATION:
Supports Parental Choice of Schools in education McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
cinops be gone Saturday, Oct. 18, 2008 P.M.
VOTER ISSUE GUIDE; 2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: www.WallBuilders,com
TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE IN FEDERAL LAW: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
CLONING: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports human cloning
OPPOSES JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Support originalist Supreme
Court Justices
HOMOSEXUAL EDUCATION: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports curriculum that
promotes homosexuality
ENERGY: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports expanded drilling of oil
HUMAN LIFE McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports protecting the lives of children who
are born alive and survive a botched abortion
BUSINESS FREEDOM: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Opposes laws forcing businesses
to favor homosexuality
OPPOSES GAY PRIDE: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Refused to support Gay Pride Celebrations
IRAQ WAR: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports immediate removal of troops
from Iraq
YOUTH & ABORTION: McCAIN NO OBAMA YES
Supports transporting minor girls across
state line for a secret abortion without
parental knowledge
GUN RIGHTS: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Opposes an assault weapon ban
PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTIONS: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Opposes partial-birth abortions
TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE IN STATES: McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Supports state and marriage amendments
in Ca and Fl.
PARENT RIGHTS IN EDUCATION:
Supports Parental Choice of Schools in education McCAIN YES OBAMA NO
Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin
cinops be gone Saturday, October 18, 2008 A.M.
Preface: Fact # 1 be aware that if Proposition 8 on the California ballot is not passed you will be called a bigot legally if you still believe that marriage is only between a man and woman. Fact # 2 once President Bush leaves office the Hate Bush CABAL will be directed against all Christians and Conservatives.
From a Flyer from Wanda Franz PH.D., President of the National Right to Life includes a sampling of what’s been published about Sarah Palin since John McCain announced her a his running mate.
1. The Hill: Three Major advocates of abortion rights are planning to spend nearly $30 million to defeat John McCain’s run for the president, citing his new running mate as the core reason. NARAL Pro-Choice America, Planned Parenthood and EMILY’S List have Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) in their crosshairs, calling her a staunch opponent of abortion rights. “This is the most anti-choice ticket in the history of the Republican Party…” Sept. 5, 2008 www.thehill.com
2. New York Times Palin has rocketed in the polls, drawing women and men with her vapid – if vivacious and visceral-scripted cheerleading. … When the phone rings at 3 A.M., will she call the Wasilla Assembly of God congregation and ask them to pray on a response. Maureen Dowd, Sept. 9, 2008 www.nytimes.com
“She would have the government intrude to police the reproductive choices of all other women… The “no surrender” warrior surrendered to the agents of intolerance not just by dumping his pal for Palin but moving so far to the right on abortion… Frank Rich, Sept. 6, 2008 www.nytimes.com
3. Salon.com: “What’s the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists? Lipstick! This grotesque headline appeared on a column at salon.com. The extreme left is doing everything it can to attack and discredit Sarah Palin.
4. Scripps News: Little by little the most hysterical charges against Sarah Palin are tumbling to the ground, but not the fury, the hatred … it’s especially grating to many in the pro-choice crowd that here’s a woman – a woman! – Who does not get it that the killing of fetuses is a precious right and any restrictions of almost any kind are mere tactical advances in the war to squash it. Jay Ambrose, Sept. 9, 2008 www.scrippsnews.com
5. FactCheck.Org: We’ve been flooded for the past few days with queries about dubious Internet postings and mass e-mail messages making claims about McCain’s running mate, Gov. Palin. We find that many are completely false, or misleading. FactCheck.org article “Sliming Palin” Sept. 8, 2008 www.factcheck.org
EVEN THOUGH FACTCHECK DEBUNKED THE RUMORS FLOATING AROUND, THEY WERE STILL REPORTED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AS HARD NEWS.
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Saturday, October 18, 2008 A.M.
Preface: Fact # 1 be aware that if Proposition 8 on the California ballot is not passed you will be called a bigot legally if you still believe that marriage is only between a man and woman. Fact # 2 once President Bush leaves office the Hate Bush CABAL will be directed against all Christians and Conservatives.
From a Flyer from Wanda Franz PH.D., President of the National Right to Life includes a sampling of what’s been published about Sarah Palin since John McCain announced her a his running mate.
1. The Hill: Three Major advocates of abortion rights are planning to spend nearly $30 million to defeat John McCain’s run for the president, citing his new running mate as the core reason. NARAL Pro-Choice America, Planned Parenthood and EMILY’S List have Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) in their crosshairs, calling her a staunch opponent of abortion rights. “This is the most anti-choice ticket in the history of the Republican Party…” Sept. 5, 2008 www.thehill.com
2. New York Times Palin has rocketed in the polls, drawing women and men with her vapid – if vivacious and visceral-scripted cheerleading. … When the phone rings at 3 A.M., will she call the Wasilla Assembly of God congregation and ask them to pray on a response. Maureen Dowd, Sept. 9, 2008 www.nytimes.com
“She would have the government intrude to police the reproductive choices of all other women… The “no surrender” warrior surrendered to the agents of intolerance not just by dumping his pal for Palin but moving so far to the right on abortion… Frank Rich, Sept. 6, 2008 www.nytimes.com
3. Salon.com: “What’s the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists? Lipstick! This grotesque headline appeared on a column at salon.com. The extreme left is doing everything it can to attack and discredit Sarah Palin.
4. Scripps News: Little by little the most hysterical charges against Sarah Palin are tumbling to the ground, but not the fury, the hatred … it’s especially grating to many in the pro-choice crowd that here’s a woman – a woman! – Who does not get it that the killing of fetuses is a precious right and any restrictions of almost any kind are mere tactical advances in the war to squash it. Jay Ambrose, Sept. 9, 2008 www.scrippsnews.com
5. FactCheck.Org: We’ve been flooded for the past few days with queries about dubious Internet postings and mass e-mail messages making claims about McCain’s running mate, Gov. Palin. We find that many are completely false, or misleading. FactCheck.org article “Sliming Palin” Sept. 8, 2008 www.factcheck.org
EVEN THOUGH FACTCHECK DEBUNKED THE RUMORS FLOATING AROUND, THEY WERE STILL REPORTED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AS HARD NEWS.
George H. Kubeck
Friday, October 17, 2008
Who Do Yout Trust?
Who Do You Trust?
cinops be gone Friday, October 17, 2008 P.M.
The following is an opinion piece. From a religious perspective the answer is simple. Jesus I trust in you! Now the answer from a political point of view may be difficult in this presidential election but not in the 47th Congressional District.
Let this question keep repeating in your mind in this financial crisis! Do you trust Obama with your wallet, savings and retirement fund? Do you trust Obama’s values? Have you checked out who his big supporters in America are: Hollywood, U.S Media and Academia? Include also the anti-war movement who for decades have worked against American interests and hate America? And this hate was there long before the Iraq war and billionaire George Soros. I know because my memory goes back to the 1940’s. My garage wall has this old sign:
VOTE AGAINST
THE CANDIDATES AND ISSUES
THAT HOLLYWOOD AND THE “ELITE”
IN THE MEDIA SUPPORT:
When you are in the voting booth how does this sound? Obama I trust in you. That is a big step! Do I really know you, Barack? Have the news media and journalists been honest and informed me all about you? They have not. Therefore by every criterion Barack you are an unknown person to most voters.
Now the same cannot be said for Catholic-in-name-only politicians. We know who you are and your votes in State and Congress. What we want is an authentic person who does not betray his Catholic beliefs especially on the evil of abortion same sex marriage, assisted-suicide, euthanasia, and embryonic stem-cell research. All of these are absolutely evil. If you can’t trust a CINOP with her religion how can you trust her in office?
For example, it is an insult and shame for any community like the cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove and Santa Ana to be represented by CINOP Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, a clone of Nancy Pelosi and San Francisco values. Do you trust Sanchez to represent your values and your issues? Doesn’t that send a shiver up your spine? While I am not in her district I do have a CINOP representing me in the State Legislature, Lou Correa.
Congresswoman Rosie Avila will replace Loretta Sanchez with your help. It is also a victory for marriage and parental notification ballot measures 8 and 4.
ROSIE AVILA IS EXPERIENCD AND QUALIFIED: SHE HAS BEEN ON THE SANTA ANA SCHOOL BOARD, 17 YEARS; BIOLA UNIVERSITY TRUSTEE, 16 YEARS.
PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER ORANGE COUNTY YOUTH COMMISSION, 10 YEARS;
PRESIDENT’S COMMISSION ON WHITE HOUSE FELLOWS APPOINTED BY THE US PRESIDENT; RENEW WOMAN ADVISOR TO CONGRESS
SANTA ANA ANTI-GANG COMMISION (EPIC) www.VoteRosie.com
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to your friends.
cinops be gone Friday, October 17, 2008 P.M.
The following is an opinion piece. From a religious perspective the answer is simple. Jesus I trust in you! Now the answer from a political point of view may be difficult in this presidential election but not in the 47th Congressional District.
Let this question keep repeating in your mind in this financial crisis! Do you trust Obama with your wallet, savings and retirement fund? Do you trust Obama’s values? Have you checked out who his big supporters in America are: Hollywood, U.S Media and Academia? Include also the anti-war movement who for decades have worked against American interests and hate America? And this hate was there long before the Iraq war and billionaire George Soros. I know because my memory goes back to the 1940’s. My garage wall has this old sign:
VOTE AGAINST
THE CANDIDATES AND ISSUES
THAT HOLLYWOOD AND THE “ELITE”
IN THE MEDIA SUPPORT:
When you are in the voting booth how does this sound? Obama I trust in you. That is a big step! Do I really know you, Barack? Have the news media and journalists been honest and informed me all about you? They have not. Therefore by every criterion Barack you are an unknown person to most voters.
Now the same cannot be said for Catholic-in-name-only politicians. We know who you are and your votes in State and Congress. What we want is an authentic person who does not betray his Catholic beliefs especially on the evil of abortion same sex marriage, assisted-suicide, euthanasia, and embryonic stem-cell research. All of these are absolutely evil. If you can’t trust a CINOP with her religion how can you trust her in office?
For example, it is an insult and shame for any community like the cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove and Santa Ana to be represented by CINOP Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, a clone of Nancy Pelosi and San Francisco values. Do you trust Sanchez to represent your values and your issues? Doesn’t that send a shiver up your spine? While I am not in her district I do have a CINOP representing me in the State Legislature, Lou Correa.
Congresswoman Rosie Avila will replace Loretta Sanchez with your help. It is also a victory for marriage and parental notification ballot measures 8 and 4.
ROSIE AVILA IS EXPERIENCD AND QUALIFIED: SHE HAS BEEN ON THE SANTA ANA SCHOOL BOARD, 17 YEARS; BIOLA UNIVERSITY TRUSTEE, 16 YEARS.
PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER ORANGE COUNTY YOUTH COMMISSION, 10 YEARS;
PRESIDENT’S COMMISSION ON WHITE HOUSE FELLOWS APPOINTED BY THE US PRESIDENT; RENEW WOMAN ADVISOR TO CONGRESS
SANTA ANA ANTI-GANG COMMISION (EPIC) www.VoteRosie.com
George H. Kubeck, Please e-mail to your friends.
Dreams of My Father - 2
Dreams from My Father – 2
cinops be gone Friday, October 17, 2008 P.M.
In 1960, though, my grandfather had not yet been tested; the disappointments would come later, and even then they would come slowly, without violence that might change him, for better or worse. In the back of his mind he had come to consider himself as something of a freethinker – bohemian, even. He wrote poetry on occasion, listened to jazz, counted a number of Jews he’d met in the furniture business as his closets friends. In his only skirmish into organized religion, he would enroll the family in the local Unitarian Universalist congregation: he liked the idea that Unitarians drew on the scriptures of all great religions (It’s like you get five religions in one,” he would say). 17
Hawaii! To my family, newly arrived in 1959, it must have seemed as if the earth itself, weary of stampeding armies and bitter civilizations, had forced up this chain of emerald rock where pioneers from across the globe could populate the land with children bronzed by the sun. The ugly conquest of native Hawaiians through aborted treaties and crippling disease brought by the missionaries; the carving up of rich volcanic soil by American companies for sugarcane and pineapple plantations; the indenturing system that kept Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino immigrants stooped sunup to sunset in these same fields; the internment of Japanese-Americans during the war – all this was recent history. And yet, by the time my family arrived, it had somehow vanished from collective memory, like morning mist and burned away… 23
My mother’s confidence in needlepoint virtues depended on a faith I didn’t possess, a faith that she would refuse of describe as religious, that, in fact, her experience told her was sacrilegious: a faith that rational, thoughtful people could shape their own destiny. In a land where fatalism remained a necessary tool for enduring hardships, where ultimate truths were kept separate from day-to-day realities, she was a lonely witness for secular humanism, a soldier of New Deal, Peace Corps, position paper liberalism. 50
What Frank called college? An advance degree in compromise. …
“And what’s that?” “Leaving your race at the door,” he said. “Leaving your people behind.” He studied me over the top of his reading glasses. “Understand something, boy. You’re not going to college to get educated. You’re going there to get trained. They’ train you to want what you don’t need. They’ll train you to manipulate words so they don’t mean anything anymore. They’ll you to forget what it is you already know. They’ll train you so good, you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that shit. They’ll give you a corner office and invite you to fancy dinners, and tell you you’re a credit to your race. Until you want to actually start running things, and then they’ll yank on your chain and let you know that you may be a well-trained, well-paid nigger, but you’re a nigger just the same.
“So what is it you’re telling me – that I shouldn’t be going to college?”
Frank’s shoulders slumped, and he fell back in his chair with a sigh. “No, I didn’t say that. You’ve got to go. I’m just telling you to keep your eyes open. Stay awake.” 97
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Friday, October 17, 2008 P.M.
In 1960, though, my grandfather had not yet been tested; the disappointments would come later, and even then they would come slowly, without violence that might change him, for better or worse. In the back of his mind he had come to consider himself as something of a freethinker – bohemian, even. He wrote poetry on occasion, listened to jazz, counted a number of Jews he’d met in the furniture business as his closets friends. In his only skirmish into organized religion, he would enroll the family in the local Unitarian Universalist congregation: he liked the idea that Unitarians drew on the scriptures of all great religions (It’s like you get five religions in one,” he would say). 17
Hawaii! To my family, newly arrived in 1959, it must have seemed as if the earth itself, weary of stampeding armies and bitter civilizations, had forced up this chain of emerald rock where pioneers from across the globe could populate the land with children bronzed by the sun. The ugly conquest of native Hawaiians through aborted treaties and crippling disease brought by the missionaries; the carving up of rich volcanic soil by American companies for sugarcane and pineapple plantations; the indenturing system that kept Japanese, Chinese, and Filipino immigrants stooped sunup to sunset in these same fields; the internment of Japanese-Americans during the war – all this was recent history. And yet, by the time my family arrived, it had somehow vanished from collective memory, like morning mist and burned away… 23
My mother’s confidence in needlepoint virtues depended on a faith I didn’t possess, a faith that she would refuse of describe as religious, that, in fact, her experience told her was sacrilegious: a faith that rational, thoughtful people could shape their own destiny. In a land where fatalism remained a necessary tool for enduring hardships, where ultimate truths were kept separate from day-to-day realities, she was a lonely witness for secular humanism, a soldier of New Deal, Peace Corps, position paper liberalism. 50
What Frank called college? An advance degree in compromise. …
“And what’s that?” “Leaving your race at the door,” he said. “Leaving your people behind.” He studied me over the top of his reading glasses. “Understand something, boy. You’re not going to college to get educated. You’re going there to get trained. They’ train you to want what you don’t need. They’ll train you to manipulate words so they don’t mean anything anymore. They’ll you to forget what it is you already know. They’ll train you so good, you’ll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that shit. They’ll give you a corner office and invite you to fancy dinners, and tell you you’re a credit to your race. Until you want to actually start running things, and then they’ll yank on your chain and let you know that you may be a well-trained, well-paid nigger, but you’re a nigger just the same.
“So what is it you’re telling me – that I shouldn’t be going to college?”
Frank’s shoulders slumped, and he fell back in his chair with a sigh. “No, I didn’t say that. You’ve got to go. I’m just telling you to keep your eyes open. Stay awake.” 97
George H. Kubeck
Dreams from My Father - 1
Dreams from My Father – 1
cinops be gone Friday, October 17, 2008 A.M.
Preface: Character, judgment and who do you trust? This is the first in a series of selected excerpts from Barack Obama’s book about himself, not yet ready for the presidency. As a McCain supporter, I want to understand the mind and heart of Obama from his life experiences. Secondly, as an activist in the pro-life movement, why he is not pro-life? Most black Americans are pro-life and believe that the true definition of marriage is between a man and a woman.
“He was an African, I would learn, a Kenyan of the Luo tribe, born on the shores of Lake Victoria in a place called Alego. The village was poor, but his father – my grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama – had been a prominent farmer, an elder of the tribe, a medicine man with healing powers.
My father grew up herding his father’s goats and attending the local school, set up by the British colonial administration, where he had shown great promise. He eventually won a scholarship to study in Nairobi; and then on the eve of Kenyan independence, he had been selected by Kenyan leaders and American sponsors to attend a university in the United States…
In 1959, at the age of twenty-three, he arrived at the University of Hawaii as that institution’s first African student. He studied econometrics, worked with unsurpassed concentration, and graduated in three years at the top of his class. His friends were legion, and he helped organize the International Students Association, of which he became the first president.
In a Russian language course, he met an awkward, shy American girl, only eighteen, and they fell in love. The girl’s parents, wary at first, were won over by his charm and intellect; the young couple married, and she bore them a son to whom he bequeathed his name… That my father looked nothing like the people around me – that he was black as pitch, my mother white as milk – barely registered in my mind…. p. 9-10
+++++
(Kansas) That was the world in which my grandparents had been raised, the dab-smack, landlocked center of the country, a place where decency and endurance and the pioneer spirit were joined at the hip with conformity and suspicion and the potential for unblinking cruelty. They had grown up less than twenty miles away from each other – my grandmother in Augusta, my grandfather in El Dorado, towns too small to warrant boldface on a road map – and the childhoods they liked to recall for my benefit portrayed small-town, Depression-era America in all its innocent glory: Fourth of July parades and the picture shows on the side of a barn; fireflies in a jar and the taste of vine-rip tomatoes, sweet as apples; dust storms and hailstorms … p. 13
Even the trauma of bank failures and farm foreclosures seemed romantic when spun through the looms of my grandparents’ memories…. So you had to listen carefully to recognize subtle hierarchies and unspoken codes that had policed their early lives, the distinctions of people who don’t have a lot and live in a middle of nowhere. It had to do with something called respectability – there were respectable people and not-so-respectable people – and although you didn’t have to be rich to be respectable, you sure had to work harder at it if you weren’t…”
George H. Kubeck,
cinops be gone Friday, October 17, 2008 A.M.
Preface: Character, judgment and who do you trust? This is the first in a series of selected excerpts from Barack Obama’s book about himself, not yet ready for the presidency. As a McCain supporter, I want to understand the mind and heart of Obama from his life experiences. Secondly, as an activist in the pro-life movement, why he is not pro-life? Most black Americans are pro-life and believe that the true definition of marriage is between a man and a woman.
“He was an African, I would learn, a Kenyan of the Luo tribe, born on the shores of Lake Victoria in a place called Alego. The village was poor, but his father – my grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama – had been a prominent farmer, an elder of the tribe, a medicine man with healing powers.
My father grew up herding his father’s goats and attending the local school, set up by the British colonial administration, where he had shown great promise. He eventually won a scholarship to study in Nairobi; and then on the eve of Kenyan independence, he had been selected by Kenyan leaders and American sponsors to attend a university in the United States…
In 1959, at the age of twenty-three, he arrived at the University of Hawaii as that institution’s first African student. He studied econometrics, worked with unsurpassed concentration, and graduated in three years at the top of his class. His friends were legion, and he helped organize the International Students Association, of which he became the first president.
In a Russian language course, he met an awkward, shy American girl, only eighteen, and they fell in love. The girl’s parents, wary at first, were won over by his charm and intellect; the young couple married, and she bore them a son to whom he bequeathed his name… That my father looked nothing like the people around me – that he was black as pitch, my mother white as milk – barely registered in my mind…. p. 9-10
+++++
(Kansas) That was the world in which my grandparents had been raised, the dab-smack, landlocked center of the country, a place where decency and endurance and the pioneer spirit were joined at the hip with conformity and suspicion and the potential for unblinking cruelty. They had grown up less than twenty miles away from each other – my grandmother in Augusta, my grandfather in El Dorado, towns too small to warrant boldface on a road map – and the childhoods they liked to recall for my benefit portrayed small-town, Depression-era America in all its innocent glory: Fourth of July parades and the picture shows on the side of a barn; fireflies in a jar and the taste of vine-rip tomatoes, sweet as apples; dust storms and hailstorms … p. 13
Even the trauma of bank failures and farm foreclosures seemed romantic when spun through the looms of my grandparents’ memories…. So you had to listen carefully to recognize subtle hierarchies and unspoken codes that had policed their early lives, the distinctions of people who don’t have a lot and live in a middle of nowhere. It had to do with something called respectability – there were respectable people and not-so-respectable people – and although you didn’t have to be rich to be respectable, you sure had to work harder at it if you weren’t…”
George H. Kubeck,
Thursday, October 16, 2008
The California Marriage Amendment
The California Marriage Amendment
cinops be gone Thursday, October 16, 2008
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Do you remember the abortion decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 22, 1973? Had the citizens voted on it, the decision could have been different?
Marriage and family is to a normal society what is air to our lungs. We are not living in a normal society. Allowing same-sex marriage is not normal for any society and for the air we breadth into our lungs and into our children’s lungs.
We get what we vote for or neglect to vote for. We have become desensitized to evil around us. When leaders around us are blind to common sense, reason and natural law, destructive decisions are made.
Please vote yes on Proposition 8 (only marriage between a man and woman is valid.) on the California ballot and support with your time and money the pro-marriage and family candidate list which will be distributed at churches throughout the County.
It is published by Orange County Pro-Family Candidate Campaign, P.O. Box 28402, Santa Ana, Ca. 92799 SERVING ORANGE COUNTY SINCE 1992.
WWW.LIFEPRIORITY.NET
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Thursday, October 16, 2008
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Do you remember the abortion decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 22, 1973? Had the citizens voted on it, the decision could have been different?
Marriage and family is to a normal society what is air to our lungs. We are not living in a normal society. Allowing same-sex marriage is not normal for any society and for the air we breadth into our lungs and into our children’s lungs.
We get what we vote for or neglect to vote for. We have become desensitized to evil around us. When leaders around us are blind to common sense, reason and natural law, destructive decisions are made.
Please vote yes on Proposition 8 (only marriage between a man and woman is valid.) on the California ballot and support with your time and money the pro-marriage and family candidate list which will be distributed at churches throughout the County.
It is published by Orange County Pro-Family Candidate Campaign, P.O. Box 28402, Santa Ana, Ca. 92799 SERVING ORANGE COUNTY SINCE 1992.
WWW.LIFEPRIORITY.NET
George H. Kubeck
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
America's Religion of Secular Humanism
America’s Religion of Secular Humanism
cinops be gone Wednesday, October 15, 2008
The terrorists have nothing to fear from this religion. The God of this religion is man and there are at least three pillars, U.S. media, Hollywood and Academia. This religion is fundamentally unconstitutional because the U.S. government cannot promote a national religion. However that national secular religion is being promoted with judicial activists and Academia’s brainwashing and indoctrination of our students via political correctness and relativism. This is called progress into a hollow and fake religion.
What we have is a culture of death religion which can turn any evil upside down. Take for example marriage and the proposition 8 which states that marriage is between a man and a woman. Someone has called this a “Cultural Crossroad Decision.” One secular cardinal professor in this Culture of Death a.k.a. secular religious humanism is Erwin Chemerinsky identified as a renowned constitutional scholar speaking on Proposition 8: 1) The California 4-3 Supreme Court’s ruling is based on sound constitution principles. 2) If proposition 8 passes it will be an incalculable blow to progress.
And then we have the church that Erwin spoke to. The Rev. Paul Tellstrom pastor the Irvine United Congregational Church said his parishioners have been working phone banks, distributing “No on 8” signs and even approved A CHURCH RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSITION 8, “FOR US IT’S A MORAL ISSUE.”
Crazy! (The above from the Orange County Register, Monday, Oct. 13, 2008)
The U.S. media is to Obama what Pravda was to Stalin and Goebbels’ propaganda newspapers were to Hitler. The media is absolutely corrupt. There are many exceptions and Fox News is one of them. When you can’t trust an editor and journalist to report the news honestly and fairly we have a very serious problem. They are able to manipulate what is news and what is not reported.
Furthermore, if today’s U.S. media had reported World War II like they reported the Iraq war we would have lost the war to Hitler. This is a fact.
We seem to be living in the twilight zone. A Republican presidential candidate with the background of Obama would never have gotten to first base in his battle for the presidency. But Democrat Barack Obama did to all the bases.
The issues between the two candidates are more than black and white. It is traditional America versus a radical and secular America. Obama is a secularist and now the God-Father of the America’s religion of secular humanism. He would be God’s punishment on America if he wins.
And yet McCain is closer to black American religious heritage and beliefs than Obama ever can be. Obama is tied into a false Christian religion a.k.a. black liberation theology which is a Karl Marx and Jesus religious experience. There has never been such a wide difference between two presidential candidates.
One day we will have an authentic Black American, a Thomas Sowell type as president of the United States.
George H. Kubeck
cinops be gone Wednesday, October 15, 2008
The terrorists have nothing to fear from this religion. The God of this religion is man and there are at least three pillars, U.S. media, Hollywood and Academia. This religion is fundamentally unconstitutional because the U.S. government cannot promote a national religion. However that national secular religion is being promoted with judicial activists and Academia’s brainwashing and indoctrination of our students via political correctness and relativism. This is called progress into a hollow and fake religion.
What we have is a culture of death religion which can turn any evil upside down. Take for example marriage and the proposition 8 which states that marriage is between a man and a woman. Someone has called this a “Cultural Crossroad Decision.” One secular cardinal professor in this Culture of Death a.k.a. secular religious humanism is Erwin Chemerinsky identified as a renowned constitutional scholar speaking on Proposition 8: 1) The California 4-3 Supreme Court’s ruling is based on sound constitution principles. 2) If proposition 8 passes it will be an incalculable blow to progress.
And then we have the church that Erwin spoke to. The Rev. Paul Tellstrom pastor the Irvine United Congregational Church said his parishioners have been working phone banks, distributing “No on 8” signs and even approved A CHURCH RESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSITION 8, “FOR US IT’S A MORAL ISSUE.”
Crazy! (The above from the Orange County Register, Monday, Oct. 13, 2008)
The U.S. media is to Obama what Pravda was to Stalin and Goebbels’ propaganda newspapers were to Hitler. The media is absolutely corrupt. There are many exceptions and Fox News is one of them. When you can’t trust an editor and journalist to report the news honestly and fairly we have a very serious problem. They are able to manipulate what is news and what is not reported.
Furthermore, if today’s U.S. media had reported World War II like they reported the Iraq war we would have lost the war to Hitler. This is a fact.
We seem to be living in the twilight zone. A Republican presidential candidate with the background of Obama would never have gotten to first base in his battle for the presidency. But Democrat Barack Obama did to all the bases.
The issues between the two candidates are more than black and white. It is traditional America versus a radical and secular America. Obama is a secularist and now the God-Father of the America’s religion of secular humanism. He would be God’s punishment on America if he wins.
And yet McCain is closer to black American religious heritage and beliefs than Obama ever can be. Obama is tied into a false Christian religion a.k.a. black liberation theology which is a Karl Marx and Jesus religious experience. There has never been such a wide difference between two presidential candidates.
One day we will have an authentic Black American, a Thomas Sowell type as president of the United States.
George H. Kubeck
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
The Case against Loretta Sanchez - 7
The Case against Loretta Sanchez – 7
cinops be gone – Tuesday, October 14, 2008 P.M.
We continue with an e-mail report from Dennis and Bachlien TranBadford on 10-25-04
“This voter guide tells you what issues Congresswoman Sanchez support or opposes,” TranBatdorf explained to Do Thanh as he was leaving. “She supports Partial-Birth Abortion, Minors seeking an abortion without Parental Notification, Human Cloning, Stem-Cell Research, Communist Dictator Fidel Castro, and Senator John Kerry…” “That is the reason I am leaving now,” responded Do Thanh as she was giving him a voter guide.
“Congresswoman is well known as an active advocate for human rights for the people of Vietnam,” TranBatdorf said to Singer Viet Dzung as he was leaving, “but at the same time she is making efforts for all resolutions and acts promoting freedom of Partial Birth Abortion killing millions of unborn babies, in violation of human rights in America.
Is Sanchez’ action quick a contrary?”
“If the Vietnamese American voters are aware of these issues that Sanchez supports, nobody of the Vietnamese community would vote for her.” Tina Lan Nguyen said to Sanchez’ guests as she was giving voter guides to them at the entrance gate. “Because of the language and cultural barriers, many Vietnamese people have voted for Sanchez in ignorance.” …
Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez (D-47) is well known in the Vietnamese community of Orange Country through her resolutions in support of freedom of religion and human rights in Vietnam, by wearing Vietnamese traditional dress (Ao Dai VN) as marching Tet Festival, and her profession for actively fighting Vietnamese Communists. Therefore, Sanchez is well considered as a daughter-in-law of the Vietnamese community here. However, we are disappointed and outraged as we read the Christian Coalition Voter Guide of California 2004…. Loretta Sanchez supporting the following issues:
PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION: MARRIAGE FOR HOMOSEXUALITY:
BAN ON PARENTAL NOTIFICATION FOR MINORS SEEKING A ABORTION:
BAN ON FEDERAL FUNDING FOR FAITH-BASE CHARITABLE ORGANIZAT
MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY: HUMAN CLONING
COMMUNIST CUBAN DICTATOR FIDEL CASTRO
JOHN KERRY KILLING THE VIETNAM HUMAN RIGHTS ACT –
HR 2833 IN 2003: NOTE: SANCHEZ STRONGLY SUPPORTEDE JOHN KERRY
IN KILLING THE VIETNAM THE VIETNAM HUMAN RIGHTS ACT –HR 283 AS SHE WORKED TOGETHER WITH KERRY AT THE CONGRESS IN WA-DC EVERYDAY:
IT IS INDEED AN IRONY TO WITNESS SANCHEZ HAVING SUBMITTED SEVERAL RESOLUTIONS SUPPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN VIET NAM WHILE SHE IS ACTIVELY MAKING ALL EFFORTS FOR RESOLUTION AND ACTS ALLOWING FREEDOM OF ABORTION, KILLING MILLIONS OF UNBORN BABIES IN VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AMERICA DESPITE OF THE FACT THE SANCHEZ IS A CATHOLIC WHO WAS BORN IN AND GREW UP IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
DURING 2000 CAMPAIGN, SANCHEZ ALSO ATTEMPTED TO HOLD A FUND RAISING EVENT FOR HER AT PLAYBOY MANSION PUBLISHING AND SELLING PORN MAGAZINE BUT AL GORE STOPPED HER FROM HOSTINGL THE EVENT AND CONSEQUENTLY, SHE WAS RESTRICTED TO SPEAK AT THE 2000 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION...
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone – Tuesday, October 14, 2008 P.M.
We continue with an e-mail report from Dennis and Bachlien TranBadford on 10-25-04
“This voter guide tells you what issues Congresswoman Sanchez support or opposes,” TranBatdorf explained to Do Thanh as he was leaving. “She supports Partial-Birth Abortion, Minors seeking an abortion without Parental Notification, Human Cloning, Stem-Cell Research, Communist Dictator Fidel Castro, and Senator John Kerry…” “That is the reason I am leaving now,” responded Do Thanh as she was giving him a voter guide.
“Congresswoman is well known as an active advocate for human rights for the people of Vietnam,” TranBatdorf said to Singer Viet Dzung as he was leaving, “but at the same time she is making efforts for all resolutions and acts promoting freedom of Partial Birth Abortion killing millions of unborn babies, in violation of human rights in America.
Is Sanchez’ action quick a contrary?”
“If the Vietnamese American voters are aware of these issues that Sanchez supports, nobody of the Vietnamese community would vote for her.” Tina Lan Nguyen said to Sanchez’ guests as she was giving voter guides to them at the entrance gate. “Because of the language and cultural barriers, many Vietnamese people have voted for Sanchez in ignorance.” …
Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez (D-47) is well known in the Vietnamese community of Orange Country through her resolutions in support of freedom of religion and human rights in Vietnam, by wearing Vietnamese traditional dress (Ao Dai VN) as marching Tet Festival, and her profession for actively fighting Vietnamese Communists. Therefore, Sanchez is well considered as a daughter-in-law of the Vietnamese community here. However, we are disappointed and outraged as we read the Christian Coalition Voter Guide of California 2004…. Loretta Sanchez supporting the following issues:
PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION: MARRIAGE FOR HOMOSEXUALITY:
BAN ON PARENTAL NOTIFICATION FOR MINORS SEEKING A ABORTION:
BAN ON FEDERAL FUNDING FOR FAITH-BASE CHARITABLE ORGANIZAT
MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY: HUMAN CLONING
COMMUNIST CUBAN DICTATOR FIDEL CASTRO
JOHN KERRY KILLING THE VIETNAM HUMAN RIGHTS ACT –
HR 2833 IN 2003: NOTE: SANCHEZ STRONGLY SUPPORTEDE JOHN KERRY
IN KILLING THE VIETNAM THE VIETNAM HUMAN RIGHTS ACT –HR 283 AS SHE WORKED TOGETHER WITH KERRY AT THE CONGRESS IN WA-DC EVERYDAY:
IT IS INDEED AN IRONY TO WITNESS SANCHEZ HAVING SUBMITTED SEVERAL RESOLUTIONS SUPPORTING HUMAN RIGHTS IN VIET NAM WHILE SHE IS ACTIVELY MAKING ALL EFFORTS FOR RESOLUTION AND ACTS ALLOWING FREEDOM OF ABORTION, KILLING MILLIONS OF UNBORN BABIES IN VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN AMERICA DESPITE OF THE FACT THE SANCHEZ IS A CATHOLIC WHO WAS BORN IN AND GREW UP IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
DURING 2000 CAMPAIGN, SANCHEZ ALSO ATTEMPTED TO HOLD A FUND RAISING EVENT FOR HER AT PLAYBOY MANSION PUBLISHING AND SELLING PORN MAGAZINE BUT AL GORE STOPPED HER FROM HOSTINGL THE EVENT AND CONSEQUENTLY, SHE WAS RESTRICTED TO SPEAK AT THE 2000 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION...
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and or translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
The Case against Loretta Sanchez - 6
The Case against Loretta Sanchez – 6
cinops be gone – Tuesday, October 14, 2008 P.M.
Before I get into my report as e-mailed to me by Dennis and Bachlien TranBadford on Monday, Oct. 25, 2004 election, may I share a few thoughts.
The best way to solve the CINOP (Catholic-in-name-only politician) problem in America is to vote them out of office. We have clones of CINOP Nancy Pelosi all over the nation. They are arrogant, cocksure and ruthless politicians. They get reelected via uninformed and duped Catholic American voters.
They use the Catholic label as a source of reelection, and social justice principles as a weapon to confuse. Now social justice issues are fundamentally prudential issues upon which Catholic voters and other Christians can disagree!
Let me explain it this way! What is the difference between a CINOP and a smut politician who supports fornication, adultery and pornography? There isn’t any! Why and How? The CINOP supports the issues of abortion, assisted-suicide, euthanasia, same-sex marriage and embryonic stem-cell research. Now these are all absolutely evil along with the 3 smut issues.
By the way, I have not gotten a chance to telephone or e-mail CINOP politicians Sanchez, Correa and Solorio and asked to come out in a news conference in support of Proposition 8 the Marriage Amendment. Can you make some calls? For all Christians, this is as serious as the abortion decision in 1973. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Now if these three politicians do not come out either individually or together at a news conference, then we can call these three politicians hypocrites, and they must stop using the Catholic label for electioneering purposes. The accurate term would Catholic Label Fraud-Politicians. All of this is a most serious scandal for all Christians and Americans.
Now here is the first and second paragraph of the e-mail report:
Santa Ana – Sunday, October 24, 2004 – A staff of Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez politically incorrect flipped up her “middle finger” at two constituents of Sanchez, Bachlien TranBatdorf and Tina Lan Nguyen as they expressed their freedom of speech by distributing some California Christian Voter Guides to her guests outside of the Regent West Restaurant in Santa Ana where a group of Vietnamese American singers, entertainers and friends of Congresswoman Sanchez held a fund raising event for her.
“These voter guides lie, and are put out by the {Republican} campaign,” said in anger Sanchez’ staff to Bachlien TranBatdorf while she was giving her a copy of California Christian Voter Guide at the entrance of the Restaurant. “That’s not true,” clarified TranBatford, “these voters guides are published by the California Christian Coalition, and independent and non-political organization, and provided for educational purposes only are not to be construed as an endorsement of any candidate or political party. (to be continued)
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
cinops be gone – Tuesday, October 14, 2008 P.M.
Before I get into my report as e-mailed to me by Dennis and Bachlien TranBadford on Monday, Oct. 25, 2004 election, may I share a few thoughts.
The best way to solve the CINOP (Catholic-in-name-only politician) problem in America is to vote them out of office. We have clones of CINOP Nancy Pelosi all over the nation. They are arrogant, cocksure and ruthless politicians. They get reelected via uninformed and duped Catholic American voters.
They use the Catholic label as a source of reelection, and social justice principles as a weapon to confuse. Now social justice issues are fundamentally prudential issues upon which Catholic voters and other Christians can disagree!
Let me explain it this way! What is the difference between a CINOP and a smut politician who supports fornication, adultery and pornography? There isn’t any! Why and How? The CINOP supports the issues of abortion, assisted-suicide, euthanasia, same-sex marriage and embryonic stem-cell research. Now these are all absolutely evil along with the 3 smut issues.
By the way, I have not gotten a chance to telephone or e-mail CINOP politicians Sanchez, Correa and Solorio and asked to come out in a news conference in support of Proposition 8 the Marriage Amendment. Can you make some calls? For all Christians, this is as serious as the abortion decision in 1973. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Now if these three politicians do not come out either individually or together at a news conference, then we can call these three politicians hypocrites, and they must stop using the Catholic label for electioneering purposes. The accurate term would Catholic Label Fraud-Politicians. All of this is a most serious scandal for all Christians and Americans.
Now here is the first and second paragraph of the e-mail report:
Santa Ana – Sunday, October 24, 2004 – A staff of Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez politically incorrect flipped up her “middle finger” at two constituents of Sanchez, Bachlien TranBatdorf and Tina Lan Nguyen as they expressed their freedom of speech by distributing some California Christian Voter Guides to her guests outside of the Regent West Restaurant in Santa Ana where a group of Vietnamese American singers, entertainers and friends of Congresswoman Sanchez held a fund raising event for her.
“These voter guides lie, and are put out by the {Republican} campaign,” said in anger Sanchez’ staff to Bachlien TranBatdorf while she was giving her a copy of California Christian Voter Guide at the entrance of the Restaurant. “That’s not true,” clarified TranBatford, “these voters guides are published by the California Christian Coalition, and independent and non-political organization, and provided for educational purposes only are not to be construed as an endorsement of any candidate or political party. (to be continued)
George H. Kubeck, Duplicate and translate into Spanish and Vietnamese.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)