Seven Days to an Historic Presidential Election
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 31, 2012
The election is about everything associated with a liberal progressive America and a traditional America. There seems to be no gray areas of difference. It’s black and white.
I wrote the following religious perspective a couple of days ago. It is plain talk and tough love. In the country, we have political correctness and among Catholics we have religious correctness. Let’s focus on the mandatory games of pretend, the CINOP is OK.
Same-sex marriage is one of the five intrinsically evil issues. We must put a stop for any Christian who believes that same-sex marriage is OK. It is not. If it is legalized federally, it wont be America anymore. It is intellectually, morally and religiously dishonest to believe in same-sex marriage and call yourself a Christian.
Furthermore, what is the difference between a CINOP who promotes the five intrinsically evil issues and a politician who promotes pornography, adultery and fornication? There isn’t any.
When a CINOP is representing you in Congress for decades like the 13 who are in California, who is primarily responsible for his presence? It is largely the bishop in that congressional district. Why? Nominal Catholics are voting that person in office. They haven’t been catechized or have listened to preaching on marriage, abortion, euthanasia, cloning or embryonic stem cell research.
I am really not picking on the Church. I am convinced if the person the CINOP was an Evangelical or Baptist, the preachers of that denomination would have voted that person out years ago. But the buck also stops with the Catholic laity. It seems that have ingrained in us that we need to ask permission from the bishop to get involved in public political action. We really don’t. And in the process the Catholic voting bloc not only in California and the Eastern States are the most uniformed and misinformed voting bloc in America. You can inform them about the HHS Mandate. But for most it is meaningless.
I am also convinced after decades of study that if the CINOP was a Republican, he would have denounced decades ago and refused Communion and a Catholic funeral. Aren’t we concerned about the soul of the CINOP? Our bishops and priest need a complete divorce from the Democratic Party. The political party of their ancestry is dead.
The CINOP is an albatross around the neck of the American Catholic Church. Quite a number of them were voted out of office in 2010. More will be voted out on Nov. 6th.
One of the major points the Catholic Church seems to be concerned about is racism. Isn’t the CINOP very much attached to Planned Parenthood? It doesn’t seem to matter. Well, there is Black Racism and Black Genocide that the CINOP indirectly and directly supports and it’s 1600 Black babies killed each day by abortion. That’s 569,000 unborn babies killed each year. Who cares? Let’s get rid of the game of pretend he’s OK.
George H. Kubeck - Whatever the outcome, it will also be God’s judgment on America.
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Monday, October 29, 2012
Challenger Jerry Hayden vs. Loretta Sanchez
Challenger Jerry Hayden vs. Loretta Sanchez
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, October 29, 2012
From: Jerry Hayden for Congress [mailto:info@haydenforcongress.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - 46th Congressional Candidate Jerry Hayden Calls on Incumbent Loretta Sanchez to Debate
(Santa Ana, CA) - Today, 46th Congressional candidate and Republican nominee Jerry Hayden called on 16-year incumbent Loretta Sanchez to leave Washington and participate in a debate within her district; a location she hasn’t visited in a while.
Now more than ever, it is vital that our incumbent politicians explain why they deserve remain in office. A public debate would offer the voters of the newly formed 46th Congressional District a chance to hear from both candidates on some of the most important issues facing Americans today including jobs, the economy, spending, public safety, immigration and education…
SHOT: Loretta Sanchez has increased our national debt by 11 trillion dollars while in office resulting in $50,000 of personal debt for every American. In addition, while Loretta has been in Congress, the number of children who have dropped out of High School within her District has doubled, and in some areas tripled.
CHASER: Loretta Sanchez continues to vacation on the public dime, while voting for one of the largest tax increases in history on small business. She continues to live in Washington D.C. and fails to even appear at her own events. It’s time Loretta explains her actions in front of the people who elected her.
“I’m ready for a debate”, said 46th Congressional candidate and GOP conservative Jerry Hayden. “Loretta has a lot to explain. Her lack of leadership with respect to immigration policy, her absence within her district, and her utter disregard for the people of California illustrate her complacency. I have a plan for this country that will steer us in the right direction, and I challenge my opponent to a debate.”
For over 20 years, Jerry Hayden has directed successful financial and investment strategies for Orange County families and business. Jerry has also given his time to the community, including serving 8 years a the volunteer freshman football coach at Foothill High School. Jerry also served on the Board of Directors for School Power, where he helped raise tens of thousand of dollars to fund public school teachers’ extra budgetary classroom needs.
The youngest of 11 children, Jerry Hayden grew up in Garden Grove and in the Santa/Tustin area, where the family bought a home on a lemon orchard. His father was a doctor and Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves. Jerry Hayden completed his Bachelors’ Degree in Business Finance from San Diego State University. Jerry, his wife Helen and their daughters Lauren and Katie enjoy the California outdoor in their free time and celebrate Jerry and Helen’s wedding anniversary every 4th of July.
George H. Kubeck,
May I share the address of the headquarters of Jerry Hayden’s campaign.
2703 N. Bristol St. [cross street Memory Lane] Suite H, Santa Ana, Ca. 92706
Open 10 A.M. to 7 P.M. - to help contact Erich Burch - 1-949-680-0007
I plan to donate today $40.00 to Hayden for Congress, PO Box 6911, Santa Ana, Ca 92706
Campaign@haydenforcongress.com He will win if all pro-life, marriage and family readers of this blog do contribute, or work via telephone or precinct walks in his district.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, October 29, 2012
From: Jerry Hayden for Congress [mailto:info@haydenforcongress.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, October 9, 2012 - 46th Congressional Candidate Jerry Hayden Calls on Incumbent Loretta Sanchez to Debate
(Santa Ana, CA) - Today, 46th Congressional candidate and Republican nominee Jerry Hayden called on 16-year incumbent Loretta Sanchez to leave Washington and participate in a debate within her district; a location she hasn’t visited in a while.
Now more than ever, it is vital that our incumbent politicians explain why they deserve remain in office. A public debate would offer the voters of the newly formed 46th Congressional District a chance to hear from both candidates on some of the most important issues facing Americans today including jobs, the economy, spending, public safety, immigration and education…
SHOT: Loretta Sanchez has increased our national debt by 11 trillion dollars while in office resulting in $50,000 of personal debt for every American. In addition, while Loretta has been in Congress, the number of children who have dropped out of High School within her District has doubled, and in some areas tripled.
CHASER: Loretta Sanchez continues to vacation on the public dime, while voting for one of the largest tax increases in history on small business. She continues to live in Washington D.C. and fails to even appear at her own events. It’s time Loretta explains her actions in front of the people who elected her.
“I’m ready for a debate”, said 46th Congressional candidate and GOP conservative Jerry Hayden. “Loretta has a lot to explain. Her lack of leadership with respect to immigration policy, her absence within her district, and her utter disregard for the people of California illustrate her complacency. I have a plan for this country that will steer us in the right direction, and I challenge my opponent to a debate.”
For over 20 years, Jerry Hayden has directed successful financial and investment strategies for Orange County families and business. Jerry has also given his time to the community, including serving 8 years a the volunteer freshman football coach at Foothill High School. Jerry also served on the Board of Directors for School Power, where he helped raise tens of thousand of dollars to fund public school teachers’ extra budgetary classroom needs.
The youngest of 11 children, Jerry Hayden grew up in Garden Grove and in the Santa/Tustin area, where the family bought a home on a lemon orchard. His father was a doctor and Colonel in the U.S. Army Reserves. Jerry Hayden completed his Bachelors’ Degree in Business Finance from San Diego State University. Jerry, his wife Helen and their daughters Lauren and Katie enjoy the California outdoor in their free time and celebrate Jerry and Helen’s wedding anniversary every 4th of July.
George H. Kubeck,
May I share the address of the headquarters of Jerry Hayden’s campaign.
2703 N. Bristol St. [cross street Memory Lane] Suite H, Santa Ana, Ca. 92706
Open 10 A.M. to 7 P.M. - to help contact Erich Burch - 1-949-680-0007
I plan to donate today $40.00 to Hayden for Congress, PO Box 6911, Santa Ana, Ca 92706
Campaign@haydenforcongress.com He will win if all pro-life, marriage and family readers of this blog do contribute, or work via telephone or precinct walks in his district.
Peggy Noonan on Barack Obama
Peggy Noonan on Barack Obama
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 29, 2012
From the Wall Street Journal, Sat. - Sun. October 27, 28, 2012
In Denver on Oct. 3 … nothing echoes out like that [presidential] debate. It was the moment that allowed dismay with the incumbent to coalesce, that allowed voters to consider the alternative. America doesn’t date losers… Why was the first debate so toxic for the president? Because the one thing he couldn’t do if he was going to win the election is let all the pent-up resentment toward him erupt.
What he couldn’t do was present himself, when everyone was looking, as smaller than you thought. Petulant, put upon, above it all, full of himself. He couldn’t afford to make himself look less impressive than the challenger in terms of command, grasp of fact, size. But that’s what he did.
And in some utterly new way the president was revealed, exposed. All the people whose job it is to surround and explain him, to act as his buffers and protectors - they weren’t there. It was him on the stage, alone with a competitor. He didn’t have a teleprompter, and so his failure seemed to underscore the cliché that the thing he need to sound good. He is not by any means a stupid man but he has become a boring one; he drones, he is predictable, it’s never new. The teleprompter adds substance, or at least safety.
What exactly happened when Mr. Obama did himself in? What led to it? Was it the catastrophic execution sound strategy? Perhaps the idea was to show the president was so unimpressed by his challenger that he could coolly keep him at bay by not engaging… So he sat back and let Mr. Romney come forward. But Mr. Romney was poised, knowledgeable, presidential. It was a mistake to let that come forward!
Maybe they assumed the election was already pretty much in the bag, don’t sweat it… The sheer number of people who watched - a historic 70 million - suggests a lot of voters were still making up their minds. Maybe the president himself didn’t think he could possibly be beaten because he is so beloved… the extraordinary internet effort to connect with every lonely person in America..
People back home he [the senator] said what happened with the president in that debate. The senator said, “I sort of have to tell them that it wasn’t a miscalculation or a weird moment, I told him I know him, that guy on the stage, that’s the real Obama.”
Which gets us to Bob Woodward, “The Price of Politics” published last month. The portrait it contains of Mr. Obama - of a President who is at once over his head, out of his depth and wholly unaware of the fact, hasn’t received the attention it deserves.
Obama is portrayed as having the appearance and presentation of an academic intellectual while being strangely clueless in his reading of political situations and dynamics. He is bad at negotiating - in fact doesn’t know how. His confidence is consistently greater than acumen, his arrogance greater than his grasp…
Business leaders and might CEOs felt patronized. After inviting them to meet with him, the president read from a teleprompter and included the press. They felt like “window dressing.” One spoke of Obama’s surface polish and essential remoteness…
He told staffers that John Boehner, one of 11 children of a small-town owner, was a “country club Republican… Mr. Woodward portrait of the President is not precisely new - it has drawn in other accounts and has been a staple D.C. gossip for three years now…
George H. Kubeck, Thanks Peggy, for now we know who he is!
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 29, 2012
From the Wall Street Journal, Sat. - Sun. October 27, 28, 2012
In Denver on Oct. 3 … nothing echoes out like that [presidential] debate. It was the moment that allowed dismay with the incumbent to coalesce, that allowed voters to consider the alternative. America doesn’t date losers… Why was the first debate so toxic for the president? Because the one thing he couldn’t do if he was going to win the election is let all the pent-up resentment toward him erupt.
What he couldn’t do was present himself, when everyone was looking, as smaller than you thought. Petulant, put upon, above it all, full of himself. He couldn’t afford to make himself look less impressive than the challenger in terms of command, grasp of fact, size. But that’s what he did.
And in some utterly new way the president was revealed, exposed. All the people whose job it is to surround and explain him, to act as his buffers and protectors - they weren’t there. It was him on the stage, alone with a competitor. He didn’t have a teleprompter, and so his failure seemed to underscore the cliché that the thing he need to sound good. He is not by any means a stupid man but he has become a boring one; he drones, he is predictable, it’s never new. The teleprompter adds substance, or at least safety.
What exactly happened when Mr. Obama did himself in? What led to it? Was it the catastrophic execution sound strategy? Perhaps the idea was to show the president was so unimpressed by his challenger that he could coolly keep him at bay by not engaging… So he sat back and let Mr. Romney come forward. But Mr. Romney was poised, knowledgeable, presidential. It was a mistake to let that come forward!
Maybe they assumed the election was already pretty much in the bag, don’t sweat it… The sheer number of people who watched - a historic 70 million - suggests a lot of voters were still making up their minds. Maybe the president himself didn’t think he could possibly be beaten because he is so beloved… the extraordinary internet effort to connect with every lonely person in America..
People back home he [the senator] said what happened with the president in that debate. The senator said, “I sort of have to tell them that it wasn’t a miscalculation or a weird moment, I told him I know him, that guy on the stage, that’s the real Obama.”
Which gets us to Bob Woodward, “The Price of Politics” published last month. The portrait it contains of Mr. Obama - of a President who is at once over his head, out of his depth and wholly unaware of the fact, hasn’t received the attention it deserves.
Obama is portrayed as having the appearance and presentation of an academic intellectual while being strangely clueless in his reading of political situations and dynamics. He is bad at negotiating - in fact doesn’t know how. His confidence is consistently greater than acumen, his arrogance greater than his grasp…
Business leaders and might CEOs felt patronized. After inviting them to meet with him, the president read from a teleprompter and included the press. They felt like “window dressing.” One spoke of Obama’s surface polish and essential remoteness…
He told staffers that John Boehner, one of 11 children of a small-town owner, was a “country club Republican… Mr. Woodward portrait of the President is not precisely new - it has drawn in other accounts and has been a staple D.C. gossip for three years now…
George H. Kubeck, Thanks Peggy, for now we know who he is!
Sunday, October 28, 2012
3 - The Case Against Loretta Sanchez
3 - The Case against Loretta Sanchez
Justice is truth in action - cinops be gone - Sunday, Oct. 28th, 2012
Preface: California is a state similar in population with Texas. Sadly, as a retired public school teacher, California is intellectually, morally, & financially bankrupt. If proposition 30 does not pass we will all feel it. But California can be redeemed, if it passes Proposition 32 which will restore integrity to the teaching profession. Without integrity, there is no teaching. Also, thank God the presidential elections will not be decided in California!
2. The next Congress will again be a Republican controlled Congress. What can Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez do to influence this Republican Congress? Nothing, absolutely nothing! The 46th Congressional District will have no input.
3. Her opponent in this race is Republican Jerry Hayden who will be honored to represent all American voters in the 46th Congressional District and in particularly the Latino and Vietnamese citizens. Believe me the Republican leadership including President Mitt Romney will be elated, proud and listen with attentive ears to this newly elected Congressman Hayden. Without doubt the registered Democratic voters know this and the smart ones could very well elect Hayden with their vote. There is need for a change!
4. What is most disturbing with Loretta Sanchez during the last two years are her votes in Congress, so contrary to the values of the District. She goes along with the President Obama’s feelings that same-sex marriage is the equivalent to a normal marriage between a man and woman. That’s a gross insult to the culture Loretta grew up with parents and grandparents. Also, let’s not think of her votes for partial-birth/infanticide abortion.
5. What is particularly shameful is her support of Planned Parenthood. Indirectly, she is promoting black racism. Does she not know that 1600 black babies are aborted each day in America? I have my signs at the abortion mills reading 1000 each day. I have to change them for accuracy. On judgment day I don’t want her to have black genocide on her hands.
6. I know she tried to follow the Catholic Church in trying to pass Obamacare, but definitely not to include abortion as part of health care. Then she voted in Congress not to give protection to doctors and health care workers with respect to their conscience rights and freedom of religion as stated in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. That is wrong.
7. Indirectly, the President went ahead with the HHS Mandate because of the votes of Catholic-label Congresspersons like herself. You can’t let the President divide Catholics like he is doing now. President Obama is making fools of sincere Catholic voters.
8. We are all Americans even the truly uniformed who may vote for Obama. There is an Obama election video which I viewed saying that voting for Obama is like losing your virginity to a really cool guy. What an insult to all the ladies in America!
9. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. Obama and his Czars want to change the very soul of being an American and yes the very soul of each one of us. But, we now know who he is!
George H. Kubeck
Justice is truth in action - cinops be gone - Sunday, Oct. 28th, 2012
Preface: California is a state similar in population with Texas. Sadly, as a retired public school teacher, California is intellectually, morally, & financially bankrupt. If proposition 30 does not pass we will all feel it. But California can be redeemed, if it passes Proposition 32 which will restore integrity to the teaching profession. Without integrity, there is no teaching. Also, thank God the presidential elections will not be decided in California!
2. The next Congress will again be a Republican controlled Congress. What can Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez do to influence this Republican Congress? Nothing, absolutely nothing! The 46th Congressional District will have no input.
3. Her opponent in this race is Republican Jerry Hayden who will be honored to represent all American voters in the 46th Congressional District and in particularly the Latino and Vietnamese citizens. Believe me the Republican leadership including President Mitt Romney will be elated, proud and listen with attentive ears to this newly elected Congressman Hayden. Without doubt the registered Democratic voters know this and the smart ones could very well elect Hayden with their vote. There is need for a change!
4. What is most disturbing with Loretta Sanchez during the last two years are her votes in Congress, so contrary to the values of the District. She goes along with the President Obama’s feelings that same-sex marriage is the equivalent to a normal marriage between a man and woman. That’s a gross insult to the culture Loretta grew up with parents and grandparents. Also, let’s not think of her votes for partial-birth/infanticide abortion.
5. What is particularly shameful is her support of Planned Parenthood. Indirectly, she is promoting black racism. Does she not know that 1600 black babies are aborted each day in America? I have my signs at the abortion mills reading 1000 each day. I have to change them for accuracy. On judgment day I don’t want her to have black genocide on her hands.
6. I know she tried to follow the Catholic Church in trying to pass Obamacare, but definitely not to include abortion as part of health care. Then she voted in Congress not to give protection to doctors and health care workers with respect to their conscience rights and freedom of religion as stated in the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. That is wrong.
7. Indirectly, the President went ahead with the HHS Mandate because of the votes of Catholic-label Congresspersons like herself. You can’t let the President divide Catholics like he is doing now. President Obama is making fools of sincere Catholic voters.
8. We are all Americans even the truly uniformed who may vote for Obama. There is an Obama election video which I viewed saying that voting for Obama is like losing your virginity to a really cool guy. What an insult to all the ladies in America!
9. But that is just the tip of the iceberg. Obama and his Czars want to change the very soul of being an American and yes the very soul of each one of us. But, we now know who he is!
George H. Kubeck
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Serious Catholic Divisions on the HHS Mandate
Serious Catholic Divisions on the HHS Mandate
The relentless pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012
George McKenna is a professor emeritus of political science at City College of New York. He has written a disturbing poignant article titled, “Sleeping with the Enemy.“ in the Summer 2012 edition of “the Human Life.” p. 13-14, You decide and pray for unity.
Left and Right Critics of the Bishops:
“Alas, some Catholics on the left have opted for neutrality or even sympathy with the other side, and some Catholics on the right seem to take spiteful satisfaction from the whole affair. Washington Post writer E.J. Dionne, a self-identified Catholic, at first expressed something like anguish over the mandate (“Obama threw his progressive Catholic allies under the bus.”).
“But he quickly got back in line with the Administration after its empty “accommodation” of February 10, which continued but said that the insurance companies had to pay for it (pretending not to notice that the insurance companies would pass back the cost in higher premiums and that many Catholic institutions are self-insured). Now Dionne declared that the Catholic bishops must decide whether they want “to defend the church’s legitimate interest” or “wage an election-year war against President Obama.”
“Throwing down the gauntlet, he added, “do most conservative bishops want to junk the Roman Catholic Church as we have known it, with its deep commitment to life and social justice, and turn it into a Tea Party at prayer.” For him, the bishops’ protest really amounts to a threat of partisan political warfare, and he, being a good Democrat before anything else was fighting back with his own threat. If you bishops don’t shut up I will hammer you with the charge of being “the Tea Party at prayer.” Does that kind of talk frighten the new generation of Catholic bishops? I don’t think so.
“More nuanced was the reaction of the editors of America, the nation’s leading Jesuit magazine. “For a brief moment,” the editors wrote, “Catholics on all sides were united in the defense of the freedom of the Catholic Church to define for itself what it means to be Catholic in the United States.” But the editorial continues, the Administration’s “accommodation” of February 10 essentially met the bishops’ objection, and now they should talk with the Administration in “a conciliatory style that keeps Catholics united and cools the national distemper.” Instead, by continuing the struggle and getting into the fine points of policy matters, the bishops are involving themselves in matters of prudential judgment, better left to the politicians.
“The America editorial has a lighter touch than E.J. Dionne’s piece; there is even a plaintiff can’t-we-all-get-along note to it. But its innocence is far more alarming than Dionne’s thuggishness. Citing what it calls “fundamental principles of Catholic political theology,” it holds that, since that there are two competing right claims in dispute, women’s health and religious freedom, Catholic rights theory “assigns to government the responsibility to coordinate contending rights and interests for the sake of the common good.”
“And that is what government did in this case. It did “what Catholic social teaching expects government to do - coordinate contending rights for the good of all.” You may need to reread these quotes. The Jesuit editors of America are saying that “government” i.e. the Obama administration should have the sovereign authority to settle the dispute. But the government is one of the parties to the dispute! This is as like asking one of the litigants in a legal case to decide the case for the court. Yet the editors insist that this is one of the “fundamental principles of Catholic theology.”
George H. Kubeck, As a graduate of a Jesuit college, the Jesuit editors of America are full of malarkey. Our Church and people are destroyed because of a lack of information, serious divisions, and the absence of strong Catholic laity leadership who proclaim the “Catechism of the Catholic Church” as our guiding light. Catholic religious correctness is as bad as political correctness.
The relentless pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012
George McKenna is a professor emeritus of political science at City College of New York. He has written a disturbing poignant article titled, “Sleeping with the Enemy.“ in the Summer 2012 edition of “the Human Life.” p. 13-14, You decide and pray for unity.
Left and Right Critics of the Bishops:
“Alas, some Catholics on the left have opted for neutrality or even sympathy with the other side, and some Catholics on the right seem to take spiteful satisfaction from the whole affair. Washington Post writer E.J. Dionne, a self-identified Catholic, at first expressed something like anguish over the mandate (“Obama threw his progressive Catholic allies under the bus.”).
“But he quickly got back in line with the Administration after its empty “accommodation” of February 10, which continued but said that the insurance companies had to pay for it (pretending not to notice that the insurance companies would pass back the cost in higher premiums and that many Catholic institutions are self-insured). Now Dionne declared that the Catholic bishops must decide whether they want “to defend the church’s legitimate interest” or “wage an election-year war against President Obama.”
“Throwing down the gauntlet, he added, “do most conservative bishops want to junk the Roman Catholic Church as we have known it, with its deep commitment to life and social justice, and turn it into a Tea Party at prayer.” For him, the bishops’ protest really amounts to a threat of partisan political warfare, and he, being a good Democrat before anything else was fighting back with his own threat. If you bishops don’t shut up I will hammer you with the charge of being “the Tea Party at prayer.” Does that kind of talk frighten the new generation of Catholic bishops? I don’t think so.
“More nuanced was the reaction of the editors of America, the nation’s leading Jesuit magazine. “For a brief moment,” the editors wrote, “Catholics on all sides were united in the defense of the freedom of the Catholic Church to define for itself what it means to be Catholic in the United States.” But the editorial continues, the Administration’s “accommodation” of February 10 essentially met the bishops’ objection, and now they should talk with the Administration in “a conciliatory style that keeps Catholics united and cools the national distemper.” Instead, by continuing the struggle and getting into the fine points of policy matters, the bishops are involving themselves in matters of prudential judgment, better left to the politicians.
“The America editorial has a lighter touch than E.J. Dionne’s piece; there is even a plaintiff can’t-we-all-get-along note to it. But its innocence is far more alarming than Dionne’s thuggishness. Citing what it calls “fundamental principles of Catholic political theology,” it holds that, since that there are two competing right claims in dispute, women’s health and religious freedom, Catholic rights theory “assigns to government the responsibility to coordinate contending rights and interests for the sake of the common good.”
“And that is what government did in this case. It did “what Catholic social teaching expects government to do - coordinate contending rights for the good of all.” You may need to reread these quotes. The Jesuit editors of America are saying that “government” i.e. the Obama administration should have the sovereign authority to settle the dispute. But the government is one of the parties to the dispute! This is as like asking one of the litigants in a legal case to decide the case for the court. Yet the editors insist that this is one of the “fundamental principles of Catholic theology.”
George H. Kubeck, As a graduate of a Jesuit college, the Jesuit editors of America are full of malarkey. Our Church and people are destroyed because of a lack of information, serious divisions, and the absence of strong Catholic laity leadership who proclaim the “Catechism of the Catholic Church” as our guiding light. Catholic religious correctness is as bad as political correctness.
Knights of Columbus Town Hall Event
Knights of Columbus Town Hall Event
For all members of the Knights of Columbus, I took notes via telephone from about 10:30 - 10:45 A.M. Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012
THIS IS GARY NOLAN - “OUR NON-PARTISAN GET OUT THE VOTE EVENT”
THIS TELEPHONE MESSAGE FROM MOST REVEREND WILLIAM LORI, AD HOC COMMITTEE ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
“RELIGION IS OFTEN NOT WELCOMED IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE. THIS IS THE YEAR OF FAITH WHICH OPENS OUR EYES TO HUMAN LIFE. CHOOSE TO STAND WITH THE LORD. CAST OUR VOTES AND WAYS THAT SUPPORT THE CORE TEACHINGS OF OUR FAITH.
“FORM OUR CONSCIENCE FROM FAIHFUL CITIZENSHIP, AND ACCORDING TO THE TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH AND VOTE CATHOLIC. BRING OUR BELIEFS INTO THE VOTING BOOTH.
“BE TRUE TO OUR FAITH AS KNIGHTS AND FOR OURCOUNTRY. GET FELLOW PARISHIONERS TO THE POLLS. OUR ORDER HAS BEEN MOST SUCCESSFUL IN PFEVIOUS ELECTIONS. DO LIKEWISE.
“PLEASE KEEP THE ELECTION AND OUR COUNTRY IN YOUR PRAYERS.”
++++++++++++
TELEPHONE MESSAGE FROM THE SUPREME KNIGHT CARL ANDERSON FROM ROME. HE WAS DOING SOME AUDITOR WORK THERE.
“I WAS WITH THE HOLY FATHER THIS MORNING. HE THANKS THE KNIGHTS FOR OUR STRONG WITNESS TO OUR FAITH AND FOR THE WORK WE DO IN SO MANY PLACES AROUND THE WORLD.
“WE FACE AN HISTORIC ELECTION. - RELIGIOUS LIBERTY - OUR CHURCH AND BUILDING A CULTURE OF LIFE. VOTE BASED ON OUR CATHOLIC VALUES. ENCOURAGE ALL FAITHFUL CATHOLICS TO VOTE.
“OUR FOUNDER VENERABLE FATHER MCGIVNEY SAID VOTE YOUR CONSCIENCE NOT PARTISANSHIP. WE STOOD FOR THAT FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.
“BE FAITHFUL TO VENERABLE FATHER MCGIVNEY - 130 YEARS AGO
VIVAT JESUS”
George H. Kubeck, Knights of Columbus, Cypress Council 8599 and Mission San Juan Capistrano Assembly 62.
For all members of the Knights of Columbus, I took notes via telephone from about 10:30 - 10:45 A.M. Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012
THIS IS GARY NOLAN - “OUR NON-PARTISAN GET OUT THE VOTE EVENT”
THIS TELEPHONE MESSAGE FROM MOST REVEREND WILLIAM LORI, AD HOC COMMITTEE ON RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
“RELIGION IS OFTEN NOT WELCOMED IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE. THIS IS THE YEAR OF FAITH WHICH OPENS OUR EYES TO HUMAN LIFE. CHOOSE TO STAND WITH THE LORD. CAST OUR VOTES AND WAYS THAT SUPPORT THE CORE TEACHINGS OF OUR FAITH.
“FORM OUR CONSCIENCE FROM FAIHFUL CITIZENSHIP, AND ACCORDING TO THE TEACHINGS OF THE CHURCH AND VOTE CATHOLIC. BRING OUR BELIEFS INTO THE VOTING BOOTH.
“BE TRUE TO OUR FAITH AS KNIGHTS AND FOR OURCOUNTRY. GET FELLOW PARISHIONERS TO THE POLLS. OUR ORDER HAS BEEN MOST SUCCESSFUL IN PFEVIOUS ELECTIONS. DO LIKEWISE.
“PLEASE KEEP THE ELECTION AND OUR COUNTRY IN YOUR PRAYERS.”
++++++++++++
TELEPHONE MESSAGE FROM THE SUPREME KNIGHT CARL ANDERSON FROM ROME. HE WAS DOING SOME AUDITOR WORK THERE.
“I WAS WITH THE HOLY FATHER THIS MORNING. HE THANKS THE KNIGHTS FOR OUR STRONG WITNESS TO OUR FAITH AND FOR THE WORK WE DO IN SO MANY PLACES AROUND THE WORLD.
“WE FACE AN HISTORIC ELECTION. - RELIGIOUS LIBERTY - OUR CHURCH AND BUILDING A CULTURE OF LIFE. VOTE BASED ON OUR CATHOLIC VALUES. ENCOURAGE ALL FAITHFUL CATHOLICS TO VOTE.
“OUR FOUNDER VENERABLE FATHER MCGIVNEY SAID VOTE YOUR CONSCIENCE NOT PARTISANSHIP. WE STOOD FOR THAT FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.
“BE FAITHFUL TO VENERABLE FATHER MCGIVNEY - 130 YEARS AGO
VIVAT JESUS”
George H. Kubeck, Knights of Columbus, Cypress Council 8599 and Mission San Juan Capistrano Assembly 62.
Friday, October 26, 2012
A Watergate at Benghazi, Libya
A Watergate at Benghazi, Libya
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 26, 2012
Let’s start with a quote from the respected Black journalist Thomas Sowell*, “President Barack Obama said that he was “offended” by the suggestion that his administration would try to deceive the public about what happened in Benghazi. What has this man not deceived the public about?” Remember his pledge to cut the deficit in half in his first term in office…”
“As for what happened in Libya, the Obama administration says that there will be an “investigation” under way. An “on-going investigation sounds so much better than “stonewalling” to get past Election Day. But you can bet the rent money that this “investigation” will not be completely before Election Day.”…
Let’s take a second look at a Reuters report, 10/24/2012 titled, “White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails.” (Reuters) - Officials at the White House were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show… Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneously protest against an anti-Muslim film…The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department’s Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon intelligence community and FBI on afternoon of Sept. 11th.
Let’s take a third look at a source, Victor Davis Hanson^, syndicated journalist: It was called, “Lying about Libya”. - We see a picture of Libyan followers of Ansar al-Shariah Brigades burn U.S. flag during a protest in front of the Tibesti Hotel, in Benghazi, Libya [three days after the attack] Sept. 14, … Brigade members chanted “Obama, Obama, we are all Osama.”
“Almost everything we have been told about Libya over the last two years is untrue… During this summer’s Democratic convention, Obama supporters trumpeted the successes of his Middle East policy: Osama bin Laden dead, al-Quaida defanged, and Arab Spring reformers in place of dictators… On the 11th anniversary of 9/11, a radical Islamist hit team with heavy weapons stormed the American consulate in Benghazi, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
“In response, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, National Intelligence Director James Clapper and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice desperately insisted that the murders were one-time, ad hoc demonstration gone awry, without much significance. Supposedly, a few Muslim outliers - inflamed over one American’s anti-Islamic Internet video - had overreacted/ stormed the consulate..
“For most of September, desperate administration officials still clung to the myth that the Libyan catastrophe was the result of a single obnoxious video. At the U.N. the president castigated the uncouth film. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lamented the senseless spontaneous violence that grew out of one American excesses, as she spoke beside the returning coffins of the slain Americans. Nevertheless, more disturbing facts kept emerging: Ambassador Stevens repeatedly warned his State Department superiors in vain of impending Islamist violence…
“Vice-President Joe Biden told a flat-out whopper in last week’s debate, saying the administration hadn’t been informed that Americans in Libya had ever requested more security. He scapegoat the intelligence agencies for supposedly failing to warn the administration of the threat…
*“Obama debates truth,” Orange County Register, Local 13, Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012
^ “Lying about Libya” Orange County Register, local 15, Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 26, 2012
Let’s start with a quote from the respected Black journalist Thomas Sowell*, “President Barack Obama said that he was “offended” by the suggestion that his administration would try to deceive the public about what happened in Benghazi. What has this man not deceived the public about?” Remember his pledge to cut the deficit in half in his first term in office…”
“As for what happened in Libya, the Obama administration says that there will be an “investigation” under way. An “on-going investigation sounds so much better than “stonewalling” to get past Election Day. But you can bet the rent money that this “investigation” will not be completely before Election Day.”…
Let’s take a second look at a Reuters report, 10/24/2012 titled, “White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails.” (Reuters) - Officials at the White House were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show… Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneously protest against an anti-Muslim film…The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department’s Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon intelligence community and FBI on afternoon of Sept. 11th.
Let’s take a third look at a source, Victor Davis Hanson^, syndicated journalist: It was called, “Lying about Libya”. - We see a picture of Libyan followers of Ansar al-Shariah Brigades burn U.S. flag during a protest in front of the Tibesti Hotel, in Benghazi, Libya [three days after the attack] Sept. 14, … Brigade members chanted “Obama, Obama, we are all Osama.”
“Almost everything we have been told about Libya over the last two years is untrue… During this summer’s Democratic convention, Obama supporters trumpeted the successes of his Middle East policy: Osama bin Laden dead, al-Quaida defanged, and Arab Spring reformers in place of dictators… On the 11th anniversary of 9/11, a radical Islamist hit team with heavy weapons stormed the American consulate in Benghazi, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
“In response, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, National Intelligence Director James Clapper and U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice desperately insisted that the murders were one-time, ad hoc demonstration gone awry, without much significance. Supposedly, a few Muslim outliers - inflamed over one American’s anti-Islamic Internet video - had overreacted/ stormed the consulate..
“For most of September, desperate administration officials still clung to the myth that the Libyan catastrophe was the result of a single obnoxious video. At the U.N. the president castigated the uncouth film. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lamented the senseless spontaneous violence that grew out of one American excesses, as she spoke beside the returning coffins of the slain Americans. Nevertheless, more disturbing facts kept emerging: Ambassador Stevens repeatedly warned his State Department superiors in vain of impending Islamist violence…
“Vice-President Joe Biden told a flat-out whopper in last week’s debate, saying the administration hadn’t been informed that Americans in Libya had ever requested more security. He scapegoat the intelligence agencies for supposedly failing to warn the administration of the threat…
*“Obama debates truth,” Orange County Register, Local 13, Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012
^ “Lying about Libya” Orange County Register, local 15, Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012
George H. Kubeck
A Message from National Right To Life
A Message from National Right To Life
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 26th, 2012
By National Right to Life News - p. 30, Fall - 2012 -
“You and I Can Prevent a Second Obama Term!”
“Take for example, the president’s power to appoint Supreme Court justices and other federal judges.
“The fact that we had a pro-life president from 2001-09 dramatically changed abortion jurisprudence - in other words, the way the Supreme Court looks at abortion.
“After President Bush appointed two Supreme Court justices who believe the states and Congress have legitimate interest in protecting unborn life, the Court for the first time since Roe v. Wade allowed an entire method of performing late abortion - to be banned, and not just regulated, as it had in previous rulings.
“This was an enormous step forward because it suggested to us the Court might allow other abortions to be banned, as well. As a result, we are now passing state laws to ban abortion when the child is developed enough to feel pain.
“But tragically, these humanitarian laws that save so many lives will likely be struck down if Obama gets a second term and gets to appoint even one Supreme Court justice as a replacement for one of the justices who have been voting to uphold limits on abortion.
“That make a second Obama term a clear and present danger to the lives of unborn children, not some “theoretical” threat that justifies weighing “other” issues against it. Simply put, anyone who thinks a vote for Obama isn’t a vote for many more aborted babies is wrong. Dead wrong.
“But there’s good news: Polls show a sizeable number of Americans will change their votes to the pro-life candidates when presented with these facts.
“And that is precisely the strength of the National Right to Life Victory Fund uses the most effective techniques to find and persuade pro-life voters to vote for pro-life candidates because of the pro-life issue. Exit polling shows we can over many more votes than pro-abortion PACs can, and because of that advantage, we can sway many more races our way.
“These campaigns work! National Right to Life’s political action committee, which uses the same proven grassroots techniques, has a history of winning more than two-thirds of its races when matched head-to-head against well-funded pro-abortion PACs like Planned Parenthood Action Fund, NARAL Pro-Choice America PACs and EMILY’s List…
“Please call the National Right to Life Victory Fund by calling the National Right to Life Development Department at 202-626-8813 to donate by credit or debit card by phone to Margaret @ 1-202-378-8851. Or you can send a check to Nat. Right to Life Political Action Committee, Inc. PO Box 96092, Washington, D.C. 20077-7812 - Carol Tobias, President” --- (I just telephoned in to make a donation of $30.00, $125.00 this year.)
Public Notice: Please make two corrections to classic letter “Christian Criteria for Correct Voting” Wed. Oct. 24. 2012 - 1) By www.fathergroom.com should be www.fatherbroom.com and 2) in the Cloning Section - woman and woman should be man and woman.
Also, henceforth in my blog - cinops be gone or George H. Kubeck, all 1500 plus letters can be edited, shortened and spelling mistakes corrected, but not the content; and sent out via your e-mail or posted by you on face book etc. only as anonymous. (Common sense is part of all of us.)
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 26th, 2012
By National Right to Life News - p. 30, Fall - 2012 -
“You and I Can Prevent a Second Obama Term!”
“Take for example, the president’s power to appoint Supreme Court justices and other federal judges.
“The fact that we had a pro-life president from 2001-09 dramatically changed abortion jurisprudence - in other words, the way the Supreme Court looks at abortion.
“After President Bush appointed two Supreme Court justices who believe the states and Congress have legitimate interest in protecting unborn life, the Court for the first time since Roe v. Wade allowed an entire method of performing late abortion - to be banned, and not just regulated, as it had in previous rulings.
“This was an enormous step forward because it suggested to us the Court might allow other abortions to be banned, as well. As a result, we are now passing state laws to ban abortion when the child is developed enough to feel pain.
“But tragically, these humanitarian laws that save so many lives will likely be struck down if Obama gets a second term and gets to appoint even one Supreme Court justice as a replacement for one of the justices who have been voting to uphold limits on abortion.
“That make a second Obama term a clear and present danger to the lives of unborn children, not some “theoretical” threat that justifies weighing “other” issues against it. Simply put, anyone who thinks a vote for Obama isn’t a vote for many more aborted babies is wrong. Dead wrong.
“But there’s good news: Polls show a sizeable number of Americans will change their votes to the pro-life candidates when presented with these facts.
“And that is precisely the strength of the National Right to Life Victory Fund uses the most effective techniques to find and persuade pro-life voters to vote for pro-life candidates because of the pro-life issue. Exit polling shows we can over many more votes than pro-abortion PACs can, and because of that advantage, we can sway many more races our way.
“These campaigns work! National Right to Life’s political action committee, which uses the same proven grassroots techniques, has a history of winning more than two-thirds of its races when matched head-to-head against well-funded pro-abortion PACs like Planned Parenthood Action Fund, NARAL Pro-Choice America PACs and EMILY’s List…
“Please call the National Right to Life Victory Fund by calling the National Right to Life Development Department at 202-626-8813 to donate by credit or debit card by phone to Margaret @ 1-202-378-8851. Or you can send a check to Nat. Right to Life Political Action Committee, Inc. PO Box 96092, Washington, D.C. 20077-7812 - Carol Tobias, President” --- (I just telephoned in to make a donation of $30.00, $125.00 this year.)
Public Notice: Please make two corrections to classic letter “Christian Criteria for Correct Voting” Wed. Oct. 24. 2012 - 1) By www.fathergroom.com should be www.fatherbroom.com and 2) in the Cloning Section - woman and woman should be man and woman.
Also, henceforth in my blog - cinops be gone or George H. Kubeck, all 1500 plus letters can be edited, shortened and spelling mistakes corrected, but not the content; and sent out via your e-mail or posted by you on face book etc. only as anonymous. (Common sense is part of all of us.)
Thursday, October 25, 2012
2 - The Case against Loretta Sanchez
2- The Case against Loretta Sanchez
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone -Thursday, Oct. 25th, 2012
From National Right to Life News- Fall 2012 - www.NRLC.org
A majority of U.S. House voted to overturn abortion-until-birth policy in the nation’s capital, and prohibit abortion of pain-capable unborn children. It would replace the District of Columbia’s abortion-to-birth policy with a new law generally prohibiting abortion after 20-22weeks past fertilization.
The bill contains extensive congressional findings that by 20 weeks fetal age, if not earlier, the unborn child is capable of experiencing pain during the abortion. On July 31, 2012, the House voted 220 - 154 in favor of the bill -- 66 vote majority. Republicans split in favor of the bill 203-6, with two voting “present.” Democrats split against the bill 17-148.
CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ COULD HAVE ONE OF THE 17 DEMOCRATS THAT VOTED FOR THE BILL (H.R. 3803) BUT SHE VOTED AGAINST THE BILL.
++++++++++++
CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ WAS A CO-SPONSOR THE “FOCA” BILL IN CONGRESS. H.R. 1964. SHE WAS JOINED BY OBAMA IN THE SENATE. THIS WAS ONE OF THE MOST SWEEPING PIECES OF PRO-ABORTION LEGISLATION EVER INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS, THE “FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT.”
FOCA was designed to overturn federal and state partial-birth abortion bans, as well as hundreds of state and federal laws that protect unborn children and their mothers, such as abortion funding bans, parental consent and notification laws, and Women’s Right to Know laws. As pro-abortionists race to process mothers through the killing machinery. Obama would ensure there is not the slightest speed bump.
BUT WAIT, THE SIGNED BILL WOULD DEPRIVE OTHERS AND ME OF THE RIGHT TO PRAY AT AN ABORTION SITE WITH COUNSELORS AND DESIGNATE OUR ACTIVITY AS CRIMINAL. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE AND DIABOLICAL.
With Obama’s election in 2008, this was going to be his first piece of legislation to be signed. Do you remember what happened? The U.S. Catholic bishops organized millions of protest post cards that were mailed to President Obama, don’t sign that bill! He did not!
Wouldn’t it be a good idea for the shepherds to inform the sheep in their parish with post cards of really who their Catholic-in-name-only politician IS AND has voted for these past several years on matters that are intrinsically evil? The Knights of Columbus can do it without any approval from anyone! Be not afraid!
++++++++++
The U.S. House of Representatives voted this spring to ban the horrific practice of sex-selection abortions. President Obama opposed the bill! IN ALMOST EVERY INSTANCE, UNBORN FEMALES ARE THE TARGET. SO MUCH FOR OBAMA THE FEMINIST.
BUT WAIT! CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ ALSO OPPOSED THE BILL WITH HER VOTE!
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone -Thursday, Oct. 25th, 2012
From National Right to Life News- Fall 2012 - www.NRLC.org
A majority of U.S. House voted to overturn abortion-until-birth policy in the nation’s capital, and prohibit abortion of pain-capable unborn children. It would replace the District of Columbia’s abortion-to-birth policy with a new law generally prohibiting abortion after 20-22weeks past fertilization.
The bill contains extensive congressional findings that by 20 weeks fetal age, if not earlier, the unborn child is capable of experiencing pain during the abortion. On July 31, 2012, the House voted 220 - 154 in favor of the bill -- 66 vote majority. Republicans split in favor of the bill 203-6, with two voting “present.” Democrats split against the bill 17-148.
CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ COULD HAVE ONE OF THE 17 DEMOCRATS THAT VOTED FOR THE BILL (H.R. 3803) BUT SHE VOTED AGAINST THE BILL.
++++++++++++
CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ WAS A CO-SPONSOR THE “FOCA” BILL IN CONGRESS. H.R. 1964. SHE WAS JOINED BY OBAMA IN THE SENATE. THIS WAS ONE OF THE MOST SWEEPING PIECES OF PRO-ABORTION LEGISLATION EVER INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS, THE “FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT.”
FOCA was designed to overturn federal and state partial-birth abortion bans, as well as hundreds of state and federal laws that protect unborn children and their mothers, such as abortion funding bans, parental consent and notification laws, and Women’s Right to Know laws. As pro-abortionists race to process mothers through the killing machinery. Obama would ensure there is not the slightest speed bump.
BUT WAIT, THE SIGNED BILL WOULD DEPRIVE OTHERS AND ME OF THE RIGHT TO PRAY AT AN ABORTION SITE WITH COUNSELORS AND DESIGNATE OUR ACTIVITY AS CRIMINAL. THIS IS UNBELIEVABLE AND DIABOLICAL.
With Obama’s election in 2008, this was going to be his first piece of legislation to be signed. Do you remember what happened? The U.S. Catholic bishops organized millions of protest post cards that were mailed to President Obama, don’t sign that bill! He did not!
Wouldn’t it be a good idea for the shepherds to inform the sheep in their parish with post cards of really who their Catholic-in-name-only politician IS AND has voted for these past several years on matters that are intrinsically evil? The Knights of Columbus can do it without any approval from anyone! Be not afraid!
++++++++++
The U.S. House of Representatives voted this spring to ban the horrific practice of sex-selection abortions. President Obama opposed the bill! IN ALMOST EVERY INSTANCE, UNBORN FEMALES ARE THE TARGET. SO MUCH FOR OBAMA THE FEMINIST.
BUT WAIT! CONGRESSWOMAN SANCHEZ ALSO OPPOSED THE BILL WITH HER VOTE!
George H. Kubeck
Aggressive Secularism* and Future of Marriage^
Aggressive Secularism* and the Future of Marriage^
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012
By George Weigel - excerpts of essays syndicated by the Denver Catholic Register
*“Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor was raising a warning flag about an aggressive and hegemonic cast of mind that seeks to drive out of the public square any consideration of what God or the moral law might require of a just society.
“Aggressive secularism was once thought to be a primarily European malady. Then it migrated to Canada. Now it has become a serious problem in American public life. Catholics can do something about that, if they understand what the Church asks of “the world.”
“… the Church demands - two things of any political community and any society. The Church asks for free space to be itself: to evangelize, to celebrate the sacraments, and to do the works of education, charity, mercy, and justice, without undue interference from government. The Church freely concedes that the state can tell the Church to do some things: to obey local sanitary laws in church kitchens hosting pancake breakfasts, for example. But the Church refuses to concede to the sate the authority to tell the Church what to think and preach, or how to order its ministerial life and serve the needy.
“Moreover, the Church asks, and if necessary demands, that the state respect the sanctuary of conscience, so that the Church’s people are not required by law to do things the Church teaches as immoral…“Over the past four years, the federal government has made unprecedented efforts to erode religious freedom.”
“The gravest assault was the “contraceptive mandate” issue earlier this year by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: an offense to conscientious Catholic employers who believe what the Church believes about the morality of human love and the ethics of the right to life… For with the HHS mandate, the federal government seeks nothing less than to turn the Catholic Church’s charitable and medical facilities into state agencies that facilitate practices the Catholic Church believes are gravely evil…
^“The very idea of “marriage” is being contested on four state ballots, and in the national election, on Nov. 6th… Because God himself is thus the author, marriage is of its very nature a holy institution, requiring of those who enter it a complete and unreserved giving of self…
“It’s impossible to imagine a Catholic priest pronouncing those words “No greater blessing can come to your married life than pure conjugal love, loyal and true to the end…” at a gay “wedding.” And that impossibility illustrates several Catholic theological objections to the notion that same-sex couples can “marry.”
“Gay marriage” is opposed to the divine order built into creation and to the Gospel: for “gay marriage,” which by definition involves grave sin, cannot be an image of Christ’s spousal love for the Church. Thus Catholics who support “gay marriage” are deeply confused about both Word and Sacrament, the twin pillars of Catholic life.
“In public policy terms, the Catholic critique of “gay marriage” reflects the Catholic idea of the just state. Rightly understood, marriage is one of those social institutions that exist “prior” to the state: prior in terms of time (marriage existed before the state), prior in terms of the deep truths embedded in the human condition. A just state thus recognizes the giveness of marriage and seeks to protect and nurture this basic institution…
“Why not one man and two women? Two women and two men? These are not paranoid fantasies; the case for polyndra and polygamy is now being mounted in prestigious law journals… Conscientious voters will keep this - and the Democratic Party platform’s endorsement of “gay marriage” in mind on November 6.” +++ George H. Kubeck +++
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Thursday, Oct. 25, 2012
By George Weigel - excerpts of essays syndicated by the Denver Catholic Register
*“Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor was raising a warning flag about an aggressive and hegemonic cast of mind that seeks to drive out of the public square any consideration of what God or the moral law might require of a just society.
“Aggressive secularism was once thought to be a primarily European malady. Then it migrated to Canada. Now it has become a serious problem in American public life. Catholics can do something about that, if they understand what the Church asks of “the world.”
“… the Church demands - two things of any political community and any society. The Church asks for free space to be itself: to evangelize, to celebrate the sacraments, and to do the works of education, charity, mercy, and justice, without undue interference from government. The Church freely concedes that the state can tell the Church to do some things: to obey local sanitary laws in church kitchens hosting pancake breakfasts, for example. But the Church refuses to concede to the sate the authority to tell the Church what to think and preach, or how to order its ministerial life and serve the needy.
“Moreover, the Church asks, and if necessary demands, that the state respect the sanctuary of conscience, so that the Church’s people are not required by law to do things the Church teaches as immoral…“Over the past four years, the federal government has made unprecedented efforts to erode religious freedom.”
“The gravest assault was the “contraceptive mandate” issue earlier this year by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: an offense to conscientious Catholic employers who believe what the Church believes about the morality of human love and the ethics of the right to life… For with the HHS mandate, the federal government seeks nothing less than to turn the Catholic Church’s charitable and medical facilities into state agencies that facilitate practices the Catholic Church believes are gravely evil…
^“The very idea of “marriage” is being contested on four state ballots, and in the national election, on Nov. 6th… Because God himself is thus the author, marriage is of its very nature a holy institution, requiring of those who enter it a complete and unreserved giving of self…
“It’s impossible to imagine a Catholic priest pronouncing those words “No greater blessing can come to your married life than pure conjugal love, loyal and true to the end…” at a gay “wedding.” And that impossibility illustrates several Catholic theological objections to the notion that same-sex couples can “marry.”
“Gay marriage” is opposed to the divine order built into creation and to the Gospel: for “gay marriage,” which by definition involves grave sin, cannot be an image of Christ’s spousal love for the Church. Thus Catholics who support “gay marriage” are deeply confused about both Word and Sacrament, the twin pillars of Catholic life.
“In public policy terms, the Catholic critique of “gay marriage” reflects the Catholic idea of the just state. Rightly understood, marriage is one of those social institutions that exist “prior” to the state: prior in terms of time (marriage existed before the state), prior in terms of the deep truths embedded in the human condition. A just state thus recognizes the giveness of marriage and seeks to protect and nurture this basic institution…
“Why not one man and two women? Two women and two men? These are not paranoid fantasies; the case for polyndra and polygamy is now being mounted in prestigious law journals… Conscientious voters will keep this - and the Democratic Party platform’s endorsement of “gay marriage” in mind on November 6.” +++ George H. Kubeck +++
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Christian Criteria for Correct Voting
Christian Criteria For Correct Voting
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 24, 2012
By www.fatherbroom.com
“There is objective and absolute TRUTH. Jesus Himself said, “I am the Way, the TRUTH, and the Life.” Truth can be discovered in Jesus Christ, in His Mystical Body, the Church, through the teaching of the Magisterium of the Church presided over by the Vicar of Christ, the Holy Father, the Pope…
“A simple and easy-to-remember ACRONYM for the choice of political candidates in the simple 5-letter monosyllabic word C.E.A.S.E. Each of the five individual letters expresses what are termed the “Non-negotiables” - meaning that these actions in and of themselves are intrinsically evil, seriously sinful and offensive to God the creator,…
“CLONING: The human person should not come into existence through biological engineering in a scientific laboratory uniting the procreative material of some anonymous woman and some anonymous man, hoping for the best results. No! The human person must come into existence through the loving and mutual embrace of a man and woman, husband and wife, married sacramentally, from which results the conception of a human person with an immortal soul and an eternal destiny. The end does not justify the means.
“EUTHANASIA: All human life is precious because human life come from God as one of His most precious gifts. God gives life and only God has the right to take it away. Euthanasia, sometimes called “Mercy-killing” proposes ending lives that seem to be on longer productive in the eyes of the world… [Euthanasia is on the Mass. Ballot in Nov.]
“Abortion: The primary criteria that should motivate all followers of Jesus in the casting of the should be the posture on human life from its inception. Abortion is the taking of the life of an innocent baby. Murder, killing, infanticide, are other words for this atrocious reality…
“SAME SEX MARRIAGE: The future of the society depends on the primary fundamental and basic “mini-society” that we call family. Blessed Pope John Paul II stated that the family is the basic cell of society and that the society depends on the solidity of the family. An authentic family is composed with the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony for the purpose of procreating children and raising them as noble citizens for this world and the kingdom of heaven… In the beginning God created man and woman… It was “Adam and Eve” and not “Adam and Steve.”
“EMBRYONIC CELL EXPERIMENTATION: Babies being created in the context of scientific laboratories, once again is against the Natural Law as well as the Divine Law. We reiterate the means by which human life comes into existence is through the mutual and loving embrace of the man and woman, husband and wife in the conjugal act, from which conception is achieved & at the same time Almighty God infuses an immortal soul…
“In conclusion, take a moral guide for voting this simple and clear acronym: C.E.A.S.E. - meaning, we desire that all of these intrinsically immoral practices, “the non-negotiables” be eliminated from the face of the earth… cease to exist these moral evils!…”
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 24, 2012
By www.fatherbroom.com
“There is objective and absolute TRUTH. Jesus Himself said, “I am the Way, the TRUTH, and the Life.” Truth can be discovered in Jesus Christ, in His Mystical Body, the Church, through the teaching of the Magisterium of the Church presided over by the Vicar of Christ, the Holy Father, the Pope…
“A simple and easy-to-remember ACRONYM for the choice of political candidates in the simple 5-letter monosyllabic word C.E.A.S.E. Each of the five individual letters expresses what are termed the “Non-negotiables” - meaning that these actions in and of themselves are intrinsically evil, seriously sinful and offensive to God the creator,…
“CLONING: The human person should not come into existence through biological engineering in a scientific laboratory uniting the procreative material of some anonymous woman and some anonymous man, hoping for the best results. No! The human person must come into existence through the loving and mutual embrace of a man and woman, husband and wife, married sacramentally, from which results the conception of a human person with an immortal soul and an eternal destiny. The end does not justify the means.
“EUTHANASIA: All human life is precious because human life come from God as one of His most precious gifts. God gives life and only God has the right to take it away. Euthanasia, sometimes called “Mercy-killing” proposes ending lives that seem to be on longer productive in the eyes of the world… [Euthanasia is on the Mass. Ballot in Nov.]
“Abortion: The primary criteria that should motivate all followers of Jesus in the casting of the should be the posture on human life from its inception. Abortion is the taking of the life of an innocent baby. Murder, killing, infanticide, are other words for this atrocious reality…
“SAME SEX MARRIAGE: The future of the society depends on the primary fundamental and basic “mini-society” that we call family. Blessed Pope John Paul II stated that the family is the basic cell of society and that the society depends on the solidity of the family. An authentic family is composed with the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony for the purpose of procreating children and raising them as noble citizens for this world and the kingdom of heaven… In the beginning God created man and woman… It was “Adam and Eve” and not “Adam and Steve.”
“EMBRYONIC CELL EXPERIMENTATION: Babies being created in the context of scientific laboratories, once again is against the Natural Law as well as the Divine Law. We reiterate the means by which human life comes into existence is through the mutual and loving embrace of the man and woman, husband and wife in the conjugal act, from which conception is achieved & at the same time Almighty God infuses an immortal soul…
“In conclusion, take a moral guide for voting this simple and clear acronym: C.E.A.S.E. - meaning, we desire that all of these intrinsically immoral practices, “the non-negotiables” be eliminated from the face of the earth… cease to exist these moral evils!…”
George H. Kubeck
The Case against Loretta Sanchez
The Case against Loretta Sanchez
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed., Oct. 24, 2012
Questions and the Vote by the Congressional House of Representatives in 2011:
For more info from TVC website: www.traditionalvalues.org
CONGRESSWOMAN LORETTA SANCHEZ VOTE NO ON EACH OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS!
1. Would you vote to restore the District of Columbia’s school voucher program which the Obama Administration had defunded?
2. Would you vote to support an amendment to the Defense Appropriations Bill prohibiting the use of Pentagon funds in any way or any Pentagon policy changes that will violate the Defense of Marriage Act?
3. Would you vote to prohibit funds from being used to implement the U.S. Navy’s memo/guidelines on same sex marriage for its Chaplains, because these guidelines violate the Defense of Marriage Act by allowing chaplains to perform or facilitate same-sex marriages or marriage like ceremonies on Naval Installations?
4. Would you vote to cut off federal funds to Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) our nation’s largest provider of abortions?
5. Would you vote to codify and strengthen existing conscience protections for pro-life health care provides and cut off federal funds for abortions (Providers ??) and health insurance coverage of abortion in federal programs?
6. Would you vote to block funding for implementation of the Obama 2010 health care and future funding for expansion for the remainder of 2011?
7. Would you have voted to cut off funds for Planned Parenthood and its affiliates for the remainder of 2011?
8. Would you vote to completely repeal Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) (PPACA)?
9. Would you vote to prohibit Obamacare from using federal funds to pay for elective abortion or health plans that cover elective abortions as well as increase legal protections for pro-life health care providers who do not wish to participate in providing abortions?
10. Would you vote to support putting America on a more prosperous course by voting for budgets with real spending cuts, entitlement reform, repealing Obamacare, cutting taxes and reining in intrusive federal government (Paul Ryan Budget)?
George H. Kubeck - What is devastating is that all of the Democratic Catholic-in-name-only politicians in California and in Congress voted like Loretta Sanchez? Cry and weep!
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed., Oct. 24, 2012
Questions and the Vote by the Congressional House of Representatives in 2011:
For more info from TVC website: www.traditionalvalues.org
CONGRESSWOMAN LORETTA SANCHEZ VOTE NO ON EACH OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS!
1. Would you vote to restore the District of Columbia’s school voucher program which the Obama Administration had defunded?
2. Would you vote to support an amendment to the Defense Appropriations Bill prohibiting the use of Pentagon funds in any way or any Pentagon policy changes that will violate the Defense of Marriage Act?
3. Would you vote to prohibit funds from being used to implement the U.S. Navy’s memo/guidelines on same sex marriage for its Chaplains, because these guidelines violate the Defense of Marriage Act by allowing chaplains to perform or facilitate same-sex marriages or marriage like ceremonies on Naval Installations?
4. Would you vote to cut off federal funds to Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) our nation’s largest provider of abortions?
5. Would you vote to codify and strengthen existing conscience protections for pro-life health care provides and cut off federal funds for abortions (Providers ??) and health insurance coverage of abortion in federal programs?
6. Would you vote to block funding for implementation of the Obama 2010 health care and future funding for expansion for the remainder of 2011?
7. Would you have voted to cut off funds for Planned Parenthood and its affiliates for the remainder of 2011?
8. Would you vote to completely repeal Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) (PPACA)?
9. Would you vote to prohibit Obamacare from using federal funds to pay for elective abortion or health plans that cover elective abortions as well as increase legal protections for pro-life health care providers who do not wish to participate in providing abortions?
10. Would you vote to support putting America on a more prosperous course by voting for budgets with real spending cuts, entitlement reform, repealing Obamacare, cutting taxes and reining in intrusive federal government (Paul Ryan Budget)?
George H. Kubeck - What is devastating is that all of the Democratic Catholic-in-name-only politicians in California and in Congress voted like Loretta Sanchez? Cry and weep!
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
2- The Ugly History of Planned Parenthood
2- The Ugly History of Planned Parenthood
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012
By Stacey Long in afaJournal, October, 2012 -American Family Association, www.afajournal.org
“To Culbreath this proves that African-Americans are targeted in the “reproductive racism [of] Margaret Sanger, [who] was a racist, an eugenicist - she believed in the preservation of superior races, which did not include people that look like me.”
“The lie: abortion is a solution: Planned Parenthood deceives African-American women into leading the country’s abortion rates with ragged promises of economic advancement, health care provisions and freedom from personal burdens. However, Culbreath said these promises are bankrupt. “It has not changed unplanned pregnancies or the economic status of African-Americans,” he asserted. “ I don’t think that was their agenda at all, but part of their masterful marketing.”
“Despite its claims, Planned Parenthood is not interested in the well-being of women. “Abortion is not health care,” Culbreath insisted. “They do not even acknowledge post-abortion issues. They want you to have this short procedure and then go on with your life, when women, men and families are impacted for years to come. They try to convince them it gets rid of a problem, but don’t inform them it creates a whole host of new problems.”
“The cost: physical, emotional pain: As a young black woman, LaTonia Jackson, community coordinator at Protecting Black Life, has experienced the pain of abortion firsthand.
“It was the summer before my junior year of high school, and abortion was the only solution offered to me,” she told AFA Journal. At the abortion facility, I asked if there were other options, but they convinced me abortion was the best. During the ultrasound, I had questions, but they would not answer my questions clearly or let me look at the screen.
“If they cared about my well-being, they would have told me of the emotional problems and health complications that could result from abortion. Immediately after I left the clinic, the reality that I just killed my child hit me like a ton of bricks. I struggled with breakdowns triggered by anything that reminded me my baby was aborted. Two years later, I received emergency surgery on my uterus due to complications from the abortion.”…
“The fruit: genocide - Culbreath said it not difficult to ascertain the abortion industry’s true agenda by looking at its fruit. “What we see is that abortion is the leading cause of death in the black community,” he said. “There are more Planned Parenthoods in black communities than in any other community. So, they can say their real agenda is anything they want, but what is the fruit from that tree?”
“Planned Parenthood’s fruit is over 1,600 black children aborted daily, 16 million black blacks aborted since 1973 and 35% of all abortions coming from the black 13% of the U.S.A.
Culbreath concluded that “based on their current modus operandi, they would [like to] decide that minorities would die and that majorities, or healthy white people, would live.
“Another unfortunate reality is that taxpayers subsidize this genocide. According to American Life League, the abortion provider’s 2010 annual report reveals that it received $487.4 million in government grants, up 34% from 2009’s $363.2 million.
“ALL executive director Paul Rondeau said, “We encourage contacting elected contacting elected representatives… to demand that they stop funding Planned Parenthood, and, in particular, stop a little known one billion dollar abortion superfund set out in section 1303 of Obamacare. A phone call is one of the most powerful things constituents can do to influence their elected representatives…”
George H. Kubeck, Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez is a clone of Planned Parenthood. A vote for her is a vote for Planned Parenthood. I believe that at least 20% of her voters think she is pro-life.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2012
By Stacey Long in afaJournal, October, 2012 -American Family Association, www.afajournal.org
“To Culbreath this proves that African-Americans are targeted in the “reproductive racism [of] Margaret Sanger, [who] was a racist, an eugenicist - she believed in the preservation of superior races, which did not include people that look like me.”
“The lie: abortion is a solution: Planned Parenthood deceives African-American women into leading the country’s abortion rates with ragged promises of economic advancement, health care provisions and freedom from personal burdens. However, Culbreath said these promises are bankrupt. “It has not changed unplanned pregnancies or the economic status of African-Americans,” he asserted. “ I don’t think that was their agenda at all, but part of their masterful marketing.”
“Despite its claims, Planned Parenthood is not interested in the well-being of women. “Abortion is not health care,” Culbreath insisted. “They do not even acknowledge post-abortion issues. They want you to have this short procedure and then go on with your life, when women, men and families are impacted for years to come. They try to convince them it gets rid of a problem, but don’t inform them it creates a whole host of new problems.”
“The cost: physical, emotional pain: As a young black woman, LaTonia Jackson, community coordinator at Protecting Black Life, has experienced the pain of abortion firsthand.
“It was the summer before my junior year of high school, and abortion was the only solution offered to me,” she told AFA Journal. At the abortion facility, I asked if there were other options, but they convinced me abortion was the best. During the ultrasound, I had questions, but they would not answer my questions clearly or let me look at the screen.
“If they cared about my well-being, they would have told me of the emotional problems and health complications that could result from abortion. Immediately after I left the clinic, the reality that I just killed my child hit me like a ton of bricks. I struggled with breakdowns triggered by anything that reminded me my baby was aborted. Two years later, I received emergency surgery on my uterus due to complications from the abortion.”…
“The fruit: genocide - Culbreath said it not difficult to ascertain the abortion industry’s true agenda by looking at its fruit. “What we see is that abortion is the leading cause of death in the black community,” he said. “There are more Planned Parenthoods in black communities than in any other community. So, they can say their real agenda is anything they want, but what is the fruit from that tree?”
“Planned Parenthood’s fruit is over 1,600 black children aborted daily, 16 million black blacks aborted since 1973 and 35% of all abortions coming from the black 13% of the U.S.A.
Culbreath concluded that “based on their current modus operandi, they would [like to] decide that minorities would die and that majorities, or healthy white people, would live.
“Another unfortunate reality is that taxpayers subsidize this genocide. According to American Life League, the abortion provider’s 2010 annual report reveals that it received $487.4 million in government grants, up 34% from 2009’s $363.2 million.
“ALL executive director Paul Rondeau said, “We encourage contacting elected contacting elected representatives… to demand that they stop funding Planned Parenthood, and, in particular, stop a little known one billion dollar abortion superfund set out in section 1303 of Obamacare. A phone call is one of the most powerful things constituents can do to influence their elected representatives…”
George H. Kubeck, Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez is a clone of Planned Parenthood. A vote for her is a vote for Planned Parenthood. I believe that at least 20% of her voters think she is pro-life.
Monday, October 22, 2012
Vote for Your Faith
Vote for Your Faith
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 22, 2012
Catholics welcome the Year of Faith which began on Oct. 11, 2012. This date also marks the 20th Anniversary of “The Catechism of the Catholic Church” and the 50th anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council. This is a time to renew the practice and values of our Catholic Faith and see whether we are on the right track.
On the other hand, Billy Graham has called evangelicals to practice their faith in the public arena. He asks America to elect candidates who ‘protect the sanctity of life.’ Billy Graham, who has been called America’s pastor, has taken out a full-page in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal under the headline, “Vote Biblical Values, Tuesday, November 6.” Ref. http://www.lifesitenews.com/home/print_article/news/36621/ 10/20/12
The ad begins, “The legacy we leave behind for our children, grandchildren and this great nation is crucial. As I approach my 94th birthday, I realize this election could be my last. “With that sense of urgency, Dr. Graham tells us that it is “vitally important to cast our ballots” for candidates “who base their decisions on biblical principles,” offering as one specific, candidates who “protect the sanctity of life.”
Last Thursday Dr. Graham met with Mitt Romney … in Montreat, North Carolina, just as he did in 2010 with President Barack Obama and in 2008 with John McCain, when McCain was the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
Following the 30-minute sit-down with Dr. Graham and his son, the Rev. Franklin Graham, Romney campaign spokesman Rick Gorka told reporters that Billy Graham led a prayer for the Romneys, saying “I’ll do all I can to help you. And you can quote me on that.”
Reprinted from National Right to Life News.
George H. Kubeck,
A) In today’s presidential debate, we have fundamental values that are contention. One of them is same-sex marriage promoted by the Obama regime. It is tragedy for honest unionism to read that the UAW, AFL-CIO, SEIU and AFSCME and other top unions have issued statements supporting same-sex marriage. Another reason why in California we must pass Proposition 32. (You pay for your political and social agenda and I will pay for mine. But don’t force me with union dues to pay for yours.)
B) Providentially, Oct. 11th is the date when we had the Vice-Presidential debate between Catholic V.P. Joe Biden and Catholic V.P. Paul Ryan. One of them is a Catholic fraud and other is authentic. The Catholic vote may decide who wins this Presidential election in battleground States.
C) Sadly, in the States of California, New York and Massachusetts, Catholics voters have been brainwashed by the two-faced-double standard news media. How? They provide total support for the false Catholic politician (CINOP) who supports the Culture of Death vs. the Culture of Life.
D) Sadly, Gary De Long is a RINO (Republican in name only).[47th Congressional District] I talked to him on the phone. He is pro-choice and for same-sex marriage. He is even opposed to a constitutional amendment for true marriage.
E) Lastly, two ladies and I had a great success in passing out a Vote for your Faith literature at St. Callistus Church, Orange County on the evening of two Masses, Saturday, Oct. 20th.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 22, 2012
Catholics welcome the Year of Faith which began on Oct. 11, 2012. This date also marks the 20th Anniversary of “The Catechism of the Catholic Church” and the 50th anniversary of the opening of the Second Vatican Council. This is a time to renew the practice and values of our Catholic Faith and see whether we are on the right track.
On the other hand, Billy Graham has called evangelicals to practice their faith in the public arena. He asks America to elect candidates who ‘protect the sanctity of life.’ Billy Graham, who has been called America’s pastor, has taken out a full-page in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal under the headline, “Vote Biblical Values, Tuesday, November 6.” Ref. http://www.lifesitenews.com/home/print_article/news/36621/ 10/20/12
The ad begins, “The legacy we leave behind for our children, grandchildren and this great nation is crucial. As I approach my 94th birthday, I realize this election could be my last. “With that sense of urgency, Dr. Graham tells us that it is “vitally important to cast our ballots” for candidates “who base their decisions on biblical principles,” offering as one specific, candidates who “protect the sanctity of life.”
Last Thursday Dr. Graham met with Mitt Romney … in Montreat, North Carolina, just as he did in 2010 with President Barack Obama and in 2008 with John McCain, when McCain was the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.
Following the 30-minute sit-down with Dr. Graham and his son, the Rev. Franklin Graham, Romney campaign spokesman Rick Gorka told reporters that Billy Graham led a prayer for the Romneys, saying “I’ll do all I can to help you. And you can quote me on that.”
Reprinted from National Right to Life News.
George H. Kubeck,
A) In today’s presidential debate, we have fundamental values that are contention. One of them is same-sex marriage promoted by the Obama regime. It is tragedy for honest unionism to read that the UAW, AFL-CIO, SEIU and AFSCME and other top unions have issued statements supporting same-sex marriage. Another reason why in California we must pass Proposition 32. (You pay for your political and social agenda and I will pay for mine. But don’t force me with union dues to pay for yours.)
B) Providentially, Oct. 11th is the date when we had the Vice-Presidential debate between Catholic V.P. Joe Biden and Catholic V.P. Paul Ryan. One of them is a Catholic fraud and other is authentic. The Catholic vote may decide who wins this Presidential election in battleground States.
C) Sadly, in the States of California, New York and Massachusetts, Catholics voters have been brainwashed by the two-faced-double standard news media. How? They provide total support for the false Catholic politician (CINOP) who supports the Culture of Death vs. the Culture of Life.
D) Sadly, Gary De Long is a RINO (Republican in name only).[47th Congressional District] I talked to him on the phone. He is pro-choice and for same-sex marriage. He is even opposed to a constitutional amendment for true marriage.
E) Lastly, two ladies and I had a great success in passing out a Vote for your Faith literature at St. Callistus Church, Orange County on the evening of two Masses, Saturday, Oct. 20th.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
The Ugly History of Planned Parenthood
The Ugly History of Planned Parenthood
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012
By Stacy Long, afaJournal, Oct. 2012 - www.afajournal.org
“Margaret Sanger was no child advocate, but on October 16, 1916, she gave birth to an entity of which she was immensely proud - America’s first birth control clinic, an abortion facility that grew into Planned Parenthood. Few promises of the birth control revolution have paid out, but its practice of “racial cultivation,” or eugenics, has had astonishing success.
“Sanger linked birth control with eugenic success as the highest end of birth control. In an article titled “Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” she wrote, “Before eugenicists and others laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must clear the way for birth control. Like advocates of birth control, eugenicists are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.”
The target: blacks, minorities: In that era, many automatically categorized blacks as inferior and susceptible to the problems Sanger was determined to solve.
“Eugenics is the most adequate avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems,” she promised in an article titled “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.”
“Sanger enlisted Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, Southern regional birth control director, to promote contraceptives to solve those “racial problems” through the 1939 Negro Project. Sanger feared blacks would view the Negro Project as an extermination plot, and she explained to Gamble that promotion of birth control might be best left to their own trusted leaders, saying, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea.”
“Even then, African Americans were slow utilize birth control methods. According to www.blackgenocide.org, in 1964, Planned Parenthood chairman Donald B. Strauss fretted, “Almost one fourth of nonwhite parents have four or more children … only eight percent of white couples have that many children.” Thereafter, abortion clinics were more strategically located in areas adjacent to concentration of black population according to the website.
“The strategy produced results. In 2011, the Guttmacher Institute reported that the “abortion rate among African-Americans women is higher than both Hispanic and white women: 40.2 per 1,000, compared with 28.5 and 11.5, respectively.”
“And so Sanger’s legacy of “racial betterment” insidiously crept into the heart of African-American community posing as a friend.
"The truth: exposing PP’s agenda: Fortunately some African-Americans are alert to this internal enemy. Rev. Arnold Culbreath is the antithesis of Sanger’s model minister - he is the man to straighten out the lie that abortion is not exterminating the black population. A founding member of the National Black Pro-Life Coalition, and Director of Protecting Black Life, the Urban Outreach Initiative of Life Issues Institute, Culbreath leads the effort in educating African-Americans on abortion’s threat to their population.
“Culbreath explained, “The black community is largely unaware, and that is why we work hard across the country to educate and activate the black community. there is the disbelief in the black community that Planned Parenthood is their friend. It’s a lie.
“ He pointed out a few telling statistics from the Protecting Black Life website: “Abortion is the leading cause of death in the black community, two of three of Planned Parenthood’s facilities are in black communities and 70% of their facilities are in minority neighborhoods.” to be continued.
Protecting Black Life - www.protectingblacklife.org
George H. Kubeck, It is incomprehensible to me why President Obama loves Planned Parenthood.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012
By Stacy Long, afaJournal, Oct. 2012 - www.afajournal.org
“Margaret Sanger was no child advocate, but on October 16, 1916, she gave birth to an entity of which she was immensely proud - America’s first birth control clinic, an abortion facility that grew into Planned Parenthood. Few promises of the birth control revolution have paid out, but its practice of “racial cultivation,” or eugenics, has had astonishing success.
“Sanger linked birth control with eugenic success as the highest end of birth control. In an article titled “Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” she wrote, “Before eugenicists and others laboring for racial betterment can succeed, they must clear the way for birth control. Like advocates of birth control, eugenicists are seeking to assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.”
The target: blacks, minorities: In that era, many automatically categorized blacks as inferior and susceptible to the problems Sanger was determined to solve.
“Eugenics is the most adequate avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems,” she promised in an article titled “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.”
“Sanger enlisted Dr. Clarence J. Gamble, Southern regional birth control director, to promote contraceptives to solve those “racial problems” through the 1939 Negro Project. Sanger feared blacks would view the Negro Project as an extermination plot, and she explained to Gamble that promotion of birth control might be best left to their own trusted leaders, saying, “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea.”
“Even then, African Americans were slow utilize birth control methods. According to www.blackgenocide.org, in 1964, Planned Parenthood chairman Donald B. Strauss fretted, “Almost one fourth of nonwhite parents have four or more children … only eight percent of white couples have that many children.” Thereafter, abortion clinics were more strategically located in areas adjacent to concentration of black population according to the website.
“The strategy produced results. In 2011, the Guttmacher Institute reported that the “abortion rate among African-Americans women is higher than both Hispanic and white women: 40.2 per 1,000, compared with 28.5 and 11.5, respectively.”
“And so Sanger’s legacy of “racial betterment” insidiously crept into the heart of African-American community posing as a friend.
"The truth: exposing PP’s agenda: Fortunately some African-Americans are alert to this internal enemy. Rev. Arnold Culbreath is the antithesis of Sanger’s model minister - he is the man to straighten out the lie that abortion is not exterminating the black population. A founding member of the National Black Pro-Life Coalition, and Director of Protecting Black Life, the Urban Outreach Initiative of Life Issues Institute, Culbreath leads the effort in educating African-Americans on abortion’s threat to their population.
“Culbreath explained, “The black community is largely unaware, and that is why we work hard across the country to educate and activate the black community. there is the disbelief in the black community that Planned Parenthood is their friend. It’s a lie.
“ He pointed out a few telling statistics from the Protecting Black Life website: “Abortion is the leading cause of death in the black community, two of three of Planned Parenthood’s facilities are in black communities and 70% of their facilities are in minority neighborhoods.” to be continued.
Protecting Black Life - www.protectingblacklife.org
George H. Kubeck, It is incomprehensible to me why President Obama loves Planned Parenthood.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Can America Survive Obama?
Can America Survive Obama?
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012
A modern-day de Tocqueville views America with great love - and great alarm
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, high priest of climate skepticism, advised Prime Minister Thatcher… was editor of the Catholic paper The Universe, managing editor of the Telegraph Sunday Magazine …[p. 45-6 in “Whistle Blower” October, 2012]
“The biggest vested interest of them all is not big media, big banks or big oil. It is big government. Wherever big government has been tried, it has expensively failed. Now, as the outstanding researched book “Fool Me Twice” thoughtfully reveals, Mr. Obama is going to try it again - the triumph of “hope-and-change” over experience.
“He is going to decide who gets paid what. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt. Edward Heath, as inflation raged in Britain in the mid-1970s as an inevitable result of his openly Socialist policy of ordering all employers to pay their workforce more every few months, announced the creation of a Relativist Board to decide whether a nurse was worth more than a bank director (a question expecting the answer Yes), or a Peer of a Realm was worth more than a movie star (ditto, and we’re better actors, too).
“Heath’s fatuous nanny-know-best approach was binned when he was flung from office after only four years as prime minister. But Obama’s malevolent policy advisers are planning to do what Health failed to do - unless Obama is flung from office after only four years as president.
“Democracy - or at least you Founding Fathers hoped it would be - the curse of vested interest and the guarantor of the general interest. It has not worked out that way. The late Milton Friedman won his Nobel Prize for Economics for his work demonstrating that any activity carried out by the State costs twice as much & produces half as much as the same activity in private sector.
“One corollary of the Friedman Multiple is that very time a politician announces that taxpayers’ money will be spend on “creating jobs,” in net terms he will in fact be destroying just as many jobs as he says he is “creating.” Remember that next time you hear a politician or bureaucrat say he is “creating jobs.”
“Fried man also pointed out that democracy would fail once the spending of the governing class exceeded one-quarter of national output, because too many people would have their snouts in the taxpayer’s pocket. Just as turkeys do not vote for Christmas, so the growing army of beneficiaries
of the State will vote for whichever party will give them more sweeties from the taxpayer over the next four-year term. And that means the Socialist, Communism, Democrats…
“Your great nation, which I love dearly, was founded 232 years before Mr. Obama moved Churchill’s bust out of the White House as an indication of his activistic hostility to the West. In those 236 years, various federal governments accumulated around $11 trillion in debt.
“Obama - who entered office saying he would sort our the debt problem - has increased that 236-year debt by well over half in just three years… Your are years - perhaps months - away from national bankruptcy and the disorder it will bring…
“Contrast Obama’s approach with that of Margaret Thatcher. As soon as she took office in 1979, she asked how much Britain owed to other nations. Within two years, she paid it all back, because sovereign nations cannot remain sovereign to the extent that it is in debt to other nation…
“In Britain, where our governing class has given away our democracy, to the atheistic-humanist, bureaucratic-centralist tyranny by clerk that is the hated European Union, we look to the United States to preserve not merely the ideal but the reality of true democracy… Your dangerously growing national debt puts your very survival as a nation in grave doubt. If your fail, the West fails.
George H. Kubeck
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012
A modern-day de Tocqueville views America with great love - and great alarm
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, high priest of climate skepticism, advised Prime Minister Thatcher… was editor of the Catholic paper The Universe, managing editor of the Telegraph Sunday Magazine …[p. 45-6 in “Whistle Blower” October, 2012]
“The biggest vested interest of them all is not big media, big banks or big oil. It is big government. Wherever big government has been tried, it has expensively failed. Now, as the outstanding researched book “Fool Me Twice” thoughtfully reveals, Mr. Obama is going to try it again - the triumph of “hope-and-change” over experience.
“He is going to decide who gets paid what. Been there, done that, got the T-shirt. Edward Heath, as inflation raged in Britain in the mid-1970s as an inevitable result of his openly Socialist policy of ordering all employers to pay their workforce more every few months, announced the creation of a Relativist Board to decide whether a nurse was worth more than a bank director (a question expecting the answer Yes), or a Peer of a Realm was worth more than a movie star (ditto, and we’re better actors, too).
“Heath’s fatuous nanny-know-best approach was binned when he was flung from office after only four years as prime minister. But Obama’s malevolent policy advisers are planning to do what Health failed to do - unless Obama is flung from office after only four years as president.
“Democracy - or at least you Founding Fathers hoped it would be - the curse of vested interest and the guarantor of the general interest. It has not worked out that way. The late Milton Friedman won his Nobel Prize for Economics for his work demonstrating that any activity carried out by the State costs twice as much & produces half as much as the same activity in private sector.
“One corollary of the Friedman Multiple is that very time a politician announces that taxpayers’ money will be spend on “creating jobs,” in net terms he will in fact be destroying just as many jobs as he says he is “creating.” Remember that next time you hear a politician or bureaucrat say he is “creating jobs.”
“Fried man also pointed out that democracy would fail once the spending of the governing class exceeded one-quarter of national output, because too many people would have their snouts in the taxpayer’s pocket. Just as turkeys do not vote for Christmas, so the growing army of beneficiaries
of the State will vote for whichever party will give them more sweeties from the taxpayer over the next four-year term. And that means the Socialist, Communism, Democrats…
“Your great nation, which I love dearly, was founded 232 years before Mr. Obama moved Churchill’s bust out of the White House as an indication of his activistic hostility to the West. In those 236 years, various federal governments accumulated around $11 trillion in debt.
“Obama - who entered office saying he would sort our the debt problem - has increased that 236-year debt by well over half in just three years… Your are years - perhaps months - away from national bankruptcy and the disorder it will bring…
“Contrast Obama’s approach with that of Margaret Thatcher. As soon as she took office in 1979, she asked how much Britain owed to other nations. Within two years, she paid it all back, because sovereign nations cannot remain sovereign to the extent that it is in debt to other nation…
“In Britain, where our governing class has given away our democracy, to the atheistic-humanist, bureaucratic-centralist tyranny by clerk that is the hated European Union, we look to the United States to preserve not merely the ideal but the reality of true democracy… Your dangerously growing national debt puts your very survival as a nation in grave doubt. If your fail, the West fails.
George H. Kubeck
Friday, October 19, 2012
Authentic Catholic Social Teachings
Authentic Catholic Social Teachings
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 19, 2012
Preface: I took notes and asked questions at the First Friday Friar monthly meeting at the Phoenix Club in Orange County, California, Friday, Sept. 7th, 2012. The speaker was Hugh Barbour. He is the Prior of St. Michael’s Abbey of the Norbertine Fathers in Trabuco Canyon, Orange County, California. Their founder, the late Abbot Ladislas Parker, was a founding member of the First Friday Friars. May I share with you some irregular notes.
“We are in a sad shape as a nation. The CINOP (Catholic-in-name-only politician) does not know the basics of Catholic teachings. With our Catechism, examination of conscience, prudence & basic principles are easy to interpret the Church’s social teaching.”
“Think of the new evangelization of the world. In Europe, we are on the outside. Catholic social teaching is a body of doctrine at the end of the 19th century. We have the rights of workers to organize and to look up to their rights. 1891 Rerum Novarum and in 1931 there was a special 40th Anniversary; and in 1991 the 100th Anniversary of Rerun Novarum with Pope John Paul II.”
“Acceptance of market capitalism - awareness of high finance and government power. There are three terms to take home with you.”
Subsidiarity: “Do it on a lower level. It is better done there. It is close to families, justice and morality. It is a basic principle. Human activity to be as close as possible to those who do the work. We have fifty sovereign states in the U.S.A.”
Solidarity: “There is a natural and moral necessity to get together based on common things. Learn to work for the common good. Have a part in the community. Common Catholic Faith: The question of political extremes: National Catholic Reporter: Christians being persecuted.”
The Principle of Gratuity: “Un-moneydness: Gospel of Charity: The support and defense of things that don’t have and economic values. Your family: No one left with debt: Economic power and the state: Economic life multilayered: The economy of gratuity: Free operation of the market. Free Enterprise: When you make money only to make money: Banks to start a business: THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL ONE IS SUBSIDIARY:”
“THE CRUX: OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION IS CLOSELY IN LINE WITH CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING”
George H. Kubeck, FROM “THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW” SUMMER, 2012 p. 23 and 20
“One of them, with the clumsy name of “subsidiary,” was first developed by Pope Leo XIII in the 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, later encouraged by Pope Pius XI in 1931, and more recently by the bishops themselves. It holds that if a government activity can be done as well at the local level as by a central authority, the local level should be its preferred locus. Moreover, since humans, being social and political animals, don’t always need to be guided by government, the ordering of human relations should be done wherever possible through voluntary associations…
“The Leviathan State: Since the beginning of the last recession (Dec. 2007), during which the private sector shed more than 7.5 million jobs, the total federal government workforce (excluding census and postal workers) has grown by 11.7%, adding 230,000 jobs, including 4,182 additional Revenue Service employees… In 1960, there were roughly 57,000 employees working in federal regulatory agencies; today there are 290,000.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 19, 2012
Preface: I took notes and asked questions at the First Friday Friar monthly meeting at the Phoenix Club in Orange County, California, Friday, Sept. 7th, 2012. The speaker was Hugh Barbour. He is the Prior of St. Michael’s Abbey of the Norbertine Fathers in Trabuco Canyon, Orange County, California. Their founder, the late Abbot Ladislas Parker, was a founding member of the First Friday Friars. May I share with you some irregular notes.
“We are in a sad shape as a nation. The CINOP (Catholic-in-name-only politician) does not know the basics of Catholic teachings. With our Catechism, examination of conscience, prudence & basic principles are easy to interpret the Church’s social teaching.”
“Think of the new evangelization of the world. In Europe, we are on the outside. Catholic social teaching is a body of doctrine at the end of the 19th century. We have the rights of workers to organize and to look up to their rights. 1891 Rerum Novarum and in 1931 there was a special 40th Anniversary; and in 1991 the 100th Anniversary of Rerun Novarum with Pope John Paul II.”
“Acceptance of market capitalism - awareness of high finance and government power. There are three terms to take home with you.”
Subsidiarity: “Do it on a lower level. It is better done there. It is close to families, justice and morality. It is a basic principle. Human activity to be as close as possible to those who do the work. We have fifty sovereign states in the U.S.A.”
Solidarity: “There is a natural and moral necessity to get together based on common things. Learn to work for the common good. Have a part in the community. Common Catholic Faith: The question of political extremes: National Catholic Reporter: Christians being persecuted.”
The Principle of Gratuity: “Un-moneydness: Gospel of Charity: The support and defense of things that don’t have and economic values. Your family: No one left with debt: Economic power and the state: Economic life multilayered: The economy of gratuity: Free operation of the market. Free Enterprise: When you make money only to make money: Banks to start a business: THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL ONE IS SUBSIDIARY:”
“THE CRUX: OUR U.S. CONSTITUTION IS CLOSELY IN LINE WITH CATHOLIC SOCIAL TEACHING”
George H. Kubeck, FROM “THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW” SUMMER, 2012 p. 23 and 20
“One of them, with the clumsy name of “subsidiary,” was first developed by Pope Leo XIII in the 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, later encouraged by Pope Pius XI in 1931, and more recently by the bishops themselves. It holds that if a government activity can be done as well at the local level as by a central authority, the local level should be its preferred locus. Moreover, since humans, being social and political animals, don’t always need to be guided by government, the ordering of human relations should be done wherever possible through voluntary associations…
“The Leviathan State: Since the beginning of the last recession (Dec. 2007), during which the private sector shed more than 7.5 million jobs, the total federal government workforce (excluding census and postal workers) has grown by 11.7%, adding 230,000 jobs, including 4,182 additional Revenue Service employees… In 1960, there were roughly 57,000 employees working in federal regulatory agencies; today there are 290,000.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Osama Bin Laden's Revenge
Osama Bin Laden’s Revenge
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012
“We love death. The U.S. loves life. That’s the difference between us.” Osama Bin Laden - That’s diabolical for any religion to believe in!
The attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya was a terrorist attack. That was known almost instantaneously by our intelligence. Why? Since the 9/11 attack in 2001, we have spent billions of dollars to prevent any terrorist attack on the U.S.A. and our embassies in foreign countries with all kinds of up to date systems.
This President has placed our national security into the twilight zone. He refuses to call a spade a spade e.g. a terrorist a terrorist. The book by Bill Bennett and Seith Leibsohn, “The Fight for Our Lives” spells it out clearly with a terrorist attack by one person three years ago, Nov. 5, 2009. Think about it when you vote on Tuesday, Nov. 6th/12.
[By the way, I believe in California, Oct. 23rd is the last day to have registered to vote. If we lose, it’s because a large number of practicing Christians do not vote.]
Reference a past letter dated Sept. 18, 2012 - The Fight for Our Lives.
Dr. Nidal Hasan shouted out on Nov. 5, 2009 “Allahu Akbar [Allah is Great]!” as he killed 13 soldiers and one unborn child at Ft. Hood, Texas. He wounded thirty others emptying some hundred rounds into his victims. The lessons from Fort Hood was released in January, 2010. In its 86 pages, not once does the report actually mention Hasan’s name. Instead he is referred to simply, almost indeterminately, as “a gunman”, just like any other random perpetrator of homicide.
That's a lie. I don’t want to live with that lie. Americans shouldn’t live with that lie. President Obama allowed this lie in this so-called “Protecting the Force: Lessons from Fort Hood released in January, 2010.”
The attack on our consulate in Libya was a successful terrorist attack. But because of the presidential election, Hillary and Barack were not going to immediately identify it for what it was. It would definitely be a distraction and hurt the polling and the coming election victory for Obama on Nov. 6th. Both spoke to the Pakistani people that the attacks were caused by a slanderous video and Americans do not believe in that video.
When the president spoke to the U.N., he referred to the video. He lied because that was not the cause in Benghazi, Libya. How can we survive as a nation with that kind of foreign affairs leadership? To find out the truth, we must vote in Romney/Ryan for President. Then we can also find out what happened with “Fast and Furious” debacle where one American was murdered and hundreds of Mexicans killed with our guns…
George H. Kubeck, Have you noticed that the spirit of the world is not interested in the truth or getting to the bottom of things? This is an ideal mindset for the Chicago political crowd! The politics in that city never includes an independent, conservative, republican or libertarian. They are trying with their Czars to foist on America, the religion of secular humanism with no God. Dennis Prager calls it ‘Liberalism’. This national religion is unconstitutional & does violence to the 1st Amendment.
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012
“We love death. The U.S. loves life. That’s the difference between us.” Osama Bin Laden - That’s diabolical for any religion to believe in!
The attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Libya was a terrorist attack. That was known almost instantaneously by our intelligence. Why? Since the 9/11 attack in 2001, we have spent billions of dollars to prevent any terrorist attack on the U.S.A. and our embassies in foreign countries with all kinds of up to date systems.
This President has placed our national security into the twilight zone. He refuses to call a spade a spade e.g. a terrorist a terrorist. The book by Bill Bennett and Seith Leibsohn, “The Fight for Our Lives” spells it out clearly with a terrorist attack by one person three years ago, Nov. 5, 2009. Think about it when you vote on Tuesday, Nov. 6th/12.
[By the way, I believe in California, Oct. 23rd is the last day to have registered to vote. If we lose, it’s because a large number of practicing Christians do not vote.]
Reference a past letter dated Sept. 18, 2012 - The Fight for Our Lives.
Dr. Nidal Hasan shouted out on Nov. 5, 2009 “Allahu Akbar [Allah is Great]!” as he killed 13 soldiers and one unborn child at Ft. Hood, Texas. He wounded thirty others emptying some hundred rounds into his victims. The lessons from Fort Hood was released in January, 2010. In its 86 pages, not once does the report actually mention Hasan’s name. Instead he is referred to simply, almost indeterminately, as “a gunman”, just like any other random perpetrator of homicide.
That's a lie. I don’t want to live with that lie. Americans shouldn’t live with that lie. President Obama allowed this lie in this so-called “Protecting the Force: Lessons from Fort Hood released in January, 2010.”
The attack on our consulate in Libya was a successful terrorist attack. But because of the presidential election, Hillary and Barack were not going to immediately identify it for what it was. It would definitely be a distraction and hurt the polling and the coming election victory for Obama on Nov. 6th. Both spoke to the Pakistani people that the attacks were caused by a slanderous video and Americans do not believe in that video.
When the president spoke to the U.N., he referred to the video. He lied because that was not the cause in Benghazi, Libya. How can we survive as a nation with that kind of foreign affairs leadership? To find out the truth, we must vote in Romney/Ryan for President. Then we can also find out what happened with “Fast and Furious” debacle where one American was murdered and hundreds of Mexicans killed with our guns…
George H. Kubeck, Have you noticed that the spirit of the world is not interested in the truth or getting to the bottom of things? This is an ideal mindset for the Chicago political crowd! The politics in that city never includes an independent, conservative, republican or libertarian. They are trying with their Czars to foist on America, the religion of secular humanism with no God. Dennis Prager calls it ‘Liberalism’. This national religion is unconstitutional & does violence to the 1st Amendment.
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
The Meaning of an Obama Reelection Victory
The Meaning of an Obama Reelection Victory
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 17, 2012
Preface: Briefly, the bureaucratic Obamacare will become law. The HHS Mandate will be enforced for everyone except those who have filed a legal action. The reelection of President Obama will be a serious blow to traditional values. Two new liberal progressive Supreme Court justices will be appointed within four years. The progressive “anything goes values” and “sexualityism” will surface and be promoted by the Czars in the regime. The Culture of Death will celebrate with “hate speech” laws etc. Thank God this election will not be decided by California.
David Kupelian is an award winning American journalist, managing editor of WND, editor of Whistleblower & the bestselling author of “The Marketing of Evil” & “How Evil Works.” - “My Crystal Ball” Oct. 2012 Issue - p. 6 - 9
Civil Disobedience: [The HHS mandate] “I believe in the rule of law, and it has been my practice since I was in college to respect and honor those in authority over us,” evangelical leader Dr. James Dobson wrote in WND recently. “However, this assault on the sanctity of human life takes me where I cannot go… “I WILL NOT pay the surcharge for abortion services… To pay one cent for the killing of babies… It would be a violation of my most deeply held convictions to disobey what I consider to be the principles in Scripture… So COME AND GET ME IF YOU MUST, Mr. President, I will not bow before your wicked regulation.”…
Political violence: “If working diligently within the system for constitutional government (and that includes peaceful, principled civil disobedience) is the noble response to intolerable injustice, the “dark side” response to the same provocation would be political violence. If Obama in a second term accelerates his relentless assault on the American system, there will probably be some who concluded all is lost and their only response is to commit violent acts in the misguided belief they are channeling America’s founding generation - refreshing “tree of liberty” as Jefferson said, with “the blood of patriots and tyrants.”…
More crime: “Speaking of evil, just as a small number of deranged people may be tempted to commit political violence, countless more will simply feel pushed over the edge by another four years of the wretched Obama economy and some will turn to crime. In fact, crime is likely to increase regardless of who wins in November, since the current economic hard times are not likely to abate any time soon…”
Widespread prepping: “In response to crime, economic uncertainty, social unrest and other manifestations of an increasingly troubled and unstable society, an ever-larger portion of the American population will take steps to become more independent from government and “the system” - just as another segment will grow ever more dependent and angry…”
Depression and mental illness: “One could jest that another four years of Obama is enough to give anyone a case of depression, but it’s not laughing matter. Presidential character is enormously important, especially during the Great Depression, America was basically unified and citizens respected and looked up to their president (first Hoover and then FDR). Today’s president, in contrast, is neither a unifying nor inspirational figure, but quite the opposite - a grossly unqualified, polarizing, ideologically driven and jarringly narcissistic politician widely perceived as dragging the nation downward…”
Creative restructuring of American life: “… Just as the Sept. attacks - expressions of unspeakable evil - brought to the surface great goodness, heroism, sacrifice and mutual cooperation in the service of one another, so will the re-election of Obama. Americans will not give up their country easily because there is quite literally no place to go. Don’t talk to me about Costa Rica etc…”
De facto secession: “… people of like mind, who believe in traditional American constitutional values, will be able to find each other on the Internet - and if they wish, move to a common geographic location . They can pick a state - Texas, South Carolina, North Dakota, where - …
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 17, 2012
Preface: Briefly, the bureaucratic Obamacare will become law. The HHS Mandate will be enforced for everyone except those who have filed a legal action. The reelection of President Obama will be a serious blow to traditional values. Two new liberal progressive Supreme Court justices will be appointed within four years. The progressive “anything goes values” and “sexualityism” will surface and be promoted by the Czars in the regime. The Culture of Death will celebrate with “hate speech” laws etc. Thank God this election will not be decided by California.
David Kupelian is an award winning American journalist, managing editor of WND, editor of Whistleblower & the bestselling author of “The Marketing of Evil” & “How Evil Works.” - “My Crystal Ball” Oct. 2012 Issue - p. 6 - 9
Civil Disobedience: [The HHS mandate] “I believe in the rule of law, and it has been my practice since I was in college to respect and honor those in authority over us,” evangelical leader Dr. James Dobson wrote in WND recently. “However, this assault on the sanctity of human life takes me where I cannot go… “I WILL NOT pay the surcharge for abortion services… To pay one cent for the killing of babies… It would be a violation of my most deeply held convictions to disobey what I consider to be the principles in Scripture… So COME AND GET ME IF YOU MUST, Mr. President, I will not bow before your wicked regulation.”…
Political violence: “If working diligently within the system for constitutional government (and that includes peaceful, principled civil disobedience) is the noble response to intolerable injustice, the “dark side” response to the same provocation would be political violence. If Obama in a second term accelerates his relentless assault on the American system, there will probably be some who concluded all is lost and their only response is to commit violent acts in the misguided belief they are channeling America’s founding generation - refreshing “tree of liberty” as Jefferson said, with “the blood of patriots and tyrants.”…
More crime: “Speaking of evil, just as a small number of deranged people may be tempted to commit political violence, countless more will simply feel pushed over the edge by another four years of the wretched Obama economy and some will turn to crime. In fact, crime is likely to increase regardless of who wins in November, since the current economic hard times are not likely to abate any time soon…”
Widespread prepping: “In response to crime, economic uncertainty, social unrest and other manifestations of an increasingly troubled and unstable society, an ever-larger portion of the American population will take steps to become more independent from government and “the system” - just as another segment will grow ever more dependent and angry…”
Depression and mental illness: “One could jest that another four years of Obama is enough to give anyone a case of depression, but it’s not laughing matter. Presidential character is enormously important, especially during the Great Depression, America was basically unified and citizens respected and looked up to their president (first Hoover and then FDR). Today’s president, in contrast, is neither a unifying nor inspirational figure, but quite the opposite - a grossly unqualified, polarizing, ideologically driven and jarringly narcissistic politician widely perceived as dragging the nation downward…”
Creative restructuring of American life: “… Just as the Sept. attacks - expressions of unspeakable evil - brought to the surface great goodness, heroism, sacrifice and mutual cooperation in the service of one another, so will the re-election of Obama. Americans will not give up their country easily because there is quite literally no place to go. Don’t talk to me about Costa Rica etc…”
De facto secession: “… people of like mind, who believe in traditional American constitutional values, will be able to find each other on the Internet - and if they wish, move to a common geographic location . They can pick a state - Texas, South Carolina, North Dakota, where - …
George H. Kubeck
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
The Catholic Voting Guide
The Catholic Voting Guide
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2012
Preface: There is a serious controversy going on with respect to the Catholic voting guides. Ref. http://cal-catholic.com/wordpress/2012/10/11/lets-be-clear-about-confusion It seems that Bishop Steven Blair is on the hot seat: He says: “Forming Consciences of Faithful Citizenship is the ONLY authentic voting guide for Catholics. That means Voter’s Guide for Serious Catholics, the Test of Fire Video, and anything from CatholicVote.org, Catholic.com [Catholic Answers]. EWTN, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good [A George Soros funded group] or any other private organization is not the official voting guide for Catholics.” [Check out the poignant commentaries.]
We are the land of the free and the home of the brave. So when I became an American citizen in 1962, I did not come to be an Obama European or even a Canadian/American socialist. Let’s do away with hyphenated-Americanism. The HHS Mandate has changed everything. It is the tip of an iceberg of deceit not only in religion but everything emanating from this administration. Sadly, at least 13 so-called Catholic politicians in the Senate voted to remove conscience protection from Obamacare. There were about 60 in the Congress including Nancy Pelosi, Loretta and Linda Sanchez who did likewise. In California we have a serious problem.
It seems to me that the bishops’ voting guide Forming Consciences of Faithful Citizenship for this 2012 Presidential election is totally inadequate and obsolete. It was a dismal failure in 2008 when almost 54% of Catholic voters voted for Obama and his allies the Catholic-in -name-only politicians. They voted to end any prejudice to get a Black American for President. Hopefully, they will do likewise for a Mormon to be elected.
They are the Catholics Pretend, Sacred Cows and Bulls, fake and fraudulent Catholic politicians. They are responsible in part for 10% of the population being ex-Catholics. With their defeat at the polls, we will make great progress with evangelization in the Year of Faith. The CINOP is an albatross around the neck of the U.S. Catholic Church and in particular the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Also, in California it was the Catholic vote that reelected pro-abortion-same-sex marriage Senator Barbara Boxer. Will they reelect Feinstein? In 2008 American voters were sucked in with the hope & change propaganda, the same way Catholic voters in Italy and Germany were duped with those two demagogues Mussolini and Hitler in the 1930’s.
We must stay away from the land of Oz and the twilight zone that these leftist progressives live in. For them windmills, environmental causes, green energy and climate change are the commandments of true believers. This is their daily religion. They want to brainwash us into their religion and even in defeat we must see through them. Never vote them into office particularly if they are members of the ACLU.
It has been said that the deepest prejudice of liberals and progressive is their contempt for faithful Catholic believers. But the two-face-double-standard news media just love Catholic political pretenders whom they support, protect & help reelect. Journalism is dead. The media promotes the culture of death and makes fools of Catholic voters in California.
George H. Kubeck, Socialism is a sick idea whether it is in the U.S.A., Canada or any other part of the world. Recall the words of Venerable Bishop Fulton Sheen on communism. Vivat Jesus
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2012
Preface: There is a serious controversy going on with respect to the Catholic voting guides. Ref. http://cal-catholic.com/wordpress/2012/10/11/lets-be-clear-about-confusion It seems that Bishop Steven Blair is on the hot seat: He says: “Forming Consciences of Faithful Citizenship is the ONLY authentic voting guide for Catholics. That means Voter’s Guide for Serious Catholics, the Test of Fire Video, and anything from CatholicVote.org, Catholic.com [Catholic Answers]. EWTN, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good [A George Soros funded group] or any other private organization is not the official voting guide for Catholics.” [Check out the poignant commentaries.]
We are the land of the free and the home of the brave. So when I became an American citizen in 1962, I did not come to be an Obama European or even a Canadian/American socialist. Let’s do away with hyphenated-Americanism. The HHS Mandate has changed everything. It is the tip of an iceberg of deceit not only in religion but everything emanating from this administration. Sadly, at least 13 so-called Catholic politicians in the Senate voted to remove conscience protection from Obamacare. There were about 60 in the Congress including Nancy Pelosi, Loretta and Linda Sanchez who did likewise. In California we have a serious problem.
It seems to me that the bishops’ voting guide Forming Consciences of Faithful Citizenship for this 2012 Presidential election is totally inadequate and obsolete. It was a dismal failure in 2008 when almost 54% of Catholic voters voted for Obama and his allies the Catholic-in -name-only politicians. They voted to end any prejudice to get a Black American for President. Hopefully, they will do likewise for a Mormon to be elected.
They are the Catholics Pretend, Sacred Cows and Bulls, fake and fraudulent Catholic politicians. They are responsible in part for 10% of the population being ex-Catholics. With their defeat at the polls, we will make great progress with evangelization in the Year of Faith. The CINOP is an albatross around the neck of the U.S. Catholic Church and in particular the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Also, in California it was the Catholic vote that reelected pro-abortion-same-sex marriage Senator Barbara Boxer. Will they reelect Feinstein? In 2008 American voters were sucked in with the hope & change propaganda, the same way Catholic voters in Italy and Germany were duped with those two demagogues Mussolini and Hitler in the 1930’s.
We must stay away from the land of Oz and the twilight zone that these leftist progressives live in. For them windmills, environmental causes, green energy and climate change are the commandments of true believers. This is their daily religion. They want to brainwash us into their religion and even in defeat we must see through them. Never vote them into office particularly if they are members of the ACLU.
It has been said that the deepest prejudice of liberals and progressive is their contempt for faithful Catholic believers. But the two-face-double-standard news media just love Catholic political pretenders whom they support, protect & help reelect. Journalism is dead. The media promotes the culture of death and makes fools of Catholic voters in California.
George H. Kubeck, Socialism is a sick idea whether it is in the U.S.A., Canada or any other part of the world. Recall the words of Venerable Bishop Fulton Sheen on communism. Vivat Jesus
Monday, October 15, 2012
A Message from Abbot Charles*
A Message from Abbot Charles*
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 15, 2012
“It is no surprise that the values which we, as Christians, hold dear are under attack. It seems necessary for us to not only proclaim our faith but to be so convincing that those values again become appealing and desirable. That is a large task, especially in a world that fails to strive for the good of everyone while becoming more forceful in its favor of a particularly group. That only ends in an increasing number of opposing factions.
“The Christian message is influenced by the culture in which we live. And we know that our culture is becoming inimical to anything but a superficial approach to living. Today the contributions with which Christianity has enriched culture and civilization are all but ignored and even resented. No doubt, that is because we have lost our sense of history. And to lose history is to become blind to what lies ahead. The ability to anticipate what lies ahead is yet another contribution of Christianity to society.
“We hear so much about placing the burden of a national debt on the backs of our children and grandchildren. However, the fiscal burden pales when we see the social burdens that the moral slippery slope has in store for future generations. Without objective norms to guide us, there is nothing left but the individual determination of what is right or wrong.
“But culture determines how receptive or closed we are to the message that Jesus brought. Culture indicates how disposed we are to accepting Christian truths. Unfortunately, today many have gotten locked into a superficial and even disdainful reaction that sees Christianity as a hindrance to the furthering any human progress.
“Judaism, and especially Christianity, are unique among religions because they look at life as having a future, rather than an endless and meaningless cycle of occurrences, which always longs for new beginnings.
“So how do we, as Christians, point out values to our society which can enkindle the quest for satisfaction which goes beyond the superficial? It can only come about by our own increase in faith and practice which are manifested in a rejection of the values being adopted by our culture.
“However, cultures are very powerful, especially when they are driven by evil. So to attempt to reverse the condition in which we find ourselves is not easy but it with the help of grace it is possible.
“That is why we must be Christians in more than name only. It is related that Gandhi once said that if Christians acted like Christ, he would be one. So to point an accusative finger at a culture without acknowledging the responsibility that we all share in what is happening today is to be guilty of hypocrisy.
“Our belied in, and longing for, eternal life and the means by which it can be attained, must permeate our lives to the extent that others witness the resulting inner peace and thus wish to attain it also. In that way we, as Christians, can again influence culture.
“May this summer [and fall] find you all ever more receptive to the message of Jesus and the means by which that message can be fully appreciated and shared.”
*Abbot Charles, Prince of Peace Abbey, www.princeofpeaceabbey.org - vocation monk@aol.com
George H. Kubeck
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 15, 2012
“It is no surprise that the values which we, as Christians, hold dear are under attack. It seems necessary for us to not only proclaim our faith but to be so convincing that those values again become appealing and desirable. That is a large task, especially in a world that fails to strive for the good of everyone while becoming more forceful in its favor of a particularly group. That only ends in an increasing number of opposing factions.
“The Christian message is influenced by the culture in which we live. And we know that our culture is becoming inimical to anything but a superficial approach to living. Today the contributions with which Christianity has enriched culture and civilization are all but ignored and even resented. No doubt, that is because we have lost our sense of history. And to lose history is to become blind to what lies ahead. The ability to anticipate what lies ahead is yet another contribution of Christianity to society.
“We hear so much about placing the burden of a national debt on the backs of our children and grandchildren. However, the fiscal burden pales when we see the social burdens that the moral slippery slope has in store for future generations. Without objective norms to guide us, there is nothing left but the individual determination of what is right or wrong.
“But culture determines how receptive or closed we are to the message that Jesus brought. Culture indicates how disposed we are to accepting Christian truths. Unfortunately, today many have gotten locked into a superficial and even disdainful reaction that sees Christianity as a hindrance to the furthering any human progress.
“Judaism, and especially Christianity, are unique among religions because they look at life as having a future, rather than an endless and meaningless cycle of occurrences, which always longs for new beginnings.
“So how do we, as Christians, point out values to our society which can enkindle the quest for satisfaction which goes beyond the superficial? It can only come about by our own increase in faith and practice which are manifested in a rejection of the values being adopted by our culture.
“However, cultures are very powerful, especially when they are driven by evil. So to attempt to reverse the condition in which we find ourselves is not easy but it with the help of grace it is possible.
“That is why we must be Christians in more than name only. It is related that Gandhi once said that if Christians acted like Christ, he would be one. So to point an accusative finger at a culture without acknowledging the responsibility that we all share in what is happening today is to be guilty of hypocrisy.
“Our belied in, and longing for, eternal life and the means by which it can be attained, must permeate our lives to the extent that others witness the resulting inner peace and thus wish to attain it also. In that way we, as Christians, can again influence culture.
“May this summer [and fall] find you all ever more receptive to the message of Jesus and the means by which that message can be fully appreciated and shared.”
*Abbot Charles, Prince of Peace Abbey, www.princeofpeaceabbey.org - vocation monk@aol.com
George H. Kubeck
Thursday, October 11, 2012
The False Catholic Religion of the Sacred Cows
The False Catholic Religion of the Sacred Cows
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012
The Sacred Cows are Catholic leaders within the nation that the U.S. Catholic Church hesitates to publicly criticize and especially the Catholic laity fears to call a spade a spade. They really fear the truth and plain talk. May the evil of division within the Church not come to pass. The reelection of Barack Obama will do it. It is something that the President wants to do. Divide and rule. So let’s have some plain talk on the two Catholic Vice-Presidential candidates debating today for the Office of Vice-President of the U.S.A.
Now V.P. Joe Biden advised Obama not to go ahead with the HHS Mandate. He was overruled and now exists as a foolish puppet who will also now support same-sex marriage besides abortion on demand and pregnancy as a disease which Obamacare will take care of.
We have Joe Biden who is the bull of the Sacred Cows. There are other bulls in the American arena. There is New York’s Governor Cuomo who champions same-sex marriage and abortion on demand. He has also the shameful audacity to post in his office a picture of St. Thomas More who is the guiding light of this blog. Then there is Governor Jerry Brown an unprincipled and misguided Catholic who also promotes abortion on demand and same-sex marriage. Now let’s not forget the Queen of the Sacred Cows, Nancy Pelosi, a witch image for the unborn. She fundamentally does violence to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. They all do including the following:
We have Senator John Kerry in Massachusetts where euthanasia is on the ballot and he doesn‘t care about the Catechism of the Church on any matter. Then we have Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois where Catholic adoption agencies had to close. There is also a so-called Catholic Governor of Maryland who is pushing for same-sex marriage.
What a shameful and scandalous lot of fake Catholic politicians in the public square! They are very closely tied in with the Democratic Party and their leftist secularist agenda. I understand that one/third of Catholic registered Democrats are pro-life. It is obvious that they still believe from their parents and grandparents that the Democratic Party of John F. Kennedy is still alive. But that party is as dead a door nail.
Now how are these Catholic pretenders going to deal with an authentic Catholic like Paul Ryan. It should be interesting. Paul Ryan is to the false Catholic religion of the Sacred Cows what a popular and authentic conservative Black American politician is to the Obama Democratic Party. They smear. The face of that attack on Paul Ryan will be that of Chicago politics a.k.a. Joe Biden.
Remember with the help of fake Catholic organization like George Soros funded “Catholic United”, Catholics voted close to 54% for Obama in 2008. They need to get a majority again in 2012. Already robot calls have gone out from a group called Catholics for Obama telling listeners that Romney is a Mormon etc. In the battleground states, this false Catholic religion of the CINOP seeks to reduce the number of Catholics or Evangelicals from going to the polls.
We are dealing with a diabolical Democratic Chicago reelection campaign. In Minnesota, Al Franken got elected because over 1000 felons voted in 2010. Al’s vote in Senate passed Obamacare. Even the Catholic Church was deluded in donating over ten million dollars to ACORN years ago.
George H. Kubeck - Today starts the Year of Faith. What excuses are you most likely to use from sharing your faith or not voting for your Faith. The re-election of any CINOP in any diocese in America will a judgment on the failed Catholic Church leadership in that diocese.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012
The Sacred Cows are Catholic leaders within the nation that the U.S. Catholic Church hesitates to publicly criticize and especially the Catholic laity fears to call a spade a spade. They really fear the truth and plain talk. May the evil of division within the Church not come to pass. The reelection of Barack Obama will do it. It is something that the President wants to do. Divide and rule. So let’s have some plain talk on the two Catholic Vice-Presidential candidates debating today for the Office of Vice-President of the U.S.A.
Now V.P. Joe Biden advised Obama not to go ahead with the HHS Mandate. He was overruled and now exists as a foolish puppet who will also now support same-sex marriage besides abortion on demand and pregnancy as a disease which Obamacare will take care of.
We have Joe Biden who is the bull of the Sacred Cows. There are other bulls in the American arena. There is New York’s Governor Cuomo who champions same-sex marriage and abortion on demand. He has also the shameful audacity to post in his office a picture of St. Thomas More who is the guiding light of this blog. Then there is Governor Jerry Brown an unprincipled and misguided Catholic who also promotes abortion on demand and same-sex marriage. Now let’s not forget the Queen of the Sacred Cows, Nancy Pelosi, a witch image for the unborn. She fundamentally does violence to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. They all do including the following:
We have Senator John Kerry in Massachusetts where euthanasia is on the ballot and he doesn‘t care about the Catechism of the Church on any matter. Then we have Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois where Catholic adoption agencies had to close. There is also a so-called Catholic Governor of Maryland who is pushing for same-sex marriage.
What a shameful and scandalous lot of fake Catholic politicians in the public square! They are very closely tied in with the Democratic Party and their leftist secularist agenda. I understand that one/third of Catholic registered Democrats are pro-life. It is obvious that they still believe from their parents and grandparents that the Democratic Party of John F. Kennedy is still alive. But that party is as dead a door nail.
Now how are these Catholic pretenders going to deal with an authentic Catholic like Paul Ryan. It should be interesting. Paul Ryan is to the false Catholic religion of the Sacred Cows what a popular and authentic conservative Black American politician is to the Obama Democratic Party. They smear. The face of that attack on Paul Ryan will be that of Chicago politics a.k.a. Joe Biden.
Remember with the help of fake Catholic organization like George Soros funded “Catholic United”, Catholics voted close to 54% for Obama in 2008. They need to get a majority again in 2012. Already robot calls have gone out from a group called Catholics for Obama telling listeners that Romney is a Mormon etc. In the battleground states, this false Catholic religion of the CINOP seeks to reduce the number of Catholics or Evangelicals from going to the polls.
We are dealing with a diabolical Democratic Chicago reelection campaign. In Minnesota, Al Franken got elected because over 1000 felons voted in 2010. Al’s vote in Senate passed Obamacare. Even the Catholic Church was deluded in donating over ten million dollars to ACORN years ago.
George H. Kubeck - Today starts the Year of Faith. What excuses are you most likely to use from sharing your faith or not voting for your Faith. The re-election of any CINOP in any diocese in America will a judgment on the failed Catholic Church leadership in that diocese.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Life Life Video* Surfaces on Obama
Life Video* Surfaces on Obama
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 10, 2012
Preface: I wish we had a pro-life President. Then I wouldn’t have to bug you daily with e-mails. I would not have to post weekly at abortion mills in Long Beach and Lakewood: “Life is the First Inalienable Right”, “Abortion Hurts Women“, and what is most poignant:
STOP BLACK RACISM! - 1,000 BLACK BABIES ARE KILLED EACH DAY THROUGH ABORTION! - 365,000 EACH YEAR - STOP THE GENOCIDE!
And all of this is occurring under this so-called Black President. Honestly, he is not really the first Black-American President. He is the first Black-White American President for his mother was white and his father was African. President Obama doesn’t care about renewing Black families and keeping their unborn children. One day, we will have a Black American President who cares; and it is most likely that our next President cares. Firstly, Romney will defund “Planned Parenthood” of over 400 million dollars it gets each year from the government monies borrowed from China.
*Video surfaces: Obama says unborn child is ‘potential life,” by P. B. Craine- LifeSiteNews.com-10-3
As President Obama steps up his outreach to moderate, independent, and faith-based voters in the final weeks before the Nov. 6th election, a new video has surfaced where he calls the unborn child a “potential life” and argues that viability is a “moving target.”
Published by David Brody of CBN News today, the video was taken at a 2004 campaign event in Springfield, Illinois.
“My basic view is that abortion is an extraordinary difficult moral issue. As a Christian, I think that a fetus is not just a collection of cells. It is a potential life,” he says.
“And I think that after viability it is legitimate for the state to prohibit late-term abortions as long as there is an exception to the mother’s life and health. Prior to viability, the problem is that this potential life is inside someone else’s body. It’s inside a woman’s body,” he continues. “And I don’t feel that it is appropriate for me to simply dictate to that person, to that woman should do with her body… “During the 2008 campaign, Obama told Christian pastor Rick Warren that it is “above my pay grade” to determine when an unborn child is eligible for human rights.
“In this most recent video he takes a more circumspect approach to late-term abortion than he did in a 2003 interview uncovered this summer. In that video Obama was asked by a reporter if he is “pro-choice” even in terms of late-term abortions, to which he replied bluntly, “I am pro-choice. I believe that women make responsible choices and they know better than anybody the tragedy of a difficult pregnancy and I don’t think that it’s the government’s role to meddle in that choice.”
“In another video from 2003, he states: “I voted no on late-term abortion ban, not because I don’t recognize that these are painful issues but because I trust women to make these decisions.” “Obama has also been accused of supporting infanticide because of his repeated votes against the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which would have protected children who are alive in the course of an abortion.”
Comments from Readers:
Ursula Pasche Stouffer: “When his wife felt his daughter’s kicking before they were born, were those just ‘potential kicks’, since it’s only a potential life, or where they REAL kicks from a REAL baby?”
Amanda Shields: “He calls himself a Christian, yet he believes that an unborn child is not a life and that abortion isn’t wrong? This man runs our country… scary.”
Wade Hudgins: “This man believes in infanticide. He has no respect for human life.”
Phylax: “Laws against infanticide are ancient among European-derived peoples; we are not allowed the choice to kill our offspring. English Common Law prohibited abortion after “quickening”, that is to say, proof of life was established when the baby was felt to move…
George H. Kubeck
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Wed. Oct. 10, 2012
Preface: I wish we had a pro-life President. Then I wouldn’t have to bug you daily with e-mails. I would not have to post weekly at abortion mills in Long Beach and Lakewood: “Life is the First Inalienable Right”, “Abortion Hurts Women“, and what is most poignant:
STOP BLACK RACISM! - 1,000 BLACK BABIES ARE KILLED EACH DAY THROUGH ABORTION! - 365,000 EACH YEAR - STOP THE GENOCIDE!
And all of this is occurring under this so-called Black President. Honestly, he is not really the first Black-American President. He is the first Black-White American President for his mother was white and his father was African. President Obama doesn’t care about renewing Black families and keeping their unborn children. One day, we will have a Black American President who cares; and it is most likely that our next President cares. Firstly, Romney will defund “Planned Parenthood” of over 400 million dollars it gets each year from the government monies borrowed from China.
*Video surfaces: Obama says unborn child is ‘potential life,” by P. B. Craine- LifeSiteNews.com-10-3
As President Obama steps up his outreach to moderate, independent, and faith-based voters in the final weeks before the Nov. 6th election, a new video has surfaced where he calls the unborn child a “potential life” and argues that viability is a “moving target.”
Published by David Brody of CBN News today, the video was taken at a 2004 campaign event in Springfield, Illinois.
“My basic view is that abortion is an extraordinary difficult moral issue. As a Christian, I think that a fetus is not just a collection of cells. It is a potential life,” he says.
“And I think that after viability it is legitimate for the state to prohibit late-term abortions as long as there is an exception to the mother’s life and health. Prior to viability, the problem is that this potential life is inside someone else’s body. It’s inside a woman’s body,” he continues. “And I don’t feel that it is appropriate for me to simply dictate to that person, to that woman should do with her body… “During the 2008 campaign, Obama told Christian pastor Rick Warren that it is “above my pay grade” to determine when an unborn child is eligible for human rights.
“In this most recent video he takes a more circumspect approach to late-term abortion than he did in a 2003 interview uncovered this summer. In that video Obama was asked by a reporter if he is “pro-choice” even in terms of late-term abortions, to which he replied bluntly, “I am pro-choice. I believe that women make responsible choices and they know better than anybody the tragedy of a difficult pregnancy and I don’t think that it’s the government’s role to meddle in that choice.”
“In another video from 2003, he states: “I voted no on late-term abortion ban, not because I don’t recognize that these are painful issues but because I trust women to make these decisions.” “Obama has also been accused of supporting infanticide because of his repeated votes against the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which would have protected children who are alive in the course of an abortion.”
Comments from Readers:
Ursula Pasche Stouffer: “When his wife felt his daughter’s kicking before they were born, were those just ‘potential kicks’, since it’s only a potential life, or where they REAL kicks from a REAL baby?”
Amanda Shields: “He calls himself a Christian, yet he believes that an unborn child is not a life and that abortion isn’t wrong? This man runs our country… scary.”
Wade Hudgins: “This man believes in infanticide. He has no respect for human life.”
Phylax: “Laws against infanticide are ancient among European-derived peoples; we are not allowed the choice to kill our offspring. English Common Law prohibited abortion after “quickening”, that is to say, proof of life was established when the baby was felt to move…
George H. Kubeck
George Weigel - Orange County Prayer Breakfast
George Weigel -Orange County Prayer Breakfast
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Wed., Oct. 10, 2012
Preface: “Our speaker is a distinguished fellow at the “Ethics and Public Policy.” He has published 50 books and in particular the one on Pope Paul II, “Witness to Hope.” He has received countless rewards. We are incredibly lucky to have him speak this morning.” Father Robert Spitzer, S.J.
“Among Americans there is that deepest prejudice against the Catholics. They are not to be trusted with respect to religious freedom. On Oct. 11th, we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Vatican Council, and also 20 years of the “Catechism of the Catholic Church.” The Vatican and Catholic religion has been strong with the collapse of Communism in 1989 and in the 1980-1990 positive changes seen in the Philippines and South America.
“However, aggressive secularism is working for a naked public square free of public religious expression. We have the Defense of the Marriage Act, however we have irrational bigotry and religious freedom is under assault. Religious freedom disappears from the State Department and freedom of worship is substituted.
“We have the HHS Mandate. Preventive Health care includes the disease of pregnancy. Why these attacks? There are cultural and legal reasons. During the last 50 years the shift from the secular mind of open-mindedness to secular progressive intolerance. They want the whole public square for itself.
“All of this has deeply infected government and particularly the White House in the three and one-half years. The Supreme Court decisions in the past 65 years have been a factor. In the 1st Amendment we have the two religious clauses. 1) No establishment of a national religion and 2) free exercise of religion.
“In 1947, Supreme Court decision, free exercise became a gift of the government and the “no establishment clause became dominant. Religious freedom is not secure. We now have public mockery of religion and religious freedom.
“WE SHOULD WELCOME THE CHALLENGE, Pope Pius IX, “Let us thank God that he make us live under the present problem. Hence no mediocrity in the defense of religious freedom.” Take up the challenge. Defend conscience rights and religious freedom.
“Bound by truth, ordered to goodness and freedom lived in justice. This government wants a bundle of desires to satisfy people’s feelings. Reject the culture of death. A mild criticism of Planned Parenthood lead to angry criticism. Religious freedom is dumbed down.
“Responsibility society vs. entitlement society. A just and well-ordered society vs. a society of debt and economic stagnation. A hospitality society vs. demagoguery and resigned to terrorists and a politically correct community.
“A call-out for Catholic laity leadership. This is a serious nature of what is happening. What is the act of voting mean for serious Catholics. Political judgment is prudential judgment. Voting is an exercise of moral judgment. Set aside this nostalgia for FDR or Eisenhower. Don’t outsource your moral judgment by voting straight party line. Don’t think only of yourself. Enter the voting booth with serious reflection and moral prayer. The religious liberty concern spoken by the bishops. Voting is a noble privilege.
“The paradox of faith is faith is increased as given to others. Blessings on our unborn children. Mary, most Holy Star of the New Evangelization. Hail Mary and Glory be to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit… Go and convert the world."
George H. Kubeck
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Wed., Oct. 10, 2012
Preface: “Our speaker is a distinguished fellow at the “Ethics and Public Policy.” He has published 50 books and in particular the one on Pope Paul II, “Witness to Hope.” He has received countless rewards. We are incredibly lucky to have him speak this morning.” Father Robert Spitzer, S.J.
“Among Americans there is that deepest prejudice against the Catholics. They are not to be trusted with respect to religious freedom. On Oct. 11th, we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Vatican Council, and also 20 years of the “Catechism of the Catholic Church.” The Vatican and Catholic religion has been strong with the collapse of Communism in 1989 and in the 1980-1990 positive changes seen in the Philippines and South America.
“However, aggressive secularism is working for a naked public square free of public religious expression. We have the Defense of the Marriage Act, however we have irrational bigotry and religious freedom is under assault. Religious freedom disappears from the State Department and freedom of worship is substituted.
“We have the HHS Mandate. Preventive Health care includes the disease of pregnancy. Why these attacks? There are cultural and legal reasons. During the last 50 years the shift from the secular mind of open-mindedness to secular progressive intolerance. They want the whole public square for itself.
“All of this has deeply infected government and particularly the White House in the three and one-half years. The Supreme Court decisions in the past 65 years have been a factor. In the 1st Amendment we have the two religious clauses. 1) No establishment of a national religion and 2) free exercise of religion.
“In 1947, Supreme Court decision, free exercise became a gift of the government and the “no establishment clause became dominant. Religious freedom is not secure. We now have public mockery of religion and religious freedom.
“WE SHOULD WELCOME THE CHALLENGE, Pope Pius IX, “Let us thank God that he make us live under the present problem. Hence no mediocrity in the defense of religious freedom.” Take up the challenge. Defend conscience rights and religious freedom.
“Bound by truth, ordered to goodness and freedom lived in justice. This government wants a bundle of desires to satisfy people’s feelings. Reject the culture of death. A mild criticism of Planned Parenthood lead to angry criticism. Religious freedom is dumbed down.
“Responsibility society vs. entitlement society. A just and well-ordered society vs. a society of debt and economic stagnation. A hospitality society vs. demagoguery and resigned to terrorists and a politically correct community.
“A call-out for Catholic laity leadership. This is a serious nature of what is happening. What is the act of voting mean for serious Catholics. Political judgment is prudential judgment. Voting is an exercise of moral judgment. Set aside this nostalgia for FDR or Eisenhower. Don’t outsource your moral judgment by voting straight party line. Don’t think only of yourself. Enter the voting booth with serious reflection and moral prayer. The religious liberty concern spoken by the bishops. Voting is a noble privilege.
“The paradox of faith is faith is increased as given to others. Blessings on our unborn children. Mary, most Holy Star of the New Evangelization. Hail Mary and Glory be to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit… Go and convert the world."
George H. Kubeck
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
A Message from Bishop Thomas John Paprocki
A Message from Bishop Thomas John Paprocki
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Oct. 9th, 2012
From “Catholic Times” - 9/30/2012 --http://www.courageouspriest.com -
Think and Pray Very Carefully about Your Vote
The Eternal Salvation of Your Own Soul is at Stake
“Much attention was given at the Democratic National Convention held recently in Charlotte, N.C., to the fact that all references to God had been purged from the draft version of the party platform. After outcries of protest from outside as well as within the Democratic Party, the sentence with the same reference to God used in 2008 was restored to read, “We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”…
“What is troubling about that is the blatant disregard for the rules and for the apparent wishes of about half the delegates. … “Even more troubling is that this whole discussion about God in the platform is a distraction from more disturbing matters that have included in the platform. In 1992 Presidential candidate Bill Clinton famously said that abortion should be “safe, legal and rare.” That was the party’s official position until 2008.
“Apparently “rare” is so last century that it had to be dropped, because now the Democratic Party Platform says that abortion should be “safe and legal.” Moreover the Democratic Party Platform supports the right to abortion “regardless of the ability to pay.” Well, there are only three ways for that to happen: either taxpayers will be required to fund abortion, or insurance companies will be required to pay for them (as they are now required to pay for contraception), or hospitals will be forced to perform them for free.
“Moreover, the Democratic Party Platform also supports same-sex marriage, recognizes that “gay rights are human rights,” and calls for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law signed by Clinton in 1996 that defined marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman.
“Now, why am I mentioning these matters in the Democratic Party Platform? There are many positive and beneficial planks in the Democratic Party Platform, but I am pointing out those that explicitly endorse intrinsic evils. My job is not to tell you for whom you should vote. But I do have a duty to speak out on moral issues I would be abdicating this duty if I remained silent out of fear of sounding “political” and didn’t say anything about the morality of these issues. People of faith object to these platform positions that promote serious sins. I know that the Democratic Party’s official “unequivocal” support for abortion is deeply troubling to pro-life Democrats.
“So what about the Republicans? I have read the Republican Party Platform and there is nothing in it that supports or promotes an intrinsic evil or a serious sin. The Republican Party Platform does say that courts “should have the option of imposing the death penalty in capital murder cases.” But the Catechism of the Catholic Church says (in paragraph 2267), “Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the dignity of the human person…”
“One might argue for different methods in the platform to address the needs of the poor, to feed the hungry and to solve the challenges of immigration, but these are prudential judgments about the most effective means of achieving morally desirable ends, not intrinsic evil… I pray God will give you the wisdom and guidance to make the morally right choice. May God give us this grace. Amen”
George H. Kubeck
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Oct. 9th, 2012
From “Catholic Times” - 9/30/2012 --http://www.courageouspriest.com -
Think and Pray Very Carefully about Your Vote
The Eternal Salvation of Your Own Soul is at Stake
“Much attention was given at the Democratic National Convention held recently in Charlotte, N.C., to the fact that all references to God had been purged from the draft version of the party platform. After outcries of protest from outside as well as within the Democratic Party, the sentence with the same reference to God used in 2008 was restored to read, “We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”…
“What is troubling about that is the blatant disregard for the rules and for the apparent wishes of about half the delegates. … “Even more troubling is that this whole discussion about God in the platform is a distraction from more disturbing matters that have included in the platform. In 1992 Presidential candidate Bill Clinton famously said that abortion should be “safe, legal and rare.” That was the party’s official position until 2008.
“Apparently “rare” is so last century that it had to be dropped, because now the Democratic Party Platform says that abortion should be “safe and legal.” Moreover the Democratic Party Platform supports the right to abortion “regardless of the ability to pay.” Well, there are only three ways for that to happen: either taxpayers will be required to fund abortion, or insurance companies will be required to pay for them (as they are now required to pay for contraception), or hospitals will be forced to perform them for free.
“Moreover, the Democratic Party Platform also supports same-sex marriage, recognizes that “gay rights are human rights,” and calls for the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, the federal law signed by Clinton in 1996 that defined marriage as the legal union of one man and one woman.
“Now, why am I mentioning these matters in the Democratic Party Platform? There are many positive and beneficial planks in the Democratic Party Platform, but I am pointing out those that explicitly endorse intrinsic evils. My job is not to tell you for whom you should vote. But I do have a duty to speak out on moral issues I would be abdicating this duty if I remained silent out of fear of sounding “political” and didn’t say anything about the morality of these issues. People of faith object to these platform positions that promote serious sins. I know that the Democratic Party’s official “unequivocal” support for abortion is deeply troubling to pro-life Democrats.
“So what about the Republicans? I have read the Republican Party Platform and there is nothing in it that supports or promotes an intrinsic evil or a serious sin. The Republican Party Platform does say that courts “should have the option of imposing the death penalty in capital murder cases.” But the Catechism of the Catholic Church says (in paragraph 2267), “Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor, authority will limit itself to such means, as these are more in keeping with the concrete conditions of the common good and more in conformity to the dignity of the human person…”
“One might argue for different methods in the platform to address the needs of the poor, to feed the hungry and to solve the challenges of immigration, but these are prudential judgments about the most effective means of achieving morally desirable ends, not intrinsic evil… I pray God will give you the wisdom and guidance to make the morally right choice. May God give us this grace. Amen”
George H. Kubeck
Vice-President Paul Ryan on the HHS Mandate
Vice- President Paul Ryan on the HHS Mandate
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Tuesday, Oct. 9th, 2012
Paul Ryan Video for Catholic Voters Highlights Religious-Freedom Pledge
Religious-liberty protections will be a ‘cornerstone’ of a Romney-Ryan administration…
National Catholic Register, by CAN/EWTN - Posted 10/5/12
Washington - Republican vice-presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan has made a special video message for Catholic voters pledging that religious-liberty protections will be a “cornerstone” of a Romney-Ryan administration.
“We need a president who will support our God-given rights, not try to circumvent them,” he said in an Oct. 2 video posted to the Romney campaign website.
“The video comes after nine months of controversy over the Department of Health and Human Services’ mandate requiring most large employers, including many Catholic institutions, to provide employees free insurance coverage of sterilization and contraception, including abortion-causing drugs.
The mandate’s narrow religious exemption applies to employers who primarily employ or serve their co-religionists and would not cover Catholic charities, universities and health systems that employ and serve the general public.
Non-exempt organizations must either comply, drop insurance coverage and face other fines, or face non compliance fines of $100 per employee per day.
Ryan said religious liberty is “our first freedom,” and there is no guarantee “more precious” than the right to free exercise of religion.
He said Catholics see faith as “more than an individual right.” Rather, faith is “ a vital part of our community.” “We celebrate the unique role our Church plays in caring for Americans of all faiths, or of no faith at all. Catholic charities & hospitals offer services that hold our society together.” he said.
Ryan charged that President Barack Obama has “attacked these indispensable institutions since virtually the moment he took office.” He encouraged Catholics to join the Romney campaign.
“Together, we will ensure that our faith and our traditions are protected for our children and for generations to come,” he said.
Ryan is the only second Catholic the Republican Party has nominated as its vice-presidential candidate. President Obama’s running mate, Vice-President Joe Biden, is also Catholic…
George H. Kubeck, I will be focusing in on Catholic ? Vice-President Joe Biden in one of my next letters. The vice-presidential debate is on Thursday evening and not Wednesday.
Truth and Righteousness - cinops be gone - Tuesday, Oct. 9th, 2012
Paul Ryan Video for Catholic Voters Highlights Religious-Freedom Pledge
Religious-liberty protections will be a ‘cornerstone’ of a Romney-Ryan administration…
National Catholic Register, by CAN/EWTN - Posted 10/5/12
Washington - Republican vice-presidential nominee Rep. Paul Ryan has made a special video message for Catholic voters pledging that religious-liberty protections will be a “cornerstone” of a Romney-Ryan administration.
“We need a president who will support our God-given rights, not try to circumvent them,” he said in an Oct. 2 video posted to the Romney campaign website.
“The video comes after nine months of controversy over the Department of Health and Human Services’ mandate requiring most large employers, including many Catholic institutions, to provide employees free insurance coverage of sterilization and contraception, including abortion-causing drugs.
The mandate’s narrow religious exemption applies to employers who primarily employ or serve their co-religionists and would not cover Catholic charities, universities and health systems that employ and serve the general public.
Non-exempt organizations must either comply, drop insurance coverage and face other fines, or face non compliance fines of $100 per employee per day.
Ryan said religious liberty is “our first freedom,” and there is no guarantee “more precious” than the right to free exercise of religion.
He said Catholics see faith as “more than an individual right.” Rather, faith is “ a vital part of our community.” “We celebrate the unique role our Church plays in caring for Americans of all faiths, or of no faith at all. Catholic charities & hospitals offer services that hold our society together.” he said.
Ryan charged that President Barack Obama has “attacked these indispensable institutions since virtually the moment he took office.” He encouraged Catholics to join the Romney campaign.
“Together, we will ensure that our faith and our traditions are protected for our children and for generations to come,” he said.
Ryan is the only second Catholic the Republican Party has nominated as its vice-presidential candidate. President Obama’s running mate, Vice-President Joe Biden, is also Catholic…
George H. Kubeck, I will be focusing in on Catholic ? Vice-President Joe Biden in one of my next letters. The vice-presidential debate is on Thursday evening and not Wednesday.
Monday, October 8, 2012
V.P. Paul Ryan vs. V.P. Joe Biden
V.P. Paul Ryan vs. V.P. Joe Biden
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 8, 2012
“I repeat the directions I gave you when I was on my way to Macedonia: stay on in Ephesus in order to warn certain people there against teaching false doctrine and busying themselves with interminable myths and genealogies, which promote idle speculation rather than training in faith which God requires.” Apostle Paul to Timothy 1:1-20
(As reported in the New Oxford Review, October 2012 p. 20-21)
“ A group of Catholic [so-called] social-justice activists descended on Georgetown University to protest Paul Ryan’s speech there. As reported by the Washington Post (Apr. 27), they hoisted a fifty-foot sign that read, “Were were you when they crucified the poor?” The protest was organized by members of “Catholics United,” who argued that Ryan’s proposed cuts to Medicaid & other welfare programs contravene the teachings of the Church. [ I have written about “Catholics United” in the 2008 election. It is a divisive Catholic group partially financed by the hateful George Soros and exists to persuade Catholics in this election to vote for Obama.] …
“In his Georgetown speech, Ryan countered the arguments of his Catholic critics. His zeal to reduce the national debt, he explained, is based on moral and religious grounds that have the support from Church teaching and the Pope: “The overarching threat to our whole society today is the exploding federal debt. The Holy Father, Pope Benedict, has charged that governments, communities, and individuals running up high debt levels are “living at expense of future generations’ and ‘living in untruth.”
Acknowledging that that relief of the poor will always be necessary, Ryan advocates allowing local organizations, among others, to play a bigger role. “We are a nation that prides itself on looking out for one another - and government has an important role to play in that. But relying on distant government bureaucracies to lead this effort just hasn’t worked. [Think of Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty.] Speaking directly to his liberal Catholic critics, Ryan said, “There are some Catholics who for a long time have thought they had a monopoly of sorts - not exactly on heaven, but on the social teaching of our church. Simply put, I do not believe that the preferential option for the poor means a preferential option for big government.” His companion argument is that if further financial disaster strikes, if the federal government goes bankrupt, the poor will be the first to suffer.”…
(As reported by Bill Donohue in LifeNews.com - 9/27/12- “No Comparison Between Pro-Life Catholic Ryan and Pro-Abortion Biden”)
“Biden got into trouble with the bishops after his infamous 2008 appearance on “Meet the Pres.” Tom Brokaw asked Biden if he agreed with the Catholic Church on abortion. “I’m prepared as a matter of faith to accept that life begins at conception. But that is my judgment. For me to impose that judgment on everyone else who is equally and maybe even more devout that I am seems to me inappropriate in a pluralistic society.” He also said that in the Catholic Church there has a long been a “debate” on when life begins.
“Following the interview, the bishops weighed in with vigor:
Speaking explicitly of Biden, as well as those Catholic politicians who share his position, Bishop Samuel Aquila of Fargo, North Dakota said, “they really should not be presenting themselves for Holy Communion because it is a scandal.
Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput said of Biden: “I certainly presume his good will & integrity and I presume his integrity will lead him to refrain from presenting himself for Communion.”
Bishop Paul S. Coakley of Salina said, “ … That life begins at conception is a scientific fact, not a personal subjective or philosophical or religious opinion.”
When Bishop Joseph F. Martino of Scranton was asked, “…” No Catholic politician who supports the culture of death should approach Holy Communion,” He added, “I will truly be vigilant on this point.”
George H. Kubeck, The Vice-Presidential debate will be on Thursday.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Monday, Oct. 8, 2012
“I repeat the directions I gave you when I was on my way to Macedonia: stay on in Ephesus in order to warn certain people there against teaching false doctrine and busying themselves with interminable myths and genealogies, which promote idle speculation rather than training in faith which God requires.” Apostle Paul to Timothy 1:1-20
(As reported in the New Oxford Review, October 2012 p. 20-21)
“ A group of Catholic [so-called] social-justice activists descended on Georgetown University to protest Paul Ryan’s speech there. As reported by the Washington Post (Apr. 27), they hoisted a fifty-foot sign that read, “Were were you when they crucified the poor?” The protest was organized by members of “Catholics United,” who argued that Ryan’s proposed cuts to Medicaid & other welfare programs contravene the teachings of the Church. [ I have written about “Catholics United” in the 2008 election. It is a divisive Catholic group partially financed by the hateful George Soros and exists to persuade Catholics in this election to vote for Obama.] …
“In his Georgetown speech, Ryan countered the arguments of his Catholic critics. His zeal to reduce the national debt, he explained, is based on moral and religious grounds that have the support from Church teaching and the Pope: “The overarching threat to our whole society today is the exploding federal debt. The Holy Father, Pope Benedict, has charged that governments, communities, and individuals running up high debt levels are “living at expense of future generations’ and ‘living in untruth.”
Acknowledging that that relief of the poor will always be necessary, Ryan advocates allowing local organizations, among others, to play a bigger role. “We are a nation that prides itself on looking out for one another - and government has an important role to play in that. But relying on distant government bureaucracies to lead this effort just hasn’t worked. [Think of Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty.] Speaking directly to his liberal Catholic critics, Ryan said, “There are some Catholics who for a long time have thought they had a monopoly of sorts - not exactly on heaven, but on the social teaching of our church. Simply put, I do not believe that the preferential option for the poor means a preferential option for big government.” His companion argument is that if further financial disaster strikes, if the federal government goes bankrupt, the poor will be the first to suffer.”…
(As reported by Bill Donohue in LifeNews.com - 9/27/12- “No Comparison Between Pro-Life Catholic Ryan and Pro-Abortion Biden”)
“Biden got into trouble with the bishops after his infamous 2008 appearance on “Meet the Pres.” Tom Brokaw asked Biden if he agreed with the Catholic Church on abortion. “I’m prepared as a matter of faith to accept that life begins at conception. But that is my judgment. For me to impose that judgment on everyone else who is equally and maybe even more devout that I am seems to me inappropriate in a pluralistic society.” He also said that in the Catholic Church there has a long been a “debate” on when life begins.
“Following the interview, the bishops weighed in with vigor:
Speaking explicitly of Biden, as well as those Catholic politicians who share his position, Bishop Samuel Aquila of Fargo, North Dakota said, “they really should not be presenting themselves for Holy Communion because it is a scandal.
Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput said of Biden: “I certainly presume his good will & integrity and I presume his integrity will lead him to refrain from presenting himself for Communion.”
Bishop Paul S. Coakley of Salina said, “ … That life begins at conception is a scientific fact, not a personal subjective or philosophical or religious opinion.”
When Bishop Joseph F. Martino of Scranton was asked, “…” No Catholic politician who supports the culture of death should approach Holy Communion,” He added, “I will truly be vigilant on this point.”
George H. Kubeck, The Vice-Presidential debate will be on Thursday.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Goodbye, Freedom of Speech and Religion
Goodbye, Freedom of Speech and Religion
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 5th, 2012
Preface: “It’s obvious that marriage is in trouble. With divorce rampant, marriage and birth rates dropping, and single parenthood on the rise, the institution of marriage has been injured - badly.
Many no longer even understood what marriage is. That is why the idea of homosexual “marriage” is being discussed. If you know what marriage is, it is clear that two men or two women do not make a marriage. This is not a matter of fairness or equality. It is a matter of reality. The union of man &woman is fundamentally different, & it’s time we recognized that.” Cath. Answers.
Catholic Answers’ Booklet, “Why Homosexual Unions are not Marriages” - 2012 explains the truth in a simple, honest, and compassionate way that everyone can understand. Here are a couple of the several sections in the booklet. WWW.CATHOLIC.COM - 1-888-291-8000
“THIS IS NOT A RELIGIOUS ISSUE: SOMETIMES HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVISTS CLAIM THAT RECOGNIZING MARRIAGE AS THE UNION OF MAN AND WOMAN AMOUNTS TO “IMPOSING YOUR RELIGION” ON THEM. THIS IS NOT TRUE. NOTHING IN OUR ARGUMENT TO THIS POINT HAS BEEN BASED ON RELIGION. W’EVE MENTIONED THAT GIVING LEGAL RECOGNITION TO HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS WOULD DIMINISH RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, BUT THAT’S NOT A RELIGIOUS CLAIM. IT’S A LEGAL & POLITICAL FACT.
OUR CASE AGAINST REDEFINING MARRIAGE IS NOT BASED ON RELIGIOUS CLAIMS BUT ON HUMAN NATURE. THE UNION OF MAN AND WOMAN IS SIMPLY DIFFERENT THAT THE UNION OF TWO MEN OR TWO WOMEN. THIS SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN OBVIOUS TO ALL PEOPLE IN ALL TIMES AND CULTURES.
“EVEN IN CULTURES SUCH AS ANCIENT GREECE, WHERE HOMOSEXUALITY WAS WIDELY PRACTICED, IT WAS ALWAYS RECOGNIZED THAT THE UNION OF MAN AND WOMAN IS DIFFERENT. CONSEQUENTLY THESE SOCIETIES DID NOT PRETEND THAT THE TWO PEOPLE OF THE SAME SEX COULD BE MARRIED. IN PARTICULAR, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN MARRIAGE AND PROCREATION WAS RECOGNIZED.
“MARRIAGE PREDATES CHRISTIANITY. IT PREDATES JUDAISM. IT PREDATES ALL OF THE HISTORICAL RELIGIONS. IT HAS BEEN WITH MANKIND FOR ITS ENTIRE HISTORY. THE “IMPOSING YOUR RELIGION” ARGUMENT IS JUST A DODGE… CONTINUE TO RECOGNIZE A BASIC FACT OF HUMAN NATURE…
“GOODBYE, FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION: IF THE IDEA OF HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE WERE ENSHRINED IN LAW, PEOPLE ACROSS THE LAND WOULD BE FORCED TO PLAY A GAME OF PRETEND. THIS WOULD DAMAGE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS - PARTICULARLY THEIR FEEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
“THE MANDATARY GAME OF PRETEND WOULD BEGIN WITH GOVERNMENT WORKERS FORCED TO CONDUCT SAME-SEX WEDDING CEREMONIES, TO HANDLE THE MARRIAGE RECORDS, AND TO PROCESS THE GOVERNMENT BENEFITS.
“THE GAME WOULD EXTEND TO EVERY INDUSTRY THAT DOES BUSINESS WITH FAMILIES, MEDECINE, INSURANCE, HOUSING, BANKING, RETAIL, ENTERTAINMENT, EDUCATION. WORKERS IN EACH OF THESE FIELD WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PLAY THE GAME…
“THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS TO PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN FROM THIS WOULD BE CURTAILED, AND MANY WOULD FEEL HELPLESS AS THEIR CHILDREN WERE BEING INDOCTRINATED WITH A FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN SEXUALITY.
“ULTIMATELY, EVERYONE IN SOCIETY WOULD BE AFFECTED, AND ANY PUBLIC DISAPPROVAL OR DIAGREEMENT WITH HOMOSEXUALITY AND HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE WOULD BE TREATED AS “HATE SPEECH.”… [I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, AND MIND CONTROL.]
GEORGE H. KUBECK, IT’S INCOMPREHENSIBLE TO ME TO PERCEIVE THAT ALMOST 40% OR MORE OF SO-CALLED CATHOLICS SUPPORT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.
In pursuit of the truth - cinops be gone - Friday, Oct. 5th, 2012
Preface: “It’s obvious that marriage is in trouble. With divorce rampant, marriage and birth rates dropping, and single parenthood on the rise, the institution of marriage has been injured - badly.
Many no longer even understood what marriage is. That is why the idea of homosexual “marriage” is being discussed. If you know what marriage is, it is clear that two men or two women do not make a marriage. This is not a matter of fairness or equality. It is a matter of reality. The union of man &woman is fundamentally different, & it’s time we recognized that.” Cath. Answers.
Catholic Answers’ Booklet, “Why Homosexual Unions are not Marriages” - 2012 explains the truth in a simple, honest, and compassionate way that everyone can understand. Here are a couple of the several sections in the booklet. WWW.CATHOLIC.COM - 1-888-291-8000
“THIS IS NOT A RELIGIOUS ISSUE: SOMETIMES HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVISTS CLAIM THAT RECOGNIZING MARRIAGE AS THE UNION OF MAN AND WOMAN AMOUNTS TO “IMPOSING YOUR RELIGION” ON THEM. THIS IS NOT TRUE. NOTHING IN OUR ARGUMENT TO THIS POINT HAS BEEN BASED ON RELIGION. W’EVE MENTIONED THAT GIVING LEGAL RECOGNITION TO HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS WOULD DIMINISH RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, BUT THAT’S NOT A RELIGIOUS CLAIM. IT’S A LEGAL & POLITICAL FACT.
OUR CASE AGAINST REDEFINING MARRIAGE IS NOT BASED ON RELIGIOUS CLAIMS BUT ON HUMAN NATURE. THE UNION OF MAN AND WOMAN IS SIMPLY DIFFERENT THAT THE UNION OF TWO MEN OR TWO WOMEN. THIS SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN OBVIOUS TO ALL PEOPLE IN ALL TIMES AND CULTURES.
“EVEN IN CULTURES SUCH AS ANCIENT GREECE, WHERE HOMOSEXUALITY WAS WIDELY PRACTICED, IT WAS ALWAYS RECOGNIZED THAT THE UNION OF MAN AND WOMAN IS DIFFERENT. CONSEQUENTLY THESE SOCIETIES DID NOT PRETEND THAT THE TWO PEOPLE OF THE SAME SEX COULD BE MARRIED. IN PARTICULAR, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN MARRIAGE AND PROCREATION WAS RECOGNIZED.
“MARRIAGE PREDATES CHRISTIANITY. IT PREDATES JUDAISM. IT PREDATES ALL OF THE HISTORICAL RELIGIONS. IT HAS BEEN WITH MANKIND FOR ITS ENTIRE HISTORY. THE “IMPOSING YOUR RELIGION” ARGUMENT IS JUST A DODGE… CONTINUE TO RECOGNIZE A BASIC FACT OF HUMAN NATURE…
“GOODBYE, FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND RELIGION: IF THE IDEA OF HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE WERE ENSHRINED IN LAW, PEOPLE ACROSS THE LAND WOULD BE FORCED TO PLAY A GAME OF PRETEND. THIS WOULD DAMAGE THEIR CIVIL RIGHTS - PARTICULARLY THEIR FEEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION.
“THE MANDATARY GAME OF PRETEND WOULD BEGIN WITH GOVERNMENT WORKERS FORCED TO CONDUCT SAME-SEX WEDDING CEREMONIES, TO HANDLE THE MARRIAGE RECORDS, AND TO PROCESS THE GOVERNMENT BENEFITS.
“THE GAME WOULD EXTEND TO EVERY INDUSTRY THAT DOES BUSINESS WITH FAMILIES, MEDECINE, INSURANCE, HOUSING, BANKING, RETAIL, ENTERTAINMENT, EDUCATION. WORKERS IN EACH OF THESE FIELD WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PLAY THE GAME…
“THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS TO PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN FROM THIS WOULD BE CURTAILED, AND MANY WOULD FEEL HELPLESS AS THEIR CHILDREN WERE BEING INDOCTRINATED WITH A FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN SEXUALITY.
“ULTIMATELY, EVERYONE IN SOCIETY WOULD BE AFFECTED, AND ANY PUBLIC DISAPPROVAL OR DIAGREEMENT WITH HOMOSEXUALITY AND HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE WOULD BE TREATED AS “HATE SPEECH.”… [I AM SICK AND TIRED OF THIS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, AND MIND CONTROL.]
GEORGE H. KUBECK, IT’S INCOMPREHENSIBLE TO ME TO PERCEIVE THAT ALMOST 40% OR MORE OF SO-CALLED CATHOLICS SUPPORT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)